another salisburyboy deflection

great

continue to validate my trolling

plz

6/12/2006 2:41:03 PM

you know somethings up when the guards name is jewstermanstein

6/12/2006 2:41:51 PM

see mortimer, i told you we could turn one of "them" into a successful member of our society





what are they talking about Bill?



oooht i owe you guys a dollar

6/12/2006 2:47:53 PM

Quote :

"False analogies! Any other fallacies of argument you want to showcase?"

Its not a false analogy. Its me demonstrating that the need to show credentials at a security checkpoint is not indicative of anything unusual. As always, you try to blow off anyone who disagrees with you, regardless of the validity of their statement.

Quote :

"We're not talking about a military facility here. Another bad analogy."

I don't work at a military facility either.

Please provide something other than a description of the security (at a meeting of high profile people, no less) if you want anyone to believe your opinions on the matter.

6/12/2006 3:06:03 PM

The Secret Rulers of the World (TV Series--U.K.)
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=5834198674054660183

Quote :

"Jon Ronson investigates on a secret organisation called the Bilderberg group, which supposedly rules the world from behind. He demonstrates this organisation really exists by trying to attend one of their meetings. He interviews many people involved with the organisation, who give their point of view of this conspiracy theories."

This show must have been produced back when the mainstream media was denying the Bilderberg Group existed, and calling anyone who even talked about the Bilderberg Group a "lunatic conspiracy theorist."

6/12/2006 3:25:39 PM

Neat video. A lot of people with absolutely no background in this sort of thing throwing around wild accusations.

And David Icke is in it, so you know that its legitimate.

Feel free to prove something at any point in this thread.

6/12/2006 3:31:42 PM

Quote :

"And David Icke is in it, so you know that its legitimate"

I don't agree with a lot of what David Icke says. And just because he's interviewed on the show doesn't mean that the entire show is useless or that it doesn't have other good information.

Does this mean that the Bilderberg Group doesn't exist, Mr. Joshuatroll, and that the "conspiracy theorists" just dreamed it all up?

6/12/2006 3:35:40 PM

Quote :

"We're not talking about a military facility here. "

Ok, how about this then, I worked at a night club for a while. Despite having a staff shirt and id badge, I still had to stop and show both badge and photo ID to enter the back room of the club. And this is a night club.

The point is as I said in my frist post "security is more than a badge"

6/12/2006 3:36:23 PM

Quote :

"Ok, how about this then, I worked at a night club for a while. Despite having a staff shirt and id badge, I still had to stop and show both badge and photo ID to enter the back room of the club. And this is a night club."

What about the police? Would they have to do that?

6/12/2006 3:37:32 PM

Quote :

" And just because he's interviewed on the show doesn't mean that the entire show is useless or that it doesn't have other good information."

It means that they are reaching far enough that they have to interview someone who believes that lizard people rule the world. That alone shoots holes in the credibility of your video.

Quote :

"Does this mean that the Bilderberg Group doesn't exist, Mr. Joshuatroll, and that the "conspiracy theorists" just dreamed it all up?"

Did I say that?

Why am I being labeled a troll simply for questioning poor logic? Isn't that what a discussion is?

Classic salisburyboy - slander anyone with a different opinion.

Quote :

"What about the police? Would they have to do that?"

Because otherwise anyone could throw together a police uniform and stroll in there.

6/12/2006 3:41:47 PM

Quote :

" see mortimer, i told you we could turn one of "them" into a successful member of our society what are they talking about Bill? oooht i owe you guys a dollar"

ftw

6/12/2006 3:42:24 PM

Quote :

"But Ottawa's finest are clearly not in charge here. To approach the hotel property, even these uniformed police officers are required to show their credentials to the half-dozen black-suited men working for Globe Risk, a private security firm. “This is pretty unusual,” one Ottawa cop said."

6/12/2006 3:45:05 PM

A group of high profile people use a private firm (who specialize in security for such events) rather than relying on the Ottawa police.

Please tell me what is so unusual about that.

Quote :

"“This is pretty unusual,” one Ottawa cop said."

Unusual in Ottawa.

I was at a hotel in Delhi last fall and woke up to see men with automatic weapons surrounding the building. Later I found out that it was because the Indian prime minister was at our hotel for the world economic forum. Same thing, little buddy.

