Manwich for 2.

(Is it sad that my first "2" is this?)

3/6/2008 4:45:23 PM

No, it just means you're watching this thread intently.

3/6/2008 4:46:50 PM

It was completely by accident, actually. (note the ghost edit)

3/6/2008 4:48:09 PM

The answer is B.

Like I said, I was in college. I wouldn't do it now. I was so sheltered in high school that when I got to college I was like 'OMG COCK!' and I'm pretty sure I only had intercourse with one and oral with the other....

3/6/2008 4:51:46 PM

Quote :

"in your eyes"

If a guy was with two girls, you wouldn't call him a dirty slut.

3/6/2008 4:52:39 PM

in your eyes we wouldnt

3/6/2008 4:53:44 PM

Quote :

"Do you fantasize about or have you engaged in a sexual encounter with more than one male partner? Question for the guys: Do you believe that a girl having such thoughts or having engaged in such behavior makes her a "slut", "whore", or of loose values?"

WTF?

no.

3/6/2008 4:58:30 PM

Quote :

"and I'm pretty sure I only had intercourse with one and oral with the other..."

haha, pretty sure

sounds memorable.

3/6/2008 5:05:30 PM

exactly....that's my point.

3/6/2008 5:08:35 PM

Quote :

"being with more than one guy at her own consent and discretion shouldn't make her a whore."

Or a slut

Or the type you interact with only for sex.

3/6/2008 5:09:20 PM

Quote :

"Getting paid for sex makes her a whore. Now is she a slut? Beauty is in the eye of the beholder. The real question is, should she care if someone finds her behavior slutty / whorish? If she does, then perhaps that suggests she herself was not completely comfortable with said acts and did so out of a shallow need for attention. If she is comfortable, perhaps this indicates an insecurity on the man's part with his own sexuality. What is important, is that any photographs of sexual acts involving multiple hot females be posted on this website in a timely manner. "

hahahahah i like you.

3/6/2008 5:10:43 PM

^^^because of drugs/alcohol? or because it didn't hold any meaning?

[Edited on March 6, 2008 at 5:16 PM. Reason : 0]

3/6/2008 5:11:14 PM

Because it was basically like having sex with one dude and blowing the other guy...It's not like they were giving it to me in my ass and vag at the same time or anything....

3/6/2008 5:52:16 PM

Here's something to consider.


DO you believe that the anatomical physicality of sex by gender should have any bearing on whether a man or a woman is a slut?


A crude metaphor perhaps. Which is more used. A hammer which has constantly hammered away. Or a board with a bunch of nails hammered into it?

3/6/2008 6:02:10 PM

board with a bunch of nails in it is useless

3/6/2008 6:08:42 PM

Quote :

"DO you believe that the anatomical physicality of sex by gender should have any bearing on whether a man or a woman is a slut?"

If you do, then you're fundamentally perpetuating a double standard against women.

3/6/2008 6:46:46 PM

Hey, I wondered when you would rear that ugly hollow head of yours

3/6/2008 6:48:41 PM

I've posted in this thread before, so I don't know why you're only commenting now.

And , you're just trying to justify whatever fucked-up thing you have against some chick you wish you were banging.

[Edited on March 6, 2008 at 6:50 PM. Reason : .]

3/6/2008 6:49:13 PM

so in the question still furshia quoted, it said men or women...so whats this double standard against women come in?

3/6/2008 6:53:12 PM

Think whatever you will of me, you hairy, lesbian, feminazi.

Not everything in the world comes down to the evilness of men and their attempts to enslave and torture the female gender.

3/6/2008 6:54:49 PM

I didn't say it did. I just said that if you SERIOUSLY judge the sexes differently when it comes to promiscuity (e.g., women are "sluts" for this behavior whereas men wouldn't be), then you're being sexist. Just so you know.

[Edited on March 6, 2008 at 7:04 PM. Reason : And it's sweet of you to resort to namecalling when you feel threatened.]

3/6/2008 6:57:15 PM

nvm

[Edited on March 6, 2008 at 6:58 PM. Reason : she was stating the obvious...i was looking for a more deep meaning]

3/6/2008 6:58:20 PM

Be dead honest with me StillFuschia


The boys on the playgrounds never wanted to chase you or pay any attention to you did they?

You thought, "Fuck them, I'm the ugly duckling who will one day blossom into a beautiful swan. Then they'll be sorry!"


That day never came did it.

Then you thought, I'm going to read so many books and be so smart! Smart is sexy!

Unfortunately, you were wrong again.

3/6/2008 7:05:55 PM

she's what you call a "starter girl"

3/6/2008 7:07:07 PM

Quote :

"Smart is sexy! "

correct!

3/6/2008 7:07:41 PM

^^As in once you starter talking the bitch will never shut up?

3/6/2008 7:08:28 PM

Hahahahahaha, I love it when people just go straight for the low blows instead of actually responding to the point I made. But at least I've got a boyfriend and don't have to worry about all these "sluts" you're having issues with.

3/6/2008 7:08:39 PM

Quote :

"at least I've got a boyfriend"

Congrats Gloria Steinem, you just validated yourself by the ability to have a man. Nice that you can be a possession!


