You're a weird guy.

9/20/2016 9:55:37 PM

yeah dude, but you're so jealous of the stache!

9/20/2016 9:59:59 PM

My bad I guess he really is a Trump supporter

9/20/2016 10:02:52 PM

false dichotomy right there

9/20/2016 10:29:55 PM

As I've said, I totally get not supporting Clinton and even if he was pro-Trump (he's not) that's all good.

I was talking about the constant memes and the link to zerohedge (bloggers and Trump surrogates have a very high percentage of MDs apparently).

[Edited on September 21, 2016 at 6:24 AM. Reason : X]

9/21/2016 6:23:54 AM

What is zerohedge?

I checked out the website last night after you said something, expecting something that goldenboy might post, but it was just more of the same, to me.

9/21/2016 8:23:24 AM

I don't know when they turned political conspiracist but it was the go-to for the gold hawks and hyperinflation freaks in like 2009-2010.

I don't really talk about what I do for my career on here but let's just say if I brought a story from them in to a meeting I'd be laughed out of the room.

[Edited on September 21, 2016 at 9:06 AM. Reason : Lol, they are STILL obsessed with hyperinflation. Wtf.]

9/21/2016 9:05:26 AM

Quote :

" false dichotomy right there"

You need to look these big words up before you use them.

I didn't present a false dichotomy. I concluded you're a Trump supporter because you just posted a pro-Trump meme right after posting his tweet.

9/21/2016 9:06:08 AM

it's also a straw man for implying that "saying mean things" is the only problem with trump

9/21/2016 9:13:06 AM

Yeah, I could not care less what he says.

I do care about the very dark side of the country that is being mainstreamed. Though I suppose having it out in the open is better. That was we can appropriately label those people who are truly awful, small-minded people (like B4C -- we knew he was a creep but now we know he is actually really just a bad human being).

9/21/2016 9:21:43 AM

how do you rate b4c above jce in terms of racism? Or do we just take jce for a legitimate troll?

9/21/2016 9:23:31 AM

JCE takes an exaggerated position to troll people, B4C is just an uncultured small town racist

9/21/2016 12:42:40 PM

B4C is bigoted. But from lack of culture/travel and real-world experience with diversity moreso than a mean spirit.

JCE is just a partisan and contrarian internet troll.

[Edited on September 21, 2016 at 12:45 PM. Reason : iPhone correction]

9/21/2016 12:45:29 PM

Might be *OLD*, but it appears that Hillary's IT guy asked reddit for help in stripping her email address from email headers, lol.

http://motherboard.vice.com/read/hillary-clinton-tech-guy-asked-reddit-for-email-advice

9/21/2016 7:58:56 PM

hilarious

9/21/2016 9:26:45 PM

^^does not support the Clinton narrative, therefore, not credible

9/21/2016 10:53:02 PM

I mean...I don't think it's unusual for any IT professional to reach out for assistance. I've seen plenty in my own workplace use google, youtube, etc. Not sure what this is supposed to prove.

9/22/2016 8:43:11 AM

^If proven true, that shows there was an active attempt to cover their tracks immediately after a court order requiring the information be turned over. In other words, purposefully destroying evidence.

9/22/2016 11:57:17 AM

depending on what the dude disclosed to the FBI, couldn't this trash his immunity?

9/22/2016 12:00:06 PM

If he had to ask on reddit how to do that he had no business running an email server...

Plus the emails would still be archived by anyone who received it, and the discrepancy would look worse most likely.

9/22/2016 12:20:27 PM

i don't think anyone in r/exchange knew how to do it. what he was asking to do was to strip certain email addresses from an archive for a "Very VIP" (this is assumed to be that he wanted to hide clinton's email address from the subpoenaed benghazi emails), so apparently its not that straight forward.

Quote :

" Hello all-- I may be facing a very interesting situation where I need to strip out a VIP's (VERY VIP) email addresses from a bunch of archived email that I have both in a live Exchange mailbox, as well as a PST file. Basically, they don't want the VIP's email address exposed to anyone and want to be able to either strop out or replace the email address in the to/from fields in all of the emails we want to send out. I am not sure if something like this is possible with PowerShell, or exporting all of the emails to MSG and doing find/replaces with a batch processing program of some sort. Does anyone have experience with something like this, and/or suggestions on how this might be accomplished?"

then a bunch of responses that its not possible
someone tells him that its not possible and that if the feature existed it would cause major legal issues
then

Quote :

"As a PST file or exported MSG files, this could be done though, yes? The issue is that these emails involve the private email address of someone you'd recognize, and we're trying to replace it with a placeholder address as to not expose it"

[Edited on September 22, 2016 at 12:38 PM. Reason : .]

