10/26/2007 12:45:12 PM

http://cfn.scout.com/2/557949.html

10/28/2007 5:22:28 PM

ha, VT barely dropped down to #11. After that monumental choke to an overrated BC team, they should have dropped further than that. And Michigan nearly in the top 10 is a fucking joke. You shouldn't get owned by App State and then end up on the verge of breaking the top 10.


[Edited on October 28, 2007 at 5:26 PM. Reason : ]

10/28/2007 5:24:20 PM

Tennessee at 27 is a joke, I can pick 5-6 teams ranked lower than them that would destroy UT the way they are playing right now

[Edited on October 28, 2007 at 5:28 PM. Reason : hah]

10/28/2007 5:27:53 PM

UT has some good wins though. They can play with anyone... well except Bama apparently.

^ p.s. I think it's funny that you respond when I obviously troll.

** Why do the computers love UConn so much? They are like .2200 ahead of Michigan on the computers.

[Edited on October 28, 2007 at 5:29 PM. Reason : x]

10/28/2007 5:29:23 PM

so you really hate fulmer then, yeah?

10/28/2007 5:30:04 PM

ha, Tennessee can beat anyone as long as every break goes their way.

[Edited on October 28, 2007 at 5:34 PM. Reason : ]

10/28/2007 5:30:32 PM

^^^ troll? you just posted a link...



^^ wouldnt say hate, but he just refuses to change/adapt. He basically goes by the belief that the pure talent at UT will beat 85% of the teams out there, and that was true for a long time... but now other teams are coming up (Kentucky, Bama) and the ones that were already good arent sitting pat, they keep adapting (Florida). Its time for new blood.

^ I wish that was true... last night was the first game where we actually got some breaks and still barely won

[Edited on October 28, 2007 at 5:33 PM. Reason : d]

10/28/2007 5:32:38 PM

why do people think playoffs will solve the problem? you really think if we select the top 8 teams for a playoff that teams 9 & 10 won't be saying how they deserve to be in it? and would we stick with the bcs formula to decide the top 8 teams? or do we stick with just 4 teams?

only step needed is a +1 bowl format, problem will be solved as well as it can

10/29/2007 2:35:11 AM

^thats not necessarily true, with the NCAA tourney i dont hear that many people saying team #66 shouldve gotten in (yes you hear it, but its not that big of a deal)

if you are team 9+ you shouldnt have a legitamite shot at a national title. plus they could make it 16 games if they wanted by adding one more game.

nfl football goes til february now, why not have college football go longer?

10/29/2007 3:38:23 AM

Can someone explain to me why Texas is knocking on the door of the Top 10 in the human polls? When they can't even break the Top 23 in the computers?

They aren't even a good team.

[Edited on November 4, 2007 at 12:24 PM. Reason : x]

11/4/2007 12:24:40 PM

Well, it's pretty straight forward now.

WVU wins against Pitt and it's either WVU-Mizzou or WVU-tOSU.

I would not want to be a couch in Morgantown next Saturday...

---------

lol, I guess a 41 point assraping doesn't get it what it used to... 2-loss VT ahead of 2-loss LSU.. huh???

[Edited on November 25, 2007 at 1:21 PM. Reason : WVU is #1 in the coaches...]

11/25/2007 1:18:37 PM

please no osu in the championship

11/25/2007 1:22:42 PM

^What he said. Add WVU to that too though. Their fans are annoying as fuck. I remember them booing every time we touched the ball during our NIT game up there and their fans are rude as fuck. They take over Sammy's in drones and they're on our freakin' campus

11/25/2007 1:25:19 PM

well at least we get to see lsu play hawaii in the sugar bowl

11/25/2007 1:27:02 PM

^^ I always thought that Maryland, WVU and State fans were all pretty similar to be honest. We all get a bad rap but for the most part (and I've been to football or bball -- maryland -- games at all 3) I've really enjoyed all three places. None are snotty like UVa or UNC and they are really passionate about their teams. Nothing wrong with that...

Actually, my worst experience was at Va Tech when I was in high school still.. their fans usually are raved about but they were rude and arrogant and annoying... hmm..

11/25/2007 1:39:13 PM

its not about talent. its about performance and lsu doesn't have the best performance. No way a 2 loss team should be higher than kansas whose only loss is to the #2 team in the nation. They should be right in theh mix with tosu who hasn't played a good team this season. If pitt and mizzou win it should be a possible rematch.

11/25/2007 2:20:53 PM

I predict that the BCS will fuck it up, once again. And I like that. Cause every time the BCS fucks up, it means we are one year closer to a legitimate championship system

11/25/2007 2:55:12 PM

http://www.adultswim.com/video/?episodeID=8a25c392167bf53f01167c7fabae0005

11/26/2007 6:54:46 PM

that is incredible

11/26/2007 6:56:44 PM

haha. carl ftw

11/26/2007 7:25:10 PM

Quote :

"And Michigan nearly in the top 10 is a fucking joke. You shouldn't get owned by App State and then end up on the verge of breaking the top 10."

11/27/2007 10:37:27 AM

Bob Stoops: "Every conference should play a conference championship game. It makes it unfair in the BCS."

No Bob, the only reason your dumbass conference plays a conference championship game is a money grab. No different than how every conference except the Ivy League has a basketball tournament. It's not to determine the best team in the conference, the regular season already determined that, it's all about the money. So why doesn't the Big 12 just play more conference games to determine the best team in the conference? I know why, just state it.

11/27/2007 6:49:53 PM