how about the chemical weapons they used on US troops in the first Gulf War?

8/7/2006 4:20:06 PM

Wow its like beating your head against a wall until all thats left is some unrecognizable bloody pulp.

8/7/2006 4:20:59 PM

Quote :

"yeah you're right...we have the receipts to the WMDs that we sold iran and n korea...just as much probable cause as Iraq OH WAIT"

Dude. They flat out, in the open, fucking told us they're seeking a nuclear program. N. Korea tested three long range missles. Iranian weapons are blowing up Isreali Tanks.

Meanwhile, your stupid fucking dumbass is sitting here thinking it has a point about 20 year old bombs that we didn't care about in 92 and an arsenal that wasn't complimented since.

Are you seriously

I mean seriously

THAT

RETARDED?

8/7/2006 4:22:06 PM

so you're in support of going to war with iran and north korea

8/7/2006 4:23:21 PM

8/7/2006 4:23:29 PM

now thats something often displayed during your average political debate

8/7/2006 4:24:02 PM

8/7/2006 4:24:54 PM

i guess posting pictures is easier than admitting i'm right

8/7/2006 4:25:19 PM

8/7/2006 4:26:07 PM

Oh yeah, the user block thing

8/7/2006 4:27:08 PM

owned ;(





[Edited on August 7, 2006 at 4:29 PM. Reason : lets try this one ]

[Edited on August 7, 2006 at 4:30 PM. Reason : The internet fails me.]

8/7/2006 4:27:27 PM

wow...another picture to prove that treetwista gays up threads by typing words about the topic instead of posting dumb pictures

8/7/2006 4:30:02 PM

Our images (had they showed up), are entertaining.

Your words are just background noise.

8/7/2006 4:30:57 PM

I kind of want to know what he says, but the blank posts make me laugh

8/7/2006 4:31:00 PM

its good to laugh and talk about pictures when you are naive enough to think iraq didnt have WMDs

8/7/2006 4:31:40 PM

He's basically repeating himself over and over. You aren't missing anything really.

8/7/2006 4:32:50 PM

not missing anything that he'd ignore in the first place

8/7/2006 4:33:47 PM

8/7/2006 4:34:30 PM

please continue posting pictures which obviously do not gay up threads as much as my posts with text that pertain to the thread issue

8/7/2006 4:35:16 PM

The thing is, he wants to have the last word too. He like, can't let it go.

Careful though, he'll rat you out to the mods.

[Edited on August 7, 2006 at 4:40 PM. Reason : .]

8/7/2006 4:40:46 PM

so why dont you think Iraq had WMDs SandSanta?

8/7/2006 4:41:54 PM

Last

Word(s)

8/7/2006 4:46:25 PM

so why dont you think Iraq had WMDs SandSanta?

i guess blatant trolls dont want to talk about the issue...would rather just post pictures and troll

8/7/2006 4:47:26 PM

ahahahha

i know this game

8/7/2006 4:51:56 PM

I mean nastoute, you have reading ability. You know where I explained my entire position twice in this thread.

Its even more hilarity that he keeps repeating the same question when all he has to do is scroll up. Surely I don't have to debate with this.

8/7/2006 4:54:01 PM

iraq did at some point have wmd's

saddams number 1 military man said so

[Edited on August 7, 2006 at 4:55 PM. Reason : they went bye bye to syria]

8/7/2006 4:55:27 PM

aahahaahahaaaaa...."Double Horrible Fantasy"...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MdD5Qt3El-k

8/25/2006 12:18:06 AM

for you ignorant bitches that still think Iraq had wmd's here is part of a press confrence by the president on AUG 22 2006

Quote :

" Now, look, part of the reason we went into Iraq was -- the main reason we went into Iraq at the time was we thought he had weapons of mass destruction. It turns out he didn't, but he had the capacity to make weapons of mass destruction. But I also talked about the human suffering in Iraq, and I also talked the need to advance a freedom agenda. And so my question -- my answer to your question is, is that, imagine a world in which Saddam Hussein was there, stirring up even more trouble in a part of the world that had so much resentment and so much hatred that people came and killed 3,000 of our citizens. "

look no further than the first few sentences, the president actually believes the truth now, which is a miracle in itself, and you the followers of this retard still believe he was right before the war, which even ADMITS being wrong about.

AND

"Cheney also tried again to link Iraq to al-Qaeda, claiming "there's overwhelming evidence" that a relationship existed, despite the fact that none of this "overwhelming evidence" has ever been seen by anybody to my knowledge."

hows that for no one ever suggesting a link between Iraq and Al-Qaeda.

