Cool. I heard that someone got better just by praying. That must be legit too.

5/22/2012 8:11:14 AM

Does GeniuSxBoY really not see the difference between Lyon and Lyons?

5/22/2012 9:07:08 AM

Oh, does it piss you off when I type Dr. Lyon? I know you can't live without the s to know who I'm talking about. Dr. Lyon. Dr. Lyon.

[Edited on May 22, 2012 at 3:46 PM. Reason : .]

5/22/2012 3:40:12 PM

what inspired you to proclaim yourself a genius?

5/22/2012 3:40:45 PM

I know why you are asking that.

1) I make typos often.
2) I have a hard time communicating my thoughts.

These are known flaws yet people still hold me accountable. Do you laugh at people who shit their pants, yet can play Mozart on a piano from hearing it just once?

Is he a genius or is he a retard?

5/22/2012 3:56:11 PM

i was just wondering if you actually think you're a genius. apparently you do.

5/22/2012 4:04:08 PM

Perhaps assuming is your fortè. Otherwise, i was just wondering if you actually think you're a bullet. apparently you do.

5/22/2012 4:06:44 PM

not the same thing at all, genius.

5/22/2012 4:08:58 PM

Explain the difference.



Also, you refused to answer if an idiot savant is a retard or a genius.

[Edited on May 22, 2012 at 4:14 PM. Reason : .]

5/22/2012 4:14:17 PM

So you think you're a retarded genius?

5/22/2012 4:16:46 PM

I'm trying to walk you to the answer but instead you are trying to jump two steps ahead but you keep on missing.

5/22/2012 4:20:25 PM

Quote :

"Oh, does it piss you off when I type Dr. Lyon? I know you can't live without the s to know who I'm talking about. Dr. Lyon. Dr. Lyon."

Nope, just wondering why after Wolfmarsh told you repeatedly that the man's name was Dr. Lyons you complained that he was being ambiguous. And to demonstrate this ambiguity you highlighted several people with the last name Lyon.

5/22/2012 5:23:58 PM

Quote :

"for the recond it helps to put a first name, but of course "I'm the idiot""

For the recond, I left it out on purpose. I don't need you bothering real doctors, especially my son's doctors, with your inane bullshit.

5/22/2012 7:15:31 PM

One of my favorite TED talks is actually pretty damned relevant here:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b_6-iVz1R0o

5/23/2012 12:34:58 AM

Oh my, wolfmarsh found another typo. You win the game.

5/23/2012 12:44:51 AM

R.I.P., Billie Bainbridge
http://scienceblogs.com/insolence/2012/06/05/r-i-p-billie-bainbridge/

Quote :

"The other reason is that Billie is emblematic of what Burzynski does. Her parents raised hundreds of thousands of pounds to take her to Houston to be treated by Burzynski, in the process recruiting some famous U.K. entertainers to stage benefits to support that treatment, a process I’ve referred to before as kind-hearted strangers being hit up to support woo. There are so many issues: Desperate parents and relatives scrambling to raise money from kind-hearted strangers who don’t know that what they are supporting is dubious at best and quackery at worst; the cult of personality that Burzynski has cultivated; and, above all, why the Texas Medical Board and the FDA are seemingly powerless to stop him. Meanwhile, despite the picture of Dr. Burzynski being painted by his admirers as the only one who can save these children, despite his claims that he can do better than conventional therapy, his patients continue to die. Patients like Billie Bainbridge. "

6/7/2012 10:01:19 AM

A pair of scientists at California Pacific Medical Center in San Francisco has found that a compound derived from marijuana could stop metastasis in many kinds of aggressive cancer, potentially altering the fatality of the disease forever.

"It took us about 20 years of research to figure this out, but we are very excited," said Pierre Desprez, one of the scientists behind the discovery, to The Huffington Post. "We want to get started with trials as soon as possible."

The Daily Beast first reported on the finding, which has already undergone both laboratory and animal testing, and is awaiting permission for clinical trials in humans.

Desprez, a molecular biologist, spent decades studying ID-1, the gene that causes cancer to spread. Meanwhile, fellow researcher Sean McAllister was studying the effects of Cannabidiol, or CBD, a non-toxic, non-psychoactive chemical compound found in the cannabis plant. Finally, the pair collaborated, combining CBD and cells containing high levels of ID-1 in a petri dish.