9/22/2016 12:30:13 PM

I'm glad someone wrote this article. The media's treatment of the Clinton Foundation was one of the most egregious acts of journalistic misconduct of any election cycle. Hit piece after hit piece with the sole goal of making Hillary look dishonest and corrupt, none of it with any factual basis.

http://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2016/9/22/12893444/clinton-foundation-effectiveness

Quote :

"This debate has become representative of how the Clinton Foundation is covered more broadly. The value of the organization is almost entirely divorced from actual charitable programming. Stories about the foundation don’t mention what the money that allegedly bought this access was spent on. They don’t distinguish between giving to the Clintons, personally, and giving to their charitable organization. Meanwhile, Hillary Clinton’s opponent runs a foundation that is very clearly a scam, which used tax-exempt funds to purchase an autographed Tim Tebow helmet and a giant portrait of Donald Trump."

9/22/2016 2:50:33 PM

9/22/2016 3:03:26 PM

^^

You are a delusional hack if you can't see the correlation of donations and political favors.

Also Vox is a mouth piece for the Clinton campaign. Comcast had fundraisers for her, for fucks sake.

9/22/2016 3:14:20 PM

Yeah stop being such a SJW with all that liberal click bait!

9/22/2016 3:19:19 PM

Drawing the ire of racist trolls tells me I'm doing good work here.

9/22/2016 3:21:18 PM

Just because the media reports "Clinton foundation crooked" doesn't mean it's what happened.

It's calculated. Say something dumb, but true, watch the SJWs/media shit themselves and twist the words so it seems worse than it is.

9/22/2016 3:28:02 PM

But guys, a neoliberal media source that donates to Hilary says she isn't corrupt!

Hacks

9/22/2016 3:47:23 PM

Exactly, it's like if the terrorist was black they would have sent in a bomb robot to kill him. You know, because "oppression". Lol

9/22/2016 3:53:39 PM

The difference here is they are smearing an organization that demonstrably saves lives, therefore putting those lives at risk if the organization is forced to shut down in the name of horse race politics. Nothing about that is ok. They want to go after Hillary's email scandal, fine, if nothing else that shit was self inflicted. The Clinton Foundation though is an unquestionable force for good and they've been entirely unable to substantiate a single accusation of corruption related to it.

[Edited on September 22, 2016 at 4:14 PM. Reason : ]

9/22/2016 3:59:44 PM

Maybe because Clinton used bleachbit and hammers to destroy evidence? Just maybe? Hack

9/22/2016 4:05:12 PM

^ Hell yeah, the real issue is we only know about it because a non journalist figured this out. The mainstream media wouldn't dare cover this in a negative light

9/22/2016 4:10:59 PM

No way man, this article from Vote4Clinton.com says Clinton and the media are awesome!

9/22/2016 4:12:50 PM

I just think it's interesting how upset and defensive SJWs get...

Why are they so bothered that people critique biased media? I'm honestly curious...

If they want you to stop calling them a social justice warrior, then stop acting like one

9/22/2016 4:15:06 PM

I wonder if he figured it out?

9/22/2016 4:21:21 PM

Quote :

"I'm glad someone wrote this article. The media's treatment of the Clinton Foundation was one of the most egregious acts of journalistic misconduct of any election cycle."

Lol it's one of the only times the media actually did their real job. Which is investigate shit that looks fishy and put the information out there for public consumption.

As opposed to Vox which is nothing but brain dead punditry like "buh, Trump is worse" which no shit

9/22/2016 4:25:45 PM

The AP specifically deliberately misled. It's ok to say that. Their tweets, their headlines. Everything. They even admitted it.

I have no issues with digging deep. They should And that is their job. However, it is also their job to not mislead the public if there is no smoking gun.

[Edited on September 22, 2016 at 4:31 PM. Reason : Or guy]

9/22/2016 4:30:39 PM

I thought that between two ferns shit was funny. Not sure how you could be a fan of the series and not like that one.

9/22/2016 4:32:54 PM

^^^Except that's not what they did at all. They took something that looked and is perfectly clean, then spun it in a way that made it look fishy. The only new information uncovered by these investigations actually directly contradicts the claim that Clinton granted favors in exchange for Foundation donations.

[Edited on September 22, 2016 at 4:33 PM. Reason : .]

