Think I've lost, because magically Urlacher went from 10 tackles with 5 minutes to go to 19 at the end of the game...BAH!

Even with 3 TD's the Bear's D wasn't enough to help me.

10/17/2006 12:17:51 AM

Ok get this...I had a one point lead going into tonight. He had no one playing. I repeat. He had no one playing so I had already won. I have Grossman and Berrian playing tonight so i'm thinking, hey, grossman has the 5th most points of anyone in the league so I can gain some major points tonight. I lose by one point b/c grossman has 5 turnovers. Anyone else had this happen to them?

[Edited on October 17, 2006 at 12:48 AM. Reason : .]

10/17/2006 12:48:33 AM

what are these negative points you speak of?

10/17/2006 12:52:52 AM

^ yahoo fantasy football gives you negative pts for fumbles, ints

you rarely see a QB get negative points because his yardage cancels such points out, but grossman had such a horrible night he ended up with negative pts

10/17/2006 1:37:50 AM

I see

I an on nfl.com

10/17/2006 1:51:13 AM

Sweet, 4-0 this week.

10/17/2006 1:53:59 AM

grossman had -8 in my league. Avg score is like 90

10/17/2006 2:09:59 AM

Another decent 3-1 week.

Facetious Ferrets	6-0	(78-69)	My worst week yet, but glad I played a guy with 5 zero's (3 byes, 2 sucked)
Unstable Isotopes	4-2	(83-65)	Good job, everyone.
Tropically Depressed	2-4	(218.78-314.78)	I did well, but can't compete with 314. Nobody's gone above 270 in 5 weeks.
Ravaging Storms	3-3	(122-82)	Great game from a team I was starting to hate.

10/17/2006 9:41:17 AM

5-1, finally got my first loss.

Play with defensive players and mine didn't show up.

Despite LT, McNabb, Branch, and the Bear's D/ST, I lost by 8.

Starting to wish we didn't carry defensive players, Urlacher killed me.

10/17/2006 11:03:51 AM

wow...someone dropped travis henry and i just picked him up...

now i have larry johnson, willie parker, frank gore, julius jones, and travis henry in a 12 man league

10/17/2006 3:48:08 PM

congrats, eventual champion.

1) Now post a message saying that all or some of those are on the trading block.

2) Recieve trades for other positions that will better your team.

3) screw them over and build a dynasty.

10/17/2006 3:57:17 PM

Thinking about trading Travis Henry.

I had Chris Brown and saw he was back so I picked him up and he's put up big numbers. Does anyone expect him to keep this up?

I'm working on a trade to get Chester Taylor, and if in fact I get him I'll have to decide between dropping Henry or Jones-Drew.

10/17/2006 6:53:45 PM

Any trades that I should look to make?

Pennington
Favre
Losman
Owens
Toomer
Cotchery
Wes Welker
Colston
Baskett
Doug Gabriel
LJ Smith
Parker
Dunn
Chris Perry

10/17/2006 8:15:44 PM

My only two QBs in one league are Bulger and Grossman (start 2).

Both are off this week.

I put in a claim for Damon Huard, and I should get him. There are ZERO other starting QBs on the FA list. Should I try to move one of my current guys for another starter that has already had a bye and is a comparable player?

[Edited on October 17, 2006 at 8:24 PM. Reason : ~]

10/17/2006 8:24:04 PM

should i start P. Riv @ KC or Leinart @ Oak?

10/18/2006 9:32:59 AM

PRiv of course.

Just look at the numbers. KC has one of the worst pass defenses in the league, giving up deep TD's to Leinart and Roethlisberger over the last 2 weeks. Oakland statistically has one of the best pass defenses in the league, for whatever reason.

10/18/2006 10:12:31 AM

mainly because people dont need to pass the ball when you are up by like 30

10/18/2006 10:14:28 AM

that's what i was thinking, but also wasn't sure if edge couldn't do anything again rendering the pass as the card's only weapon

10/18/2006 12:13:13 PM

phil vs kc

or

leinart vs oakland

10/18/2006 12:57:11 PM

Quote :

"jeffshelton All American 569 Posts user info edit post should i start P. Riv @ KC or Leinart @ Oak? 10/18/2006 9:32:59 AM Prawn Star All American 1566 Posts user info edit post PRiv of course. Just look at the numbers. KC has one of the worst pass defenses in the league, giving up deep TD's to Leinart and Roethlisberger over the last 2 weeks. Oakland statistically has one of the best pass defenses in the league, for whatever reason. 10/18/2006 10:12:31 AM BoobsR_gr8 All American 24972 Posts user info edit post mainly because people dont need to pass the ball when you are up by like 30 10/18/2006 10:14:28 AM jeffshelton All American 569 Posts user info edit post that's what i was thinking, but also wasn't sure if edge couldn't do anything again rendering the pass as the card's only weapon 10/18/2006 12:13:13 PM "

10/18/2006 1:01:43 PM

haha, my bad

I didn't even read before I posted

so phil it is

10/18/2006 1:04:07 PM

shit, i got andre johnson against the jaguars

bu I'm thinkin the texans will be down, forcing them to throw more leading to a decent amount of yards for johnson

the alternative is nate burleson

10/18/2006 1:06:28 PM

of those two, go with Johnson.

10/18/2006 1:15:16 PM

god some of the decisions my mom could make

what is wrong with you people

10/18/2006 2:57:28 PM

^ so true - why would you even have Burleson on your team, much less consider starting him over Andre Johnson?!?!?