"What we found was that his Cannabidiol could essentially 'turn off' the ID-1," Desprez told HuffPost. The cells stopped spreading and returned to normal.

"We likely would not have found this on our own," he added. "That's why collaboration is so essential to scientific discovery."

Desprez and McAllister first published a paper about the finding in 2007. Since then, their team has found that CBD works both in the lab and in animals. And now, they've found even more good news.

"We started by researching breast cancer," said Desprez. "But now we've found that Cannabidiol works with many kinds of aggressive cancers--brain, prostate--any kind in which these high levels of ID-1 are present."




http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/09/19/marijuana-and-cancer_n_1898208.html?utm_hp_ref=fb&src=sp&comm_ref=false

9/28/2012 11:12:36 PM

Man, weed makes everything lazy.

9/29/2012 12:55:14 PM

Where you believe him or not, they just dismissed his case again,

Quote :

" December 2, 2012 Dead silence is all that remains, over a week since the Texas Medical Board was forced to drop their case against Dr. Stanislaw Burzynski. Other than a couple random small-town newspapers, a questionable blog and Saturday's opinion piece in a tiny Canadian newspaper, no one in the media has been willing to touch the news that, yet again, all charges were dismissed against a certain doctor that has literally and successfully cured cancer on many occasions. http://www.examiner.com/article/dr-burzynski-free-to-continue-curing-cancer "

http://www.anh-usa.org/tmb-lawsuit-against-cam-cancer-pioneer-dismissed/

Case Docket:
http://www.bolenreport.com/feature_articles/soahdismissalorder.pdf

12/3/2012 1:04:20 PM

I got the toxin remover insoles for me shoes, i'm good

12/3/2012 1:12:29 PM

^^I find it repugnant that your paranoia has led you to defend a monster who sells piss chemotherapy (sorry, "antineoplastons extracted from urine") to terminal cancer patients for hundreds of thousands of dollars.

Luckily most people ignore you but in case anyone is interested on how this slickster evaded the Texas Medical Board again: http://scienceblogs.com/insolence/2012/11/26/significance-of-the-tmb-dismissal-case-against-burzynski/

Quote :

"So why was Buryznski’s case dismissed? Fortunately, some of my readers helped me out in the comments of my last post. You, too, can get these PDFs if you wish, just by going to the Texas State Office of Administrative Hearings (SOAH) and, using a guest account, searching for docket 503-11-1669. The “money filings” are ORDER NO. 12 – RULING ON RESPONDENTS MOTION FOR DISPOSITION, STAFFS SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS, AND MEMORIALIZING PARTIES STIPULATION OF FACTS and ORDER N O. 16 » GRANTING AND DENYING IN PART STAFFS MOTION FOR RECONSIDERTION OF ORDER NO. 12. Basically, the TMB had gone after Burzynski based on the doctrine of vicarious liability, which means in essence that the TMB was arguing that Burzynski was responsible for the actions of the physicians working for him who had cared for the patients at the heart of the TMB case against Burzynski. In response, Burzynski moved to dismiss and/or strike TMB allegations against him to the extent that the allegations were based on the actions of other physicians working at his clinic. His attorney’s argument was that, under administrative law, there is no vicarious liability for the actions of others. This is apparently different from tort law (for example, medical malpractice), where the physician can be held liable for the actions fo physicians working under his control or supervision in some circumstances. The bottom line is that the administrative judge ruled in Burzynski’s favor. From the RESPONDENT’S REPLY TO THE BOARD STAFF’S SUPPLEMENTAL RESPONSE ON THE CONSOLIDATE MOTION FOR DISMISSAL AND SUMMARY DISPOSITION: Respondent’s ownership of the clinic and his self-designation as the clinic’s chief physician on some forms, his ability to hire and fire everyone, and even that the forms which state that he is in “charge of treatment” (as stated in the informed consent forms for patient A) is only evidence of responsibility under vicarious liability theory, given the fact that the medical records detail exactly what doctors provided services to these two patients and who was involved in the delivery of medical care to these patients. The judge accepted this reasoning, which meant that the TMB faced the bad option of trying to prosecute a case based only on what the complaint alleged that Burzynski himself did. It’s not clear why the TMB voluntarily dismissed the case after this ruling, but perhaps the TMB’s lawyers concluded that there wasn’t a strong enough case based only on the allegations against only Burzynski. Basically, by throwing his fellow physicians working for him under the bus, Burzynski walks. Why do I say “throwing them under the bus”? Simple. The TMB could, if it so desired, begin actions against the individual physicians who took care of these patients, and I sincerely hope that the TMB does just that. As for the significance of the ruling, contrary to what Burzynski’s apologists would like you to believe, this ruling says absolutely nothing about whether what Burzynski is doing is good science or not. It says exactly nothing about whether what Burzynski is doing is good medicine or not. It says even less about whether Burzynski’s clinical trials are ethical or not. All the board found was that, as a matter of law, the TMB couldn’t bring action against Burzynski on the basis of actions performed by doctors under his supervision. So when someone like Patrick “Tim” Bolen exults that Burzynski’s somehow been vindicated, Sarah the Healthy Economist says “alternative cancer treatment wins big,” or Burzynski’s lawyer Richard Jaffe says something like, “The cutting-edge, multi-agent gene targeted therapy devised by Dr. Burzynski which was at the heart of this proceeding is still being given at the clinic and is helping countless patients,” it’s a non sequitur. Just because the judge ruled on a narrow point of law regarding whether specific allegations were admissible in a case against Burzynski says nothing about the validity of Burzynski’s work, nor does it in any way vindicate him. He got off on a technicality, and that’s all."

