i give up on this thread trying to talk about werner

i'll just look for info in the other 18 threads

6/16/2006 8:39:28 AM

Yeah I really love how I get bashed for defending Herb in this thread and telling the truth about Chuck.

Quote :

"Why do you think Chuck's head hasn't been on more of a pole than it should be based on records? Because he manages to pull out wins over FSU, takes VT and OSU to the wire, and is known to run an exciting offense."

I think another 6-6 season like I am expecting and his head will be more on a pole.

BTW I don't want Chuck fired, not yet at least.

6/16/2006 10:32:01 AM

Quote :

"Yeah I really love how I get bashed for defending Herb in this thread and telling the truth about Chuck."

I'm bashing you for being a complete moron and an ingrained inability to understand what I am posting, not because of any allegiance or hate you have for coaches present and past at NCSU.

6/16/2006 12:36:15 PM

You're the fucking idiot.

Quote :

"Why do you think Chuck's head hasn't been on more of a pole than it should be based on records?"

The motherfucker got booed at the Clemson home game when his Jiffy Lube commercial came up on the Jumbotron and he got booed at a recent Carolina Hurricanes game when he was shown on the jumbotron. Not to mention he's on everyone's "hot seat" list. Base that on the fact that he's been here for about 5 years...I'd say his head is pretty much on a fucking pole.

Quote :

"Because he manages to pull out wins over FSU, takes VT and OSU to the wire, and is known to run an exciting offense."

You mean he loses to inferior UNC and Wake teams?? Our basketball team has beat big names schools too (UConn anyone, the occasional top-ranked Duke, Maryland, Wake Forest).

And an exciting offense?? You mean the one year we had Norm Chow?? And the three years after that where we rode Philip Rivers?? I don't know what kind of exciting offense you're talking about. Even when Rivers was here our offense was getting blasted for being predictable. Luckily we had Philip to pull shit ouf of his ass all the time.



I'm not running Chuck into the ground to build up Herb. I'm just saying that you're fucking stupid to use Chuck in an argument against Herb.

[Edited on June 16, 2006 at 12:44 PM. Reason : .]

6/16/2006 12:43:47 PM

Quote :

"You're the fucking idiot. Quote : "Why do you think Chuck's head hasn't been on more of a pole than it should be based on records?" The motherfucker got booed at the Clemson home game when his Jiffy Lube commercial came up on the Jumbotron and he got booed at a recent Carolina Hurricanes game when he was shown on the jumbotron. Not to mention he's on everyone's "hot seat" list. Base that on the fact that he's been here for about 5 years...I'd say his head is pretty much on a fucking pole."

His head is not on a pole, we can just agree to disagree. But clearly, not a single person this year had any thoughts that Chuck would get canned after this year. Hell, we are going to have a really poor season this year and it's not going to happen. So seriously shut the fuck up, a poor performance in the Clemson game and a huge frustration with the offense (mainly due to one position) does not mean his head is on a pole. You clearly are one gigantic brain vaccuum if you think that the "noise" about Chuck has even begun to approach the volume it had with Herb.

Quote :

"And an exciting offense?? You mean the one year we had Norm Chow?? And the three years after that where we rode Philip Rivers?? I don't know what kind of exciting offense you're talking about. Even when Rivers was here our offense was getting blasted for being predictable. Luckily we had Philip to pull shit ouf of his ass all the time."

Hahahahhaha, hahahahaha. You outdo yourself with stupidity here. I think if I can do the math correctly, you just mentioned 4 out of 5 years where the offense could be called exciting. Under Rivers's helm, we were known to pull reverses, flea flickers, and several other classic excitement things during the course of a game. And regardless, just because the trips formation doesn't work under under Davis and Stone, when P Riv was here and we threw the "predictable" (your words) pass over there, the shit still went for big numbers. Fucking dumb shit, get off my dick now.

