Aircraft Parts as a Clue to their Identity

by George Nelson Colonel, USAF (ret.)

http://www.physics911.net/georgenelson.htm

back-up: http://www.rense.com/general64/prec.htm

Quote :

"[T]he 911 hijackings and damage to buildings were not the work of Arab terrorists, but appear to have been part of a black operation carried out with the cooperation of elements in our government. ...The government alleges that four wide-body airliners crashed on the morning of September 11 2001, resulting in the deaths of more than 3,000 human beings, yet not one piece of hard aircraft evidence has been produced in an attempt to positively identify any of the four aircraft. On the contrary, it seems only that all potential evidence was deliberately kept hidden from public view. ...With all the evidence readily available at the Pentagon crash site, any unbiased rational investigator could only conclude that a Boeing 757 did not fly into the Pentagon as alleged. Similarly, with all the evidence available at the Pennsylvania crash site, it was most doubtful that a passenger airliner caused the obvious hole in the ground and certainly not the Boeing 757 as alleged. Regarding the planes that allegedly flew into the WTC towers, it is only just possible that heavy aircraft were involved in each incident, but no evidence has been produced that would add credence to the government's theoretical version of what actually caused the total destruction of the buildings, let alone proving the identity of the aircraft. That is the problem with the government's 911 story."

Very interesting article.

4/23/2005 3:19:22 PM

interesting because you entirely suspend reality

oh wait i forgot, let me unplug my zionist control harness from the back of my head

what were you saying?

[Edited on April 23, 2005 at 3:22 PM. Reason : .]

4/23/2005 3:21:19 PM

There's a room where the light won't find you
Holding hands while the world's gone totally to hell
When they do I'll be right behind you

So glad we've almost made it
So sad they've had to fade it
Everybody wants to rule the world

4/23/2005 3:50:49 PM

The Silencing of Sibel Edmonds
http://www.villagevoice.com/news/0517%2Cwebmondo1%2C63324%2C6.html

Quote :

"WASHINGTON, D.C.—The unsettling story of whistleblower Sibel Edmonds took another twist on Thursday, as the government continued its seemingly endless machinations to shut her up. The U.S. Court of Appeals here denied pleas to open the former FBI translator's First Amendment case to the public, a day after taking the extraordinary step of ordering a secret hearing. Edmonds was hired after 9-11 to help the woefully staffed FBI's translation department with documents and wiretaps in such languages as Farsi and Turkish. She soon cried foul, saying the agency's was far from acceptable and perhaps even dangerous to national security. She was fired in 2002. Ever since, the government has been trying to silence her, even classifying an interview she did with 60 Minutes. Oral arguments in her suit against the federal government were scheduled for this morning, but yesterday the clerk of the appeals court unexpectedly and suddenly announced the hearing would be closed. Only attorneys and Edmonds were allowed in."

[Edited on April 23, 2005 at 9:51 PM. Reason : 2]

4/23/2005 9:51:07 PM

Moussaoui pleads guilty to terror charges
http://www.cnn.com/2005/LAW/04/22/moussaoui/index.html

Can you explain this? A muslim man pleading guilty to terrorism charges and stating that bin Laden personally picked him to carry out such acts?

Oh, let me guess, he really works for the NWO and his trial is a farce. I can only assume that this is what you will argue because it is exactly what you argue whenever a new hole appears in your theory.

4/24/2005 12:46:25 PM

^ dude u should know by now that Moussaoui is a secret US government agent that was told to become a "terrorist" by the Jew, government controlled, elite, zionist media. o and the trial...its definately a farce. there probably is no trial going on, he's prob sitting on a private island beach sipping margaritas and earning 20%.

4/24/2005 2:17:23 PM

ADL: "Conspiracy Theories About Jews and 9/11 Cause Dangerous Mutations in Global Anti-Semitism"
http://www.adl.org/PresRele/ASInt_13/4346_13.htm

Quote :

"According to the League's report, Unraveling Anti-Semitic 9/11 Conspiracy Theories, the canard of Jewish or Israeli involvement in 9/11 has gained widespread acceptance in the Arab and Muslim world, parts of Europe and even in the United States."

