they are out there

i'm not so sure they are non-trivial (i mean, in the spectrum of racism, that's pretty far to the fringe)

regardless, terpball is smart enough that he ought not to habitually wallow in that victim mentality, and not to throw such stupid allegations around at people who, whatever else you want to say about them, definitely don't display anything that could even possibly be construed as an indication of that sort of mindset.

4/22/2008 1:50:56 AM

Quote :

""Pastor Byrd told News Channel 7 he would ask his congregation to vote on whether to keep the sign. They voted unanimously to keep the sign up Sunday night. Jonesville Church of God does not have any African American members. " "

Quote :

"Wow. And these people think they're the superior race."

...and don't get me wrong, I these these fucking knuckle-draggers ought to be made to sit in the corner with their dunce hats on national TV, but I don't think race is what drives them at all, and think it's counterproductive, boy-who-cried-wolf bullshit to try to frame it as a racial issue.

[Edited on April 22, 2008 at 1:55 AM. Reason : asdfads]

4/22/2008 1:54:39 AM

Quote :

"regardless, terpball is smart enough that he ought not to habitually wallow in that victim mentality, and not to throw such stupid allegations around at people who, whatever else you want to say about them, definitely don't display anything that could even possibly be construed as an indication of that sort of mindset. "

well said

4/22/2008 8:57:59 AM

4/22/2008 9:23:34 AM

Quote :

"I am so fucking tired of this victim mentality you keep spouting off."

I'm spouting off that eyedrb is a victim of his own stupidity, in case you couldn't catch that.

4/22/2008 9:46:22 AM

so is hillary's gender going to get her any female votes? absolutely not? of course?

4/22/2008 9:51:27 AM

I wonder if you could grasp this strange concept of 2 different questions having 2 different answers after sleeping on it. I really hope so, I'm surprised you couldn't understand it yesterday... but look at who I'm dealing with.

4/22/2008 9:54:23 AM

you're still the only one who thinks the questions were any different...even DNL figured it out immediately

4/22/2008 9:56:53 AM

that should say something! They are 2 different questions, and you truncated one of them in a quote to try to make it look more similar. Whatever dude, nice try, but fuck off.

4/22/2008 10:01:06 AM

you're still the only one who thinks the questions were any different...EVERYONE ELSE realizes they were the same question, including the 2 people who asked the 2 questions.......but of course I wouldn't expect you to ever admit that some women would vote for a woman because they're women and some blacks would vote for a black because they're black...clearly the voting population isn't fickle at all, and they always vote based solely on issues......

4/22/2008 10:29:11 AM

It was a pwn, but not that big of a pwn. Come on guys.

Let's talk about the real issues. Like how Obama is an elitist snob.

4/22/2008 10:31:56 AM

Quote :

"but of course I wouldn't expect you to ever admit that some women would vote for a woman because they're women and some blacks would vote for a black because they're black...clearly the voting population isn't fickle at all, and they always vote based solely on issues...... "

Well, I've said on a few occasions I believe both of these to be true -

BUT - here is the real question you asked first

Quote :

"do you think hillary clinton's gender is helping her get any more female votes than another candidate might get who happens to be a male"

NO, I do not believe this to be true, because the question contains a weak hypothetical. Who is this other candidate who happens to be a male? Is it Richard Simmons?

No, I was not pwn'd here, nobody got me - if you can't see how the questions are different, you are possibly even more stupid than I thought.

[Edited on April 22, 2008 at 10:55 AM. Reason : ]

4/22/2008 10:53:25 AM

Quote :

"Who is this other candidate who happens to be a male? "

Quote :

"even more stupid than I thought. "

4/22/2008 11:08:57 AM

Anyways.

Has anyone else heard that Obama's dad was a Marxist? And I don't mean in the hyperbolic 1950's McCarthy way, I mean as in he was an economist that was proposing marxist solutions for addressing problems in his native Kenya. Indeed, you can read one of his father's scholarly articles and decide for yourself.
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0408/9610.html

Did this affect Obama II's political leanings? Who knows. His dad wasn't exactly around a lot. Though in his biography, "Dreams from my father" he talks about "seeking" out "Marxist professors" (his words). *shrug*

Obviously, the proposals he's offering now are not marxist (not really) and people change a lot from when they were in college. But, it might explain why his grasp of economics is apparently so poor. The kid never had a chance.

