news flash! wanna know why we have one of the "better" defenses? because there has been a lack of offense in the ACC. dont be a twat, its more than obvious.

11/16/2006 4:08:12 PM

Yup, that is such a great argument. Maybe it could be because the ACC has focused a lot of attention on defense through the years.

Your argument has become laughable.

11/16/2006 4:10:52 PM

Quote :

"we suck cuz we suck, bad coach and poor talent because of bad coaches. "

look at this post and laugh

11/16/2006 4:15:49 PM

yeah i'm sure it has...? its obvious that your superior statements consisting of generalizations are no match for me. i really doubt they purposely focused on defense and has shoed away good players on the offensive side of the ball, because teams just want defense. I have a feeling that if ACC schools had they chance, they would have taken offensive stand outs. We had a shot at chris leak but he went to florida. if he committed to state i'm sure the staff would have welcomed him over a mediocore defensive player.

11/16/2006 4:17:15 PM

wats so funny gunnz?

11/16/2006 4:18:06 PM

clemson had the #1 offense in the country. then they met the acc.

11/16/2006 4:18:26 PM

I'm just going to hang my head and laugh. Your entire argument focuses around Chris Leak? Do you realize that teams get 25 scholarships a year? and by all accounting, we were set at quarterback when Leak committed to Florida, therefore you look to sure up other parts of the team. If it means taking a 3 star lineback over a 5 star running back when you already have 3 stand out running backs but you need linebackers, you go for linebackers.

11/16/2006 4:19:42 PM

when did they have the top offense? when they beat florida atlantic? dont feed me that bullshit.

11/16/2006 4:20:37 PM

Nutsmackr is correct about the ACC definitely. I'd put up the ACC overall team speed on defense up there with the best in the country..

However, hcngay needs to go ahead and look up Clemsons OOC schedule before proclaiming them some kind of offensive juggernaut. I've seen D2 teams with harder schedules.

[Edited on November 16, 2006 at 4:23 PM. Reason : x]

11/16/2006 4:21:25 PM

Boston College had the number 1 offense in the ACC until they met NC State

11/16/2006 4:21:30 PM

damnit you asshat i was using leak as an example! but since your dumb, four years ago we were set at qb, but who was there to back up phil? jay davis? yeah like you wouldnt still take chris leak, even if you didnt know that jay davis would be a bust. Im sure we wouldnt have to settle for three star linebackers over 5 star backs if we could fucking recruit correctly in the first place. god i'm not even sure what we were arguing about in the first place!

11/16/2006 4:26:59 PM

oh and please dont act like our d is the shit because we beat boston college. we got lucky on the last play of the game. Those who are somewhat football educated would know that boston college would have beaten us 7 times out of ten.

11/16/2006 4:29:00 PM

you are calling people dumb the way you spell

your grammar is horrible

11/16/2006 4:30:11 PM

holy shit who gives a fuck?! that has nothing to do with the entire discussion and because this is not a paper or an assignment, i could really care less if my grammer is bad.

11/16/2006 4:31:50 PM

another dumb noob.

11/16/2006 4:32:00 PM

stone was a 4 star qb. he was locked up while rivers wa sstil here. we got all the running back commits because they thought we were a great passing team that envolved the runnign back more than any other gerat passing teams. thats why every running back wanted to come here. qbs dont want to go somewhere where a qb within 1 year of thier age is already at. stones stars scared pple away until this year.

[Edited on November 16, 2006 at 4:33 PM. Reason : they saw ta and were like damn he sux and is the man.]

11/16/2006 4:33:10 PM

Didn't we go for Stone over leak?

11/16/2006 4:37:23 PM

stone and leak are the same age, i doubt that you know if stone made his decision before or after leak committed to florida.

11/16/2006 4:37:47 PM

Why is Leak even in the discussion? We didn't have a chance.

11/16/2006 4:38:45 PM

YES WE DID!

11/16/2006 4:38:56 PM

We had no chance at leak and stone committed early in the recruiting process. Let's also not forget that Jay Davis was a highly touted Quarterback recruit as well.

Quote :

"Im sure we wouldnt have to settle for three star linebackers over 5 star backs if we could fucking recruit correctly in the first place. god i'm not even sure what we were arguing about in the first place!"

Yes, because the only way to properly recruit is to have five stars at every single fucking position

[Edited on November 16, 2006 at 5:14 PM. Reason : .]

11/16/2006 5:13:59 PM

Will someone else besides me just say this guy is a "great person" but a "bad coach." And let's not roll into Chapel Hill spouting off negatives about our coach...only makes us look worse. Let's support until we get the presser that he's gone. I would take him as Athletic Director.

11/16/2006 5:19:38 PM

another

11/20/2006 1:30:56 PM

Quote :

"According to NCSU records requested by The News & Observer this year, Amato's contract runs through Jan. 5, 2010. He has an annual salary of $206,601 and would be owed his remaining salary if fired. Amato also is eligible for $840,000 in annuities, funded by the Wolfpack Club, to be paid by on Jan. 6, 2008. His contract assures him of a portion of that deferred compensation if fired. He is paid $750,000 a year in outside compensation for his radio and TV shows and other interviews and appearances."

http://www.newsobserver.com/752/story/513076.html

11/21/2006 4:15:19 PM

^Pretty much, it's saying that it's going to cost a good amount of $$$ to buy him out?

11/21/2006 4:18:22 PM

I dont think its as much as you make it out to be

The TV show money will not be awarded to him and the salary I dont think would be either because he is not employed

I think all we would owe him would be the annuities but I could be wrong, from what I remember reading his contract the only way we owe him is if he is fired versus resigning.

I thinkkkkk though annuities is all, its like 1.5 million all together.

11/21/2006 4:27:34 PM