And, of course, according to the ADL, this widespread view in various parts of the world is due to "rabid hatred of the Jews" and nothing more. The FACTS and EVIDENCE apparantly have absolutely nothing to do with it.

[Edited on April 24, 2005 at 10:11 PM. Reason : 2]

4/24/2005 10:08:09 PM

^Wait, why did you link that? Someone else should have linked that to show what harm perpetuating these conspiracies is doing.

4/24/2005 10:10:12 PM

I don't agree with what the ADL is saying. I'm posting it to expose the deception and smear tactics they are using.

4/24/2005 10:14:43 PM

aha

ahahaha


Carry on, then

4/24/2005 10:18:18 PM

MITRE: The 9/11 trojan horse?
http://www.libertythink.com/2005/04/mitre-911-trojan-horse.html

Quote :

"Monday, April 04, 2005 American Free Press / Christopher Bollyn Did a central controller with "super user" privileges of the command and control systems of the Department of Defense, NORAD, the Air Force, and the FAA, control the aerial attacks of 9/11? There is only one agency that has that capability ? a little-known private company known as MITRE Corp.[...] A host of unofficial explanations, based on available evidence, [indicates] that agents embedded within the U.S. military and intelligence organizations conspired to carry out the terror attacks. "

How Mossad Deceived the U.S. Military on 9/11
http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/forum.cgi?read=68484

Quote :

"by Christopher Bollyn Mossad, Israel's military intelligence agency, infiltrated the most sensitive computer networks in the United States through a little start-up company known as Ptech, in Quincy, Massachusetts. Most notably, it was this infiltration that allowed the events of September 11, 2001 to occur. If the crimes of 9/11 had been properly investigated, these people would have been investigated and booked long ago. The Mossad connection is obvious; read on: In order to facilitate the computer network penetration, Mossad set up a IT consultancy and software provider named Ptech using Lebanese and Arabs as the front-man financiers and founders and keeping their Jewish American "sayan" in a secondary, but critical position."

[Edited on April 24, 2005 at 10:35 PM. Reason : 2]

4/24/2005 10:32:13 PM

Once again you've ignored the questions that you can't answer.

Quote :

"Moussaoui pleads guilty to terror charges http://www.cnn.com/2005/LAW/04/22/moussaoui/index.html Can you explain this? A muslim man pleading guilty to terrorism charges and stating that bin Laden personally picked him to carry out such acts?"

4/25/2005 9:00:36 AM

Quote :

"Once again you've ignored the questions that you can't answer. "

You just WISH I couldn't answer your "questions". But, ONCE AGAIN, you are wrong. I can answer that question. I didn't respond to it earlier partly because I didn't feel it was an important enough question to deserve a response.

Has it ever occured to you that a person who pleads guilty to something may in fact be innocent of the charges? Many people plead guilty because they believe the government will be able to convict them at trial on charges they are innocent of, so they plead guilty to get a more lenient sentence. Who knows why Moussaoui has now decided to plead guilty.

There are oddities about the Moussaoui case. Apparantly, Moussaoui has been fighting for 3 years to get testimony for Guantanamo detainees, which would apparantly prove his innocence. So why does he now enter a guilty plea? Also, I have read that the the flight trainer who trained "Moussaoui" says that the guy he trained is a different guy than the one on the news (ie, the one being charged).

The guy initially captured as being "Moussaoui" may have not been the real Moussaoui, but someone impersonating the real Moussaoui. Moussaoui was born in France and speaks fluent French, but when the flight instructor (who spoke French) tried to speak to this "Moussaoui" in French, he reacted very strange and acted as if he didn't understand what the instructor was saying.

More: http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/zmanomaly.html

Prior to 9/11, the government was obstructing FBI investigations regarding Moussaoui. Also, it is very noteworthy that Moussaoui is the ONLY person to be charged in connection to 9/11. It's been 3 and a half years, and they've only charged one person related to 9/11? And this case may never go to trial. The government doesn't want it to go to trial, because that may end up exposing some of the truth, revealing the lies and complicity of the government.


