Quote :

"two different shoe producers independently arrived at a similar design for inexpensive yet durable shoes"

lol...chuck taylor's have been out since 1917

i'm sure it was pure coincidence that their shoes look exactly like chuck taylors

probably has nothing to do with trying to capitalize on the current non-conformist market, some of whom already wear chuck taylors

must be a coincidence though..."Chuck's have been out 90 years? I've never seen them, these are our original shoe design, designed completely independent of anything Converse might've started making 90 years ago"

4/28/2008 11:54:00 AM

4/28/2008 11:55:54 AM

i don't think 392 has ever said anything that hasn't turned a thread into a shit storm

4/28/2008 12:11:10 PM

Saving my allowance for a pair

4/28/2008 12:31:29 PM

$10 for the shoes $90 for the little logo...

i think im gonna get some rainbows and cut off the label

(it's damn hard to find cloth top (thin) flip flops that aren't super shitty, my old cheapass pair from 2000 are still kickin' but it's time to replace them...)

[Edited on April 28, 2008 at 12:51 PM. Reason : s]

4/28/2008 12:48:53 PM

Quote :

"those shoes are perfect for scrumps because hes a 30 something faggot with no taste "

hahahaha.

thanks, sk8k8lover

4/28/2008 3:19:17 PM

no prob

4/28/2008 3:26:55 PM

oh, and yeah i guess i did see this on a facebook ad, you got me...

man, i really hate facebooks but

anybody know where i can buy these retail?

4/28/2008 7:47:22 PM