Optimum All American 13716 Posts user info edit post |
And Bush bequeathed this country a face-shooting shadow president. rawr rawr rawr 11/20/2009 10:20:24 PM |
TerdFerguson All American 6600 Posts user info edit post |
news outlets starting to cover this a lot more closely
check out CNN's "FED FOCUS"
http://money.cnn.com/news/specials/fed/
Quote : | "Bernanke, whose four-year term expires in January, is certain to face a contentious Senate banking panel at his confirmation hearing, set for Dec. 3. He is also defending against the sharpest attack on Federal Reserve powers ever.
" |
11/23/2009 9:40:47 AM |
TerdFerguson All American 6600 Posts user info edit post |
BWAHAHAHAHAHA
http://www.cnn.com/2009/US/12/16/time.bernanke/index.html
Quote : | "Time names Bernanke Person of the Year" |
12/17/2009 9:00:02 AM |
TKE-Teg All American 43410 Posts user info edit post |
There goes their credibility... 12/17/2009 11:31:01 AM |
d357r0y3r Jimmies: Unrustled 8198 Posts user info edit post |
They named Hitler and Stalin as Person of the Year too. It isn't always a good thing. 12/17/2009 11:32:07 AM |
timswar All American 41050 Posts user info edit post |
They name it after the person who's had the most influence on our world (or just country) in a given year.
If anything, this is just showing how little effect Obama has actually had, thusfar. 12/17/2009 11:43:28 AM |
TerdFerguson All American 6600 Posts user info edit post |
^^,^ I didn't realize that,
I've only skimmed the article so far, seems like a lot of "ZOMG Bernanke saved teh economy" 12/17/2009 12:10:18 PM |
PinkandBlack Suspended 10517 Posts user info edit post |
i have no confidence in bernanke.
once this gets to the senate floor, we'll see some pretty clear divisions between three factions in the senate: conservative libertarians, progressives, and corporatists. i'd say there's like 10 in the first catagory, 10 in the second, and too many in the 3rd. guess who wins? 12/17/2009 5:56:25 PM |
JCASHFAN All American 13916 Posts user info edit post |
seems appropriate here:
Quote : | " Jan. 12 (Bloomberg) -- The Federal Reserve asked a U.S. appeals court to block a ruling that for the first time would force the central bank to reveal the identities of financial firms that might have collapsed without the largest government bailout in U.S. history.
The U.S. Court of Appeals in Manhattan will decide whether the Fed must release records of lending programs that were instituted or expanded to help banks survive the longest recession since the Great Depression. In August, a federal judge ordered that the information be released, responding to a request by Bloomberg LP, the parent of Bloomberg News.
“This case is about the identity of the borrower,” said Matthew Collette, a lawyer for the government, in oral arguments yesterday. “This is the equivalent of saying ‘I want all the loan applications that were submitted.’”
Bloomberg argued that the public has the right to know basic information about the “unprecedented and highly controversial use” of public money. Banks and the Fed warn that bailed-out lenders may be hurt if the documents are made public, causing a run or a sell-off by investors. Disclosure may hamstring the Fed’s ability to deal with another crisis, they also argued. The lower court agreed with Bloomberg. " | http://ow.ly/VCEG1/13/2010 1:20:27 PM |
Shaggy All American 17820 Posts user info edit post |
if you get public loans the related information should be public knowledge 1/13/2010 1:22:29 PM |
TerdFerguson All American 6600 Posts user info edit post |
http://www.businessday.co.za/articles/Content.aspx?id=91719
Quote : | "FEDERAL Reserve chairman Ben Bernanke has sought to defuse allegations that the central bank tried to conceal details about the 182,3bn bail-out of American International Group (AIG), calling for a review of the Fed’s actions.
In a letter to the Government Accountability Office on Tuesday, Bernanke pledged “all records and personnel necessary” for a congressional audit. " |
This is certainly a change in tune.1/21/2010 12:38:55 PM |
1337 b4k4 All American 10033 Posts user info edit post |
^ Translation "We've shredded, misplaced, lost or otherwise removed any incriminating evidence and we're ready for you now." 1/21/2010 1:00:41 PM |
TerdFerguson All American 6600 Posts user info edit post |
Yeah, Im still pretty skeptical.