[Edited on April 25, 2005 at 9:49 AM. Reason : 10]

4/25/2005 9:23:25 AM

do you have ANY real websites?

4/25/2005 9:25:04 AM

Lawyers: Moussaoui Unfit to Plead Guilty
http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2005/4/22/152841.shtml

This is pure speculation, but the government may be mistreating Moussaoui in some way to cause him to become mentally unstable. It is possible that he is being tortured. After what has been exposed as having occured at Abu Ghraib and at Guantanamo, that is entirely plausible.

[Edited on April 25, 2005 at 9:35 AM. Reason : 1]

4/25/2005 9:28:33 AM

Quote :

"do you have ANY real websites?"

Did you even examine the information at the site? (http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/zmanomaly.html) It uses information from so-called "mainstream" sources to support its analysis. It even has the links to the "mainstream" sources (CNN, the Mineapolis-St. Paul Star Tribune) right there for the reader to use. But I guess that isn't good enough for you, is it?

[Edited on April 25, 2005 at 9:46 AM. Reason : 5]

4/25/2005 9:39:10 AM

A profile of Zacarias Moussaoui
http://www.cnn.com/2005/LAW/04/22/moussaoui.profile/index.html

Quote :

"Investigators say he attended mosques in England with suspected al Qaeda connections. One of those mosques is where terrorist cleric Abu Hamza al-Masri was prayer leader. In 1996, French authorities began monitoring Moussaoui's activities after they noticed him with Islamic extremists. The French placed him on a watch list three years later. In 1998, according to prosecutors, he attended a terrorist training camp in Afghanistan. Shortly after arriving in the United States, he began taking flying lessons at the Airman Flight School in Norman, Oklahoma. He left without a license, after taking over 50 hours of lessons. The school was attended by would-be bin Laden pilots in the late 1990s and visited by September 11 hijacker-pilots Mohamed Atta and Marwan al-Shehhi in 2000. By August 2001, Moussaoui was living in Minneapolis, Minnesota, where he bought training time on a jumbo jet simulator at a flight school. About the same time, he allegedly received $14,000 from al Qaeda operative Ramzi Binalshibh in Germany. School officials contacted the FBI after they grew suspicious of him when he could barely handle a small private plane. FBI agents arrested him August 16 on charges of violating his visa. A search of Moussaoui's belongings turned up Boeing 747 flight manuals, two knives, an aviation radio, information on aerial application of pesticides, and a notebook containing telephone numbers in Germany. A business card found at the Pennsylvania plane crash site of United Flight 93 had a phone number on it that Moussaoui had called shortly before the attacks. Prosecutors said the name printed on the card was that of Ziad Jarrah's uncle. Jarrah was one of the hijackers aboard Flight 93."

As always, you provide the web address of a site devoted to the propogation of its own bizarre conspiracy theories. Its entire case is that Moussaoui didn't speak french to his instructor. While this defies all of the other (real) evidence that you choose to ignore, you continue to believe it solely because it fits in with your other inane theories.

Has it ever occured to you that the majority of people who plead guilty are guilty? I know that sounds shocking.

And you're right. Moussaoui is the only person to be charged in connection with 9/11 - in the United States. Evidently you're unaware of the individuals being tried in Spain as well as the numerous others detained by the US in connection with the attacks.

Of course, you will never see the absolute lunacy of some of your theories. As long as you can find a related web page, you will believe any nonsense to support your ideas.

4/25/2005 10:02:34 AM

Quote :

" But I guess that isn't good enough for you, is it? "

no
whatreallyhappened.com is not good enough regardless of how much they quote from real sites

4/25/2005 10:10:57 AM

Quote :

"Did a 757 really hit the Pentagon?"

Doubt it.

