2 many posts by slowblack96 and too many Mustangs in general /thread

5/4/2008 3:07:35 PM

Quote :

"maybe you can explain the quality of tbi and quaduapuke carbs too while you are on a little rant homo. FAIL"

what would you like explained? crossfire (twin tb's) was every bit as reliable as anything else from that era, and was actually quite an advanced method of fuel injection at the time of its introduction. i don't know why you're even mentioning quadrajets, since they weren't even offered on corvettes after 1981. if you want to talk about it though, from a performance and reliability standpoint the quadrajet is hands down one of the best carbs ever made. it's only retards like you that don't know how to tune them that put them down.

Quote :

"post #1 in thread"

thanks for proving my point and quoting where you brought it up. you're the one that mentioned camaros, you're the one that posted a picture of a 3rd gen., you're the one that rambled about a non existent 4 cylinder, and you're the one that's attempted to compare a turbo 2.3 mustang to a corvette. you keep trying to change the subject, and you keep getting owned. what other dumb comments and comparisons would you like to make?

Quote :

"READERING"

seriously?

5/4/2008 9:14:55 PM

this should actually say arguing with retards is well, retarded..but I couldn't find that one







[Edited on May 4, 2008 at 9:47 PM. Reason : asdf]

5/4/2008 9:46:25 PM

Quote :

" Slowretard: haha i remember stomping a hole in your EVO when i only had heads on my 20 year old car. hahaha"

uh...i don't remember you from VIR? When did you 'stomp a hole' in my Evo?

5/4/2008 11:06:30 PM

HEY GUYZ, THE CHRYSLER 225 IS A 2.25 LITER LOL

5/5/2008 3:05:19 AM

OMG DOES THAT MEAN A VETTE ONLY HAS A 3.5L

GUYZ I THINK I GOT RIPPED OFF

5/5/2008 7:42:37 AM

Quote :

"Through extensive douchebag networking, a random douchebag always knows some other douchebag who is a friend of a douchebag with an Evo that runs single digits in the quarter mile. This information is bogus, and often imparted by a douchebag trying to impress non-douchebags about a hyped up douchemobile that he doesn't own."

don't take it as a personal attack i just find the wording funny. the evo is obviously a very capable car.

5/5/2008 7:54:52 AM

imo i think an fbody (specifically the more recent trans am's) would pull more punani than a mustang, stock for stock

5/5/2008 8:30:06 AM

there is a Dale Jarrett edition? Don't get me wrong, DJ is a good guy, but does he really deserve his own Mustang?


And, ironically, the P-51A had a completely anemic Allison power plant. It wasn't until the P-51B got the RR Merlin that it's potential as a fighter became apparent. Roush could have done better. Besides, its ugly.

5/5/2008 8:55:12 AM

^^^^nah, it's actually 3.48 liter gallons of milk!!11

^^^haha. check out this guy running 13's and talking shit.




[Edited on May 11, 2008 at 11:57 AM. Reason : psi]

5/5/2008 9:23:19 AM

^13's is what stock evo's run.

8's is what Buschar's Evo runs.

5/5/2008 9:43:05 AM

yeah, i know... just funny to hear that guy saying fords suck when he's running 13's. ricers. that one also isn't stock.

ams is well into the 8's also. who's got the record now? last i saw ams had the et and buschur had the mph...

[Edited on May 5, 2008 at 10:07 AM. Reason : .]

5/5/2008 10:06:31 AM

Quote :

"FORDS ARE THE RULERS OF THE PLANET. "

This coming from someone who apparently had a built 5.0 that barely ran high 12s before he drove it into something solid.

[Edited on May 5, 2008 at 10:26 AM. Reason : /]

5/5/2008 10:25:38 AM

^^personally I hate drag racing. Its for rednecks and ricers with civics running 16's.

the last good thing to come out of FORD was the assembly line.

[Edited on May 5, 2008 at 10:44 AM. Reason : .]

