3

6/29/2009 2:01:20 AM

Quote :

"You do know those twins were a case of heteropaternal superfecundity right?"

Wrong, smartass.



Are there any actual proven cases of bipaternal twins?


[Edited on June 29, 2009 at 3:55 AM. Reason : 2]

6/29/2009 3:48:36 AM

There's been a few cases over the years. This is the most recent:

http://tinyurl.com/lxgjs2

6/29/2009 5:50:45 AM

they should read the dna test results on maury. would be his highest rated show

6/29/2009 6:26:21 AM

that kid looks mixed to me, fwiw. especially the nose and the lips. plus non-white babies get much darker over the first few years.

Sonia you are light skinned, yes, but you still appear mixed to me. its distinguishable in your face. this is how one can tell, and what i'm saying the kids of MJ lack, except blanket.

Quote :

"really? did you know him? did he tell you this? because the billions of dollars he raised for africa and the countless free concerts and time spent over there trying to raise money for the poor tell me otherwise. youre an idiot"

no to all the above questions. but the changing of his skin, reduction in nose width, sloping of the nose, cleft to the chin, straightening of the hair, etc... all indicate my position. you can not hate black people and still dislike being black. its not an uncommon occurrence and a few 1930's actresses felt this way (mostly mulattos) so much that it led to their eventual suicide.


On to OJ.



that is his son. definitely not white looking.

here is sydney. also not white looking.





oh yeah, i forgot about these kids. the twins. this happened, but was much more likely because they were from parents who were both mulattoes. so much easier for one child to come out white looking, even though for parents of significantly mixed admixture the odds are still 100million to 1 (don't know the exact statistic and thats probably a slight exaggeration)



Also of note how not causcasian looking the parents of those twins are even though both of them have one white and one black parent.


[Edited on June 29, 2009 at 9:59 AM. Reason : twins]

6/29/2009 9:49:31 AM

just got a thing from cnn.com saying jackson's mother was petitioning for legal guardianship of the three children

6/29/2009 11:56:09 AM

Quote :

"Jackson/Rowe Not the Biological Parents Posted Jun 30th 2009 10:00AM by TMZ Staff We've learned Michael Jackson was not the biological father of any of his children. And Debbie Rowe is not the biological mother of the two kids she bore for Michael. All three children were conceived in vitro -- outside the womb. Multiple sources deeply connected to the births tell us Michael was not the sperm donor for any of his kids. Debbie's eggs were not used. She was merely the surrogate, and paid well for her services in the births of Michael Jr. and Paris. In the case of Prince Michael II (the youngest), we're told the surrogate was never told of the identity of the "receiving parent" -- Michael Jackson. Three days after Prince was born at Grossmont Hospital in San Diego County, Jackson's lawyer came to the hospital to pick the baby up and deliver him to Michael. We do not know if Jackson chose the sperm or egg donors or if he even knew who they were. Although Rowe is not the biological mother, it's not a slam dunk that she would lose a custody battle. This type of case has never been litigated in California courts. Since Rowe was married to Jackson when Michael Jr. and Paris were born, there's a presumption that she's the biological parent. That presumption can be rebutted by other evidence. We know there are documents outlining the whole arrangement for the birth of all three kids. Nonetheless, it's still an open issue with the courts. "

Also,

Quote :

"Jackson Never Adopted Kids Posted Jun 30th 2009 11:47AM by TMZ Staff We've learned Michael Jackson never adopted his three children, even though he's not the biological father. We broke the story that neither Jackson nor Debbie Rowe are the biological parents of Michael Jr. and Paris. And Michael was not the biological parent of Prince Michael II either. Now here's the rub. We've learned Jackson never filed legal papers to adopt any of his children. Legal experts tell us Jackson would be presumed the father but it's not conclusive by any means. As for why Jackson didn't formally adopt -- we're told at the time the kids were born there was no third party whom he believed would try and claim custody. For some reason, Jackson never thought Debbie Rowe would mount a custody challenge. "

6/30/2009 12:00:41 PM

Things just got interesting.

6/30/2009 12:04:26 PM

I present two



and

6/30/2009 12:22:46 PM

I just re-read through this thread and pretty much everything bottombaby said is bullshit.

7/1/2009 12:17:23 AM

this bitch is crazy nuts...she says that MJ fathered Tom Cruise's black son and that she is the mother of MJs children

[Edited on August 11, 2009 at 1:46 PM. Reason : lol]

8/11/2009 1:45:42 PM