User not logged in - login - register
Home Calendar Books School Tool Photo Gallery Message Boards Users Statistics Advertise Site Info
go to bottom | |
 Message Boards » » Our grandkids will be fighting in Afghanistan. Page 1 [2], Prev  
ssjamind
All American
30098 Posts
user info
edit post

Quote :
"Indians failed
Brits failed
Russians failed
Americans are failing
Chinese will fail Have a Shot"


there, i fixed it for you

6/17/2010 5:38:22 PM

adultswim
Suspended
8379 Posts
user info
edit post

Quote :
"Maybe they will. I dunno, the governments of Germany and Japan have worked pretty good for the past 65 years or so."


Iran and Guatemala, not so much.

6/21/2010 10:44:09 PM

GrumpyGOP
yovo yovo bonsoir
18128 Posts
user info
edit post

I'm just saying, we don't have a 0% success record. Obviously we have failures. But we don't have utterly consistent failures.

6/22/2010 1:38:59 AM

adultswim
Suspended
8379 Posts
user info
edit post

Vietnam, Afghanistan, Venezuela, Nicaragua, Cuba, Iraq, Libya

The fact of the matter is we aren't trying to help these countries. It's all to protect our own interests, under the guise of good will, and at the expense of innocent lives.

6/22/2010 10:49:52 AM

lazarus
All American
1013 Posts
user info
edit post

That's hardly a fact. It's more like a crackpot delusion.

6/23/2010 9:03:47 AM

adultswim
Suspended
8379 Posts
user info
edit post

“If we choose, we can live in a world of comforting illusion.”

6/23/2010 11:06:01 AM

adultswim
Suspended
8379 Posts
user info
edit post

Fun fact: we have soldiers in every country bordering Iran. All 7 of them, 11 if you count the ones across the Persian Gulf.

6/24/2010 11:31:39 AM

lazarus
All American
1013 Posts
user info
edit post

What's your point?

6/24/2010 12:09:13 PM

smc
All American
9221 Posts
user info
edit post

6/30/2010 9:00:02 AM

SkiSalomon
All American
4264 Posts
user info
edit post

Quote :
"Fun fact: we have soldiers in every country bordering Iran."


Another fun fact: we have soldiers stationed in nearly every country in the world.

6/30/2010 12:54:25 PM

adultswim
Suspended
8379 Posts
user info
edit post

^
Uhh, what is your definition of "nearly"?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:US_military_bases_in_the_world-1.svg

6/30/2010 6:37:37 PM

Mr. Joshua
Swimfanfan
43948 Posts
user info
edit post

Quote :
"As of March 31, 2008, U.S. armed forces were stationed at more than 820 installations in at least 135 countries. Some of the largest contingents are the 151,000 military personnel deployed in Iraq, the 71,000 in Afghanistan, the 52,440 in Germany (see list), the 35,688 in Japan (USFJ), the 28,500 in Republic of Korea (USFK), and the 9,660 in Italy and the 9,015 in the United Kingdom respectively. These numbers change frequently due to the regular recall and deployment of units.

Altogether, 77,917 military personnel are located in Europe, 141 in the former Soviet Union, 47,236 in East Asia and the Pacific, 3,362 in North Africa, the Near East, and South Asia, 1,355 are in sub-Saharan Africa with 1,941 in the Western Hemisphere excepting the United States itself."


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_armed_forces#Overseas

6/30/2010 6:45:41 PM

jwb9984
All American
14039 Posts
user info
edit post

and there are about 195 countries in the world

so we have military personnel stationed in about 70% of the world's countries. not too shabby.


[Edited on June 30, 2010 at 7:05 PM. Reason : .]

6/30/2010 7:05:05 PM

SkiSalomon
All American
4264 Posts
user info
edit post

Quote :
"Uhh, what is your definition of "nearly"?"


My definition of 'nearly' directly coincides with the number of countries that we have diplomatic relations with (+plus a few others).

