damn unlimited stuff used to run out in the old days?fuck thatI'm Big Business and i approved this message.
1/10/2009 3:37:39 PM
can you imagine if they took photographs and stood still for 60 secondsthen the photographs disappearedi'd be a pissed off photographer
1/10/2009 3:37:45 PM
Screw George Washington's time, I would like to have an AK-47 with unlimited bullets now.that would amaze all my friends. plus I bet I could make some money with that.
1/10/2009 3:41:56 PM
you guys are retarded. if i could go back in time, i'd take crack with me and make $bank. and have all the bitchesI'm Big Business and i approved this message.
1/10/2009 3:42:44 PM
fuck that man i'd hoard the fuck out of some gold
1/10/2009 3:43:35 PM
1/10/2009 3:44:55 PM
also, anyone interested in taking ak-47s to the past should read the first half of Turtledove's "Guns of the South"thats def robert e lee holding an ak47
1/10/2009 3:48:56 PM
^Why just the first half when the whole book revolves around that concept?
1/10/2009 4:13:39 PM
this movie clearly doesn't agree with the "multiverse" theory. (the only time travel theory that makes sense)[Edited on January 10, 2009 at 4:21 PM. Reason : .]
1/10/2009 4:21:26 PM
you can have 2 things existing in the same state as long as you don't collapse the wave functionalso marty probably would have died of dyssentary like in oregon trail because he could not adapt to the food back then. He should have time traveled some doritos or something back with him.
1/10/2009 4:30:48 PM
yeah and if you want a good time travel movie....go timecop with van damme
1/10/2009 4:31:55 PM
all back to the future threads on tww are successful
1/10/2009 4:32:45 PM
i like the way it worked in Bill & Tedhe just thought "ill steal my dad's keys and hide them over there" then he walks over there and voila, keysdidn't waste any time
1/10/2009 4:34:09 PM
1/10/2009 5:58:18 PM
haha. I knew there was a reason I never finished that book.
1/10/2009 6:07:36 PM
But wouldn't Doc in the future have already gone back to the past and saved Clara and the name would have never been anything other than Eastwood Ravine anyways
1/10/2009 6:23:58 PM
^^yeahthey kill the rivington boyslee is presidenthe finds an apple macintoshthen he frees the slavesand nathan bedford forrest goes apeshitand they spend the rest of the book fillibustering and shitthe highlight has to be abe lincoln's career as a traveling salesman or some shit like thatits been a while since i read iti distinctly remember the AK47 parts lasting only about 200 pages, and the book lasting over 500[Edited on January 10, 2009 at 6:26 PM. Reason : ^SHE DOESN'T NEED SAVING UNTIL MARTY SHOWS UP IN THE DOC TIMELINE, FUCK]
1/10/2009 6:24:23 PM
Ok, well anything that you were going back in time to do, you would have already done in the future, so it would already be done. or something.
1/10/2009 6:31:30 PM
If you buy the collector DVD set with all 3 films there is a FAQ from the Producers/Writers on one of the DVDs that tries to explain some of the timeline issues. Bob Zemeckis himself readily admits that there are plot holes here and there but they tried to stitch together all 3 films the best that they could. It is amazing how well the entire series fits together considering all of the logistics involved.Damn You TDubb...now I am gonna have to pull my BTTF set out and watch all 3 flicks again!
1/10/2009 6:48:09 PM
1/10/2009 6:52:47 PM
The Clayton Ravine thing could be explained away by simply saying she simply fell into the ravine later in the second 1885 timeline, after Doc died.Maybe there is property that prohibits the DeLorean from existing multiple times in any particular timeline. Even though we assume that it does, possibly the existence of the car changes depending on the perspective of either Marty or Doc. If I am remembering correctly, there is never a point in the trilogy where 2 DeLoreans appear at the same time.So in this case, the moment Marty gets back to the mall in pt 1 and sees the DeLorean, the one he left sitting in the middle of the road near the wrecked theater simply vanished. Not unlike how old Biff vanished after returning to 2025. I mean, he obviously was alive long enough to drive back. If that can happen to people, why not cars?
