i don't really care what you have to say. in fact, you may be right.

it's beside the point though. i'm just tired of seeing 95% of your posts in the garage being about how badass saabs are.

i thought we were rid of you for a while, but now you're back. still posting the same stuff years later.

btw, plz to explain what in the hell this comparison is: turbo vs slush

[Edited on January 25, 2007 at 10:07 PM. Reason : TWOOOO]

1/25/2007 10:07:41 PM

oh, and there's only one reason saab's are more rare. they're ugly as sin.

1/25/2007 10:09:13 PM

yeah, No...




I dont need to explain shit... go drive the saab and then the lincoln. You'll figure it out.

[Edited on January 25, 2007 at 10:10 PM. Reason : ztrh]

1/25/2007 10:09:23 PM

i've driven both. i already said you may even be right on most of you points.

that doesn't change the fact it's an ugly ass car though, even if they're better than previous models.

i mean, oprah lost some weight but that doesn't make her hot.

1/25/2007 10:12:54 PM

Saabs have some terrible depreciation in comparision to their competitiors. Also their turbo lag and dashes suck.

[Edited on January 25, 2007 at 10:14 PM. Reason : The new audi 2.0ts are far superior]

1/25/2007 10:13:34 PM

^ actually you are wrong. there was a recent article that showed saab resale was above avg for its class. I will try and find it for ya.. I have to admit I was surprised because I would have agreed with you before I read that.. saw it on one of the saab forums.

Data is as follows:
Rank; Car; Depreciation Dollars(C$); Depreciation % of Actual Transaction Price
1.) Lexus IS250 Sport 6M;-$7000; -15%
2.) Acura TSX 6M;-9500; -25%
3.) SAAB 9-3 Aero 6M; -$11000, -26%
4.) BMW 325i Sport 6M; -$18000, -35%
5.) Cadillac CTS Sport 6M; -19000, -40%
6.) Infiniti G35 M6; -$19000, -41%

I have VERY little if any turbo lag... have you drive the new SS.. esp the 2.8 one? They are rolling out with the v6 twin turbo AWD biofuel one within 3 years I was told.

and the dash was also changed this year.. I think the new ones are fucking awesome.


[Edited on January 25, 2007 at 10:25 PM. Reason : data]

1/25/2007 10:24:00 PM

1/25/2007 10:29:41 PM

also found this from edmunds to show my point about the misconception of saabs depreciation.

1/25/2007 10:30:00 PM

why the hell is a cts-v listed on there? it's a specialty low production car.

1/25/2007 10:30:41 PM

i found this which pretty much settles any argument you might think you are winning]

1/25/2007 10:30:47 PM

^^ wow, do you really need to keep posting the same pic and/or statement in several threads?

Dude, you can make a whole thread of photoshops if you want.. could care less. A pic of me, my hot wife, on a cruise in Hawaii... yeah.. thats really hurting my feelings.

1/25/2007 10:31:22 PM

I drove an 2005 aero.

1/25/2007 10:31:47 PM

^ so you personally dont like the dash then.. thats cool... the new ones are much better. But you really thought the car had turbo lag??? I find that really surprising.. granted the aero had a larger turbo than the linear but most conclude the car has little turbo lag.

didnt say it was an arguement... said I was pointing out peoples misconceptions.

[Edited on January 25, 2007 at 10:34 PM. Reason : aerg]

1/25/2007 10:32:41 PM

who are you talking to?

1/25/2007 10:33:23 PM

you look like a fucking saab driving child molester.

[Edited on January 25, 2007 at 10:36 PM. Reason : i bet you listen to ABBA in your saab]

1/25/2007 10:34:20 PM

^ err... yes, this is true.

1/25/2007 10:35:17 PM

Granted, I had driven a 2006 3.2 a4 quattro a few hours before. So that may played into it.


At the time, yes I did notice turbo lag.

[Edited on January 25, 2007 at 10:38 PM. Reason : ]

1/25/2007 10:36:11 PM

where's Igor? he's like saab's top technician.

i'm still wondering two things:

Quote :

"btw, plz to explain what in the hell this comparison is: turbo vs slush"

and

Quote :

"why the hell is a cts-v listed on there?"

unless there's a good reason, i would discount that information based on the intelligence of the creator.

[Edited on January 25, 2007 at 10:39 PM. Reason : .]

1/25/2007 10:37:11 PM

or pwnt saabs top stunt driver

[Edited on January 25, 2007 at 10:38 PM. Reason : LOL]

1/25/2007 10:37:30 PM

or sumfoo1, he hasn't accused of us of conspiracy here yet.

1/25/2007 10:40:07 PM

^^
1 - already answered.. read dumbass
2 - because people that buy the aforementioned also consider the cts.

1/25/2007 10:40:49 PM

wait didnt the lincoln ls handle just about the same as the bmw 5 series one year?

if so, i didnt know saabs had better handling than bmw

[Edited on January 25, 2007 at 10:41 PM. Reason : .]

1/25/2007 10:41:16 PM

1- plz show me where, i'm obviously blind
2- a 400hp v8 6 speed low production sedan is not in the same class as those vehicles.

