2

3/4/2007 11:51:38 AM

she is such a horrible bitch

3/4/2007 1:48:40 PM

^^^cry some....








































































































































faggot

[Edited on March 4, 2007 at 3:17 PM. Reason : b]

3/4/2007 3:16:31 PM

consider yourself officially called out you faggot....

3/4/2007 5:02:23 PM

what makes this funny is not her comment, its the reaction by the lefties. My goodness, get over it already.

3/4/2007 11:47:10 PM

So us "lefties" are supposed to just drop it but if the shoe was on the other foot you wingnuts would still be nutting yourselves to cry foul and demand apologies from every democrat you can find.

The bitch should be sued for slander.

[Edited on March 5, 2007 at 7:40 AM. Reason : but then again what do you expect from the right?]

3/5/2007 7:39:38 AM

I dont see a bill mahr thread or an air america thread, so I disagree.

3/5/2007 9:17:57 AM

Quote :

"I am convinced that she is hated because she is willing to stoop to the left's level and fight them on their own terms, which usually means childish name calling and meaningless drivel."

I'm amazed that people think shes anything other than an entertainer. Without her saying shit like this, she doesn't sell truckloads of books, she doesn't appear on tv, and you people don't hold her up as the freedom fighter of the right. I seriously doubt she believes Edwards is a homosexual; shes just playing her role, as is Bill Mahr.

3/5/2007 9:30:15 AM

^^ and ^ It's "Maher," fellas--not that it matters, he's a secular fundamentalist either way.

^^^ So, it's okay to call people "wingnuts"? You can discriminate with epithets based on legitimate political positions but others can't discriminate based on sexual orientation/behavior?

3/5/2007 10:29:07 AM

what is the difference between wingnut and "feminazi" or any other highly used phrase? there isnt one.

but if you cant tell the difference between any of those terms and something like faggot...

3/5/2007 10:56:00 AM

^^ You are trying to equate political ideology with sexual orientation? wtf? Do I use the word wingnut as a durogatory term, sure, but it's a far cry from calling someone a faggot.

3/5/2007 11:24:07 AM

^^^

true that.

This is at the same level as Michael Richards calling people niggers.

But sadly, she has somehow been given political credibility by our moron public.

3/5/2007 11:24:20 AM

nah i think michael richards' tirade was tenfold worse than this one.

i kinda laughed, said "yeah, he is a fag" and moved on.

but i don't equate "Fag" with homosexuality as much as i do with being a nancy-boy. JE is def. a nancy-boy, so "fag" fits him quite well.

plus historically, the n word is on an entirely different level than faggot

3/5/2007 11:41:36 AM

i agree axl

and she really didnt call him a faggot, she just insinuated it. She made a comment about how in this country you have to go to rehab if you say the word faggot, so now she has nothing else to say about edwards. It was a joke, a poor one, but a joke.

I dont understand why this is a HUGE issue. Its exactly what she wants and you are playing right to her.

3/5/2007 11:51:35 AM

its not really a huge issue. mostly the media has ignored it. i doubt she wanted to do what it has done, which is help john edwards raise money

3/5/2007 11:58:28 AM

^how, did he sue her?

3/5/2007 12:53:35 PM

Quote :

"but if you cant tell the difference between any of those terms and something like faggot..."

RevoltNow

Quote :

"You are trying to equate political ideology with sexual orientation? wtf? Do I use the word wingnut as a durogatory term, sure, but it's a far cry from calling someone a faggot."

HockeyRoman

You know, to be so allegedly offended by the epithet in question, you two sure seem to use it a lot. After all, there are ways of referring to an offensive word without actually using it--the N-word would be one such example. You will note well that I have never used the word here in any context. Are you feigning outrage or what?

PS: "durogatory" DUR!

[Edited on March 5, 2007 at 1:35 PM. Reason : .]

3/5/2007 1:12:43 PM

DO NOT OFFEND HOMOSEXUALS

now if you want to just rip into Christians, be my guest...I mean religious freedom doesn't protect you against people's verbal opinions...but you just better not offend the gays!

3/5/2007 1:19:49 PM

Quote :

"You know, to be so allegedly offended by the epithet in question,"

I am not sure where you read that I was offended by this especially since I am no where near the target of her "joke". She is just a vile creature that thrives on attention. What is there to be "outraged" about?

Quote :

"but you just better not offend the gays!"

Why not? Offend them if that is how you truely feel. Just be prepared to deal with whatever consiquences follow.

3/5/2007 2:00:32 PM

^sure i agree...its just funny that some groups (Christians for example) get bashed and the people bashing them don't really have to deal with any consequences...maybe its that Christians dont make a big fuss about it...but don't insult the gays!

3/5/2007 2:02:26 PM

Quote :

"the people bashing them don't really have to deal with any consequences"

Maybe bashing Christians is more acceptable in our culture than bashing gays?

3/5/2007 2:05:44 PM

^Oh I think it is...I don't know why though

It was probably the opposite ~20 years ago...and I don't think the current stance is any kind of progress

[Edited on March 5, 2007 at 2:10 PM. Reason : .]

3/5/2007 2:10:18 PM

gg ann coulter

3/5/2007 3:17:27 PM

And gg to anyone who will step up and call her out for being a psychotic bitch.

3/5/2007 3:21:37 PM

Quote :

"John Edwards and his wife Elizabeth are family friends, and I was friends with his son Wade before he passed"

And the funny thing is you're apparently proud of this.