Also, he's been doing clinical trials for 20 years, since it was decreed by the Texas Medical Board that he couldn't use his crank science outside of a trial. If he really has a cure (a string of dead children suggest otherwise) where's the peer review? How many clinical trials do you have to do? All he's doing is masquerading junk as a cure, never publishing it and making millions of dollars off of the despair of parents and kindness of strangers. I don't believe in Hell but sometimes wish it existed for fuckers like Stanislaw Burzynski.

[Edited on December 3, 2012 at 2:36 PM. Reason : .]

12/3/2012 2:27:54 PM

Dude, the post was informing you that the case was dismissed


You're such a drama queen.

12/3/2012 2:48:32 PM

With a link proclaiming him a CAM Cancer Pioneer.

12/3/2012 2:58:10 PM

Who gives a shit what he's called, you have the freedom not to use him.

12/3/2012 2:59:01 PM

I should be allowed to provide medical services too, the "doctor" cabal has to end!

12/3/2012 4:14:09 PM

Only the government can rape you of all your money for the treatment of cancer which ends in miserable results and suffering.

12/3/2012 4:19:15 PM

or people that some secret organizations allows to call themselves medical doctors

12/3/2012 4:21:31 PM

Buryznski is a complete secret.

As unlawful and unlicensed as he may be, why can't the government stop him?







"Technicalities"

12/3/2012 4:28:24 PM

They can still bring case against his physicians that have actually been harming people. Learn to read.

12/3/2012 4:34:40 PM

Quote :

"They can still bring case against his physicians that have actually been harming people. Learn to read."

You mean like all doctors that use chemotherapy for treatment who end up dying from the effects of chemotherapy?

12/3/2012 4:36:53 PM

Suspend this ass clown.

12/3/2012 6:18:10 PM

"I don't like what he's saying, suspend him! If I don't hear it, it doesn't exist!"

Signed NyM

12/3/2012 8:38:11 PM

It's true, we really don't like hearing the ramblings of idiots, and would rather such ramblings didn't exist.

12/4/2012 8:33:41 AM

It's getting to the point that hardly any real discussions are had in the TSB, it's dominated by one person's crazy opinions.

12/4/2012 9:55:02 AM

Has he tried to justify drunk driving yet? That was one of my favorites.

12/4/2012 10:44:56 AM

Quote :

"Suspend this ass clown."

Mods don't suspend anymore, this kind of shit is what you're left with now

12/4/2012 11:42:28 AM

The four posts above me seem to talk about me more than cancer.

In fact, all threads stop to talk about me.

It is no wonder why all threads are never on topic.

Doesn't take a genius to see this trend.

But then again, maybe it does.

12/4/2012 4:57:14 PM

Well then maybe you should just stop posting so that the threads can get back on track.

12/4/2012 5:00:24 PM

Maybe you should post on topic.

But then again, you are soapbox cancer, so carry on.

12/4/2012 5:02:06 PM

LOL, you are such a fucking moron.

12/4/2012 5:25:09 PM