Serious question, salisburyboy. How do we know you're not in on the whole damn thing???

[Edited on November 16, 2005 at 6:45 PM. Reason : I'm 37!?]

11/16/2005 6:44:50 PM

because aliens did it.

and that would mean that he's an alien!

11/16/2005 7:24:22 PM

How do we know that prisonplanet isn't spreading false conspiracy theories to take attention off of the real conspiracy?

11/16/2005 7:36:37 PM

the real conspiracy? love doesnt exist. and 911 hijacked love from all or lives, and we went looking for it in sex, aka, iraq. or did i just blow your mind?

11/16/2005 7:37:52 PM

i've been officially blown

11/16/2005 7:44:35 PM

11/16/2005 7:46:22 PM

my cover's been blown

i am a government agent sent to tww to keep track of salisburybot's posts and to discredit and slander him

11/16/2005 11:07:53 PM

You gonna answer me, salisburyboy?

11/17/2005 2:06:34 PM

Well, I usually don't answer silly questions.

11/17/2005 2:09:05 PM

What makes it a silly question?

11/17/2005 2:13:23 PM

Quote :

"Well, I usually don't answer silly questions."

you're quite the enigma, considering how silly most of your posts/threads are

OH HOW WE LOVE PRISONPLANET!!!1

[Edited on November 17, 2005 at 2:34 PM. Reason : pp]

11/17/2005 2:21:39 PM

Yeah, it's so "silly" to make threads about Bush misleading the nation on Iraq's WMDs, how Cheney and the White House want to use torture, sexual abuse in the Catholic Church, the use of white phosphorous and napalm-like weapons in Fallujah, the U.S. government lie about the Gulf of Tonkin incident, the Israelis being evacuated before the Amman Jordan bombing, GOP memos about how a terror attack could reverse thier decline, illegal immigration, 9/11, the London bombings, the Bali bombings, the push to go to war in Iran, how gun control doesn't reduce crime, etc.

11/17/2005 2:30:40 PM

^ My favorite was the one about stamps selling for $6.66.

11/17/2005 2:33:49 PM

the fact that you can just rattle off that many conspiracy theories, most of which are crackpot, in that short amount of time just proves my point.

oh, btw, i forgot...

OH HOW WE LOVE PRISONPLANET!!!1

11/17/2005 2:34:39 PM

Quote :

"the fact that you can just rattle off that many conspiracy theories, most of which are crackpot, in that short amount of time just proves my point. "

Wow. What a convincing argument! You used the dreaded....wait...."conspiracy theories" label...OMG! The definitive label for someone who can't argue against an idea but still tries to discredit it.

11/17/2005 2:37:38 PM

Quote :

"The definitive label for someone who can't argue against an idea but still tries to discredit it."

Because you never try to discredit someone when you can't argue against their idea.

In all honesty, you have created well over 100 threads pushing conspiracy theories. Some of these are dozens of pages long. How many theories have you proven? 0

[Edited on November 17, 2005 at 2:41 PM. Reason : although I approve of the Allie Bagget thread.]

11/17/2005 2:40:48 PM

You're engaging in the very argument tactic you claim to despise, salisburyboy: misrepresentation.

I asked you what makes my question silly. You have as yet, failed to answer.

11/17/2005 2:43:43 PM

You didn't answer my question as to how I am supposedly "discrediting conspiracy theorists."

11/17/2005 2:51:03 PM

ah the "answer a question with a question" tactic

11/17/2005 3:01:52 PM

only a zionist would do such a thing

OH HOW WE LOVE PRISONPLANET!!!1

11/17/2005 3:14:15 PM

I've responded.

But that shouldn't have mattered, and isn't even remotely relevant. I asked you first.

[Edited on November 17, 2005 at 3:20 PM. Reason : .]

11/17/2005 3:16:42 PM

nm

[Edited on November 17, 2005 at 3:36 PM. Reason : reveiwing response; did not see the referred to response at first]

11/17/2005 3:18:09 PM

Did the Illuminati steal your ability to comprehend English?

Quote :

"Basically, you make conspiracy theorists who don't see the Illuminati or NWO behind every little thing that happens in the world--BUT DO BELIEVE SUCH CONSPIRACIES EXIST, look like fringe kooks by association."

[Edited on November 17, 2005 at 3:19 PM. Reason : ...]

11/17/2005 3:18:57 PM

Well, I've reviewed your "response."

Quote :

"Prisonplanet.com reported on the Postage stamp story, and runs stories on use of the "devil's horn salute" hand signal. So...if you're going to use that to suggest that I'm a "government agent" trying to discredit all true truthseekers and NWO investigators, then I guess you need to accuse Alex Jones and prisonplanet.com of the same thing."

[Edited on November 17, 2005 at 3:30 PM. Reason : 1]

11/17/2005 3:27:23 PM

You still didn't tell me what makes the question silly.

11/17/2005 3:38:23 PM

he's not going to

because he's silly

OH HOW WE LOVE PRISONPLANET!!!1

11/17/2005 3:48:06 PM

Quote :

"You still didn't tell me what makes the question silly."

Let's review your question:

Quote :

"Gamecat: Serious question, salisburyboy. How do we know you're not in on the whole damn thing??? "

Ok. Number one, I'm here trying hard to expose the truth about 9/11, and you're suggesting I am "in on it"? Later, I see that you are suggesting by the question that I'm a "government agent" who's "working to discredit the real NWO investigators and truthseekers." And, let's not forget the emoticon you included at the end of your question (hardly suggestive of the "seriousness" of your question). Am I really to expect that you really believe I'm trying to keep people from seeing the truth about 9/11 and the NWO?

That's why I think it's a silly question. Now, are you satisfied I wasted my time to respond to your silly question?

