User not logged in - login - register
Home Calendar Books School Tool Photo Gallery Message Boards Users Statistics Advertise Site Info
go to bottom | |
 Message Boards » » Boo! Supporting Obama? No treats for you Page 1 [2] 3, Prev Next  
twoozles
All American
20735 Posts
user info
edit post

hateful bitch
but what else would you expect from a republican?

11/2/2008 1:59:43 PM

moron
All American
34140 Posts
user info
edit post

for page 2
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jbkBE0lWeYU

[Edited on November 2, 2008 at 2:02 PM. Reason : ]

11/2/2008 2:02:00 PM

WolfAce
All American
6458 Posts
user info
edit post

Quote :
"Television station WJBK reported that a sign posted outside Nagel's house in suburban Detroit served this notice to children seeking treats: "No handouts for Obama supporters, liars, tricksters or kids of supporters.

Nagel told WJBK that "Obama's scary.""


What a moron. If she had half a brain she could have at least told the kids that instead of giving them their candy she was redistributing the candy to less fortunate children who did not make the effort to go trick-or-treating.

11/2/2008 2:03:36 PM

Smath74
All American
93278 Posts
user info
edit post

if it had been the other way around, the news would have never reported it.

11/2/2008 2:07:17 PM

wdprice3
BinaryBuffonary
45912 Posts
user info
edit post

^

11/2/2008 2:07:42 PM

jataylor
All American
6652 Posts
user info
edit post

that fat bitch in that video must have been dressed up as rosie odonnell

11/2/2008 2:10:31 PM

moron
All American
34140 Posts
user info
edit post

^^^ Obama supporters aren't trifling hoes like that

11/2/2008 2:14:09 PM

wdprice3
BinaryBuffonary
45912 Posts
user info
edit post

ahahah. yeh fucking right

11/2/2008 2:14:55 PM

NCSUWolfy
All American
12966 Posts
user info
edit post

^6 LOL

i bet she wished she thought of that

shit like this doesnt deserve to be "in the news" but shit like this is what makes me love america. we can think and say and do what we want.

...for now anyway


[Edited on November 2, 2008 at 2:16 PM. Reason : jksdf]

11/2/2008 2:15:00 PM

moron
All American
34140 Posts
user info
edit post

^^ Do you remember that time a McCain supporter scratched a backwards B in to her face? And blamed it on a 6'4" black Obama supporter? lol

11/2/2008 2:17:49 PM

twoozles
All American
20735 Posts
user info
edit post

Quote :
"if it had been the other way around, the news would have never reported it.

"


yeah right news stations would be all up in that

[Edited on November 2, 2008 at 2:45 PM. Reason : ]

11/2/2008 2:45:53 PM

AxlBonBach
All American
45550 Posts
user info
edit post

Quote :
"Punish the kids for the parents' choices. Classy."


Yeah it'll be especially classy when Obama substantially raises the Estate Tax.

Which is, in effect, the same damn thing.

[Edited on November 2, 2008 at 2:50 PM. Reason : k]

11/2/2008 2:50:02 PM

aaronburro
Sup, B
53050 Posts
user info
edit post

HOLY FUCKING SHIT SOAP BOX GOD DAMMIT

11/2/2008 3:04:52 PM

Mr Grace
All American
12412 Posts
user info
edit post

they should have taken all the kids candy and redistributed it


i mean im sure the kids had way more candy than they needed anyway

11/2/2008 4:25:05 PM

Str8Foolish
All American
4852 Posts
user info
edit post

hurfy durfy

11/2/2008 4:27:13 PM

0EPII1
All American
42540 Posts
user info
edit post

She was well within her rights to do that, but yes, that was childish and mean (only because the 'victims' were children).

But someone explain this to me:

Quote :
"When asked about children who were turned away empty-handed and crying"


CRYING? WTF?

The real people to be blamed in this story are the FUCKING PARENTS who raise their kids to be pussies like that. Seriously, that's just bad parenting. And it doesn't matter what political or religious leanings they have, and what skin color they are. I guess millions of kids must be like that, which means millions of bad parents.

11/2/2008 5:11:21 PM

d357r0y3r
Jimmies: Unrustled
8198 Posts
user info
edit post

If it was the other way around, of course you wouldn't hear anything about it. Anyone that supports McCain over Obama is a racist, anyway.

11/2/2008 5:15:08 PM

jataylor
All American
6652 Posts
user info
edit post

^^well the the kids that were crying, their parents are liberal. most liberals i know dont punish their kids and they always get what they want, and cry when they dont get what they want.