6/16/2006 3:07:56 PM

How about you define what "head on a pole" means. Because word among the big donors is that if he fucks up for one more year...then he's gone. I don't know if you can get any worse than that. It's funny about Herb and Chuck....Herb had the support of the donors but was disliked by the "majority" of the fans. Chuck has less support among the big donors, but is liked by most of the majority of the fans. Either way...his head is on the pole...or his seat is hot...whatever the fuck you want to call it.

And your reading comprehension skills suck. I said the year Norm Chow was here was really the only year that our offense was truly "exciting". Yeah, we'd throw a flea flicker and do some crazy reverse shit every now and then after he left....but it wasn't anywhere close to what we did his first year. And I'm saying that Philip produced results...that doesn't mean the offense was exciting. We had a couple of exciting players (Philip and TA)....but that doesn't mean the offense was exciting. We have been one of the most predictable teams in the ACC the past three years. We're just lucky we had Philip Rivers to bail us out. Chuck hired a fucking dumb ass coordinator and recruiting shitty quarterbacks that has led us into our current shitty status as a team.


Bottom line is that you can't read and you are a fucking dolt for trying to use Chuck Amato to argue against Herb Sendek. Please stop.

6/16/2006 3:19:39 PM

Quote :

"Chuck hired a fucking dumb ass coordinator and recruiting shitty quarterbacks that has led us into our current shitty status as a team. "

This is the only thing we agree on.

Quote :

"Because word among the big donors is that if he fucks up for one more year...then he's gone"

Yea, everyone on this board "knows" a big donor. Might as well add you to the list of idiots that think they have more power than they really do.

Quote :

"Chuck has less support among the big donors, but is liked by most of the majority of the fans. Either way...his head is on the pole...or his seat is hot...whatever the fuck you want to call it."

Because a few donors don't like the results he has produced so far (again, this is hear say on your part and not one god damn bit reliable) his head is on a pole or he's on the hot seat? Wake up you dumbass. Lee Fowler for one isn't going to fire anyone. And while the grumblings from fans grew louder last year, I say it again, it is nowhere near the volume it was with Herb. This is nearly quantifiable by looking at all the message board postings and news articles written. He just isn't on the hot seat yet, I'm sure if others take the time to read the lines of our pissing contest, they will surely agree with me. Hell, make a new thread "Is Chuck on the hot seat?".

I'm reading just fine, and I took a bit of liberty to try and decipher what it is you said, in retrospect, it isn't at all clear. Let's study it

Quote :

"And an exciting offense?? You mean the one year we had Norm Chow?? And the three years after that where we rode Philip Rivers??"

You questioned my comment about excitement. Then you asked about the one with Norm Chow, which isn't an admission on your part about this year in particular, but I interpreted this way (liberally), and you just confirmed it. Then you make another non sequitor comment about when P. Riv was here. Do you see how these two "questions" are essentially the same? And then you try to accuse me of not being able to read?

Quote :

"And I'm saying that Philip produced results...that doesn't mean the offense was exciting. We had a couple of exciting players (Philip and TA)...."

Jerricho got open deep a few times, Tremain was exciting, Dick Wash was exciting, I could go on.

Quote :

"We have been one of the most predictable teams in the ACC the past three years. We're just lucky we had Philip Rivers to bail us out."

So what exactly are you trying to say? If you are trying to make the distinction between exciting and productive, then stop trying to put them together again with comments like this, you aren't helping your "reading comprehension" cause one bit when you can't exactly articulate what the fuck you are trying to say.

And I'll say it yet again, predictable can be exciting. Even if you know a reverse is coming, and it gets executed perfectly, is that not entertaining?

[Edited on June 16, 2006 at 3:55 PM. Reason : a]

6/16/2006 3:55:14 PM

what do you know, jbrick83 getting into another long-winded argument....

6/16/2006 5:41:52 PM

Quote :

"whoopdy fucking do"

6/16/2006 6:15:58 PM

Quote :

"what do you know, jbrick83 getting into another long-winded argument...."

You still sore about being called out on the NBA draft???

6/16/2006 6:45:16 PM

gone to florida per packpride

6/17/2006 6:37:47 PM