4/25/2005 11:04:32 AM

Evidently you missed this on page 28:

Quote :

"OK, I only read about half of this thread, but listen up. I know for a fact that a plane hit the pentagon becasue I saw it. With my own eyes. I was on my way to DC with my parents on the morning of September 11. I took the week off of school and after spending Monday night in Richmond, we were headed up to see the sites in DC. We were coming up on washington and were almost to the point where the pentagon is visable on the left. I was driving and my dad was in the passenger seat. All of a sudden we both see a plane coming from the right and behind us, though we hadn't heard it apporach. National Airport is in the direction that the plane was flying, but this plane was flying low and fast. It crossed our path and disappeared for about 2 seconds before we saw a flash of light and heard what sounded like a muffled firework. A few seconds later, we saw a large plume of smoke coming from where the plane had been headed. Just then we came around the bend and saw the building on fire. Fucking scary as shit. We pulled over on the side of the road, as did some of the other drivers, to watch and talk to the other people who had seen it, but about 5 minutes later a bunch of cops came through running everybody out. So yeah, it was a plane. End of thread."

4/25/2005 11:08:23 AM

Mr. Joshua, you don't quite get it. FreeBird already suspects the government story on the Pentagon is false. Given that, we know he has probably already taken a lot of time to research the facts and evidence. He's probably not one of these people who accepted the government and media story from the get go, never quetioned it, and ignores all evidence that contradicts the official version.

He's informed. Do you really think one post by a user here on TWW is going to make him reverse his opinion? He probably knows that there is conflicting eyewitness testimony and that there are eyewitnesses that saw an aircraft much smaller than a 757.

It's going to be difficult to sell lies to people who already know the truth, mr joshua. The official government and media story on 9/11 is a monstrous lie. It is FULL of holes. More and more people are awakening to that fact every day.

[Edited on April 25, 2005 at 12:36 PM. Reason : 2]

4/25/2005 12:33:28 PM

Maybe he has researched it, or maybe he's just seen the ridiculous internet video that has circulated about it.

I've examined all evidence with an open mind, and I'm afraid that the internet garbage the you have taken to heart and repeatedly regurgitate is anything but solid evidence. The fact is that you are the absolute last person that can talk about looking at evidence with an open mind. Your unwaivering commitment to such asinine ideas has made you the laughing stock of the Soap Box.

4/25/2005 12:39:51 PM

Quote :

"The official government and media story on 9/11 is a monstrous lie. It is FULL of holes. More and more people are awakening to that fact every day."

you are the LAST person to be talking about what is full of holes and what isnt. all your bull is INUNDATED with holes that many people in this thread have pointed out to you only to be ignored.

Quote :

"there are eyewitnesses that saw an aircraft much smaller than a 757."

so every eyewiteness knows what a 757 is, the technical specs to it, the size of it? i bet u could show a picture of a 757 in a lineup of Boeing's aircrafts and most people wouldnt get it right. u ask what i base that on...i base that on the fact that not everyone is an aerospace/aeronautical engineer and/or has absolutley no affiliation or knowledge of the airlines. but hey, it was somethin smaller than a 757

4/25/2005 1:23:08 PM

Quote :

"Do you really think one post by a user here on TWW is going to make him reverse his opinion?"

Considering that a 1000+ posts by you haven't reversed our opinions either (on any subject you post about), no, probably not.

4/26/2005 12:08:11 AM

4/26/2005 1:20:50 AM

"New Flight 175 Footage: No Pod?"
http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/april2005/270405newfootage.htm

Quote :

"It is a common tactic for the government media spin machine to misdirect people's attention by getting them excited about one aspect of an issue, then later bring out evidence to debunk that aspect and thus tarnish the credibility of the entire subject. Many analysts fear this is the case with 9/11. For example, whatreallyhappened.com and others postulate that the government will eventually release clear footage of Flight 77 hitting the Pentagon. This will then discredit an entire portion of the 9/11 truth movement and the debunkers will have a field day. It is unclear whether the movement could take a blow of this magnitude and not be significantly damaged."

If the government did release "footage showing Flight 77 hitting the Pentagon" it would most likely be phony/doctored footage, since the evidence does not support a Boeing 757 hitting the Pentagon. With all the special effects technology available today in the area of video and film, it would be quite easy for the government to produce very convincing phony footage of nearly anything. Just think what Hollywood and the movie industry can do.

They even have technology available now to make fake video/audio of someone and "put words in their mouths." They could make a video of someone saying something they never said.