[Edited on April 22, 2008 at 11:14 AM. Reason : ``]

4/22/2008 11:12:24 AM

^^ I see your point

You don't have one

bravo - pretend doctor who has enough time on his hands to spend all day and night on TWW

4/22/2008 11:14:06 AM

Quote :

"Well, I've said on a few occasions I believe both of these to be true"

really? like when you said:

Quote :

"The notion that Barack Obama's race is helping him get votes is ridiculous."

Let me guess, you're answering two completely different questions, even though you're the only person on TWW who sees a difference in the questions

4/22/2008 11:21:08 AM

Yeah, Barack's race is helping him get more votes, like a few people will vote for him because he's black. I also think many are NOT voting for him because he's black. I think he had to work pretty damn hard for many of the white votes, because he's black.

So yeah, I don't think his race is helping him, I think it's a set back. But yes, I believe there are some people voting for him because he's black - likely not as many who are NOT voting for him because he's black.

Get it? I am trying my hardest to dumb it down to your level, I hope that worked.

4/22/2008 11:28:04 AM

you're trying your hardest to play both sides of any question and then trying to act like its other people who have problems understanding simple questions, and not you

i mean you're so naive you think a white freshman senator could get 90% of the black vote even though no candidate with any amount of experience has EVER gotten 90% of the black vote..............its probably just pure coincidence that Obama, a black man, is getting 90% of the black vote while being the presidential candidate with the least amount of experience of the last few elections....god forbid you admit anything thats true and blatantly obvious to anyone who doesn't have their head completely up obama's ass

4/22/2008 11:30:46 AM

Wow, you went right back to the exact same shit you posted yesterday, almost verbatim. You expect me to sit here and argue with you about the same exact subject again? Are you going to ask me different questions and act like you GOT ME when I answer the different questions differently again too? Then I guess i'll have to hand you your ass again and show how retarded you and eyedrb are for not being able to tell the difference between different questions.

No, wait, I know, you're trying to RESTART this debate from the point where you started failing yesterday, so maybe you don't make the same dumb mistakes!!!

hahaha, you're so stupid.

4/22/2008 11:45:11 AM

only one person in this thread had trouble understanding all the gender and race questions and that was obviously your dumb ass...dont you have a cool anti war rally to attend? maybe you can scour youtube for some cool videos to post...how bout you deny common sense shit like a black candidate is going to get more black votes than the same freshman senator if he was white...then when you realize how mindless it is to deny something like that, you can pull the context and syntax cards and backstroke since obviously you're infallible, just like your boy obama, and everyone else just wants to hold him down cause he's black, rawr but what about mccain rawr hillary is evil obama doesnt use negative campagining rawhr

our country is so fucked with morons like you being so passionate about politics...completely fucked

4/22/2008 12:02:38 PM

Quote :

"Who is this other candidate who happens to be a male? Is it Richard Simmons? "

You say this, but then call other people stupid. Kinda ironic huh.

Why isnt richard simmons being considered? He "inspires" people too.


"pretend doctor".. cute. Esp coming from a secretary.

4/22/2008 12:04:49 PM

ironic?

4/22/2008 12:30:00 PM

^run out of pictures?

Ironic, sure look it up.

[Edited on April 22, 2008 at 12:32 PM. Reason : .]

4/22/2008 12:31:59 PM

i looked it up on monday

because it was getting slung around on some other board

4/22/2008 12:36:02 PM

Man this is bullshit.

From Philly.com:

We continue to hear reports of broken machines. This tale was reported to the Daily News by a very patient voter:

"I just came from voting. Finally got my vote in at 49 ward, 07 division....after waiting for (the only) 2 voting machines to be repaired. "I was able to cast my vote for Obama after waiting 1 and 1/2 hours. During that time at least 100 voters left without voting.....possibly not to return.