7/1/2010 9:05:18 AM

hooksaw
All American
16500 Posts
user info
edit post

The Democrats Give Notice on Afghanistan
July 27, 2010


Quote :
"The House of Representatives approved $33 billion in new spending for the war in Afghanistan this evening, but in the process President Obama received a sharp rebuke from members of his own party. More than 100 Democrats voted against the spending, in particular criticizing plans to add 30,000 troops to the conflict."


http://blogs.abcnews.com/nightlinedailyline/2010/07/the-democrats-give-notice-on-afghanistan.html

This used to be the "good" war (when Democrats were using it to beat Bush over the head about Iraq--you remember, right?) What happened?

7/28/2010 3:09:02 AM

SkiSalomon
All American
4264 Posts
user info
edit post

^ They finally bothered to start reading up on Afghanistan and now realize how incredibly dificult any semblance of victory in that country will be.

7/28/2010 8:56:46 AM

smc
All American
9221 Posts
user info
edit post

Then they gave them the money anyway.

More money and lives down the drain, oh well.

7/28/2010 12:11:42 PM

lazarus
All American
1013 Posts
user info
edit post

In that case let's go with the Taliban because they cost less.

[Edited on July 28, 2010 at 12:15 PM. Reason : ]

7/28/2010 12:15:00 PM

smc
All American
9221 Posts
user info
edit post

Taliban now or taliban later. They're savages, they deserve a conservative religious government.

7/28/2010 1:14:28 PM

smc
All American
9221 Posts
user info
edit post

Netherlands have withdrawn from Afghanistan, Canada, Poland and the UK soon to follow. The war is over, time to retreat.

8/1/2010 1:03:56 PM

Mr. Joshua
Swimfanfan
43948 Posts
user info
edit post

After nearly a century, a modern Afghan railroad is under construction
http://www.cnn.com/2010/WORLD/asiapcf/09/27/afghanistan.first.railroad/index.html?hpt=C2

Cool.

9/27/2010 9:53:37 PM

smc
All American
9221 Posts
user info
edit post

A roadsiderailside bomber's dream. This is money that could have been spent flying soldiers home.

9/27/2010 10:01:01 PM

smc
All American
9221 Posts
user info
edit post

War now officially extended until 2014 at least.

http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/2010/1116/Afghanistan-Is-2014-the-new-2011-for-Pentagon-war-planners

11/16/2010 7:15:58 PM

smc
All American
9221 Posts
user info
edit post

I fear for our military when they have to invade North Korea. They are are a real enemy. They don't wear sandals.

11/25/2010 1:23:00 PM

JCASHFAN
All American
13916 Posts
user info
edit post

^

1) You underestimate the amount of planning / training the US Military has done to prepare for Korea.
2) You ignore the fact that warfare against a conventional enemy is precisely what we're equipped for and, until very recently, trained for.
3) You underestimate the ROK Army.


Also,

Quote :
"The fact of the matter is we aren't trying to help these countries. It's all to protect our own interests"
I'll agree that we only act in our own interest, but the two are not mutually exclusive.


Don't get me wrong it'll be serious shit. The DPRK is already a pariah, so the use of CBRN is almost a given and casualties will be much higher than Iraq and Afghanistan, but fear mongering is unnecessary.

[Edited on November 25, 2010 at 3:57 PM. Reason : edit.]

11/25/2010 3:55:15 PM

smc
All American
9221 Posts
user info
edit post

Afghanistan is making us weak and unable to protect the country.

11/26/2010 11:24:33 PM

 Message Boards » The Soap Box » Our grandkids will be fighting in Afghanistan. Page 1 [2], Prev  
go to top | |
Admin Options : move topic | lock topic

© 2024 by The Wolf Web - All Rights Reserved.
The material located at this site is not endorsed, sponsored or provided by or on behalf of North Carolina State University.
Powered by CrazyWeb v2.38 - our disclaimer.