Video research at MIT puts words into mouths
http://cerboli.mit.edu:8000/research/mary101/news/cnn.html

Quote :

"In an eerie video clip created by Massachusetts Institute of Technology researchers, the long-dead celluloid star croons the song "Hunter" by the very much alive performer. The MIT team has combined artificial intelligence and videography to make words and song -- even in foreign languages -- emerge from the lips of people who could never possibly have uttered them."

[Edited on April 27, 2005 at 9:53 AM. Reason : 2]

4/27/2005 9:52:08 AM

Quote :

"If the government did release "footage showing Flight 77 hitting the Pentagon" it would most likely be phony/doctored footage, since the evidence does not support a Boeing 757 hitting the Pentagon."

So even if something does come out that completely verifies the story, you won't believe it because you will immediately label it propaganda. In fact, you've labeled it as such before it even came out. You are now disallowed from ever telling someone to "have an open mind".

Quote :

"They even have technology available now to make fake video/audio of someone and "put words in their mouths." They could make a video of someone saying something they never said."

This has been around for a long time. Evidently you never saw Forrest Gump.

4/27/2005 10:00:43 AM

RETIRED AIR FORCE COLONEL CHALLENGES OFFICIAL REPORTS OF SEPTEMBER 11TH
http://www.thepowerhour.com/press_release/press12.htm

Quote :

"During an appearance on The Power Hour radio program today, USAF Col. George Nelson (ret.), a 30 year veteran, aircraft accident investigator and expert in aircraft maintenance and aircraft identification, stunned the Power Hour listeners by stating that in regard to the 911 attack at the Pentagon, “I didn’t see any damage on the sides of that hole, anything that would say that an airplane that size could have gone through a 16 or 18 ft. hole.” He was referring to the hole seen at the Pentagon before the collapse of the e-ring. He went on to say, “There would be large parts of that wing lying on the ground on the outside. It wouldn’t all go through that hole…It is impossible for all of the time change parts that have these serial numbers that are trackable to the specific aircraft,… it is impossible for them to be totally destroyed where these serial numbers could not be read.” http://www.physics911.net/georgenelson.htm When asked to express his opinion in regard to the controversial photographs and video showing an anomaly attached to the belly of the plane that struck the South tower and the mysterious “flash” that occurred as the plane made contact, Col. Nelson said, “There appeared to be something attached to the belly and there definitely appeared to be a flash. What caused that flash? Who knows? I can’t explain it and it’s just a number of these anomalies like that, that just makes the entire picture more suspect.” The video and photographic evidence can be seen in the video ”911 - In Plane Site.” http://www.911inplanesite.com The “flash” was seen on four different video angles that captured the plane that struck the South tower. Given that the flash occurred 6 to 10 feet to the right of the point of contact of the fuselage, Col. Nelson stated that it was “highly unlikely” that it was caused by static electricity or an aluminum burn. He also said that aluminum could not have “vaporized” as was asserted by the official story. Due to the fact that public officials and news networks have refused to honestly address these very serious questions raised by confirmable video and photographic evidence, an increasing number of military personnel and airline pilots are coming forward to challenge the official story of September 11th. More to come."

[Edited on April 29, 2005 at 10:23 AM. Reason : 2]

4/29/2005 10:20:35 AM

Seventeen Techniques for Truth Suppression
http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/april2005/290405truthsuppression.htm

Quote :

"3) Characterize the charges as "rumors" or, better yet, "wild rumors." If, in spite of the news blackout, the public is still able to learn about the suspicious facts, it can only be through "rumors." (If they tend to believe the "rumors" it must be because they are simply "paranoid" or "hysterical.") 5) Call the skeptics names like "conspiracy theorist," "nut," "ranter," "kook," "crackpot," and of course, "rumor monger." Be sure, too, to use heavily loaded verbs and adjectives when characterizing their charges and defending the "more reasonable" government and its defenders. You must then carefully avoid fair and open debate with any of the people you have thus maligned. For insurance, set up your own "skeptics" to shoot down. "

4/29/2005 11:56:23 AM

one of the important parts of brainwashing someone is telling them what they are going to hear so that instead of challenging their misguided beleif it reinforces it

"they told me you'd say that"

4/29/2005 11:58:15 AM

Quote :

"Seventeen Techniques for Truth Suppression"

written by Alex Jones, an individual with no credit to his name who spews ridiculous shit to those who need someone to follow. i've realized its like a religion and that he is the leader who has these people follow him and treat him as their God. no matter what he says or does he will still be their God who is blindly worshipped. tis a shame.