"I immediately called every News channel I could get through to. Persons who answered at the stations informed me that my ward was not the only one with broken machines and 'Paper ballots (as an alternative) without Obama's name on it. These provisional ballots did have Hiliary's name on them."


Now, voting machines malfunction every election. The worry today is that a high turnout will compound those problems -- forcing voters to wait, as in the case above, or turn to provisional ballots (the paper ones) which will take much longer to count. We'll keep an eye on this today.

4/22/2008 12:43:58 PM

why would hillary do such a thing? certainly bill "the first black president" clinton didnt have anything to do with it

4/22/2008 12:48:25 PM

And it gets worse

Look at what this poll worker are saying: But according to O’Connell, there have been a number of Republican “flips” to the Democratic Party. She said these voters switched for the primary, but intend to return to the GOP for the general election.
i

i.e. They are voting for hillary per fat Rush Limbaugh's orders to cause chaos

4/22/2008 12:51:24 PM

looks like its causing chaos

4/22/2008 12:54:51 PM

don't hate the player

4/22/2008 12:59:51 PM

Don't put too much hope in Operation Chaos. There are a lot of hotly contested Republican primaries in Pennsylvania today, from the Philly suburbs, to the Central Susquehana Valley and to all points west.

Pennyslvania has a long tradition of switching parties in primaries in order to vote. It is higher than normal this year, but this isn't a normal election year. We'll see in the end how the new Republican's voted, but don't put too much stock in operation chaos being the root cause of it.

4/22/2008 1:02:57 PM

Quote :

""pretend doctor".. cute. Esp coming from a secretary. "

Not exactly, even though I have to train secretaries on different ways yo use our internal docketing system. You wouldn't understand what I do anyway - it's pretty specific to Law. Plus, this work experience will be a plus when I apply to law schools in december. yay!

You, on the other hand, are a horrible pretend doctor. I have plenty of family members who are doctors, none of them could possibly spend so much time on the internet babbling about political bullshit. None of them went the easy route and chose eye doctor though, so who knows.

4/22/2008 1:11:32 PM

you must be paying attention to the lawyers at your firm pretty closely since only a lawyer could take the same 2 questions and give completely different answers for each...well a lawyer or a politician

4/22/2008 1:14:59 PM

They were different questions - it's that simple. It dosen't take a lawyer to be able to tell the difference between 2 different questions with 2 different sets of words, and 2 different queries. it takes a literate person - sometimes with some educational background

4/22/2008 1:22:12 PM

you must be the only literate person in this thread since you're the only person who thought the questions were different

keep telling me they were two different questions though...clearly you know more about the question that i asked than i do, even though i asked the question

4/22/2008 1:27:16 PM

You asked one, DNL asked the other

You and eyefakerb are the only ones who said they were the same - oh, and socks. It's a stupid argument to say the they were the same, that's why it stayed between you 3 idiots.

Anyone could see they were different questions - unless you truncate the original queastion to try to fool people, which of course you did, lol.

4/22/2008 1:40:06 PM

congrats on law school terp.

4/22/2008 1:42:43 PM

Quote :

"You and eyefakerb are the only ones who said they were the same - oh, and socks."

oh and DNL...so basically the whole thread except for you

why dont you ask DNL if they're the same question since he asked the other question

i know you're king shit and you've never been wrong so maybe ask DNL

and then when he says he too was just echoing my first question, you can attack him personally and tell us how neither of us knew what questions we asked

4/22/2008 1:42:45 PM

falling back on DNL in a politics thread. oooookay.

and yeah there are a few others than the anti-obama people and DNL in the obama thread.

4/22/2008 1:45:08 PM

DNL and I asked the "2" questions

Yet our intentions with the questions are apparently not relevant, in favor of terpball's warped interpretation and over analysis of a simple question and a simple followup of "really?"

and please inform me if you or anyone else besides terpball thinks the questions were different instead of just trolling me by informing me that more than 4-5 people have actually posted in this thread

4/22/2008 1:47:52 PM

Why don't you just repost the 2 original questions treetwista - and we can investigate this controversy further!!!

or you could just get a life and realize that nobody other than you really gives a fuck. I can't believe you really brought this stupid shit up again today.