5/5/2008 10:43:43 AM

have you ever driven anything reasonably fast? it doesn't really compare. i'd hate it/be bored also in a stockish rsx/sti/evo.

5/5/2008 10:56:48 AM

^yes, i've actually driven an STi and Evo reasonably fast around a track. I'm sorry that you rednecks don't have the attention span to watching anything that doesn't involve going in a straight line or turning left

5/5/2008 12:40:05 PM

you want to call me a redneck, when you're the one being ignorant? lawl. the subject was drag racing, i never said anything about road courses. i'm sorry that all the gel in your hair has seeped into your head and blocked logical thought.

in case i need to make it clearer, if you've never DRAG RACED anything faster than that your opinion is unfounded and useless. that'd be like taking a lifted 4wd truck to a hpde and writing it off as stupid/boring in general.

why you brought up circle track racing, i have no idea but it takes a longer attention span to watch a car go fast/turn left for hours than anything else. maybe you meant mental capacity? i personally lack the desire to watch any kind of sanctioned racing on tv, so it's whatever.

5/5/2008 2:01:49 PM

Quote :

" KENNY BELL COBRA"

that is all

5/5/2008 2:10:53 PM

^^i agree....

i'll watch f1 but in super fast i recorded this earlier and am just looking for pit strategies and highlights mode...

[Edited on May 5, 2008 at 2:12 PM. Reason : carrots are yummy]

5/5/2008 2:11:38 PM

Quote :

"you want to call me a redneck, when you're the one being ignorant? lawl. the subject was drag racing, i never said anything about road courses. i'm sorry that all the gel in your hair has seeped into your head and blocked logical thought. in case i need to make it clearer, if you've never DRAG RACED anything faster than that your opinion is unfounded and useless. that'd be like taking a lifted 4wd truck to a hpde and writing it off as stupid/boring in general. why you brought up circle track racing, i have no idea but it takes a longer attention span to watch a car go fast/turn left for hours than anything else. maybe you meant mental capacity? i personally lack the desire to watch any kind of sanctioned racing on tv, so it's whatever."

the subject was fast. You brought in drag racing because you ignorant rednecks think thats the definition of 'fast'

and a 4wd truck at an HPDE is the equivalent to a bicycle at a drag strip. NOT an evo/sti at a drag strip

and on that note...unless you are running under 10's. Anything you bring to the table isn't going to feel any different from an STi/Evo running 12's-13's. Which no one here has a car that can do that....so again you have no point.

I'm sure a Buschar Evo running 8's feels decent enough on a drag strip

5/5/2008 2:15:45 PM

I don't even know what you two are arguing about but since you thought that one evo picture had a quad turbo setup when it was just a nice equal length big turbo manifold i doubt your argument holds any weight or actual automotive knowledge.

5/5/2008 2:20:37 PM

Quote :

" the subject was fast. You brought in drag racing because you ignorant rednecks think thats the definition of 'fast'."

it pretty much is. im sorry your foreign shit cant take the abuse of clutch dumping and speed shifting. and the overall abuse of ragging a car out for 150K miles and back and forth to the track every weekend

[Edited on May 5, 2008 at 2:47 PM. Reason : ha i forgot about quad turbos]

5/5/2008 2:45:32 PM

without reading this thread i'm assuming the foreigners are correct and the americans probably think they are correct

5/5/2008 2:52:23 PM

thank you cumloaded

5/5/2008 2:58:11 PM

Quote :

"it pretty much is. im sorry your foreign shit cant take the abuse of clutch dumping and speed shifting. and the overall abuse of ragging a car out for 150K miles and back and forth to the track every weekend"

lol? Did you just bring quality to the table in defense of your POS?

5/5/2008 3:01:48 PM

^ you forgot former....
and you drive a Mitsubishi.... so i wouldn't bring quality to the table there either.

I drive a jeep... i too cannot bring quality to the table...


