back to the fapper part 3

11/5/2007 5:06:34 PM

dnl... why would you fuck a big girl who cant even control her piss when fucking. that would just be awkward as shit having her piss all over you when you're grinding and bumping..... and plus, big girls aren't really that good in bed. And im sure she's more of a fat thick than a thick type of girl.

11/5/2007 5:08:14 PM

parabola is not the same as



why do you insist on letting everyone know how stupid and thickheaded you are?

11/5/2007 5:11:27 PM

well see the plan is to fuck all the time but never tell anyone

11/5/2007 5:11:37 PM

Quote :

"There isn't any data. But the fact that you first thought of using the terminal velocity equation with regards to a relatively small parabola of liquid doesn't make that much sense. "

You can't really assert it doesn't make sense to factor that in, because it's still not obvious that terminal velocity won't be a factor. There are many things, including the geometry of the object (which would change during the journey), that factor in to terminal velocity.

11/5/2007 5:14:23 PM

such as the jizz in question being a drop of liquid whilst in air and falling, vs. a blob on the ceiling (parabola ) trying to fall.

11/5/2007 5:16:11 PM

^^ Yeah, but THE FIRST THING he thought of? I mean come on. He should've tried the simple DVAT equation out first, at minimum.

Quote :

"why do you insist on letting everyone know how stupid and thickheaded you are?"

THE PATH of the object as parabolic, not the shape of the liquid (did you ever take a Physics class?). And it's extremely unlikely that jizz would be the size of one raindrop.

[Edited on November 5, 2007 at 5:21 PM. Reason : .]

11/5/2007 5:17:49 PM

fat chicks give great head though

11/5/2007 5:18:49 PM

11/5/2007 5:21:22 PM

guess ol' DNL is getting desperate



believe me, i know desperate

11/5/2007 5:21:43 PM

^^DVAT

the "A" stands for acceleration

And assuming that acceleration is only with regards to GRAVITY, it'd be fairly constant.

What the fuck are you talking about with the jizz being straight down? It has to go up and come back down.

[Edited on November 5, 2007 at 5:23 PM. Reason : .]

11/5/2007 5:22:07 PM

^^^^^ That's a good point, XSMP obviously doesn't have the best grasp of physics, but you have to admit you were a little too assured of you opinion in this thread.

[Edited on November 5, 2007 at 5:22 PM. Reason : ]

11/5/2007 5:22:23 PM

^ That I can readily concede. But most of these laws are reductive to the point that all kinds of things are left out. Hell, even things like the temperature of the room would matter to truly be able to figure out what's going on here.

11/5/2007 5:24:59 PM

when using DVAT, the equations apply only to objects with constant or zero acceleration.
that said, we are dealing with 0-?acceleration, thus DVAT doesn't apply here.
if the path it follows is a parabola, then once again DVAT has no place in this discussion because
DVAT equations apply to objects moving in a straight line.

either way, you aren't being consistent.

11/5/2007 5:25:16 PM

Quote :

"WHY DOES EVERYONE CARE ABOUT HOW HIGH HOMEBOY CAN BUST A NUT"

11/5/2007 5:25:58 PM

quick, someone go try to replicate this experiment, someone take measurements, and someone else start working backwards with projectile equations

11/5/2007 5:27:56 PM

Here's how it goes down...quit trying to make shit more complicated than it should be

11/5/2007 5:32:25 PM

Quote :

"when using DVAT, the equations apply only to objects with constant or zero acceleration. that said, we are dealing with 0-?acceleration, thus DVAT doesn't apply here. if the path it follows is a parabola, then once DVAT has no place in this discussion because DVAT equations apply to objects moving in a straight line. either way, you aren't being consistent."

I am being consistent, you obviously don't know that DVAT equations are a broad set and apply to more than just straight lines. Acceleration with respect to gravity is constant for being this close to the earth. Here, I'll give you a few the situation I'm talking about:

http://id.mind.net/~zona/mstm/physics/mechanics/curvedMotion/projectileMotion/generalSolution/generalSolution.html

11/5/2007 5:33:29 PM

LINK WARZ!!1
you're tinking of a curved flight path, whereas I was not factoring that in for simplicity's sake
http://courses.ncssm.edu/apb67/resources/guides/kinematics_guide_1.htm

and if nothing else, you have referred to the fluid, and the flight path as a parabola.

11/5/2007 5:34:07 PM

^ Yeah, because projectile motion (well, from a dude's dick into the air and back down) is parabolic.

They're equally simple, really.

The jizz would not have started on the dude's ceiling, I don't think.

[Edited on November 5, 2007 at 5:37 PM. Reason : .]

11/5/2007 5:36:19 PM

not at all - for a 6 count starting at it's apex, it would have to much higher than a ceiling's constraints.

this illustration should clear things up:

11/5/2007 5:37:10 PM

It's irrelevant whether the equation applies to a straight line or not. In terms of the time it takes to go up and down, the horizontal displacement doesn't matter, you only care about the vertical motions, which if you want to think of it this way, are a straight line.

11/5/2007 5:37:28 PM

haha, you artards are arguing about jizz trajectory

11/5/2007 5:39:32 PM

hey, im not an artard

11/5/2007 5:41:01 PM

There really shouldn't be an argument... the answer is: we would need to know more about the ballistic properties of jizz

11/5/2007 5:41:14 PM

Quote :

"we would need to know more about the ballistic properties of jizz"

FTW lol

11/5/2007 5:41:53 PM

hahahaha

yes

11/5/2007 5:42:18 PM

you people

11/5/2007 5:43:10 PM

i just fapped, good times.

11/5/2007 6:01:12 PM

Normally I'd shake your hand.......but....

11/5/2007 6:02:37 PM

thank you tww for an amusing discussion on the ballistics of jizz

11/5/2007 6:58:59 PM

XSMP got so owned

11/5/2007 7:16:13 PM

11/5/2007 7:19:31 PM

oh my god i never expected this from this thread

11/5/2007 7:36:00 PM

evan did you end up fapping?

i need to know this.

11/5/2007 7:37:46 PM

maybe it hit the ceiling and stuck there for a few seconds before coming back down and hitting him in the face.

COME ON GUYS THINK OUTSIDE THE BOX

11/5/2007 7:59:17 PM

remember this one? lol

1/23/2008 10:02:51 PM

ahahaha wow

1/24/2008 12:50:13 AM