TreeTwista10 minisoldr 148441 Posts user info edit post |
2.0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000001 9/14/2006 2:55:18 PM |
Crede All American 7339 Posts user info edit post |
gamecat won this thread on page 1 9/14/2006 2:57:59 PM |
slackerb All American 5093 Posts user info edit post |
There is no remainder in the mathematics of infinity. 9/14/2006 3:10:00 PM |
Josh8315 Suspended 26780 Posts user info edit post |
page 2 9/14/2006 3:11:27 PM |
Gamecat All American 17913 Posts user info edit post |
^^ Exactly.
The concept of 1 isn't a law, but an abstraction.
The concept of 1.5 isn't a law, but an abstraction.
The concept of 2 isn't a law, but an abstraction.
The abstractions are infinite, even if our concepts aren't. 9/14/2006 3:20:55 PM |
TreeTwista10 minisoldr 148441 Posts user info edit post |
I think Mr. Joshua won this thread with the 2nd post on page 1 9/14/2006 3:23:23 PM |
Gamecat All American 17913 Posts user info edit post |
I think threads can't be won. 9/14/2006 6:17:59 PM |
HockeyRoman All American 11811 Posts user info edit post |
Or is there just a finite number of threads that can be won!?!?! 9/14/2006 6:20:59 PM |
1985 All American 2175 Posts user info edit post |
I guess we just haven't been able to find all of pi's digits then... 9/14/2006 6:27:40 PM |
Gamecat All American 17913 Posts user info edit post |
No way, man. Cuz like, this guy found a pattern in Pi and it fucked up his computer. Didnja see tha movie? 9/14/2006 6:28:44 PM |
0EPII1 All American 42541 Posts user info edit post |
Quote : | "I think threads can't be won." |
And this post by Gamecat wins the thread 9/14/2006 11:30:33 PM |
hcnguyen Suspended 4297 Posts user info edit post |
lol google search "finite set of numbers" and this comes up. i thought that was lolable.
check this site out you might be able to open your mind to what im explaining here
http://www.c3.lanl.gov/mega-math/workbk/infinity/inbkgd.html
infinity is for children
[Edited on October 2, 2006 at 1:56 AM. Reason : are you children?] 10/2/2006 1:52:15 AM |
spro All American 4329 Posts user info edit post |
this thread made my morning 10/2/2006 8:11:54 AM |
kwsmith2 All American 2696 Posts user info edit post |
Quote : | "the finite ammount of numbers goes all the way to the largest number that anyone has ever been imagined. any other number higher of that does not exist yet." |
You do not have to imagine a number for it to exist.
The counting numbers, which you alluded to, exist as a logical extension of the concept of one more. Technicially, the successor function.
Without a doubt computers have implemented a floating point number which no human has actually taken the time to imagine. However, it reaches an answer whose implications are borne out in the real world. In every sensible way that number is exists.
[Edited on October 3, 2006 at 4:58 AM. Reason : .]10/3/2006 4:58:24 AM |
mathman All American 1631 Posts user info edit post |
But mathematicians have already imagined infinity so it exists. 12/16/2006 11:51:33 PM |
spöokyjon ℵ 18617 Posts user info edit post |
You should be suspended for bumping this monstrosity. 12/16/2006 11:56:19 PM |
GoldenViper All American 16056 Posts user info edit post |
12/17/2006 12:12:16 AM |
Erios All American 2509 Posts user info edit post |
Fine, lets end the threat:
Assume there is a finite set of numbers, E. E contains a highest number, q. Now add 1 to q, creating the number q + 1. Since q + 1 > q, and q is the highest number in E, then q + 1 is not in set E. Therefore E does not contain all numbers and the original statement is false. We can conclude this is NOT a finite set of numbers.
[/thread] 12/17/2006 1:53:29 AM |