[Edited on November 17, 2005 at 3:58 PM. Reason : 1]

11/17/2005 3:57:08 PM

what a silly response to a question, geez.

OH HOW WE LOVE PRISONPLANET!!!1

11/17/2005 3:59:09 PM

Quote :

"How do we know that prisonplanet isn't spreading false conspiracy theories to take attention off of the real conspiracy? "

11/17/2005 4:03:03 PM

how do we know we're not spreading false conspiracy theories to take attention off prisonplanet spreading false conspiracy theories to take attention off what they think is the real conspiracy but isn't?

OH HOW WE LOVE PRISONPLANET!!!1

11/17/2005 4:07:41 PM

^^You know, Mr. Joshua...you can include that particular quote in all your future posts as far as I'm concerned. I find it really funny that you seem to think it bothers me. And I'm being completely serious. Please do keep posting it.

11/17/2005 4:08:31 PM

Where did I say that it bothers you? I'm asking a serious question.

11/17/2005 4:10:02 PM

I think the real truth behind 9/11 is even MORE sinister than salisburyboy suggests. He is a disinformation agent trying to send people REALLY looking for the truth down false trails and whatnot.

11/17/2005 4:12:25 PM

I never said that you said it bothers me. What I said is that it seems you think it bothers me. In other words, I have concluded (via my intuition, etc.) that you think it bothers me.

11/17/2005 4:12:45 PM

I NEVER SAID THAT YOU SAID THAT HE SAID THAT THEY SAID THAT I SAID THAT OH HOW WE LOVE PRISONPLANET!!!1

11/17/2005 4:13:39 PM

Quote :

"I think the real truth behind 9/11 is even MORE sinister than salisburyboy suggests. "

And what is this real truth that is more sinister than I suggest? Seriously.

11/17/2005 4:13:46 PM

and he's hooked.

job done.

btw,

OH HOW WE LOVE PRISONPLANET!!!1

11/17/2005 4:14:39 PM

I'd tell you, but I'd have to kill you.

11/17/2005 4:14:42 PM

Quote :

"I NEVER SAID THAT YOU SAID THAT HE SAID THAT THEY SAID THAT I SAID THAT"

Blame your buddy mr. joshua on that one. If he didn't ask such completely asinine questions, I wouldn't have to make such tedious responses.

11/17/2005 4:14:45 PM

Quote :

"I'd tell you, but I'd have to kill you."

Wait. I thought you were the one here that was so "serious" and asking all these "serious" questions. Guess I've been right all along.

11/17/2005 4:15:37 PM

i AM mr. joshua.

and gamecat, and everybody else on this board.

we're all bots sent here to discredit and slander you in a public medium.

OH HOW WE LOVE PRISONPLANET!!!1

11/17/2005 4:16:26 PM

Wow. Page 37 has been a wash.

11/17/2005 4:17:21 PM

Quote :

"In other words, I have concluded (via my intuition, etc.) that you think it bothers me."

Wrong again! Maybe you should reconsider following your intuition and, oh, I don't know, think?

11/17/2005 4:17:43 PM

THINK?!?!? ONLY ZIONISTS GET THE FREEDOM TO THINK!

OH HOW WE LOVE PRISONPLANET!!!1

11/17/2005 4:18:27 PM

OMF AGENT salisburyboy IS DROPPING HINTS Y'ALL!!!1

"a wash"

wash like hygiene

hygiene like gene hackman

gene hackman was lex luther the supervillain in the superman movies

therefore, salisburyboy is the super genius behind the illuminati led attacks against the US!!1

11/17/2005 4:20:17 PM

11/17/2005 8:17:48 PM

Well, here's something substantive for page 37:

http://www.iamthewitness.com/DarylBradfordSmithInterviewsHufschmidAndReynolds.html

Quote :

"Daryl Bradford Smith interviews Dr. Morgan Reynolds and Eric Hufschmid Bush administration Labor Dept. economist, Dr. Morgan Reynolds, and Eric Hufschmid, author of "Painful Questions", spell out clearly the evidence proving 9-11 was done by our government and agents from Israel. ...from Nov. 16, 2005"

Audio of interview at link.

11/18/2005 8:41:42 AM

hey salis...i have a serious question...i dont know the answer...

how long before the planes hit were folks aware that they had been hijacked by terrorists??

11/18/2005 8:57:53 AM

Here's a complete 9/11 timeline with that information:
http://www.911timeline.net/

11/18/2005 9:33:30 AM

http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2005/11/17/122900.shtml

Quote :

"Louis Freeh Charges 9/11 Commission Cover-Up NewsMax.com Wires Thursday, Nov. 17, 2005 Former FBI Director Louis J. Freeh slammed the 9/11 Commission Thursday saying it ignored – or "summarily rejected" – the most critical piece of intelligence that could have prevented the horrific attacks of September 11, 2001. [...] The former Bureau Director, who resigned his position just months before Sept. 11, 2001, points out that the U.S. government had learned of the identity of Mohammed Atta the year prior to the attacks. Atta was one of the ringleaders of the group, and piloted an American Airlines plane that slammed into one of the Twin Towers. Freeh recounts that military intelligence operation code-named "Able Danger" concluded in February 2000 that military experts had identified Atta as an al-Qaida agent operating in the U.S. "Subsequently, military officers assigned to Able Danger were prevented from sharing this critical information with FBI agents," Freeh writes. "Why?" he ponders, suggesting the failure to share such intelligence may be a smoking gun pointing at federal malfeasance in the case. Freeh maintains that the Able Danger intelligence, if confirmed, is "undoubtedly the most relevant fact of the entire post-9/11 inquiry . . . Yet the 9/11 Commission inexplicably concluded that it "was not historically significant.""

11/18/2005 9:36:09 AM