1/10/2009 7:10:36 PM
damnlooks like i missed the fireworks
1/10/2009 7:30:27 PM
http://www.bttf.com/film_faq.htmThe link above looks to be the same FAQ that is presented on the DVD. Gale/Zemeckis both have said in the past that the whole time travel/time paradox issues were meant to be taken lightly (it is only a piece of entertainment after all!) and not taken as uber serious science. Goddamn I love all 3 movies though...besides Star Wars, BTTF is my all time movie series...mainly because I grew up through the years the movies came out and saw all 3 in theatres.
1/10/2009 7:30:37 PM
1/10/2009 7:41:31 PM
the thing i hated most about back to the future was that the future was the shortest part of any movie
1/10/2009 7:43:11 PM
lolwut
1/10/2009 7:45:20 PM
ok first of all... you people saying 1855 are completely wrong. it was 1885.second... yes, doc had stored the time machine in the cave before marty got there. ask anyone in the garage... typically if you store a car for a long time, you would drain all of the fluids, including gasoline.third... clayton/shonash(sp)/eastwood ravine...A. named clayton ravine after bitch drives into it.B. Doc saves the bitch in timeline before marty gets to pastC. Oh, marty fucks up doc saving her, so his "memory" of B does not exist.D. in all other instances, the time travelers are immune to things they have changed in their current timeline, so marty would still remember it as "A"
1/10/2009 7:45:52 PM
theres only like 30 minutes of the future and then its back to the past or current...3rd is basically all old west, and the first is pretty much all the past[Edited on January 10, 2009 at 7:47 PM. Reason : ^agreed]
1/10/2009 7:46:21 PM
1.21 GIGAWATTS [sic] ?!!1[Edited on January 10, 2009 at 7:52 PM. Reason : Lloyd pronounced the word at issue as "jigawatts."]
1/10/2009 7:51:07 PM
1/10/2009 7:51:55 PM
i def agree with smath...his version makes more sense
1/10/2009 7:52:53 PM
1/10/2009 8:06:35 PM
it being a writer's error makes the most sense[Edited on January 10, 2009 at 8:23 PM. Reason : ^we see two Martys several times, why would the car be any different?]
1/10/2009 8:22:28 PM
I agree with smath and drunknloadedi.e. in part 2 when Marty returns to a Hill Valley run by billionaire Biff, memories of his own 1985 are still intact. If Marty's pre-time-travelling self did not know of "Clayton's Ravine" because of something he was GOING to do, then the movies would completely fall apart. It's like asking "why were Marty's parents so meek and dumpy when he made them cool and hip 30 years ago?
1/10/2009 8:53:46 PM
1/10/2009 9:01:41 PM
1/10/2009 10:54:27 PM
i just finished watching all three of these. i can't remember if i had ever seen them before, but they were pretty good.
1/11/2009 5:19:09 PM
You damn right.
1/11/2009 5:46:26 PM
i got the trilogy for christmas. good shit.
1/11/2009 5:51:49 PM
1/11/2009 7:14:07 PM
its best guess gentlemen, thats all science is, is best guess.
1/11/2009 7:21:37 PM
Back to the Future is a science documentary
1/11/2009 7:25:19 PM
1/12/2009 2:10:37 AM
I don't think Hill Valley had a MLB team, Marty was just watching the 'national' news feed about the world series............
1/12/2009 9:25:45 AM
1/12/2009 9:56:01 AM
they didn't have a MLB team.
1/12/2009 9:57:01 AM
^^I already said that.and yes, a different timeline was created. notice the "twin pines mall" became the "lone pine mall" at the end.
1/12/2009 9:58:17 AM
1/12/2009 10:27:25 AM
1/12/2009 10:37:21 AM
set em up
1/12/2009 10:41:08 AM