Quote :

"Golovko is just being a flaming douchebag. He makes shitty flash sites, though, so I guess that gives him the right. "

yeah...i don't actually do flash sites. I've done 1 flash site and it was to their budget. Try again, burt.

4/21/2008 4:49:40 PM

Also, I'd like to point out that Golovko's douchebaggery is a bit hypocritical for a guy who only a year ago figured out that you could design page layouts without using tables.

[Edited on April 21, 2008 at 4:54 PM. Reason : ]

4/21/2008 4:54:02 PM

incorrect again. I've known about CSS layout design for a while, just never bothered to learn it myself. I didn't, however, make a thread saying "omg did you guys know you can design websites without tables!!!?!?!?!"

fail 2. lets see if you can get a third.

4/21/2008 5:35:24 PM

you must be a pretty big loser in real life to still be posting in this thread

4/21/2008 5:37:02 PM

you people

wait.

[Edited on April 21, 2008 at 5:41 PM. Reason : you can design webpages without tables?]

4/21/2008 5:39:14 PM

wow, I've been doing these since highschool.

4/21/2008 5:39:16 PM

My point was that you fairly recently made this post:

Quote :

"Golovko TURBO 22077 Posts user info edit post ^what are some of the pluses and minus? i've been using tables for layout design and the code usuall gets really lengthy and confusing without comments. Also I have found it doesn't always work the way I indented with different browsers. also, i figure it would require less code if I hvae one external style sheet with the layout definitions thats being used through out every page on the site. So i don't have to have repeated code etc. Oh and browser compatibility, again, is my main reason for wanting to learn more CSS. Plus i've seen some really cool things done with CSS. such as accordion navigation, tabbed navigation etc. 5/18/2007 11:45:18 AM"

which says a lot about your experience in web design and the value of that limited experience. No one was a douchebag when you were practically clueless about things that most people picked up eons ago. You started separating content from layout a year ago and you're repeatedly being a dick to a guy who doesn't seem to be too far from where you were then.

[Edited on April 21, 2008 at 5:44 PM. Reason : ]

4/21/2008 5:41:05 PM

^^well in fairness, if these did become supported in 2000, i had already graduated high school 2 years earlier

4/21/2008 5:41:26 PM

^^thats not even remotely the same. thanks for playing, burt. oh and thanks for the nut massage.

4/21/2008 6:53:32 PM

lol at golovko calling out somebody for their analogies

4/21/2008 7:08:24 PM

what's an icon?

4/21/2008 7:13:51 PM

well i just upgraded my dos 5.0 by installing something called windows and supposedly icons are visual representations used to run exe, com, bat and pif files among others...that windows is hard to learn though...got some corded input peripheral doohicky you're supposed to click

4/21/2008 7:16:25 PM

smoke weed everyday...

4/21/2008 7:19:00 PM

4/21/2008 7:31:00 PM

i might not've known what tags setup the favorite icon but at least i knew you could make webpages without tables...i do at least pay attention to things that affect the look of the webpage even if i was ignorant to something that strictly affected address bar / bookmarks appearance

4/21/2008 7:34:27 PM

i appreciate your attempt to share some knowledge, but it just didn't work out this time. let it go man, let it go.

4/21/2008 7:41:09 PM

i've let that go hours ago, thanks, i'm simply responding to golovko's douchebaggery now

4/21/2008 7:44:01 PM

Quote :

"incorrect again. I've known about CSS layout design for a while, just never bothered to learn it myself."

smoke weed everyday

4/21/2008 8:49:35 PM

smoke enough to beat your time in the cargo ship mockup

4/21/2008 10:59:43 PM

TWW thread of the week

this thread delivers

epic [fail]

10/10

the cake is a lie

dell dude got arrested

etc

4/21/2008 11:16:49 PM