4/29/2005 12:13:32 PM

Techniques for Internet Conspiracy Ranting Nut Kook Crackpots
http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/april2005/someshitthatimadeup/

Quote :

"6) Insist that your uncorroborated and unprovable theories aren't reported or widely believed because of a massive coverup and widespread brainwashing of everyone but yourself. This will also explain your complete lack of credibility. 8) Whenever someone calls you a name because of your theories, insist that you're being smeared or slandered. This will take attention off of your theories and will further stall rational explanations on your part. 11) Whenever someone presents information that contradicts your theory, tell them that it is propaganda from the secret organization and thus not true. In this manner, you can ignore whatever mountains of evidence are presented. 15) Present articles that state your point of view. This way, whenever they are proven wrong, you can say that you never believed it, you just presented it for the consideration of others."

[Edited on April 29, 2005 at 12:14 PM. Reason : .]

4/29/2005 12:14:28 PM

GUYS

THE STAR TRIBUNE

wait

sorry


the

STAR TRIBUNE

4/29/2005 12:25:51 PM

C-Span Explodes 9/11 Truth Blackout!
Will Broadcast David Griffin Talk Saturday

by
Kevin Barrett

Email:
kevin@mujca.com

27 Apr 2005

The word has finally come down: David Griffin's incendiary but well-documented charges of Bush administration complicity in 9/11 have been scheduled for national telecast!

C-span will broadcast Griffin's talk "9/11 and the American Empire: How Should Religious People Respond?" on Book TV (C-Span 2) this Saturday, April 30th, at 10:30 a.m. Eastern time.

My C-Span contact said the talk will also be rebroadcast on Book TV on several weekends after that--check the C-Span website for times:

http://inside.c-spanarchives.org:8080/cspan/schedule.csp

http://www.booktv.org/schedule/

4/29/2005 1:52:02 PM

huhuh

4/29/2005 2:13:42 PM

Quote :

"brianj320: written by Alex Jones, an individual with no credit to his name who spews ridiculous shit to those who need someone to follow. i've realized its like a religion and that he is the leader who has these people follow him and treat him as their God. no matter what he says or does he will still be their God who is blindly worshipped. tis a shame. "

Uh...No. It WASN'T written by Alex Jones. It was written by someone else.

See the hyperlink to the original article at the prisonplanet.com link:
http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/april2005/290405truthsuppression.htm

It was written by a David Martin. See http://www.dabney.com/wacomuseum/library/martin1.html

Keep trying.

As for Alex Jones. He's a radio talk show host. Most of his listeners don't treat him as a "god." That's completely ridiculous. That's just you trying to smear his listeners and Alex himself. I listen to Alex's radio show, and I don't believe Alex is correct in everything he says. But I agree with him on most of what he says and I respect him for what he is doing.


[Edited on April 29, 2005 at 2:48 PM. Reason : 7]

4/29/2005 2:39:21 PM

Quote :

""3) Characterize the charges as "rumors" or, better yet, "wild rumors." If, in spite of the news blackout, the public is still able to learn about the suspicious facts, it can only be through "rumors." (If they tend to believe the "rumors" it must be because they are simply "paranoid" or "hysterical.") 5) Call the skeptics names like "conspiracy theorist," "nut," "ranter," "kook," "crackpot," and of course, "rumor monger." Be sure, too, to use heavily loaded verbs and adjectives when characterizing their charges and defending the "more reasonable" government and its defenders. You must then carefully avoid fair and open debate with any of the people you have thus maligned. For insurance, set up your own "skeptics" to shoot down. ""

Quotemarks! The newest tool for all true believers in the fight against untruth and coverup. Because even the goddamn English language is a "conspiracy"...

4/29/2005 2:46:49 PM

Quote :

"That's just you trying to smear his listeners and Alex himself."

that's right, thats exactly what i'm trying to do.