6/12/2006 3:51:32 PM

heh

thxu aficionado

6/12/2006 4:05:47 PM

Quote :

"What about the police? Would they have to do that?"

Yes, they did.

But regardless of if they did or not, what right do police have to enter private property? For someone so concerned about the new world order and police states, you sure seem to want the police to have some pretty far reaching powers.

Actualy scratch that. How do you know they are really police without checking IDs? As I said "security is more than a badge"

[Edited on June 12, 2006 at 5:18 PM. Reason : x out]

6/12/2006 5:16:46 PM

HE HAS ALREADY DISMISSED YOU

IF YOU KEEP BRINGING UP THIS VALID POINT

HE WILL LABEL YOU A TROLL

I SUGGEST YOU MOVE BEYOND REASON AND PROCEED DIRECTLY TO TROLLING

ITS JUST AS EFFECTIVE

6/12/2006 5:20:15 PM

kekekekekeke

6/12/2006 5:31:46 PM

^_^

6/12/2006 8:03:54 PM

C- .-C

6/12/2006 8:12:00 PM

0_o

6/12/2006 8:21:02 PM

\(^.^)\

6/12/2006 8:24:23 PM

I WANT AN EXPLANATION FOR THIS SHIT, DUKE

6/12/2006 9:14:01 PM

I WANT AN EXPLANATION FOR THIS SHIT, DUKE

6/12/2006 9:24:04 PM

thats viewpoint censorship

6/12/2006 9:26:40 PM

,(^.^)'

6/12/2006 9:28:49 PM

ooooht, i owe you guys a dollar

6/12/2006 10:37:24 PM

Quote :

"I WANT AN EXPLANATION FOR THIS SHIT, DUKE"

i'm going to keep bttt'ing this until we get one

6/14/2006 8:41:38 AM

^ i think it was an oversight

6/14/2006 10:02:36 AM

no

he has made mention to it in the Referendum thread

^^you're not going to get anything out of him, he doesn't click these threads

he buries his head in the sand rather than address an issue



[Edited on June 14, 2006 at 10:19 AM. Reason : `]

6/14/2006 10:18:16 AM

OK

I WANT A REAL EXPLANATION FOR THIS SHIT, DUKE

6/14/2006 10:19:04 AM

oh ok

maybe he supports some kind of affirmitive action plan for batshit crazy folk, and JohnGuth does not qualify as one and is thus denied benefits

6/14/2006 10:19:25 AM

THATS VIEWPOINT CENSORSHIP

saying that guth isn't crazy enough

6/14/2006 10:53:53 AM

i didnt know that making that thread was crazy at all

but since this is some bullshit, heres megaman rolling his eyes at you








[Edited on June 14, 2006 at 11:17 AM. Reason : .]

6/14/2006 11:15:08 AM

BTT UNTIL WE GET A REAL EXPLANATION

6/15/2006 12:10:26 PM

since he doesn't look in these threads

i can tell the duke to lick my asshole till the corn is gone

6/15/2006 12:19:27 PM

Quote :

"“This is pretty unusual,” one Ottawa cop said."

so do the cops in Ottwawa, or the hotel employees for that matter, not have names?

6/15/2006 1:12:12 PM

STILL FUCKING WAITING ON AN ANSWER AS TO WHY THIS THREAD WAS LOCKED WHEN ANOTHER USER MADE IT AND IS A-O-FUCKING-KAY WHEN THIS DOUCHE CREATES IT.

THIS IS NOT A HARD QUESTION.

6/16/2006 11:24:12 AM

BTTT

STOP AVOIDING IT

6/17/2006 12:33:48 PM

STILL DUCKING THE QUESTION EH

BOY YOU'RE A GREAT MODERATOR

NOT SHITTY AT ALL

6/17/2006 6:30:11 PM

GOOD JOB ON THE REFERENDUM BTW

6/17/2006 6:37:50 PM

I'VE HEARD YOU TALK ABOUT WANTING TO BE A POLITICIAN

YOU ARE WELL ON YOUR WAY TO BEING A SHITTY POLITICIAN

YOU HACK

6/18/2006 10:49:36 AM