I'm walls1441 and i condone the use of page 2
9/23/2008 2:34:36 PM
9/23/2008 2:37:38 PM
9/23/2008 2:39:02 PM
9/23/2008 2:42:09 PM
thats what your parents tell you when you get a new BB gun. and its legally the safest thing to do and is practiced by the police. but shooting to wound is not a new thing
9/23/2008 2:45:37 PM
off on a tangent here....I can't research this right now. But does anyone remember the outcome of the trial for that texas man that shot and killed burglars he saw breaking into his neighbor's home?fairly recent case I think
9/23/2008 2:46:18 PM
I meant to keep track of that case http://abcnews.go.com/TheLaw/Story?id=5278638&page=1[Edited on September 23, 2008 at 2:52 PM. Reason : ]
9/23/2008 2:47:43 PM
Grand jury didn't even indict him... but that's texas law and they are certainly in a minority on a number of issues.[Edited on September 23, 2008 at 2:51 PM. Reason : rrr]
9/23/2008 2:48:59 PM
oh manI guess we'll chalk that one up to TEXAS GUN LAW
9/23/2008 2:51:28 PM
what if the dude who allegedly boobytrapped his house (i say allegedly because they say the house has been abandoned for years, maybe some other hoodlums set the traps) put up some signs that said "DANGER: TRESPASSERS WILL BE SHOT"...is it still illegal then?]
9/23/2008 2:56:57 PM
yes because you cannot simply avoid most laws by making disclaimers. It's like those bullshit signs on dump trucks that claim they are not responsible for debris falling from the vehicle. They have a duty to secure their payload, plain and simple.
9/23/2008 3:06:23 PM
just had an image of a dump truck driver getting pissy when i would say he had to pay for damages. then hold up a sign that says i'm not responsible whose knees i break with this baseball bat and swing away
9/23/2008 3:27:25 PM
9/23/2008 3:37:42 PM
9/23/2008 3:39:50 PM
Too bad it only got one of the two little fuckers.
9/23/2008 3:43:18 PM
9/23/2008 3:49:06 PM
9/23/2008 6:41:00 PM
yo party people you are generally liable for spring guns or other set traps on your property. it isn't self defense. and it isn't defense of property. it isn't really anything at all except you getting fucked (and killing someone so i guess they get fucked too).GOOD LUCK WITH THAT.[Edited on September 23, 2008 at 6:48 PM. Reason : even though i guess it was already said. seems like a big DUH to me.]
9/23/2008 6:47:38 PM
OK, so update on story. Owner interviewed, didnt do it. Son pending, possibly did it. Police think place was a drug house at one point without owners permission/knowledge. That said, I withdraw my objections on this being a 2nd amendment defense. Nail the bastard to the wall.I was basing my assumptions on the owner did it, and nothing else illegal.Fermat, I love you.
9/23/2008 10:17:57 PM
gotta love it. Kid breaks into house, lookin to steal shit, and he is made out to be the victim. nail the KID to the wall
9/23/2008 11:21:08 PM
9/23/2008 11:42:10 PM
look at it this way: mr. volunteer firefighter is probably gonna assume that your windows aren't booby trapped, and if your house is on fire and he's crawling through the window to save your ass, he isn't gonna appreciate a shotgun blast to the chest.
9/24/2008 1:07:26 AM
then u take that risk at that point. but, mr. dumb fucking robber? got what he deserved. case closed.
9/24/2008 1:09:15 AM
9/24/2008 1:14:29 AM
9/24/2008 1:19:13 AM
9/24/2008 1:20:22 AM
9/24/2008 6:12:18 AM
9/24/2008 8:07:35 AM
Well when you're 10 and a place is in the middle of nowhere empty for as long as you've been alive, you're not really thinking that someone will be in there, or booby traps for that matter. We did sometimes find some raccoons camping out though
9/24/2008 8:10:29 AM