ever thought of switching to pinnacle? they are the unanimous favorite for best site.

[Edited on January 8, 2007 at 6:40 PM. Reason : .]

1/8/2007 6:40:25 PM

if florida wins by a fg or less i'm getting a 1 to 13.9 payout

1/8/2007 6:42:52 PM

i took the teaser for OSU and the over also

and Georgetown

1/8/2007 6:44:07 PM

by the way, if anyone wants to sign up at http://www.bodog.com pm me. With my referral code they will give me a bonus of 40% of whatever you deposit.... i will give you half of that bonus....

so if you put in 100$ it will give you an extra 10% just for signing up and it will give me 40$ for referring you... which you don't have to earn it is able to be automatically cashed out... so if you deposit 100$ you'll end up with $130.

1/8/2007 7:26:26 PM

okay, how will you get us the money? neteller?

1/8/2007 7:27:21 PM

paypal, neteller or i can just lose it to you at a 1 on 1 poker table... the money counts towards all aspects of bodog

[Edited on January 8, 2007 at 7:28 PM. Reason : the poker table would be easiest... straight into your bodog account]

its not cheating the system or anything, and i am actually referring so i figure its all fair and good... and we both make extra money

[Edited on January 8, 2007 at 7:30 PM. Reason : m]

1/8/2007 7:27:48 PM

if yall dont wanna use him for a referral, PM me


if georgetown looks good late, i think im gonna jump on nevada -10 1/2 at 10pm. and then possibly pepperdine +18 1/2 late

1/8/2007 7:39:57 PM

don't chip dump.. you should be able to make a transfer with the poker client

1/8/2007 7:40:44 PM

you can't transfer with bodog

i tried

1/8/2007 7:41:28 PM

so you get 40% of my deposit and you don't have to earn it? that sounds crazy

1/8/2007 7:51:39 PM

i know... look it up on the site though.... its automatically in my account and the 10% bonus on your deposit is automatically in your account.

1/8/2007 7:56:27 PM

I took OSU -7.5 and over 41, parlay.


This should cap off my weekend of getting my ass kicked.

1/8/2007 8:12:51 PM

glad i only took the over

1/8/2007 10:12:23 PM

fucking georgetown

1/8/2007 10:13:21 PM

The over was covered before halftime. That's fucking awesome

1/8/2007 10:16:24 PM

good fucking call on georgetown being the easiest pick of the year idiot

1/8/2007 10:35:27 PM

Quote :

"^ georgetown is the no brain bet of the year so far in college bball. i put my largest sum so far on it. Villanova doesn't have anyone within 5 inches of that 7'2" monster. and they cant run like Oregon. Georgetown is going to kill"

dumbass

Quote :

"Georgetown is going to kill"

1/8/2007 11:16:36 PM

lol @ whoever lost money on tOSU

1/9/2007 12:01:44 AM

die please

1/9/2007 12:05:05 AM

yo i just got hurt bad, i mean bad, that was embarrasing

1/9/2007 12:08:39 AM

whenever someone posts a "no brain bet of the year" or something that sounds like it is being sold to you, bet the other way

1/9/2007 12:34:55 AM

I thought Va Tech at -3 1/2 was the easiest bet this bowl season, and at halftime, it looked to be true. Next was Rutgers, which covered, and you'd have to put Ohio State in that category to, huge letdown.

1/9/2007 1:38:25 AM

I put $$ on CMU, Louisville, and the over in the Florida game. All 3 came through..

The only 2 lines of all the bowls I felt safe on going in were CMU and Louisville...

[Edited on January 9, 2007 at 1:44 AM. Reason : wake forest scared me for a long time though..]

1/9/2007 1:40:51 AM

pepperdine

1/9/2007 4:11:26 AM

where does my money need to go today? suggestions?

1/9/2007 1:38:04 PM

state and the under

1/9/2007 1:45:00 PM

nc state clemson
notre dame west virginia
texas a&m baylor
boston college wake forest
lsu alabama

1/9/2007 3:42:57 PM

why are u taking state? they are bad vs the spread all year

1/9/2007 4:04:44 PM

because they are 5pt underdogs and they will win straight up.

1/9/2007 4:39:35 PM

^

1/9/2007 10:11:07 PM

sports bettors love homers =)

1/9/2007 10:19:59 PM

nc state clemson
notre dame west virginia
texas a&m baylor
boston college wake forest
lsu alabama

not too bad.

1/9/2007 10:48:06 PM

Alright fellas i think i have some pretty good advice here so Im gonna re-iterate it one more time. It paid off last year, and it should be a winner again this year.

