just think, ECU has to play WVU next weekend!

[Edited on September 14, 2006 at 8:39 PM. Reason : Page 2 says it'll be worse than the UMD game]

9/14/2006 8:38:46 PM

50-0 in the first quarter for the ECU game and then ECU leaves.

9/14/2006 8:40:59 PM

poor ecu

9/14/2006 8:41:53 PM

WVU's running back already has 149 yards! DAMN!

9/14/2006 8:43:56 PM

WVU will take their starters out for the ECU game.

...........right before kickoff

9/14/2006 8:44:21 PM

dont call it a comeback

9/14/2006 8:46:31 PM

Slaton stuffed for no gain

That'll lower his average by 10 yards!!

9/14/2006 8:52:05 PM

I love this game

Go Mountaineers!

Living in WV now, people here are nuts for their football team...everyone at work was just dying to get home and peep this

I wish NC State was half the team WVU is, the offense is just nuts

9/14/2006 8:54:53 PM

shit is just not fair. qb runs a 4.4 hb and wr run 4.3 fb runs 4.6 olinemen run 4.7s its just not fair.


texas and florida are the only athletics depts better.

[Edited on September 14, 2006 at 8:58 PM. Reason : wow texas and florida pwn all]

9/14/2006 8:56:17 PM

Holy shneikies maryland, why do you suck so much?

9/14/2006 9:00:45 PM

ACC should have got WV

9/14/2006 9:00:51 PM

ACC should have stuck to basketball

9/14/2006 9:12:19 PM

lol

9/14/2006 9:18:36 PM

man Thurs. night games have not been kind to UMD in the past couple of years. during 2004 they got a 55-6 drubbing care of VT.

9/14/2006 9:18:39 PM

this is bad.....i love it

9/14/2006 9:18:39 PM

couldn't happen to a better bunch of guys

9/14/2006 9:19:04 PM

haha he fumbled on purpose to throw maryland off

9/14/2006 9:19:10 PM

Wow, that nigga just strait took off

9/14/2006 9:24:08 PM

whats the final gonna be

9/14/2006 9:24:17 PM

wtf? why did this game start so early? i missed all the fun?!

9/14/2006 9:29:12 PM

I'd hate to say it, but it looks like WVU is going to run the table this year and still not get to play for the national championship. Damn Strength of schedule.

9/14/2006 9:31:08 PM

"Well I'm picking the University of USC" - Lou Holtz

9/14/2006 9:33:12 PM

^^ if they run the table and so do 2 others, your god damn right they wont play for the title

and they wont deserve to

9/14/2006 9:36:21 PM

he fucking did it again. "Well I like the University of Auburn". it's Auburn University, not the University of Auburn, just like Clemson University.

9/14/2006 9:37:16 PM

its only semantics

9/14/2006 9:38:09 PM

University of North Carolina .. State

.. only semantics

9/14/2006 9:51:01 PM

if west virginia goes undefeated and their are two schools which better s.o.s., but with a loss, west virginia still shouldn't play for the national title.

notre dame, ga tech, florida, meeechigan, usc... could all have a loss and still should undoubtedly play for the title over west va. their schedules are ridiculously tough in the first place, but if you compare them to west virginia's... hahahahaha!

9/14/2006 10:00:18 PM

i still don't understand why WVU took seats out of their stadium. that has to be one of the dumbest ideas ever. i mean build a new atheltic center but don't take out seats in a place where football is big, and you sell out nearly every game.

actually that's not even an atheltic center, that's just a bunch of suites and restaurant shit. it could have easily been built up above those older stands.

[Edited on September 14, 2006 at 10:03 PM. Reason : ]

9/14/2006 10:00:22 PM

"Timeout.. North Carolina" ....... STATE! REF YOU SUCK

9/14/2006 10:02:13 PM

This is exactly what happened last year vs. Georgia

WVU goes up 28-0, and it ended up being a close game

9/14/2006 10:05:04 PM

i predict that if WVU goes on to win the NC or go to the National Title game they will soon tear down their crappy current press box and build something similar to Vaughn Towers/the one at VaTech/or Michign State.



[Edited on September 14, 2006 at 10:05 PM. Reason : ]

9/14/2006 10:05:20 PM

Quote :

"if west virginia goes undefeated and their are two schools which better s.o.s., but with a loss, west virginia still shouldn't play for the national title. notre dame, ga tech, florida, meeechigan, usc... could all have a loss and still should undoubtedly play for the title over west va. their schedules are ridiculously tough in the first place, but if you compare them to west virginia's... hahahahaha!"

This should be applied to the ACC then. If you haven't noticed, the Big East has kicked the ACC's ass every time so far this short season save one game. Not to mention the conference's best out-of-conference win so far is at Central Michigan.

