"bush's third term">>>>ayers

4/18/2008 1:08:50 PM

Quote :

"^ So you want the majority opinion to rule? "

I'm not one of the classmates at whatever school for retards you went to - this shit doesn't work with me. I was very clear when I posted what I posted.

hooksaw: ^SO YOU MEAN BLAH BLAH BLAH SOMETHING COMPLETELY DIFFERENT, BECAUSE I'M A A DUMB REDNECK AND CAN'T UNDERSTAND!

4/18/2008 1:09:12 PM

Meanwhile--back to reality--let's recap, shall we?

Quote :

"Yeah, soemone [sic] who goes against the grain, and just doesn't give a fuck about public opinion, and completely dismisses the fact that this country is supposed to be a democracy."

herpball

So I asked a simple question. I mean, which part of "public opinion" do you think he was referring to--the minority?

Quote :

"^ So you want the majority opinion to rule?"

hooksaw

Then, you brought nothing to the discussion except idiocy--as usual (hence the "Tard" label). I simply posed a question, which was not answered and that's no surprise.

Quote :

"So you if he's not on one extreme, he must be on the other? Do you have any concept of rational debate?"

Boone-Tard

And he concluded with this trinket, which has nothing to do with anything.

Quote :

"I'm not one of the classmates at whatever school for retards you went to - this shit doesn't work with me. I was very clear when I posted what I posted. hooksaw: ^SO YOU MEAN BLAH BLAH BLAH SOMETHING COMPLETELY DIFFERENT, BECAUSE I'M A A [sic] DUMB REDNECK AND CAN'T UNDERSTAND!"

herpball

So I'll try again:

Quote :

"So you want the majority opinion to rule?"

[Edited on April 18, 2008 at 2:47 PM. Reason : .]

4/18/2008 2:46:37 PM

If you can't "extract" the meaning from my post - go shoot yourself. I'm not letting you put words in my mouth. Maybe that shit works with your retard redneck buddies, but not me.

4/18/2008 2:49:12 PM

^ You don't know me. And it just so happens that I'm not a "redneck"--GG on the stereotyping.

BTW, I have a question for you:

Quote :

"So you want the majority opinion to rule?"

4/18/2008 2:55:42 PM

I don't want any "opinion" to rule, you fucking retard

4/18/2008 2:58:50 PM

^ Then, could you explain your post, goon:

Quote :

"Yeah, soemone [sic] who goes against the grain, and just doesn't give a fuck about public opinion, and completely dismisses the fact that this country is supposed to be a democracy."

herpball

Which part of public opinion do you want "someone" to "give a fuck about"?

[Edited on April 18, 2008 at 3:03 PM. Reason : .]

4/18/2008 3:01:46 PM

I didn't say anything about any opinion ruling anybody - that was your ignorant redneck logic letting in the way. If you can't understand my post, admit ignorance and move on. I'm not going to fit my thoughts into your twisted redneck words.

4/18/2008 3:08:59 PM

^

Quote :

"Which part of public opinion do you want 'someone' to 'give a fuck about'?"

Simple question.

4/18/2008 3:11:33 PM

hooksaw

Quote :

"You don't know me. And it just so happens that I'm not a "redneck"--GG on the stereotyping."

seriously!!??

4/18/2008 3:12:16 PM

^ Just trying to set the record straight. And in this exchange, you choose to object to that?!

How about he just answers the simple questions?

4/18/2008 3:15:43 PM

I don't have to answer your dumb-ass questions just because your simple mind couldn't comprehend my statement. That question DOESN'T EVEN MAKE SENSE as asked. You think you can catch me in one of the simplest of rhetorical traps (which in the end would still make you out to be an idiot). By me answer your nonsensical question, i'd be giving validity to your specious question.

4/18/2008 3:20:41 PM

^ LOL. You seem frustrated--maybe you should rest, take a nerve pill or something.

Or return to your homeland:

4/18/2008 3:23:51 PM

^^^I don't necessarily object to it so much as find it funny given your left-wing moonbat, elitist laced tirades.

most people, dems and repubs alike are, many times, guilty of the very behavior they condem.

[Edited on April 18, 2008 at 3:24 PM. Reason : .]

4/18/2008 3:23:54 PM

Quote :

"^ LOL. You seem frustrated"

LOL you lose, faggot

4/18/2008 3:25:35 PM

^ Return to your homeland, goon:

4/18/2008 3:30:18 PM

Hillary made a good point the other day when responding to complaints that the debate was "too tough." She said that, having been in the White House for eight years helped her. I think she still has a lot to hide and she is still willing to say anything to get elected, but I think that the media has been on a Obama Love Fest for so long that they haven't gotten into scrutinizing his past. And, because he hasn't done anything worthwhile in the Senate, all we have to look at (as far as making a determination as to how he will run the country if elected) is his past.

We know Clinton's past. We've seen all (or most of) the skeletons in her closet.

Which brings up another question: If the things in her past weren't brought up 18 years ago, but today, do you think she would have ANY chance of being elected?

4/18/2008 8:06:50 PM