^^If you have to resort to insulting someone's spelling, you have already lost.

Fuck it, it is time for some 16th century spelling.

From here on out, I'm using no spellings that didn't exist before the turn of the 17th Century. After this post that is.

[Edited on July 17, 2008 at 9:45 AM. Reason : .]

7/17/2008 9:42:35 AM

if i was a horrible speller, i'd prefer to learn how to spell simple words instead of criticizing people for insulting pointing out the gross misspellings that make me look like i'm uneducated, but thats just me

7/17/2008 9:46:09 AM

Youe ?till have to u?e firefox inorder to knowe how to ?pel correctly.

7/17/2008 10:03:34 AM

that strawman is false, and i don't know why you're replacing your S's with ?'s, i guess i'm not a bad enough speller to understand that one

7/17/2008 10:06:52 AM

Youe do not knowe what a ?trawman is. It is quite amu?ing to me that youe throw out ?uch logical fallacies without even knowing what they mean.

7/17/2008 10:10:48 AM

i dont rely on firefox for spelling, i was trying to give you a suggestion since you clearly need help, so if you think that boone's post wasnt a strawman, its apparent that in addition to being a shitty speller, you yourself dont know what a strawman is, but now you're on some stupid shit where you replace the letter 's' with a question mark...i guess if you cant be right now, you can pretend its hundreds of years ago, or something

7/17/2008 10:12:45 AM

Quote :

"If you have to resort to insulting someone's spelling, you have already lost."

nutsmackr

Quote :

"Look, it is the non-partisan guy who likes to throw in partisan jabs by not spelling the party's name right. Unless of course he is truely [sic] illiterate."

nutsmackr

http://thewolfweb.com/message_topic.aspx?topic=533815&page=2

Self-pwn--again!!!1

7/17/2008 10:15:58 AM

It is not a letter s. It is a long s. It is not my fault youe are incapable of viewing the letter in que?tion.

Al?o, there is an apo?trophe in the word don't.

^Not at all. I know your rea?ons for not u?ing the proper word there. It deflates your notions of being non-parti?an. In other words. Youe are ju?t another Bill O'Reilly. A douche who claims to be ?omething, but in the end youe are not.

[Edited on July 17, 2008 at 10:18 AM. Reason : .]

7/17/2008 10:16:50 AM

Quote :

"From here on out, I'm using no spellings that didn't exist before the turn of the 17th Century."

thats pretty pathetic

7/17/2008 10:19:41 AM

Quote :

"theDuke866 Cock of the walk 36018 Posts user info edit post take it to the smackdown thread. 7/15/2008 1:45:39 PM"

7/17/2008 10:25:56 AM

Quote :

"no actually that was a self pwn...or as you would say, thats truely a self pwn"

Let me put it in terms you can understand

1. Hooksaw claims to not be partisan
2. Calling the Democratic Party Democrat is a Rovian/Gingrich tactic
3. Hooksaw calls the party the Democrat Party
4. Therefore, either Hooksaw is an idiot, or a liar.

7/17/2008 10:32:01 AM

Quote :

"2. In the instances that I use 'Democrat' instead of 'Democratic' adjectivally, my purpose is to piss off you and others like you through my use of spelling as commentary. I have obviously succeeded."

Self-pwn III--at least. GG!

7/17/2008 10:40:39 AM

i really dont know whats wrong with abbreviating Democratic...i mean we don't say "Republicans and Democratics"...they go by Democrats...whats the big deal?

7/17/2008 10:41:40 AM

So you're acknowledging that you don't come here for debate, rather to piss those off that you don't agree with?

7/17/2008 10:41:50 AM

Quote :

"2. In the instances that I use 'Democrat' instead of 'Democratic' adjectivally, my purpose is to piss off you and others like you through my use of spelling as commentary. I have obviously succeeded."

So you are acknowleding that you are a liar.

Congratulations on the self-pwn.

Quote :

"i really dont know whats wrong with abbreviating Democratic...i mean we don't say "Republicans and Democratics"...they go by Democrats...whats the big deal?"

One is a noun, the other is an adjective. The party is the Democratic Party. Members of the party are Democrats. In reference to the party, it is an n-bar and thus uses the adjectival form. In reference to an individual they are nouns and therefore take the noun form.

[Edited on July 17, 2008 at 10:45 AM. Reason : .]

7/17/2008 10:43:41 AM

well I personally will just say Reps and Dems just to abbreviate, I dunno, seems like nitpicking to me

7/17/2008 10:45:58 AM

It is just one of those things Republic partisans like to employ to get under the skin of Democrats.

7/17/2008 10:49:26 AM

^^^ Not at all. It has, however, been firmly established here that you are a liar--you even admitted as much.

And it's damned peculiar how some of you idiots continue to overlook this important part of the post at issue:

Quote :

". . .spelling as commentary."

[Edited on July 17, 2008 at 10:51 AM. Reason : .]

7/17/2008 10:51:22 AM

Reps say it to get under the skin of Dems, i get it, just seems utterly retarded like both parties

7/17/2008 10:51:56 AM

Quote :

"^^^ Not at all. It has, however, been firmly established here that you are a liar--you even admitted as much. And it's damned peculiar how some of you idiots continue to overlook this important part of the post at issue: "

Acknowledging a mistake is not lying.

Per your statement on "commentary." Why would you be wanting to get under the skin of Democrats, unless of course you are a partisan hack. I cannot recall a time in the Soapbox that you used the proper word Democratic.

So this is twice now that you have acknowledged being a partisan, despite your claims to the contrary. That is twice now that you have acknowledged yourself as being a liar.

that now make two self-pwns.

7/17/2008 10:54:33 AM

Quote :

"wow another thread about a gay republican...this is some important shit"

Quote :

"btw whats up with all the democrats and their satanic torture? i mean, whats that all about?"

What's with the change of heart on page 3, Tree?

[Edited on July 17, 2008 at 10:57 AM. Reason : .]

7/17/2008 10:56:45 AM

am i supposed to question the "democratics" and their satanic torture? or are you simply saying if i dont think a gay republican is important, why would i think a satanist democrat is important? i dont understand the point you're trying to make

7/17/2008 11:05:07 AM

oh wait, I get it

[Edited on July 17, 2008 at 11:10 AM. Reason : nm]

7/17/2008 11:09:19 AM

are you trying to turn that around as me claiming i ONLY say Reps and Dems? weak troll attempt

7/17/2008 11:09:47 AM