@ Wake Forest 20, Syracuse 10
@ Pittsburgh 38, Virginia 13
Rutgers 21, @ North Carolina 16

West Virginia is leading Maryland 45-17 at home.

-Wake Forest plays at Connecticut this weekend, and based on the Duke game this past weekend, Wake's gonna lose with their backup QB.
-Louisville hosts Miami this coming weekend.
-North Carolina hosts South Florida later in the year.

I can see the Big East going 6-1 for the season versus the ACC.

[Edited on September 14, 2006 at 10:23 PM. Reason : .]

9/14/2006 10:15:22 PM

game, set, match

9/14/2006 10:17:57 PM

ECU is going to get their dicks drug in the dirt

9/14/2006 10:18:38 PM

If I were still in Raleigh, I'd go to the ECU/WVU game just to laugh

9/14/2006 10:22:24 PM

awesome game

9/14/2006 10:38:52 PM

haha they were talking about how WVU needed a sponsor for their stadium.

I know one, Jack Daniels. They will give the money to the stadium, hell, enough of them chug the stuff already

9/14/2006 10:46:10 PM

rofl @ goalpost

[Edited on September 14, 2006 at 10:52 PM. Reason : i wish i had espnu]

9/14/2006 10:51:44 PM

haha. poor guy.

9/14/2006 10:51:49 PM

I wish our team could adjust and score like Maryland did

9/14/2006 11:06:11 PM

PASSING
CP/AT YDS TD INT
P White 6/9 44 1 0



Gee, who does that look like?

9/14/2006 11:48:15 PM

can we beat maryland?

9/14/2006 11:50:23 PM

I don't think Louisville can hang with Miami without Bush.

^Ummm no.

We can't beat them when WE are good.

[Edited on September 14, 2006 at 11:51 PM. Reason : ^]

9/14/2006 11:50:37 PM

it doesn't matter if the big least has a winning record vs. the acc this season.

1. those middle of the big least teams beat 3 of the 4 bottom feeders of the acc.
2. by that logic, the acc is clearly the best conference because we have a winning record vs. every other conference (including the sec) the past 2-3 years. furthermore, the acc is the only conference with a winning bowl record over the past 3-4 years, the acc has sent the most teams to bowls the past couple of years, and i think the acc has the winningest bowl record overall.
3. i know the big east went 1-3 in bowls last year. i'm going to guess and say they have a losing record over the past 2-3 years too.
4. only 3 teams in the big least had a winning record last season. THREE. and it's not because of tough out of conference schedules, with the exception of louisville.
5. to keep it's automatic bcs bid eligibility, a conference's champion has to average a top-12 over four years. when the big least was about to lose it's bcs bid in 2004, they were allowed to count incoming louisville's top-10 finish even though louisville wasn't in the big east yet. the big east champion that year was pittsburgh, and they were 20-something in the polls. basically, the bcs were being fucking pussies and too nice.

[Edited on September 14, 2006 at 11:57 PM. Reason : ]

9/14/2006 11:52:57 PM

Quote :

"it doesn't matter if the big least has a winning record vs. the acc this season. 1. those middle of the big least teams beat 3 of the 4 bottom feeders of the acc. 2. by that logic, the acc is clearly the best conference because we have a winning record vs. every other conference (including the sec) the past 2-3 years. furthermore, the acc is the only conference with a winning bowl record over the past 3-4 years, the acc has sent the most teams to bowls the past couple of years, and i think the acc has the winningest bowl record overall. 3. i know the big east went 1-3 in bowls last year. i'm going to guess and say they have a losing record over the past 2-3 years too. 4. only 3 teams in the big least had a winning record last season. THREE. and it's not because of tough out of conference schedules, with the exception of louisville. 5. to keep it's automatic bcs bid eligibility, a conference's champion has to average a top-12 over four years. when the big least was about to lose it's bcs bid in 2004, they were allowed to count incoming louisville's top-10 finish even though louisville wasn't in the big east yet. the big east champion that year was pittsburgh, and they were 20-something in the polls. basically, the bcs were being fucking pussies and too nice"

As far as point 5, the worst ranked conference by the way is the ACC. The ACC champion was Florida State last year and they were 20-something. Nothing says quality like an 8-5 champion.

