+2 for the allusion[Edited on January 19, 2009 at 12:51 PM. Reason : 2]
1/19/2009 12:50:46 PM
1/19/2009 12:50:50 PM
1/19/2009 12:59:25 PM
1/19/2009 1:14:18 PM
^ she knew good and well that wasn't the case. i don't know why she posted that.
1/19/2009 1:18:43 PM
never cheatednot driven by moneythus, i guess i will never experience this super orgasm phenomenon.
1/19/2009 1:26:43 PM
1/19/2009 1:28:35 PM
*COUGH* BULLSHIT *COUGH*
1/19/2009 1:29:28 PM
^^yea. why? i feel as though this only helps my point. ^ hopefully that wasn't to me. though i feel that it was.[Edited on January 19, 2009 at 1:37 PM. Reason : .]
1/19/2009 1:31:29 PM
1/19/2009 1:38:23 PM
^^ what i meant was you're sticking through law school even though you hate it. i can only assume you are doing this to make money afterwards.
1/19/2009 1:39:31 PM
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/science/article5537017.ece(original story fox news links to)
1/19/2009 1:41:44 PM
well its ruthlessly exploiting them if you feel its in your best interest to get knocked up and make him pay for it if you can't afford it otherwise
1/19/2009 1:43:39 PM
1/19/2009 1:46:11 PM
i want to meet a girl when i go to law school and exploit her into working while i become a stay at home dad
1/19/2009 1:49:56 PM
Girls want alpha males, not money. It doesn't matter how much money you make if you are a sniveling little prick.
1/19/2009 1:51:38 PM
^^ see that is the spirit no seriously. i would totally go for that.
1/19/2009 1:53:08 PM
well you better sweep me off my feet before i move up to Concord for Franklin Pierce
1/19/2009 1:54:33 PM
my salary (for the jobs i'd want) wouldn't support a family though. so you better find a mergers and acquisitions chick pronto.
1/19/2009 1:56:49 PM
1/19/2009 1:58:35 PM
My grandma always told her daughters, "You can fall in love with a rich man as easy as you can fall in love with a poor man"I do think this is kinda shallow, but then, I'm not a woman and can't really comprehend the sorts of obstacles women have to faceIt is different now, though, when a woman can make the money for herself if she wants it
1/19/2009 1:59:36 PM
1/19/2009 2:00:44 PM
ive never seen an episode of M*A*S*H in my life, although my father taped the entire series onto vhs over its initial years
1/19/2009 2:06:53 PM
1/19/2009 2:21:45 PM
1/19/2009 2:40:05 PM
then what happens when you have bad sex with a wealthy man?[Edited on January 19, 2009 at 3:03 PM. Reason : wtf, words?]
1/19/2009 2:53:40 PM
you say it was good so that he pays for your cab home
1/19/2009 2:54:45 PM
^^? I dunno, wut?
1/19/2009 3:02:16 PM
I didn't need a study to know this to be true.
1/19/2009 3:05:05 PM
was the author of this article/study a male or female?
1/19/2009 3:07:28 PM
it said scientists, not scientist's wives so i think its pretty clear
1/19/2009 3:08:26 PM
i figured. some guy scientist got burned and had to find a way to get back at women everywhere. but seriously. i read the original article. it says the female orgasm has no reproductive purpose because women can get pregnant without orgasms (big fat duh). but does that really mean it doesn't have a reproductive purpose? i mean...if you orgasm, sex is probably more enjoyable/fun/whatev soooooooo if it is fun, you might want to do it more, and the more you do it the higher the chances of reproducing????
1/19/2009 3:16:46 PM
1/19/2009 3:18:19 PM
it said scientists, not scientist's wives so i think its pretty clearhahahhaha
1/19/2009 3:19:10 PM
bahahahhaa
1/19/2009 3:19:56 PM
http://www.ncl.ac.uk/cbe/postgrad/phd/pollet.htmthis guy. is cool.really cool.http://www.students.ncl.ac.uk/t.v.pollet/[Edited on January 19, 2009 at 3:24 PM. Reason : .]
1/19/2009 3:22:30 PM
He's still right about women.
1/19/2009 3:25:17 PM
i trust himhis theory seems really sound[Edited on January 19, 2009 at 3:27 PM. Reason : .]
1/19/2009 3:26:43 PM
1/19/2009 3:27:25 PM
this is so untruei survived for years where my only job was making sweet love to women. maybe i was even a gigolo. you know, where the girls friends are like why do you date that loser, and they just wink. OH BABY OH BABY
1/19/2009 3:29:49 PM
Yet, again, research that absolutely proves nothing. I am all for some research, but this is a waste of time money and effect.
1/19/2009 3:32:11 PM
1/19/2009 3:57:43 PM
I like sour stuff, you should try to be bitter more often.
1/19/2009 3:58:49 PM
What we have here class is a classic case of penis envy. Pay close attention to the female posters and take careful notes. This will be on the test.[Edited on January 19, 2009 at 4:03 PM. Reason : 8==8]
1/19/2009 4:03:00 PM
This is the problem why this research looks legit:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C_3-fGPT8-g
1/19/2009 4:07:23 PM
Boats and hoes.Boats and hoes.
1/20/2009 3:08:48 PM
Correlational studies and sensational journalism for the win?
1/20/2009 5:35:07 PM
Evolutionary psychology is junk science
1/20/2009 5:38:29 PM
The results have to be viewed in the proper cultural context. The Cultural Revolution tried to define sex as simply reproductive work. Anything else was bourgeois excess. I have a feeling this conditioning remains stronger amongst rural poor than the urban middle class.
1/20/2009 5:49:57 PM
set em up
1/20/2009 6:35:33 PM