I guarantee he's with you because he can't pull anything better.

3/6/2008 7:09:59 PM

not quite

kind of like when you first start playing the guitar....you don't go out and buy the nicest one....you get a starter

3/6/2008 7:10:10 PM

3/6/2008 7:10:55 PM

I didn't need him to validate my existence. I'm just pointing out that I'm not a man-hater or lesbian.

But you're having such a crisis with women that you needed a whole thread to talk about what sluts they are! Good for you! You'll certainly land one with an attitude like that... if you can.

[Edited on March 6, 2008 at 7:15 PM. Reason : Maybe one of the ones who enjoys being treated like shit.]

3/6/2008 7:13:15 PM

Quote :

"You'll certainly land one with an attitude like that... if you can."

You are once again stating there is a correlation between validation and having a significant other, in essence deriving self worth from having one. By doing so you are yet again being a hypocrite.

Second, you don't know the kind of women I associate with. Right now I'm sleeping with a nurse, and a college student. Two well read and well educated women. Your generalizations and pre conceived notions continue to weaken your already precarious stance.


Lastly, do not attempt to debate me. My swinging dick and Y chromosome make me more intelligent than you could ever hope to be. Don't worry your little head with opinions and debates, just go bake a cake or something, honey. You can't really land a worthwhile guy being an over opinionated fugly. But the proverb does state the way to a man's heart is through his stomach.

I am not being condescending or hurtful, actually benevolent by imparting such worthwhile advice to you.

3/6/2008 7:19:49 PM

I don't understand why a lot of men would put a 'not the marrying type' label on a girl for something like that - and more over, Most of the men saying that likely have 4 times the number of women chalked up at the foot of their bed.

Is this one of those cases where you feel it's bad because of something you did, or are you seriously just judging the chick for her choices?
(Yes, that was a serious question)

I suppose my real reason for asking is that being out of college for quite some time now, few of my gal pals would bring up too many college experiences into their current relationships... and their BF's are the same way - - but the ones who have the over-jealous and insecure type BFs that say they can't trust them are more often because of things they have done themselves and assume the worst in others. The girl in many cases really hasn't done much wrong at all (esp. in comparison).




[/ramble]

3/6/2008 7:25:13 PM

^thanks for the thoughtful reply

The question I posed in the initial post was more of me musing on a thread made by another poster rather than based on personal experience.

3/6/2008 7:26:34 PM

Quote :

"You are once again stating there is a correlation between validation and having a significant other, in essence deriving self worth from having one. By doing so you are yet again being a hypocrite."

No, I'm pointing out that I can be happy and as ugly as I like whereas you are apparently having issues with what you're trying to criticize me of. Namely, being too ugly to ever be attractive to guys, which my entire self worth should be based on, right?! Of course not. Again, I only pointed that out because I'm not a lesbian or man-hater, which you accused me of. I just thought it was funny that you pointed the finger at me when you're the one who made the thread, most likely because you're self-conscious about one of those women fantasizing about having more than one guy. That's not insecure at all.

Quote :

"Second, you don't know the kind of women I associate with. Right now I'm sleeping with a nurse, and a college student. Two well read and well educated women. Your generalizations and pre conceived notions continue to weaken your already precarious stance."

I said nothing about the women you were fucking. Interesting you'd bother posting this thread if you yourself were fucking two women and somehow want to judge women who want more than one guy.

Quote :

"Lastly, do not attempt to debate me. My swinging dick and Y chromosome make me more intelligent than you could ever hope to be. Don't worry your little head with opinions and debates, just go bake a cake or something, honey. You can't really land a worthwhile guy being an over opinionated fugly. But the proverb does state the way to a man's heart is through his stomach."

hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha

[Edited on March 6, 2008 at 7:31 PM. Reason : ,]

3/6/2008 7:30:00 PM

Look how riled up you get at the thought of being a lesbian. I smell repression

3/6/2008 7:33:20 PM

That's weird, I smell manslut.

3/6/2008 7:35:18 PM

Quote :

"Most of the men saying that likely say that they have 4 times the number of women chalked up at the foot of their bed."

fixed that for you.

also, regarding this whole idea: lenny bruce said something to the effect of "you want a prostitute in the bedroom and a nun in public." it's completely ridiculous to expect to get both. men who require that of women are just insecure in their ability to keep said woman.

[Edited on March 6, 2008 at 7:43 PM. Reason : duh]

3/6/2008 7:43:07 PM

and if you look closely, this here is a ménage à trois



[Edited on March 6, 2008 at 7:51 PM. Reason : ménage à trois]

3/6/2008 7:46:41 PM

Quote :

"lenny bruce said something to the effect of "you want a prostitute in the bedroom and a nun in public." it's completely ridiculous to expect to get both. men who require that of women are just insecure in their ability to keep said woman."

not really. i've had relationships in the past that were like that. lady on the street, freak in the bed. that's the marrying type.

[Edited on March 6, 2008 at 7:54 PM. Reason : f]

3/6/2008 7:54:37 PM

Quote :

"not really. i've had relationships in the past that were like that. lady on the street, freak in the bed. that's the marrying type. "

3/7/2008 10:08:28 AM