It'll be one of those "audits" where you have more questions when finished than when you started
[Edited on January 21, 2010 at 1:04 PM. Reason : Still holding out hope that this or the bills in congress will eventually shed some light] 1/21/2010 1:02:41 PM |
d357r0y3r Jimmies: Unrustled 8198 Posts user info edit post |
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BG-tbclZmo0
Bernanke is either crazy, ignorant, or evil. 3/18/2010 3:12:13 PM |
TerdFerguson All American 6600 Posts user info edit post |
LOL at Ron Paul.
I can only imagine everytime Bernanke leaves one of those meetings hes like "Gawd I wish that guy would get off my nuts"
I also liked this exchange (made me lol for some reason)
Bernanke: Umm arent you a gold standard supporter?
Paul: Well, Im for the Constitution . . . . . . . .
Bernanke: uhhhhhhh . blah blah blah blah 3/18/2010 4:04:37 PM |
d357r0y3r Jimmies: Unrustled 8198 Posts user info edit post |
Yeah, that was hilarious. I'm sure Bernanke wanted to say something along the lines of "Dude...no one gives a shit about the constitution anymore, we do whatever we want."
Central banking is an art, man. It's a delicate balancing act, and the best way to "balance" it is to keep interest rates at fucking zero. How does Bernanke seriously get away with saying something like we don't need to worry about having too many houses? Does he even know what the housing bubble was?
Also, when Bernanke himself admits that keeping interest rates too long too long results in inflation...what do you think is going to happen?
[Edited on March 18, 2010 at 4:21 PM. Reason : ] 3/18/2010 4:19:56 PM |
Kris All American 36908 Posts user info edit post |
Quote : | "Also, when Bernanke himself admits that keeping interest rates too long too long results in inflation...what do you think is going to happen?" |
We will get inflation, and when we do, we should up the rate accordingly, but until we do, we should keep it low.3/18/2010 5:34:09 PM |
d357r0y3r Jimmies: Unrustled 8198 Posts user info edit post |
Double digit unemployment, double digit inflation...and a rate hike on top of that? Sounds rough. 3/19/2010 1:36:04 AM |
TerdFerguson All American 6600 Posts user info edit post |
http://www.businessweek.com/news/2010-03-19/federal-reserve-must-disclose-bank-bailout-records-update1-.html
Quote : | "March 19 (Bloomberg) -- The Federal Reserve Board must disclose documents identifying financial firms that might have collapsed without the largest ever U.S. government bailout, a federal appeals court said.
" |
so can the FED appeal it again or is this the end of the line?3/19/2010 12:34:00 PM |
TerdFerguson All American 6600 Posts user info edit post |
http://www.businessweek.com/news/2010-04-14/fed-shouldn-t-reveal-crisis-loans-banks-vow-to-tell-high-court.html
Banks are still worried that releasing these documents will cause a run on weak banks. It takes forever to accomplish anything in the court system. The only thing slower is congress, what happened to the Sunshine act?
Quote : | "The biggest U.S. commercial banks will take their fight against disclosure of Federal Reserve lending in 2008 to the Supreme Court if necessary, the top lawyer for an industry-owned group said. " |
4/14/2010 8:54:56 AM |
TerdFerguson All American 6600 Posts user info edit post |
http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2010/05/obama-administration-ramps-up-opposition-to-fed-audit-provision.php?ref=dcblt
Quote : | "It's likely, in fact, that the Obama administration will be under intense pressure to veto the entire financial reform bill if "audit the fed" survives.
That's why, according to the Wall Street Journal they'll "fight to stop it at all costs." The White House is hoping to cut off "audit the Fed" in the Senate, so that they'll have a stronger hand when House and Senate negotiators meet to iron out the differences between their regulatory reform bills. If the Senate bill does not include Sanders' amendment, then the House will be in a weak position vis-a-vis the Senate and White House and the provision could be easily stripped.
If Sanders prevails, then the White House will be all but out of options and President Obama will likely be left with the choice of vetoing the legislation, or signing it and raising the ire of very powerful people. Stay tuned. " |
plz to not veto 5/5/2010 9:15:05 AM |
d357r0y3r Jimmies: Unrustled 8198 Posts user info edit post |
I don't think Obama will defy his banking cartel overlords. 5/5/2010 12:36:56 PM |
Kris All American 36908 Posts user info edit post |
THE ZOG CONTROLS HIM!!! 5/5/2010 6:08:01 PM |
TerdFerguson All American 6600 Posts user info edit post |
The administration may pressure people to take it out of the bill before its passed but I don't think Obama can veto. You would look pretty dumb vetoing after pointing at Republicans for threatening filibusters.
I'm still hoping some form of legit audit legislation passes. 5/5/2010 6:35:47 PM |