3/5/2007 3:24:56 PM

she's a horrible person

3/5/2007 3:25:13 PM

^^ I'd be very proud to be personally familiar with John Edwards too but that is just me.

3/5/2007 3:28:00 PM

Quote :

"I am not sure where you read that I was offended by this especially since I am no where near the target of her 'joke'."

HockeyRoman

Uh. . .I never said you were--not sure where that's coming from. No need to be so defensive, man. I didn't bring up your sexuality--you did.

3/5/2007 3:31:08 PM

Quote :

"You know, to be so allegedly offended by the epithet in question,you two sure seem to use it a lot."

Looks like a duck...

And by target of the "joke" I meant John Edwards not homosexuals. Anything else you need handholding with to understand?

3/5/2007 3:44:22 PM

^ I never said anything about holding hands, dude.

PS:

Quote :

"Looks like a duck..."

WTF?

V Oh, man, lighten up a little. BTW, that sighing thing is a little fem.

[Edited on March 5, 2007 at 4:09 PM. Reason : .]

3/5/2007 3:45:32 PM

/sigh

Apparently reading comprehension is beyond you.

3/5/2007 4:03:13 PM

Looks like TWW definition of a "wingnut" or "partisan hack" (must be this week's 10 cent word, last week it was ad hominem) is somebody who doesn't tow the democrat line, especially considering that those who are using the terms are some of the more partisan leftists on this board.

3/5/2007 6:23:47 PM

Wingnut is my word for the heavy to fringe righties that I borrowed from Jay Diamond. If you feel that I am talking about you then boo-freakin-woo.

3/5/2007 7:01:49 PM

It's hypocritical of you of all people to call anybody a wingnut (this can be used for heavy to fringe lefties as well).

3/5/2007 7:09:13 PM

ok, moonbat

3/5/2007 7:26:19 PM

Quote :

"John Edwards: "I think that Jesus would be disappointed in our ignoring the plight of those around us who are suffering and our focus on our own selfish short-term needs," I think he would be appalled, actually." "

..and then he flew back to his multi-million dollar mansion to think some more about selfishness, and then have a sauna.

3/5/2007 10:46:04 PM

It's not hypocriphal if we expect to be called "libbies/libs/dems" or any other pagorative term the wingnuts can come up with. Faggot, though (omg Hooksaw I used that word!!!1), is totally outside the realm of political labeling and is merely gaybashing as per her context.

3/5/2007 10:48:46 PM

I have already agreed that Coulter was out of line, that was kinda what I was going with when I created this thread.

I have yet to see any liberal apologize for Bill Maher's comments about Dick Cheney. Calling someone a faggot is stupid, but wishing death on somebody takes it to a whole new low.

3/5/2007 10:57:52 PM

OMG NEWS FLASH!!!!
John Edwards is rich.
Back to your regulary scheduled program.


Considering Edwards is rich, the only reason Earthdogg doesnt like him is because he has the gall to do something other than rape every poor person he meets.

3/5/2007 11:02:47 PM

So money removes personal responsibility?

3/5/2007 11:06:50 PM

according to earthdogg, yes

3/5/2007 11:14:56 PM

the question is, "Would you hit it?"

3/5/2007 11:16:53 PM

Quote :

"I have yet to see any liberal apologize for Bill Maher's comments about Dick Cheney. Calling someone a faggot is stupid, but wishing death on somebody takes it to a whole new low."

Cheney sent thousands of US troops to their deaths based for a war based on a lie. He then awarded billions of dollars in no bid war contracts to his former company Halliburton, of which he is still a major shareholder. He is a war profiteer and lines his wallet with the deaths of heroic Americans through the the policy decisions that he created. If Republicans weren't such irrational partisan hacks, unable to admit the slightest fault in men who created one of the largest policy blunders and in American history, both him and Bush would have been on trial by now.

I hope Cheney rots in hell.



[Edited on March 5, 2007 at 11:36 PM. Reason : .]

3/5/2007 11:34:20 PM

wait, Edwards isn't a faggot?

3/5/2007 11:39:23 PM

jesus greg

don't be a dolt

3/5/2007 11:44:36 PM

lol



I also thought about subbing "edwards" for "tarheel"


in the famous "and all this time I thought tarheel was jsut another word for faggot" quote

3/6/2007 12:09:52 AM

Well, why are you bitching about her telling the truth???

3/6/2007 12:19:01 AM

Quote :

"Cheney sent thousands of US troops to their deaths based for a war based on a lie. He then awarded billions of dollars in no bid war contracts to his former company Halliburton, of which he is still a major shareholder. He is a war profiteer and lines his wallet with the deaths of heroic Americans through the the policy decisions that he created. If Republicans weren't such irrational partisan hacks, unable to admit the slightest fault in men who created one of the largest policy blunders and in American history, both him and Bush would have been on trial by now."

Stop reading the Daily Kos because Cheney doesn't own any Halliburton stock, he sold it years before the war started.

I guess you also hope that every liberal democrat that voted for the war rots in hell too, since they saw the same intelligence that Cheney saw.

3/6/2007 7:16:42 AM

actually they didn't see it all, they saw what the administration chose to show them.


given this.

cheney shouldn't die and bill mahr shouldn't have said that.

though i think he would have had a case to say that cheney should rot in jail and be tried for treason which carries the death penalty.

3/6/2007 7:25:11 AM

he just had a clot in his leg treated...

i hope he gets a bigger fatal clot soon.

3/6/2007 7:36:37 AM