never had the ball

9/19/2009 9:22:45 PM

yeah this would be bullshit if they didnt overturn this

9/19/2009 9:25:20 PM

this UGA/ARK game is the longest ever, STILL in the first half

9/19/2009 9:28:59 PM

FSU is crushing BYU. It's like watching them in the 90s.

9/19/2009 9:34:38 PM

Transitive property says the ACC and more importantly, MIAMI are for real.

9/19/2009 9:42:16 PM

TT faked out the refs on the fake kneel down

9/19/2009 9:46:48 PM

Transitive property also says Jacksonville State would beat BYU

9/19/2009 9:56:46 PM

nope

9/19/2009 9:58:34 PM

Mallett is sick

9/19/2009 10:05:51 PM

Mallett just said

9/19/2009 10:22:15 PM

does Troy Polamalu really sound like that?

he sounds like a woman.


what the fuck is up with these teams?? this is some Mountain West shit... lets get some defense

[Edited on September 19, 2009 at 10:26 PM. Reason : d]

9/19/2009 10:24:44 PM

This is a shitfest of a game. I feel like every team outside the state of Florida sucks this year.

9/19/2009 11:07:26 PM

rzrback ball!

[Edited on September 19, 2009 at 11:16 PM. Reason : really? are you sure? ron cherry?]

9/19/2009 11:13:45 PM

yeah man, Florida was really impressive today

o wait

9/19/2009 11:18:05 PM

my feed cut out. what happened after the georgia fumble?

9/19/2009 11:24:13 PM

they said the georgia guy recovered it

booming punt to ark 9

ark 3 and out

ark shitty punt to their own 30

Georgia short drive and FG

up 11 with 2 mins left

9/19/2009 11:28:11 PM

Quote :

"yeah man, Florida was really impressive today o wait"

Tennessee's defense held them back pretty well last year, too

and we all saw how that season turned out.

9/19/2009 11:31:18 PM

Quote :

"yeah man, Florida was really impressive today o wait"

?

UF?
Miami?
FSU?

9/19/2009 11:32:22 PM

^^^ lame. was that a blown review by the officials?

9/19/2009 11:35:08 PM

miami #5?

i think not

9/19/2009 11:36:53 PM

yeah...I don't know about that

9/19/2009 11:37:54 PM

^^
If miami wins the next two games then they'll likely face the fsu/ncsu winner with a trip to the national championship game at stake. Watchout for FSU to knock of Florida if they're still around at that point. Tebow should wear down and FSU's man to man d might be just the trick to slow him down. If nobody comes out of the SEC unbeaten (as I expect) then Miami could realistically be the team that beats Texas for the championship.

9/20/2009 4:06:39 PM

i wont say thats not a possibility, but the likeliness of it is preposterous

9/20/2009 4:50:50 PM

lol the season is two games old for miami...sounds like the fucktard miami fans in espn conversations. absolutely outlandish at this point.

9/20/2009 5:38:38 PM

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8GuGqPKP3xw

9/21/2009 12:23:44 PM

I'm confused about where you're seeing that Miami is #5. Did someone post that they should be #5 and I'm missing it?

9/21/2009 2:02:20 PM

I think Herbstreit mentioned Saturday night they should be there but was half joking, Musberger was serious though. No fucking way right now at least.

9/21/2009 2:36:25 PM

OHHHHHHHHH, yeah Herbstriet voted miami #5.

http://pollspeak.com/pollstalker/pollstalker.php?s=9&p=18&t1=53&v=400&w=4&r=T

9/21/2009 2:39:54 PM

Why shouldn't they be #5? They've beaten two teams that are ranked when they played them. If they had started out ranked say #10 due to preseason hype, there's no doubt they'd be #5, if not higher.

9/21/2009 2:40:54 PM

they are in the ACC for one and are still, essentially, the same team as last year added in some freshmen.

They are no where near top 10

9/21/2009 2:43:25 PM

Quote :

"they are in the ACC for one and are still, essentially, the same team as last year added in some freshmen."

This is the same team that gave up 470+ rushing yards to GT last year?

Saying this is "essentially the same team" plus some freshman is kind of ignorant.

I'm not saying they necessarily deserve number five, or that they're Nat'l Championship contenders, but this team appears to be light years ahead of the 2008 Miami Hurricanes. And a number of things contribute to this improvement, which I guess you're ignoring, and that's fine. I hope everyone else is as doubtful, and that the players stay hongry.

you simply can't deny at least a top fifteen spot to a team that said "fuck scheduling cupcakes early" and beat two ranked opponents in two games, both nationally televised, one in an incredibly decisive manner.

[Edited on September 21, 2009 at 2:54 PM. Reason : .]

9/21/2009 2:44:16 PM

Last year doesn't matter. They're 2-0 and have beaten two ranked opponents. Like I said, if they were ranked preseason then they'd easily be in the top 5.

9/21/2009 3:13:46 PM

Quote :

"sounds like the fucktard miami fans in espn conversations"

keep in mind this is the same retarded troll who believes the transitive property applies to sports (even though he/she doesn't even understand it) and thinks that the Mitsubishi Eclipse is the pinnacle of Japanese engineering.