11/2/2008 5:51:16 PM

aaronburro
Sup, B
53050 Posts
user info
edit post

HOLY FUCKING SHIT SOAP BOX GOD DAMMIT

11/2/2008 5:56:03 PM

neodata686
All American
11577 Posts
user info
edit post

Quote :
"most liberals i know dont punish their kids and they always get what they want, and cry when they dont get what they want."


hahaha are you serious? I could say most conservatives i know always get their kids what they want, and they cry when they don't get it much more than the liberal parents i know. The liberal parents teach their kids delay of gratification and values that show them they don't need to cry when they don't get candy.

In fact growing up the conservative parents i knew always got their kids the video games, and let them sit in front of the tv, whereas all the liberal parents i knew didn't allow video games and made them go outside.

11/2/2008 6:08:51 PM

aaronburro
Sup, B
53050 Posts
user info
edit post

HOLY FUCKING SHIT SOAP BOX GOD DAMMIT

11/2/2008 6:10:03 PM

WolfAce
All American
6458 Posts
user info
edit post

^^oh don't give me those across the board blanket judgements, on either side of this

my situation was the exact opposite of what you just outlined, and a lot of my friends were the same way

spoiling your kids (or not) is not a political affiliation


[Edited on November 2, 2008 at 6:14 PM. Reason : ]

11/2/2008 6:11:45 PM

neodata686
All American
11577 Posts
user info
edit post

^you're right but there's sometimes a trend. At least i grew up not having video games or having very limited tv time, and now that i think about it the only times i got to play video games were usually at the more conservative kids houses. I guess everyone grows up differently though.

11/2/2008 6:14:42 PM

ReceiveDeath
INEED2 GET HIRITENOW
70284 Posts
user info
edit post

FUCK JOHN MCCAIN

11/2/2008 6:15:43 PM

neodata686
All American
11577 Posts
user info
edit post

In fact i remember always enjoying going to my cousins in Statesville, NC because they always had video games, kid-atvs (as opposed to riding a bike), and typical kids toys that i never had, and they're quite conservative. Growing up i had legos, and anything we could build outside.

You're right it's not a political affiliation, but i think it's definitely a traditional/non-traditional trend, which can often be related to conservative/liberal.

[Edited on November 2, 2008 at 6:25 PM. Reason : .]

11/2/2008 6:24:16 PM

theDuke866
All American
52837 Posts
user info
edit post

^^^^^

dude, shut the fuck up

this does not belong in soap box. it is in the correct forum.

[Edited on November 2, 2008 at 6:31 PM. Reason : also, what a dumb bitch]

11/2/2008 6:30:46 PM

WolfAce
All American
6458 Posts
user info
edit post

^^I think that often trends economically too, the rich kids had all the toys and video games while the poor ones didn't get anything much

i mean i grew up in a pretty traditional/conservative household but we never had anything beyond basic cable and i never was allowed video games until i was much older, mainly so that i'd do things that were actually productive, like exercise, social interaction and get smarter from reading instead

11/2/2008 7:29:40 PM

neodata686
All American
11577 Posts
user info
edit post

^I would actually say the opposite. Growing up the more economically sound a family was, the more they traveled, got involved in various activities, and were rarely at home. Whereas lower income families might have both parents working, and would have to find ways to occupy the kids at home with video games/toys etc. Video games and tv's aren't exactly a sign of wealth growing up. Who had a gameboy or nes growing up, i don't think had to do with the income level of the household. I grew up in a middle class family, but the friends i had who would be categorized in the upper class defiantly didn't have more video games or toys. They did on the other hand travel more, had more opportunities for private lessons in music/sports, etc.

11/2/2008 7:49:17 PM

tromboner950
All American
9667 Posts
user info
edit post

^agreed.... the fact that richer families had more wealth with which to buy video games was balanced out largely by the fact that many such parents also saw video games as immoral or counter-productive, and thus were more reluctant to buy them.

11/2/2008 7:53:16 PM

neodata686
All American
11577 Posts
user info
edit post

^yes you could make the argument that the wealthier families wanted their kids not to play video games, and paid for better more productive activities. I mean a video game is actually a cheap solution to entertaining a kid. Whereas weekly lessons or traveling involves much more money, and time spent with the kid.

