TreeTwista10 minisoldr 148444 Posts user info edit post |
your interest in this conversation is kind of homosexual 5/4/2007 12:50:52 AM |
sarijoul All American 14208 Posts user info edit post |
it's this stupid shit that annoys me about twista. not that i disagree with him often, but this stupid shit.
[Edited on May 4, 2007 at 12:52 AM. Reason : ie the childish back and forth.] 5/4/2007 12:52:04 AM |
TreeTwista10 minisoldr 148444 Posts user info edit post |
yeah its clearly just me
what a surprise, just like sarijoul saw zero fault in the dems in the stubborn iraq war meeting issue, he sees zero fault in troll_schmoe...what a shock! 5/4/2007 12:53:02 AM |
sarijoul All American 14208 Posts user info edit post |
no, they fucked up too. but the difference is that you do this with multiple different people every day. the common denominator is that you're usually involved in this stupid bullshit. 5/4/2007 12:54:08 AM |
TreeTwista10 minisoldr 148444 Posts user info edit post |
every day huh? i'm 'usually' involved huh? more typical sarijoul, but this time its gross overexaggerations instead of and only seeing one side of the issue] 5/4/2007 12:55:37 AM |
sarijoul All American 14208 Posts user info edit post |
see this is me not getting involved in your petty bullshit: you won't see me on here again until at least sunday. later. 5/4/2007 12:57:39 AM |
TreeTwista10 minisoldr 148444 Posts user info edit post |
this is you realizing the analogies of my last two posts pwn you by exposing the bias in your views of politics as well as your views of me personally in TSB
its also a shame that your selective memory fails to see that i was making comments strictly about the thread topic until troll_schmoe started trolling me...but all that shit is in the half of things that you choose not to see] 5/4/2007 12:59:25 AM |
pmcassel All American 1553 Posts user info edit post |
this is good stuff 5/4/2007 1:05:50 AM |
joe_schmoe All American 18758 Posts user info edit post |
TreeTwista brought the retardation and fucked up another thread 5/5/2007 1:32:44 AM |
joe_schmoe All American 18758 Posts user info edit post |
Quote : | "joe_schmoe
bah.
they'll retask him to an Indian Regiment's elephant battalion at the last moment.
you watch." |
it seems i was right.
http://www.cnn.com/2007/WORLD/europe/05/16/iraq.harry/index.html5/16/2007 4:40:11 PM |
Ytsejam All American 2588 Posts user info edit post |
Didn't expect anything different, but why did they let him join the Army in the first place? Somewhat of a joke if they won't let him fight. I thought royalty always served in the Navy anyway... 5/16/2007 10:10:17 PM |
roddy All American 25834 Posts user info edit post |
speaking of homo
5/19/2007 9:08:37 AM |
Smoker4 All American 5364 Posts user info edit post |
Sending Prince Harry to Iraq is a stupid idea. He's a public figure with a symbolic tie to the British system of government.
The British don't get to have it both ways. You can't have a monarchy and not expect its members to be "special" where these matters are concerned. The idea of an egalitarian, integrated, for-show "monarchy" is stupid and self-contradictory, just by the beast's nature.
That one less brave young man can serve in Iraq should be another reason to end it.
And I'll also say -- Harry himself shouldn't be put in any graver danger than his comrades just because the British society decided to pamper him his whole life. The British stuck him with the monarchy, so they have to give him a break -- expecting him to walk out onto a battlefield with a big red target on his back is inhuman and insane. 5/19/2007 8:59:37 PM |