[Edited on May 5, 2008 at 3:10 PM. Reason : .]

5/5/2008 3:09:58 PM

^i wasn't bringing quality to the table. I was bringing all-around performance. The only thing slowbacks mustang was good for is pruning trees.

and the other thing he mentioned was that he some how raced me before? lol? the only time i've seen his POS car was when it was depreciating my property value parked in my neighborhood.

[Edited on May 5, 2008 at 3:13 PM. Reason : .]

5/5/2008 3:11:12 PM

Quote :

"the subject was fast. You brought in drag racing because you ignorant rednecks think thats the definition of 'fast'"

wrong. drag racing is hardly the definition of fast, and not my opinion at all. technically, i was responding to Quinn and you decided you wanted to chime in. i'm not the one placing any labels on anything.

a stockish sti/evo running low 13's or high 12's is not entertaining on a drag strip, and i can definitely see how you would perceive drag racing as boring and useless if that's all you've been in. the difference to a 9, 10, or even 11 second car is HUGE. not to mention the associated evils if piloting a true street car that quick on dot's, stock style suspension, etc. it can be a real handful. i'd be happy to let you drive my car for a pass sometime if you'd like to experience it for yourself. seriously.

at least we can all agree that slowblack is a dumbass...

5/5/2008 4:59:57 PM

i can tell you this.

my honda is the definition of fast.

5/5/2008 5:30:21 PM

^^well thats what i'm saying. Dragging street cars is dull and boring. Although watching drag racing on TV is dull and boring but i'm sure sitting in one of those things is fun. But to me it would get old and boring too fast. all that time and effort adds up to 8 seconds of thrill.

and yes, slowback is a dumbass.

5/5/2008 5:33:46 PM

Quote :

"Through extensive douchebag networking, a random douchebag always knows some other douchebag who is a friend of a douchebag with an Evo that runs single digits in the quarter mile. This information is bogus, and often imparted by a douchebag trying to impress non-douchebags about a hyped up douchemobile that he doesn't own."

Quote :

"8's is what Buschar's Evo runs."

Quote :

"I'm sure a Buschar Evo running 8's feels decent enough on a drag strip "

hahahaaa



honestly though I would be happy if my car ran a 15

[Edited on May 5, 2008 at 6:17 PM. Reason : ]

5/5/2008 6:17:15 PM

^for us that don't share your sense of humor. care to point out the funny?

5/5/2008 7:07:33 PM

Quote :

"uh...i don't remember you from VIR? When did you 'stomp a hole' in my Evo? "

vir is the new gorman. you wanted to race me.

why are you even in here. i might be a dumbass but this is a ford thread.

5/6/2008 1:42:38 PM

^the new gorman? WTF are you smoking? you are a fucking retard.


Street racing is for dumbass retards that enjoy wrapping their cars around trees. I stick to the track.

[Edited on May 6, 2008 at 3:31 PM. Reason : .]

5/6/2008 3:30:50 PM

Quote :

"dumbass retards that enjoy wrapping their cars around trees"

That explains it

5/6/2008 3:33:27 PM

^^ I concur, even though running with an EVO IX (not stock) on the highway was pretty cool. I don't think he expected a 944 to stay right there with him

But for cereal, keep that shit off the streets


[Edited on May 6, 2008 at 3:41 PM. Reason : just realized how little power a stock evo IX has... hmm.]

5/6/2008 3:34:56 PM

^that may be, but they hold their own very well.

[Edited on May 6, 2008 at 4:04 PM. Reason : ]

5/6/2008 4:04:41 PM

^^yeah, evo's are incredible all around performance cars on most any surface. 4 doors and a trunk to boot. strictly straight line monsters they are not. however, relatively little investment can help that a lot.

"real" street racing is a lot different than the fast and the furious shit most people are used to though.

Quote :

"i might be a dumbass but this is a ford thread."

you're the one that took it off subject in the first place talking about camaros. durrrr.