I just found this to support my idea:

Quote :
"Ethnicity and income level are indicators of video
game playing, particularly among older kids ages 8-
18: African American and Hispanic youth play more
video games than White youth, and kids from low
and middle income communities spend more time
playing video games than kids from high income"


http://www.kff.org/entmedia/loader.cfm?url=/commonspot/security/getfile.cfm&PageID=14092

11/2/2008 7:58:07 PM

Optimum
All American
13716 Posts
user info
edit post

bttt for more partisanship

11/2/2008 10:17:51 PM

wolfpackgrrr
All American
39759 Posts
user info
edit post

4chan jumped on this apparently:

http://pics.livejournal.com/quasi_troll/pic/00002rpa

11/2/2008 10:23:56 PM

fjjackso
All American
14538 Posts
user info
edit post

the fact that this made the news shows just how fucking liberal our faggot ass nation is

you all make me sick

11/2/2008 10:24:06 PM

wolfpackgrrr
All American
39759 Posts
user info
edit post

Dumb shit like this makes it on the news all the time. Just because this is somehow related to the election that makes it worse?

11/2/2008 10:26:50 PM

moron
All American
34140 Posts
user info
edit post

It's now "liberal" to want kids to be able to trick or treat with joy?

11/2/2008 10:27:28 PM

fjjackso
All American
14538 Posts
user info
edit post

if it was someone not giving candy to mccain supporters this never would have made the news

media is liberal

if you deny that you're a complete fucking idiot

11/2/2008 10:27:57 PM

wolfpackgrrr
All American
39759 Posts
user info
edit post

Even if it had been the other way around it would have been an asshole thing to do. I don't think it really matters what candidate the bitch was touting.

^ Of course it would have made the news. What else do stations like WRAL have to report And then the national media would have picked it up because anything about the election is OMG SERIOUS BUSINESS.

[Edited on November 2, 2008 at 10:29 PM. Reason : .]

11/2/2008 10:28:22 PM

jwb9984
All American
14039 Posts
user info
edit post

liberal media

11/2/2008 10:30:47 PM

fjjackso
All American
14538 Posts
user info
edit post

im not saying i support either candidate, because i don't

but if you support obama you can get away with murder, if you support mccain you breathe wrong and you're on the new

i've decided you're an idiot, thanks

Quote :
"election is OMG SERIOUS BUSINESS."


now i'm certain you're an idiot

the election is serious business stupid ass

[Edited on November 2, 2008 at 10:31 PM. Reason : had to be mean]

11/2/2008 10:30:56 PM

wolfpackgrrr
All American
39759 Posts
user info
edit post

Did they not go nuts over this girl:



Too bad it turned out she was just crazy

^ Of course the election itself is serious business. Any little retard story slightly related to the election is not, even though the media likes to think it is.

[Edited on November 2, 2008 at 10:33 PM. Reason : .]

11/2/2008 10:32:35 PM

fjjackso
All American
14538 Posts
user info
edit post

tell that to the maker of this thread

11/2/2008 10:35:02 PM

Optimum
All American
13716 Posts
user info
edit post

^ blow it out of your ass, ass.

11/2/2008 10:36:00 PM

Spontaneous
All American
27372 Posts
user info
edit post

^^ OMG, it's Donkey Lips! YAY FOR SALUTE YOUR SHORTS!

11/2/2008 10:36:02 PM

fjjackso
All American
14538 Posts
user info
edit post

do the world a favor and die fagbag

11/2/2008 10:37:44 PM

Optimum
All American
13716 Posts
user info
edit post

moving on

11/2/2008 10:42:59 PM

Str8BacardiL
************
41753 Posts
user info
edit post

11/3/2008 12:54:00 AM

WolfAce
All American
6458 Posts
user info
edit post

I'm sure this kind of thing is nothing new, but the advent of the internet age means everything and anything can and will go viral and get blown up way out of proportion

I think that's a silly way to get a message out, and I also think that rosie o' donnell looking mom was exaggerating her story to try to play on people's sympathies, (Crying? Really?) but the lady shouldn't be nationally crucified all the same

11/3/2008 1:08:26 AM

wolfpackgrrr
All American
39759 Posts
user info
edit post

^ some kids are crybabies. I could see my one cousin crying over something like that when she was the age of that girl.

11/3/2008 2:40:10 AM

Tiberius
Suspended
7607 Posts
user info
edit post

that 4chan screen cap made my evening

11/3/2008 3:07:38 AM

wolfpackgrrr
All American
39759 Posts
user info
edit post

set em up

11/3/2008 3:11:51 AM

 Message Boards » Chit Chat » Boo! Supporting Obama? No treats for you Page 1 [2] 3, Prev Next  
go to top | |
Admin Options : move topic | lock topic

© 2024 by The Wolf Web - All Rights Reserved.
The material located at this site is not endorsed, sponsored or provided by or on behalf of North Carolina State University.
Powered by CrazyWeb v2.39 - our disclaimer.