Conference strength is based entirely on who you beat out-of-conference. So far this year:

Home:

Florida State defeated Troy 24-17
Wake Forest defeated Syracuse 20-10
Maryland defeated Middle Tennessee State 24-10
North Carolina State lost to Akron 20-17
Clemson defeated Florida Atlantic 54-6
Georgia Tech lost to Notre Dame 14-10
Virginia defeated Wyoming 13-12
North Carolina lost to Rutgers 21-16

I-AA (at Home):

Maryland defeated William & Mary 27-14
North Carolina State defeated Appalachian State 23-10
Virginia Tech defeated Northeastern 38-0
Georgia Tech defeated Samford 38-6
Miami defeated Florida A&M 51-10
Duke lost to Richmond 13-0

Away:

Boston College defeated Central Michigan 31-24
Maryland lost to West Virginia 45-24
Virginia lost to Pittsburgh 38-13

Against I-A opposition, the ACC is 6-5.
Three of those I-A wins are against the Sun Belt Conference.
Against BCS opposition, the ACC is 1-4. (lone win is Wake over a very bad Syracuse)

It's still early in the season, but is there anything on this list that makes you think the ACC could even match any other BCS conference in record against good teams? Heck, FSU almost lost to Troy. Do a comparative analysis midway through the season and if you can back yourself up with facts other than "2 years ago they were s*** and that's why we're better", feel free.

Quote :

" North Carolina at Notre Dame South Florida at North Carolina Furman at North Carolina Duke at Alabama Vanderbilt at Duke Navy at Duke Miami at Louisville Houston at Miami Florida International at Miami Western Michigan at Virginia Virginia at East Carolina Troy at Georgia Tech Georgia Tech at Georgia Cincinnati at Virginia Tech Southern Miss at Virginia Tech Kent State at Virginia Tech Louisiana Tech at Clemson Temple at Clemson North Carolina State at Southern Miss East Carolina at North Carolina State Florida International at Maryland Wake Forest at Ole Miss Liberty at Wake Forest Brigham Young at Boston College Maine at Boston College Buffalo at Boston College Rice at Florida State Western Michigan at Florida State Florida at Florida State "

[Edited on September 15, 2006 at 12:23 AM. Reason : /]

9/15/2006 12:22:40 AM

what a joke of a game

9/15/2006 12:25:05 AM

Quote :

"big least"

I totally get it! You just put an L in front of East to make it a whole new word! You are so fucking clever

9/15/2006 12:28:28 AM

1a. the acc is the worst ranked conference? by what/who's rankings?
1b. i'll repeat since you missed it, the final ranking stipulation for conference champions is contended on the average of four seasons; not just last year's.
2a. the stats referring to the past 2-4 seasons that i noted are in directly regards to the acc, not the big least.
2b. i didn't single out one season 2 years ago. i provided a trend based on factual results. the fact of the matter is that the big least has underperformed consistently for the past several years, even more so once miami and va tech seceded.
3. conference strength isn't based entirely on who is beaten ooc. that's a ridiculous assertion imo.
4. you say that sorrycuse is "very bad". i agree, but wake is worse.
5. as you said yourself, we're still early in the season. no valid arguments as to conference strengths and prowess for the 2006 season can be made at this time. the only things to go on are previous seasons, which i addressed.

i gave you facts, and you're only response is conjecture and filling the screen with schedules (twice). that's your argument? the acc sucks because it has a losing record to the big least so far this season? that doesn't even address the original argument - the big least should lose it's automatic bcs bid. atleast keep me entertained by retorting each of my points.


konami, "big least" isn't something new that i just made up. before you post another sarcastic remark, i didn't come up with "sorrycuse" either.

[Edited on September 15, 2006 at 2:32 AM. Reason : ]

9/15/2006 2:28:26 AM

Quote :

"PASSING CP/AT YDS TD INT P White 6/9 44 1 0 Gee, who does that look like? "

I hope you weren't inplying Marcus Stone....his would be more like
PASSING
CP/AT YDS TD INT
P WhiteM Stone 6/9 44 1 3

9/15/2006 12:38:25 PM

HA HA.....ALL YOU FAGGOT ACC HOMERS NEED TO WAKE UP AND REALIZE THE ACC IS A SHITTY FOOTBALL CONF.,
THE TWO BEST TEAMS IN THE BIG EAST (WVU AND LOUSIVILLE) ARE RANKED HIGHER THAN THAN FSU AND MIAMI AND YOU'LL SEE WHEN LOUSVILLE OFFS MIAMI THAT THEY ARE RANKED THERE FOR A REASON.....THE MIDDLE OF THE PAC BIG EAST TEAMS (IE PITT, RUTGERS, AND UCONN) WOULD SURELY BEAT UNC,MARYLAND AND NC STATE....BC WAS CONSIDERED A REALLY GOOD PROGRAM UNTIL THEY LEFT THE BIG EAST AND STARTED WINNING...


THE REALLY FUNNY THING ABOUT THIS GAME IS JABA THE FRIDGE (THAT FAT SLOP OF SHIT FROM FARYLYAND) GAVE SLATON A SCHOLARSHIP THEN TOOK IT BACK...OBVIOUSLY THAT FAT LOSER HAS SHOWN HE CAN'T RECRUIT WORTH SHIT!!!

HA HA
LETS GO MOUNTAINEERS....NATIONAL CHAMPIONSHIP HERE WE COME!!!

9/15/2006 1:22:55 PM