[Edited on October 18, 2006 at 3:23 PM. Reason : V not being a dick, just stating the obvious]

10/18/2006 3:04:58 PM

I agree.

But I dont discriminate.

If this is what they have, this is what they have.

Dont be such a dick.

10/18/2006 3:11:22 PM

Leftwich vs. Houston

or

McNabb vs. Tampa Bay


and

Willie Parker vs. Atlanta

or

M. Jones-Drew vs. Houston

10/18/2006 4:09:33 PM

McNabb and Parker...that's an easy one IMO

10/18/2006 4:15:10 PM

not when you look at the texans (lack of)defense....it's what makes it an interesting choice to me...

10/18/2006 4:16:30 PM

^^agreed.

Always play studs with pretty difficult matchups over in-betweeners who have good matchups.

Both Jones-Drew and Lefty may have great games, but How can you ever sit the #1 player in all of fantasy football right now in McNabb?

If you must take a Jaguar, go with Jones-Drew.

but still, I would start Parker and McNizzle.

[Edited on October 18, 2006 at 4:19 PM. Reason : asdf]

10/18/2006 4:18:48 PM

Can play 3 WR's, trying to decide which 3.

Currently in:
Marvin Harrison vs. Was
Andre Johnson vs. Jax
Deion Branch vs. Minn

Bench:
Chris Chambers vs. GB
Reggie Brown @ TB
Randy Moss vs. Ari

I'm playing McNabb so I don't like playing duo's so I might avoid Reggie this week despite his great week last week(when I had to play him )

It's a good situation to be in I guess, but it's hard to tell which ones are going to have the best games.

10/18/2006 4:49:24 PM

you have it right

10/18/2006 5:52:02 PM

sometimes you get stuck with people

I got stuck with burleson

I am working on getting rid of him

thanks for the support

10/18/2006 7:00:13 PM

My only two QBs in one league are Bulger and Grossman (start 2).

Both are off this week.

I put in a claim for Damon Huard, and I should get him. There are ZERO other starting QBs on the FA list. Should I try to move one of my current guys for another starter that has already had a bye and is a comparable player?

10/18/2006 7:43:41 PM

opinions of this trade:

I give Toomer and LJ Smith and get Tiki Barber and Troy Williamson. Also, what about Julius Jones instead of Barber?

I have Colston and I can play him at tight end for the rest of the time. The Vikes play a lot of poor pass defense teams from now on.



[Edited on October 18, 2006 at 8:06 PM. Reason : ,/]

10/18/2006 8:03:15 PM

the dude giving you tiki is a moron

10/18/2006 8:04:18 PM

he is stacked at RB. He has westbrook, julius jones, barber, ladell betts. He needs receivers. We can play 2 RB

[Edited on October 18, 2006 at 8:07 PM. Reason : sdfs]

10/18/2006 8:06:33 PM

Accept or Reject this?

I would get:
Fred Taylor
Rex Grossman

I would lose:
Thomas Jones
Drew Brees

*My usual starting QB is E. Manning, so Brees/Grossman would be my usual back-up.

Not sure about T. Jones vs. F. Taylor. Definitely leaning towards rejecting it and keeping T. Jones and Brees. I think Maurice Jones-Drew ends up starting over Taylor in a week or two.

[Edited on October 18, 2006 at 11:44 PM. Reason : f]

10/18/2006 11:29:05 PM

While I'd love for you to be right about Jones-Drew, no way he takes Taylor's starting spot.

10/18/2006 11:48:42 PM

I think I'm going to counter and see if he'll give up Rudi instead of Fred Taylor.

10/18/2006 11:52:17 PM

AHAHAHA STACKED AT RB WITH He has westbrook, julius jones, barber, ladell betts

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

10/18/2006 11:54:49 PM

Think I should propose this trade?


Im trading:

Westbrook
H. Ward

In return I would be getting

K. Jones
R. Brown

10/19/2006 12:22:32 PM

i would say no, just my opinion though

10/19/2006 12:24:06 PM

why would you consider doing this?

Westbrook is finally off the questionable list and the steelers offense is showing life.

Do not propose this trade.

10/19/2006 12:27:39 PM

Who gets majority of the carries this week.... Gado or Lundy?

10/19/2006 12:37:46 PM

L. Maroney
Rudi
Warrick
Portis

T.O.
Reggie Williams
Shockey
Cotchery


pick either 2 RB's and 3 TE/WR or 3 RB's and 2 TE/WR

no points for receptions

I'm thinking about playing Portis, Dunn, TO, Reggie and Shockey...what do you think Panthro?

10/19/2006 12:55:08 PM

Dunn,Portis,Johnson,Owens,Shockey

easy enough

10/19/2006 12:57:43 PM

Reggie Williams will score 2 TDs on Sunday with Matt Jones out

[Edited on October 19, 2006 at 1:04 PM. Reason : 1]

10/19/2006 1:04:04 PM

why will they need to pass the ball in the redzone at any point when Houston is giving up 6yds a carry in the redzone?

[Edited on October 19, 2006 at 1:04 PM. Reason : .]

10/19/2006 1:04:17 PM

^Good point. I'm actually debating whether or not to start Burress or Reggie Williams myself.

I really like Williams' matchup, but Eli is my QB so a Burress TD means Eli TD as well.

Thoughts?

(My other two WR's that I plan on starting are Steve Smith and Darrell Jackson)

[Edited on October 19, 2006 at 1:07 PM. Reason : 333]

10/19/2006 1:07:04 PM