Quote :

" 2006 playoffs: Here's what I like for the NFL this week. Pittsburgh +156 (@Denver) Carolina +160 (@Seattle) Put $500 on both of them. If they both lose, you only lose $1,000. If just Carolina wins you win $300. If just Pitt wins you win $280. If they both win, you win $1,580. "

Now go do the exact fucking thing for the Eagles moneyline and the Patriots moneyline.

I got Eagles (+210) and Patriots (+205).

So if i lose both i lose $1,000.

If i split i win $525 or $550.

If i win both i win $2,075.





[Edited on January 10, 2007 at 12:45 AM. Reason : a]

1/10/2007 12:44:23 AM

Bet the house on SD

They are gonna stomp the Patriots. This game is not even gonna be close.

1/10/2007 12:55:42 AM

^

Quote :

"Rule #2 When in doubt, seek out the popular opinion and go the other way If the general public could pick games, bookies wouldn't be driving Lexuses around town with giant wreaths on them"

1/10/2007 1:20:32 AM

Thats a pretty stupid quote. Bookies get a cut either way as long as they don't totally fuck up on the spread.

1/10/2007 2:11:11 AM

^^that quote shows a total lack of understanding of sports betting

1/10/2007 8:14:13 AM

^^^^ Thats a pretty bold bet for a quarterback who has never started a playoff game.

1/10/2007 8:35:00 AM

^^ and ^^^

haha please.

Lack of understanding of sports betting? Newsflash, ive been doing this for a pretty long time. Bill Simmons (quoted above) has been doing this even longer.

Theres no misunderstanding.


You do realize that most gamblers bet on the losing team, right???

Bookies get a cut either way???? That's absolutely untrue.

Bookies get their ass handed to them from time to time, trust me.

1/10/2007 12:14:31 PM

i really like oklahoma state tonight +8 or whatever @ Kansas

1/10/2007 5:51:58 PM

I have

Syracuse -2 Rutgers
Va Tech -6.5 UNC-G (strange line which makes me a bit cautious but I'll take it)
Pitt -2 DePaul
Louisville -2.5 South Florida

1/10/2007 6:03:25 PM

Pitt -1
Louisville -2
Duke +3

1/10/2007 7:02:12 PM

i took okla state +10. come on cowboys

1/10/2007 8:53:12 PM

wrong thread

[Edited on January 10, 2007 at 9:14 PM. Reason : +]

1/10/2007 9:13:51 PM

1/10/2007 9:15:10 PM

Solid night for me. 3 for 3 so far, waiting on Syracuse. Tough bet because it's at the RAC. I knew to pick Marquette tonight +8.5 but I hate betting against my boys when I'm going to watch the game..

That OK State bet isn't looking so hot so far

[Edited on January 10, 2007 at 9:34 PM. Reason : x]

1/10/2007 9:33:31 PM

went 2-2 but I made money, put more money on Pitt than the other 3 games.

1/10/2007 9:43:41 PM

Quote :

""Rule #2 When in doubt, seek out the popular opinion and go the other way If the general public could pick games, bookies wouldn't be driving Lexuses around town with giant wreaths on them""

There actually is some truth/basis for this statement. Take the NFL for instance, the 2005-2006 season was the FIRST time in legal betting history of the NFL that the public beat the bookies. Prior to that season if you bet completely opposite of the public money on every game you would've come out ahead. Of course how much $$ you bet on each game would've affected your loss/winnings.

Quote :

"Bookies get a cut either way as long as they don't totally fuck up on the spread."

Not exactly true. They are only guaranteed to make money IF the $$ is exactly 50/50. BUT Bookies/casinos don't get filthy rich just on the juice/vig. They get filthy rich because the public generally makes bad bets.

1/10/2007 10:20:48 PM

wow. okla. state was horrible tonight. looked very much like nc state. turnovers turnovers turnovers.

1/11/2007 1:59:52 AM

talking about the bookie shit (i'm not gonna quote all that)......those statements are very misleading. There are several confounding facts that may lead the public to in general lose money against the bookies without implying that it's basically from the ml or general point spread. The most obvious example is parlays and teasers. Teasers in general are sucker bets, which the bookies will have a big edge in no matter what, the public likes to make these bets, which will cause them to in general lose to bookies even more, but it's not like you can take the opposite side of a teaser.

The goal of a bookie is to get 50/50 on each point of the line, which is why the line moves, OF COURSE this doesn't happen every game, but in the long run it DOES happen. If the general public loses in the long run it is bc of sucker bets like teasers, not that they pick the wrong team, that is so stupid. oh yea, and i also know a little bit about this.



but anyway, yea that pitt line was so ridiculous last night, i mean i know depaul was undefeated at home, but wtf?

[Edited on January 11, 2007 at 8:33 AM. Reason : dsfa]

1/11/2007 8:32:11 AM