^^Because when it's done they want to be associated with the winning side? That's the most liar-ish reason I can think of for them.
Or maybe, like a lot of other people, they just like him better.
Or maybe, they answered your question in their endorsement statements.

Are you trying to imply that somehow liars gravitate towards Obama? Pretty much any politician is going to be a liar, so this line of thought is pointless.

Or are you simply asking an honest question?
If so, refer to http://www.boston.com/news/politics/politicalintelligence/2008/10/mcclellan_endor.html for McClellan's endorsement, and http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/10/19/colin.powell/index.html?iref=newssearch for Colin Powell's endorsement.


^You state that a mistake doesn't matter, and in the same post, talk shit about someone for making mistakes... and as for you "[not] ever try[ing] to hide shit", you still haven't addressed the point that OEPII1 made. Dodging questions == Trying to hide shit.

[Edited on October 26, 2008 at 8:33 AM. Reason : .]

10/26/2008 8:29:28 AM

Biden is the inverse of Obama. Obama chooses his words carefully with intelligent self-awareness, while Biden speaks from the heart without thinking first. It's a dynamic ticket, very exciting, and bound to make the new administration much more transparent than the administration of the past eight years.

10/26/2008 8:29:35 AM

^That post really doesn't say anything substantial. You could replace the word "obama" with "mccain" and the word "biden" with "palin", and it would still make sense.

10/26/2008 8:36:19 AM

You think McCain chooses his words with careful intelligent self-awareness? Like "...the fundamentals of the economy are strong?"

LOL

I completely disagree.

[Edited on October 26, 2008 at 9:04 AM. Reason : -]

10/26/2008 9:03:42 AM

Quote :

"^ Um. . .could you find the post in which I stated that I hate Obama, OPIEE? "

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA


[Edited on October 26, 2008 at 9:46 AM. Reason : ]

10/26/2008 9:45:26 AM

http://afp.google.com/article/ALeqM5j81JfJQgAFq49SAZCOKM0etBtS2g
Financial Times endorses Obama

10/26/2008 9:42:57 PM

Obama had to pick a dumbass as a VP candidate in case someone gets crazy and tries to knock him off, they have to deal with the consequences of a dipshit for president.

10/26/2008 9:47:40 PM

^you mean mccain?

10/26/2008 9:48:43 PM