5/6/2008 4:38:10 PM

Drag racing has a lot to do with pride in what you built too..

Sure you can drive around a track but I'm willing to bet you have no clue how to setup a car (Golovko).

Also i think you're drag racing speed threshold is way off too... look into a magazine and you'll find most "supercars" run somewhere in the 11s.... you don't have to run 10s to feel fast and in that range every few tenths feels like a completely different car (mainly because it requires a significant amount of power increase or weight loss or suspension work to gain a couple 10ths)

5/6/2008 4:52:56 PM

Quote :

"Sure you can drive around a track but I'm willing to bet you have no clue how to setup a car (Golovko). "

I can do certain things on my own car...so whats your point? I'm willing to bet you can't drive around a track among 1000 other things. This has always been a weak argument. Not everyone wants to be a mechanic.

I can find my way around the simple things like changing fluids, brake pads/rotors. Replacing a few gaskets, suspension etc...

5/6/2008 5:04:27 PM

Its not a call out or a dig... i'm just saying... sure its a different kind of feeling.... drag racers tend to be proud of what they built track day people tend to be arrogant about their skillz. I can't setup a car for track situations either... but i plan to learn.

p.s. driving an evo around a track fast is like a kid with training wheels proud that he can stay up right on his bike. (thiiiss is a dig)

5/6/2008 5:32:52 PM

Quote :

"p.s. driving an evo around a track fast is like a kid with training wheels proud that he can stay up right on his bike. (thiiiss is a dig)"

and the trap is set.

5/6/2008 5:56:13 PM

oh geez not again.

you guys need to just shut up and stop talking about the differences between different motor sports.

WTH, putting brake pads, susp and gas in a car doesnt really equate to "setting it up for the track (or strip)"

the guy who can dial in susp. settings on a track car probably cant dial in launch settings on a drag car.

so who cares.

quit trying to act like one sport is superior to the other. they both take an ungodly amount of skill to get them right.

every single one of us on here can take our cars from the strip to the track and vice versa without really any difference in mods/tweaks. (ok, maybe change a couple tires, but still)

5/6/2008 6:14:10 PM

Quote :

"^^yeah, evo's are incredible all around performance cars on most any surface. 4 doors and a trunk to boot. strictly straight line monsters they are not. however, relatively little investment can help that a lot. "

Don't get me wrong, I know for a fact that even a stock Evo IX with a sensible driver behind the wheel would kill me at an auto-x or road course since I'm still running on 20 year old suspension components and my front koni struts have seen the last of their days. (It won't stay like that forever of course ). I just thought that it would have more power than what I saw. It was a clean looking car with aftermarket exhaust,blow off valve, and who knows what other goodies under the hood. I wasn't about to think for a minute that it was stock when we were both on the highway. Especially after seeing videos of 600+rwhp evo's out there...


^ftw.

[Edited on May 6, 2008 at 6:22 PM. Reason : .]

5/6/2008 6:21:14 PM

Quote :

", putting brake pads, susp and gas in a car doesnt really equate to "setting it up for the track (or strip)"

WTH, no one said that either...

5/6/2008 7:56:24 PM

Quote :

"[quote] KENNY BELL COBRA"

that is all[/quote]

Its KENNE BELL, not kenny bell, i dont know why but that bothers me so much

5/7/2008 2:41:31 AM

haha, even other mustang guys think he's an idiot. that's rough.

5/7/2008 2:43:00 AM

Quote :

"shmorri2p.s. driving an evo around a track fast is like a kid with training wheels proud that he can stay up right on his bike. (thiiiss is a dig) "

have u seen Golovko drive? obviously not.



[Edited on May 7, 2008 at 9:37 AM. Reason : .]

5/7/2008 9:36:40 AM

^explain to me why my username was used there... Does not compute...

5/7/2008 9:53:29 AM

oops, i got my fucking S'S confused

5/7/2008 10:42:45 AM