8/27/2006 4:36:58 PM

u have too much free time on ur hands

8/27/2006 6:22:14 PM

And therefore your point is logically invalidated.

8/27/2006 11:59:16 PM

http://youtube.com/watch?v=0fhWX2F6G7Y

8/28/2006 12:36:13 AM

Wow, is that the first time he has acknowledged that there were no WMDs? Before, he has dodged such questions on several occasions.

BUT, hold on! He stil put this in there for all the easily manipulated people:

Quote :

"imagine a world in which Saddam Hussein was there, stirring up even more trouble in a part of the world that had so much resentment and so much hatred that people came and killed 3,000 of our citizens. ""

Didn't at one time some 50% of Americans think Saddam caused 9-11? I bet they still do, with a twisted manipulative (dumb and too simple-minded actually) president like that.

8/28/2006 8:38:11 AM

Quote :

"twisted manipulative (dumb and too simple-minded actually"

which is he? twisted and manipulative? or dumb and simple-minded? how bout whatever is convenient for whichever argument you're using to bash him on an incident-by-incident basis! he's a dumbass! no he is shiesty and outsmarted us! no he's an idiot! no he outsmarted us again!

8/28/2006 10:35:31 AM

^ hahahaha i dont see how that is helping your arguement

8/28/2006 10:52:15 AM

its not supposed to...its pointing out how bush is either a manipulative mastermind or a bumbling dumbass, depending on what fits the democrats' current argument

cant have it both ways guys

8/28/2006 10:53:04 AM

Apparently people on both sides still confuse the president himself with a compendium of advisors...

8/28/2006 10:53:35 AM

when you're manipulative and everyone finds out that you are then you're an idiot.

[Edited on August 28, 2006 at 10:54 AM. Reason : when when whene ]

8/28/2006 10:54:14 AM

^^so bush is a dumbass but his advisors are manipulative, ah ok

no thats a double standard too...why do you blame bush if its his advisors who do the manipulative things?

8/28/2006 10:58:51 AM

blaming his advisors would take too much typing.

8/28/2006 11:00:59 AM

yeah, that time spent typing could be better spent reiterating how bush is the worst president ever because he's a manipulative idiot

8/28/2006 11:06:14 AM

about the same amount of time you spend with your lips on his dick

!

[Edited on August 28, 2006 at 11:09 AM. Reason : !!!!!]

8/28/2006 11:08:12 AM

Quote :

"Apparently people on both sides still confuse the president himself with a compendium of advisors..."

8/28/2006 11:09:13 AM

no i think its mostly the democrats

i mean dont all evil dumbass republicans love bush AND his advisors no matter what?

^^hey thats cute and shows your intellect and class

8/28/2006 11:12:43 AM

8/28/2006 11:14:48 AM

maybe they believe it because we did find weapons of mass detruction in the form of gas and missles shipped to syria?

8/28/2006 6:37:42 PM

if someone wants to believe something then there is no way to stop them from believing.

8/28/2006 6:53:34 PM

if someone wants to believe something then there is no way to stop them from believing.

8/28/2006 6:54:49 PM

Quote :

" maybe they believe it because we did find weapons of mass detruction in the form of gas and missles shipped to syria? "

god damn you are a moron. Where and when did we actually find proof they shipped gas and missiles to Syria? show me the proof, even your conservative website links provide no proof of when it happened or where, its pure speculation. Randy, is it possible for you to be any more gullible?

8/29/2006 12:19:47 PM

how come all the people who like to point out logical fallacies and strawmen and act like they have a good grasp of logic still dont understand the concept that just because you dont find something doesnt mean it doesnt exist

8/29/2006 12:27:47 PM

^ my problem is not with that, they might have been there, but everything shows they were not, and there was never any confirmation of them being there, no confirmation of them being destroyed before invasion, and no confirmation of them being shipped to syria. Yet despite all this blatant evidence of non-confirmation, gullible conservative brainwashed minions such as Randy continue to pitch the contrary, saying that they absolutley had them. If they did, all I want is some confirmation, real confirmation, not some bill o riely type saying "they were shipped to syria" when they really dont know shit.

Randy, I provided a excerpt from YOUR LEADER THE PRESIDENT saying they never found WMD. believe it son.

[Edited on August 29, 2006 at 3:56 PM. Reason : .]

8/29/2006 3:54:05 PM