9/22/2016 4:33:12 PM

Pump the brakes gentlemen. It was the tweet and the headline that was sloppy. Not exactly the most egregious act of journalistic misconduct ever. They didn't retract the article.

9/22/2016 4:47:36 PM

Quote :

"If they want you to stop calling them a social justice warrior, then stop acting like one"

Nobody is offended by the term Social Justice Warrior.

If people stopped using that term it would be harder to figure out who to ignore.

9/22/2016 5:39:28 PM

It reminds me of how, when growing up, my parents would refer to people as bleeding heart liberals.

9/22/2016 6:03:57 PM

Quote :

"Nobody is offended by the term Social Justice Warrior."

Thats because you are a SJW. To non SJWs, SJW is the worst insult imaginable.

9/23/2016 12:09:05 AM

Yeah! And by the way even if you think you're cool, well, you aren't!

9/23/2016 7:19:24 AM

here is the timeline for the PRN stuff:

Quote :

"*July 18, 2013: Platte River Networks signed a contract to manage Hillary’s email server *June 30, 2013: Emails from the server run by Bryan Pagliano were slowly migrated to a PRN server. By *December 2013 the emails were being exclusively managed by the PRN server. *July 2014: Clinton aide Cheryl Mills arranged for [name withheld by FBI] to export all .gov emails from the PRN server, which he then exported to Mills’ and Clinton lawyer Heather Samuelson’s laptops via ScreenConnect. *July 23, 2014: House Select Committee reached an agreement with the State Department for production of Hillary Clinton’s emails. *July 24, 2014: “Stonetear” posted on Reddit asking other tech professionals how to “strip out” and batch convert the emails of a “VERY VIP” client, for the sole purpose of concealing that “VERY VIP” client’s email address. According to the post, “they don’t want the VIP’s email address exposed to anyone.” *Late September 2014: Mills and Samuelson asked [name withheld by FBI] to export all emails to them, not just those with .gov addresses. The FBI noted that [name withheld by FBI] made “inconsistent statements” over three interviews regarding the location from which he extracted the emails on the server. *September to December 2014: Samuelson reviewed Clinton’s emails using keywords and email header information, but did not review the content of each email. *December 5, 2014: Clinton provided 55,000 work related emails to the State Department. *December 2014: The month Hillary Clinton decided to implement an auto-deletion policy to purge emails older than 60 days, per her FBI interview. *December 10, 2014: “Stonetear” asked Reddit users for help formulating a 60-day deletion policy, which involved automatically deleting emails 60 days old for “certain users” unless specifically saved. *March 2, 2015: The New York Times published an article titled “Hillary Clinton Used Personal Email Account at State Dept., Possibly Breaking Rules.” *March 3, 2015: Congressional committee sent a written preservation request to Clinton’s lawyers for Clinton’s emails held on the PRN server. *March 4, 2015: Congressional committee issued subpoena to Hillary Clinton for her emails held on PRN server relating to Benghazi events. *March 9, 2015: Mills emailed [name withheld by FBI] at PRN and referenced Congress’ preservation request. *March 25, 2016: President Clinton’s staff and employees of PRN held a conference call. *Sometime between March 25 and 31, 2015: Combetta realized he did not implement a 60-day email purge policy pursuant to Mills’ order in December 2014 and reportedly had an “oh sh*t” moment, after which he used BleachBit software to destroy Hillary Clinton’s emails on the PRN server. Combetta later told the FBI that he knew about Congress’ preservation request when he used the BleachBit program to purge Clinton’s emails. Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2016/09/22/how-reddit-ruined-the-hillary-clinton-campaign/#ixzz4L5IKXWxG"

9/23/2016 9:13:53 AM

Can we go back to that between two ferns interview? There's no way that wasn't 100% scripted. I've never watched any other B2F interviews, so I didn't know what to expect, but there's no way Clinton went into that thing not knowing exactly what was coming.

9/23/2016 9:15:10 AM

aren't all of the two ferns scripted?

9/23/2016 9:18:31 AM

They are probably not totally scripted (maybe a few) but I'm sure they lay out how they want the interview to play out beforehand and basically ad-lib their way there. Kind of like a wrestling match, they know who is going to win and how, but they don't plan out every suplex and elbow drop.

9/23/2016 9:26:05 AM

pretty good interview on how the Ferns went down

http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2016/09/22/between-two-ferns-director-scott-aukerman-trump-would-be-terrible-on-the-show.html

9/23/2016 9:45:12 AM

Quote :

"Can we go back to that between two ferns interview? There's no way that wasn't 100% scripted"

9/23/2016 10:25:51 AM