User not logged in - login - register
Home Calendar Books School Tool Photo Gallery Message Boards Users Statistics Advertise Site Info
go to bottom | |
 Message Boards » » 2012 Page 1 2 [3], Prev  
CalledToArms
All American
22025 Posts
user info
edit post

Well I think this will sum it up pretty accurately:

If you thought the trailer looked stupid: you probably won't think the movie is any good.

If you were still interested in seeing the movie after watching the trailer: you will probably enjoy the movie on a 7+/10 scale.

11/15/2009 1:02:28 PM

Capt Insano
Veteran
389 Posts
user info
edit post

Quote :
"BS. This is nearly as much of a scientific stretch as that movie. I am not much of a disaster movie fan (some friends are though, which is why I went) so my criticism may not matter to you, but this movie was boring. 4/10 from me. The disasters are entertaining if you turn off your brain, but that gets old after awhile."


No shit it's a stretch because it's never happened. obviously...Because you don't like disaster movies you probably went in thinking it was gonna suck. The point of this movie is to entertain, not inform you prick.

11/17/2009 9:28:15 AM

Slave Famous
Become Wrath
34079 Posts
user info
edit post

I liked the whole disaster part for the first few hours, but the climax was fucking dumb

John Cusack only works in comedies where he narrates and breaks the 4th wall

High Fedelity was his last good movie

11/17/2009 9:33:55 AM

Capt Insano
Veteran
389 Posts
user info
edit post

Anyone like how his name was Jackson Curtis?

Made me chuckle.

11/17/2009 9:40:11 AM

CalledToArms
All American
22025 Posts
user info
edit post

^^^ I understand that these kinds of movies are a stretch. I don't go in expecting reality. My comment wasn't so much directed at the movie's "reality," rather I was completely and singularly responding to your statement that all these events were actually scientifically possible.

The fact that they, at least in the form carried out in the movie, are not did not actually negatively affect my enjoyment of the movie. I already explained that, after the initial disaster excitement wore off, it felt long and lacked a strong climax.

And ^^, yea, for the most part. I kinda liked Runaway Jury.

Anyway, I'm peacing out. I'm not trying to convince anyone not to see the movie or anything so theres no need to continue to clutter the thread to retrace the same steps.

[Edited on November 17, 2009 at 9:43 AM. Reason : ]

11/17/2009 9:41:10 AM

d357r0y3r
Jimmies: Unrustled
8198 Posts
user info
edit post

Quote :
"Obama gets reelected"


Probably the prediction least likely to come true ITT

I think people may be overthinking this movie. The events aren't supposed to make sense. You're supposed to turn your brain off and enjoy the explosions, while completely ignoring the terrible acting and plot.

11/17/2009 10:21:28 AM

SandSanta
All American
22435 Posts
user info
edit post

I think they could have ended it an hour early.

11/17/2009 12:06:09 PM

pirate5311
All American
1047 Posts
user info
edit post

zomjesus, the neutrinos are coming.

lol at outrunning cold in day after tomorrow. like somebody else said if you know better you'll have to ignore the science, but it wasn't a terrible movie.

11/17/2009 8:11:52 PM

lafta
All American
14880 Posts
user info
edit post

i dont know why anyone doesnt want more movie for their money
unless of course its a bad movie, but most people want to get in and out of a movie even if its good

11/17/2009 8:20:23 PM

Smath74
All American
93278 Posts
user info
edit post

This movie was fucking awesome!

12/5/2009 10:43:46 PM

rjrumfel
All American
23027 Posts
user info
edit post

you cant go wrong with sending nancy pelosi and her home state to the bottom of the ocean

12/6/2009 7:29:40 PM

Nerdchick
All American
37009 Posts
user info
edit post

what do you guys think was the most implausible part of the movie, other than the basic premise??

I think it was that an electric cord could completely stop the massive reduction gears for that ark. also that there would be a camera in that room. also that the room is called the "hydraulics room" and I didn't see any hydraulics in there

12/6/2009 9:58:09 PM

Smath74
All American
93278 Posts
user info
edit post

they designed the battlestar galactica from scratch awfully fast.

12/6/2009 11:25:40 PM

parentcanpay
All American
3186 Posts
user info
edit post

this thread has run its course, and its for a movie that is hardly worth it. please simply let it die of natural causes so that myself and the other unfortunate souls who have seen this movie can forget about it sooner than later.

12/7/2009 2:31:31 AM

quagmire02
All American
44225 Posts
user info
edit post

^ you're not that important...and just to piss you off, i will bump it every morning

12/7/2009 8:36:03 AM

Smath74
All American
93278 Posts
user info
edit post

^^It was a very entertaining movie. Realistic? not at all. fun to watch? definitely.

12/7/2009 9:32:02 AM

Golovko
All American
27023 Posts
user info
edit post

Comes out on BluRay on tuesday. $19.99 at Best Buy.

2/25/2010 5:49:22 PM

Quinn
All American
16417 Posts
user info
edit post

this movie was horrible

2/25/2010 5:54:49 PM

Golovko
All American
27023 Posts
user info
edit post

this movie was awesome! Whats not to like?

2/25/2010 6:47:02 PM

TreeTwista10
minisoldr
148442 Posts
user info
edit post

pretty cool CGI

Quote :
"what do you guys think was the most implausible part of the movie, other than the basic premise??

I think it was that an electric cord could completely stop the massive reduction gears for that ark."


I thought that was unrealistic, but I think it was actually the drill or whatever that was blocking the gears, which at least makes a little more sense than the cord

12/27/2010 2:21:12 PM

 Message Boards » Entertainment » 2012 Page 1 2 [3], Prev  
go to top | |
Admin Options : move topic | lock topic

© 2024 by The Wolf Web - All Rights Reserved.
The material located at this site is not endorsed, sponsored or provided by or on behalf of North Carolina State University.
Powered by CrazyWeb v2.39 - our disclaimer.