Quote :

"I respect him for what he is doing."

i certainly dont respect him or u. and if i were to ever meet either of u i'd spit in ur faces.

4/29/2005 2:52:07 PM

^
Is anybody reading this?

4/29/2005 2:55:53 PM

Quote :

"That's just you trying to smear his listeners and Alex himself."

Will you ever wake up to the fact that no one is trying to smear you or any of your conspiracy demi-gods? If someone wants to call you out for being a moron, then let them. When you were little and another kid called you stupid, did you run to the teacher crying "Billy smeared me"?

1) Learn the difference between smearing and name-calling.

2) Stop being such a whiny little bitch. When you build your life around ideas like this, 99 out of 100 people will call you stupid. Get used to it.

4/29/2005 4:06:46 PM

Watch/Download David Ray Griffin's CSPAN Lecture on 911: A Must See
http://mparent7777.blog-city.com/read/1245062.htm

video here:http://www.911blogger.com/2005/04/proper-release-of-griffin-in-madison.html

[Edited on May 3, 2005 at 2:35 PM. Reason : 1]

5/3/2005 2:22:19 PM

Your link is busted, little buddy.

C-Span is run by the jew/elitist media, right? Why would they let someone on who might reveal
the truth about their global conspiracy?

In all honesty, 30 pages of this garbage hasn't convinced anyone. Why keep posting links to "the truth"?

5/3/2005 2:26:54 PM

Major WTC Insurance Company Questions Building 7 Collapse As Potential Fraud
http://www.prweb.com/releases/2005/5/prwebxml235341.php

Quote :

"A proposal by a small shareholder to withhold approval from the Board of Directors for failure to investigate signs of insurance fraud on 9/11 has been published on the website of the Allianz Group, one of the world’s largest insurers, in preparation for its May 4th annual meeting. (PRWEB) May 2, 2005 -- Allianz Group published a shareholder proposal on April 20th faulting management for ignoring signs of insurance fraud on 9/11/2001. Allianz carried a significant portion of the insurance coverage on the WTC, and stands to pay a corresponding portion of the $3.5 billion payout currently being litigated in New York. In his proposal, shareholder John Leonard, a California native and a publisher of books on 9/11, pointed to reports that building WTC 7 apparently collapsed by demolition, and for no plausible reason related to the 9/11 attacks. Management replied that it relied on official US government reports which made no mention of such evidence. "

CNN: WTC Collapse Looked Like Implosion
short video clip: http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/may2005/050505collapseimplosion.htm


[Edited on May 4, 2005 at 11:51 PM. Reason : 5]

5/4/2005 11:35:03 PM

Scientific American Plans 9/11 Hit Piece
http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/may2005/050505hitpiece.htm

Quote :

"Again, the fact that [they] have to address this at all shows their desperation and the fact that we're winning. Remember what Ghandi said...... "First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.""

[Edited on May 5, 2005 at 12:42 PM. Reason : 1]

5/5/2005 12:40:14 PM

Quote :

"First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win"

applying this logic to u, we have won considering u ignore us, u laugh at us and ridicule what we have to say, and u fight our logic and evidence. so in retrospect, we've won. thanks for the proof to show us that we have.

[/thread]

5/5/2005 1:01:06 PM

Operation Northwoods.

5/17/2005 12:35:02 AM

Mossad & 911: US Becomes Zionist Beast Of Burden
http://www.rense.com/general65/mossw.htm

The Edomite "Jews" & Mossad are known for framing Arabs with "false flag" operations; the Lavon Affair; the 1967 attack on the USS Liberty; the bombing of Libya in 1986.

Good, short article.

5/26/2005 8:08:02 PM

and of course, ladies and gentlemen, because its on the internet... it MUST be true.

5/27/2005 1:45:18 AM

ahahahahahaha: there's this show about to come on Court TV about some guys crashing a plane into a building. One of the witnesses said, "It sounded like a missle coming in."

OMF IT WAS A MISSLE FIRED BY TEH GOVERNMENT!!!

5/30/2005 8:53:52 PM

5/30/2005 9:40:40 PM