^handling is an easily skewed term by manufacturers. i don't claim to know which handles better, but it could easily be you put both on a track a bmw busts the saab's ass. maybe the saab is better in one category/test than the bmw though.

[Edited on January 25, 2007 at 10:45 PM. Reason : .]

1/25/2007 10:43:08 PM

OMG SAABs ARE CLEARLY SUPERIOR

1/25/2007 10:44:46 PM

lincoln, we ridin spinnas

1/25/2007 10:47:13 PM

Quote :

"handling is an easily skewed term by manufacturers. i don't claim to know which handles better, but it could easily be you put both on a track a bmw busts the saab's ass. maybe the saab is better in one category/test than the bmw though."

i remember reading something about the ls having better lateral acceleration and better emergency lane change speed

1/25/2007 10:48:36 PM

^^^^

wtf are you talking about dude.. the CTS is a V6 if I am not mistaken.. not even offered as a V8... you are talking about the CTS right?

^^ did I say anything about the saab having better driving ability than a BMW? nagh... interesting that it was better in that catergory being a FWD

[Edited on January 25, 2007 at 10:50 PM. Reason : etr]

1/25/2007 10:49:00 PM

CTS != CTS-V

[Edited on January 25, 2007 at 10:50 PM. Reason : six speed cts indicates V model]

1/25/2007 10:49:47 PM

^ I cant point out how fucking stupid you sound.. you should just edit that shit. You were the one whining about the CTS from the start....

1/25/2007 10:52:21 PM

^^^you are obviously very mistaken about a number of things.

i'm waiting for my turbo vs. slush explanation.

[Edited on January 25, 2007 at 10:53 PM. Reason : .]

1/25/2007 10:53:05 PM

^

as answered the first time you asked a stupid fucking question

"I dont need to explain shit... go drive the saab and then the lincoln. You'll figure it out."

1/25/2007 10:55:25 PM

I wasnt talking about CTS anything. And since I hate Saabs I can make up whatever I want in regards to american cars.

1/25/2007 10:55:52 PM

homey's definately got that creepy child molester grin.

folks don't let any kids near this guy!!

1/25/2007 10:58:17 PM

^^^that doesn't explain anything. turbo vs. slush makes absolutely no sense, i could drive every car in the world and not know what the hell you're talking about.

1/25/2007 11:01:25 PM

red bull vs slurpee

1/25/2007 11:04:05 PM

I think it's about turbo'd cars in the snow slush. You know==he drives a saab. Scandinavians and their slush.

[Edited on January 25, 2007 at 11:04 PM. Reason : for brains]

1/25/2007 11:04:19 PM

Quote :

"arent those 3.9 liter v8s? I havent ridden in one so I cant say for sure how they drive, but sounds kinda small for a v8"

it's not that great off the line, but passing power is more than you'd expect

i believe by 2003 they got the shit worked out with the tranmissions so they would quick fucking up all the time

1/25/2007 11:06:10 PM

Quote :

"red bull vs slurpee"

Fuck you muthuh fuckuh, I need likker too.

And you just wait till I twin turbo MY Super Saab. I think there's room under the hood, or might just cut a big fucking hole, or hell, might just take the whole damn hood off! I'm a Super Saab Stunt driver you fucking idiot!!!!!!!!! (just ask all those Messicans up the road)

1/25/2007 11:09:18 PM

just put part of the turbo in the pass. seat like maximadrvr

1/25/2007 11:10:16 PM

put them on the roof. natural intercooler.

1/25/2007 11:15:45 PM

Not a bad idea. Especially in Seattle.

1/25/2007 11:19:50 PM

Riddle: What is the best part about driving a Super Saab?



Any takers?

1/25/2007 11:27:25 PM

it only cost 200 bucks so lunch that fucker threw every ditch there is?

1/25/2007 11:28:53 PM

Nah man, get real.


Answer: Swerving at Saab snobs to scare the shit out of them.

1/25/2007 11:31:12 PM

hahahaha. or anybody to scare them. like minivans full of kids. rember that fool?

1/25/2007 11:34:04 PM

shit nigga ditchs with a car full of bitchs is where it is at

1/25/2007 11:35:20 PM

Why y'all gotta be incriminatin' and shit?

1/25/2007 11:40:03 PM

your lucky i didnt push you at that show just lil bit you would have been on ur ass lol all punching on me and shit...Your lucky im a nice guy lol

1/25/2007 11:41:24 PM

Holy shit this thread got nigged up real quick.

No I don't want to drive a fucking Saab.

And no, I'm not a "negroe"

Quote :

"wait didnt the lincoln ls handle just about the same as the bmw 5 series one year?"

Yeah, thats what the commercial said. It's probably BS, but every car magazine raved about the handling on the LS. 50/50 weight distribution, RWD, sport-tuned suspension shared with the Jag S-type, decent HP and torque, etc.

[Edited on January 26, 2007 at 12:29 AM. Reason : 2]

1/26/2007 12:24:03 AM

it was nigged up as soon as you posted about those rims.

1/26/2007 12:26:08 AM