deux

9/2/2008 10:05:09 PM

Sarah Palin is NOT Hillary Clinton
http://www.new.facebook.com/home.php#/group.php?gid=22583199522

Between the image that Palin is against women's rights & Hillary is for them, they stand opposed to each other on almost all the issues, and the likelihood that Hillary will be offered a position in the Obama-Biden administration, I don't think Palin will take many Hillary voters.

9/2/2008 10:17:36 PM

Secretary of State

11/13/2008 11:08:37 PM

hello, welcome to two months ago. HRC is not going to take any position in the Obama administration. only a dunce would think she'd accept Sec of State under Obama.

11/14/2008 3:22:42 AM

Since a lot of people like to focus on the statistics this election they should just research every position, find out which gender/ethnicity has never held the position, and dole out assignments accordingly. Get it all out of the way this year.

11/14/2008 7:51:03 AM

Quote :

"hello, welcome to two months ago. HRC is not going to take any position in the Obama administration. only a dunce would think she'd accept Sec of State under Obama."

bump

11/21/2008 3:08:13 PM

that was cold

11/21/2008 3:11:30 PM

pwnt

11/21/2008 3:39:13 PM

She would be a great Secretary of State

She would make a mockery of the court as a Supreme Court Justice.

11/21/2008 4:04:14 PM

Quote :

"hello, welcome to two months ago. HRC is not going to take any position in the Obama administration. only a dunce would think she'd accept Sec of State under Obama."

word has it she just accepted. I guess Obamas idea of change is a bunch of old Clinton hacks

11/21/2008 4:15:53 PM

^ wow really?

that's newwwws to me

11/21/2008 4:26:44 PM

LAWLZ

11/21/2008 4:28:33 PM

haha ... did i really say that?




but, there's actually a constitutional obstacle to her taking the position, last i heard.

Quote :

"Even if the vetting problems involving former president Bill Clinton's finances can be resolved, Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton may face another roadblock on her way to the secretary of state's chair. It's called the Constitution of the United States, specifically, Article One, Section Six, also known as the emoluments clause. ("Emoluments" means things like salaries.) It says that no member of Congress, during the term for which he was elected, shall be named to any office "the emoluments whereof shall have been increased during his term." This applies, we're advised, whether the member actually voted on the raises or not. In Clinton's case, during her current term in the Senate, which began in January 2007, cabinet salaries were increased from $186,600 to $191,300. --http://voices.washingtonpost.com/the-trail/2008/11/19/hillary_clintons_fix.html "

[Edited on November 21, 2008 at 5:02 PM. Reason : ]

11/21/2008 4:58:09 PM

we will see i guess, but it seems she is into it

11/21/2008 9:11:37 PM

Quote :

"but, there's actually a constitutional obstacle to her taking the position, last i heard. "

what a silly man to think the constitution will get in the way of what Obama wants

*shakes head in sadness

11/22/2008 1:27:30 AM