4/22/2008 1:49:45 PM

you seem to give enough of a fuck to continuously respond to me, and not only that, you must take it so seriously that you refuse to admit that you're wrong...if it wasn't a big deal to you, you would've admitted you were wrong yesterday

but no, you chose to answer my question in a defensive and dishonest way...then you came to your senses when DNL repeated the question to you...then when I called you out, you denied it

and thats how you are on pretty much every issue, which is why our country is so fucked

somebody asks you about obama, you bring up clinton...somebody asks you about obama, you bring up mccain...somebody asks you anything else, you pull the race card...fucking brilliant

4/22/2008 1:51:03 PM

Are you going to post the 2 original questions? Or are you going to cut them down nice and small so they're even siliar in length, along with meaning? Maybe I should follow that last question up with another retarded question eyefakerb style

AND EVEN TALK ABOUT STRIKES!!!!!

^ haha, dishonest? Mr ghost edit is saying I answered the questions dishonestly. I answered both questions correctly. Don't get mad at me because you can't comprehend basic English.

[Edited on April 22, 2008 at 1:55 PM. Reason : ]

4/22/2008 1:53:46 PM

why dont you post them? afraid that everyone will realize how much of a complete moron you are?

the fact that you honestly dont think the questions were the same shows just how hardheaded and stubborn of a troll and obama slave you are

(oh no i said teh word slave even though you truly are a mental slave to anything he says...i must be a racist! time to pull the race card, that will be a good way to draw attention away from my completely shitty reading comprehension, after all maybe richard simmons is running for president!)

4/22/2008 1:54:23 PM

I think everyone reading this has gathered enough information about what really happened. Some people can read, some can't. Continue on your tirade - I'm getting back to work.

4/22/2008 1:57:22 PM

and after a couple pages of adamant denial, this is the copout "admission" of being wrong he gives, over something so trivial, i still dont understand why he'd even bother denying it in the first place

i'd worry about the secretaries you train though...ask them how they are doing and they'll say "great"...ask them how their day is going and they'll say "horrible"...cause those are two completely different questions

4/22/2008 2:00:05 PM

I'm not admitting I was wrong, I wasn't. If you can't understand different questions OFTEN yield different answers - maybe you should just stop communicating with people all-together.

And cute little anecdote there - even though it isn't close or relevant to the questions which you're alluding! Hey, maybe you tricked another eyefakerb-like idiot with your wordplay though!

[Edited on April 22, 2008 at 2:09 PM. Reason : ]

4/22/2008 2:05:35 PM

Quote :

"I'm not admitting I was wrong"

well no shit, anybody who has seen your posts knows you'd never admit that you were wrong regardless of how wrong you actually are...especially when you'd have to admit it to some dumbass cracker like me, even if its something as trivial as you misunderstanding a question that someone else asked...dont say "oh i misunderstood your question that you asked"...just stick to your guns

4/22/2008 2:07:40 PM

somebody post the questions. i'm not gonna hunt around for what you dumbasses are going on about.

4/22/2008 2:11:25 PM

Quote :

"eyefakerb"

LOL, another example of some more BS. Its no wonder someone who is consistantly wrong on so many things supports obama.

SO which is it terp, am I really not an eye doctor or did I choose the easy way? Because if you had any space left in that head after your ego, you would realize that there are two different types of eye doctors. One is an MD the other an OD. I would assume you knew that...but that is probably a bad assumption. So ill mark your comment up as just another ignorant statement.

You wanna get back to obama terp? How much does he lose tonight by? I say anything under 10 points is a win for Obama, anything over is a loss. just my opinion

4/22/2008 2:12:28 PM

ok this is for you sarijoul you dumbass

question "1"

Quote :

"do you think hillary clinton's gender is helping her get any more female votes than another candidate might get who happens to be a male?"

terp's answer: "Absolutely not - I know plenty females who would love a female president, but hate the fact that it's HER running."

question "2"

Quote :

"u seriously dont think some females are voting for her cause shes a woman?"

terp's answer: "of course I do, I also think some females are NOT voting for her because she's a woman"

4/22/2008 2:14:51 PM