9/21/2009 3:43:10 PM

NCSU @ WAKE FOREST
3:30PM ESPNU

9/21/2009 4:11:47 PM

you are ignorant and don't understand the variation of the transitive property that applies to sports.

If team A beats team B and team B beats team C it doesn't mean team A would beat team C. (Thats elementary and I'm sorry if thats as far as your mind can take it). It just means that its possible. Also transitive property HAS to be used in college football when you have 12 games to determine everything. Every voter uses the transitive property at the end of the year to untangle log jams of teams with the same record. Computer polls have complex variations of the transitive property built into them.

9/21/2009 5:14:30 PM

hey Earl

9/21/2009 6:23:57 PM

Has anyone seen Cincy play yet this year? They are CFN's pick to play in the NC game. A lot of that has to do with playing in arguably the worst BCS conference (though I think the ACC and Big 10 -- regardless of Sagarin rating -- are on par) but they seem to have a dynamic offense.

Too bad Ohio State is afraid to play them after being tied after 3 qtrs a few years back...

9/22/2009 8:48:39 AM

They are not CFN's pick, they are one writer who likes to always go out on a limb's pick.

Fuitak is a great and hilarious writer (their Bill Simmons) but picks the random underdog a lot for shock value.

[Edited on September 22, 2009 at 8:55 AM. Reason : x]

9/22/2009 8:55:01 AM

http://cfn.scout.com/2/901289.html

Except it wasn't him.

And projection would be a better word than pick.

[Edited on September 22, 2009 at 8:59 AM. Reason : x]

9/22/2009 8:58:31 AM

Its an example of a smaller site trying to get readers

A texas fan will see it, email their friend like "look at this asshole", he'll email more people, etc, etc, etc

If they picked Florida/Texas, they wouldn't stand out

[Edited on September 22, 2009 at 9:02 AM. Reason : x]

9/22/2009 9:00:11 AM

Really? It's CFN.

Not Lord of the Lines.

Anyway, have you seen them play? I haven't and I'm wondering what they look like.

9/22/2009 9:14:54 AM

CFN isn't no name, but they still get trounced in the click count I'm sure by the likes of ESPN, SI, Sportsline, Yahoo, etc




And I've seen two of their games, first the Labor Day Raping of Rutgers, and last week at Oregon State

They're a good team, but only fringe top 10 from a talent level, if that

Getting to the NC game would be more about luck and circumstances than a true measure of their caliber

but then again, isn't it always ?

9/22/2009 9:28:31 AM

Quote :

"you are ignorant and don't understand the variation of the transitive property that applies to sports. If team A beats team B and team B beats team C it doesn't mean team A would beat team C. (Thats elementary and I'm sorry if thats as far as your mind can take it). It just means that its possible."

That's not what it means at all, that's your retarded interpretation of it...if all it means is that it's possible for team A to beat team C then it's MEANINGLESS since we all already knew it was POSSIBLE for team A to beat team C anyways.

Quote :

"Also transitive property HAS to be used in college football when you have 12 games to determine everything. Every voter uses the transitive property at the end of the year to untangle log jams of teams with the same record."

That is hilarious, and I'm sure it's the truth because there isn't such a thing as Strength of Schedule to differentiate teams with the same record.

I know you're trolling and everything but it's a pretty pathetic attempt at trolling. You should probably stop embarrassing yourself now.


As far as Cincy is conerned, I would hope they would get jumped by a 1 loss team from either the Big 12 or the SEC because they would probably embarrass themselves in the NC game.

9/22/2009 2:24:20 PM

Quote :

"That is hilarious, and I'm sure it's the truth because there isn't such a thing as Strength of Schedule to differentiate teams with the same record"

You don't understand SOS either because its all related. If Miami beat florida state and florida state beats byu who beat oklahoma...GUESS HOW THAT EFFECTS MIAMIS SOS? sos is everchanging depending on what the teams you've played do.

Go back to my original statement. I have never said Team A beat team B who beat team C so team A is better than Team C. Never. Anywhere. So for you to accuse me of believing in transitive property means you had to either

A. think I said something that I didn't say
B. think something I said was a variation of the transitive property

Which is it?

9/22/2009 5:33:53 PM

Quote :

"Really? It's CFN. Not Lord of the Lines. "

If I could just find someone to setup my page I would be fine

9/22/2009 5:39:55 PM

Have you seen the Duke marketing stuff for Saturday?

BULL CITY GRIDIRON CLASSIC

Duke vs NCCU

9/23/2009 10:20:43 AM

9/23/2009 12:35:37 PM

South Cacky vs. Manning U

from a strictly NCSU standpoint, we want USC to win...it'd be nice if our only loss was to a team that beat an (overrated) top 5 team

[Edited on September 24, 2009 at 7:53 PM. Reason : .]

9/24/2009 7:50:28 PM

what do you think ole miss should be ranked?

9/24/2009 8:02:24 PM

too early in the season to accurately predict where any team should be ranked

9/24/2009 8:03:52 PM