Michael F. Lowenstein
Henkle, Henkle & Goldmann
1426 East Blvd.
Charlotte, NC 28203

[Edited on May 9, 2006 at 4:30 PM. Reason : *]

5/9/2006 4:30:19 PM

the person that made this sn has given out his information 10 times in this thread

now he gave the sn to me, i hate jews

his name is jon, and he will still post occasionally, but i am the one that agrees with you

5/9/2006 4:31:21 PM

http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/handofallah.php

Quote :

"Surely the "Hand Of Allah" If one accepts the "Official Version" of the events that occurred on 9/11 or in the days leading up to it, one can only conclude that a series of Miracles occurred suggesting the hand of higher powers. I am struck by the similarities between a 9/11 and the events of "The Iliad" wherein a Pantheon of Gods battled one another by proxy by choosing Champions amongst the Greeks and Trojans and interceding on their behalf with various "Miracles". I felt it would be interesting to see which "Gods" manifested themselves at or around 9/11 , the nature of that manifestation and which of the various "Gods" won each particular battle. [...] The Miracle These 19 terrorists are under the surveillance of various agents of the United States Government. All of these are called off at the last moment with Agents in Chicago and Miami and Phoenix all ignored by higher authorities when they raise questions about the presence of the various terrorists within the United States. Investigations are actively blocked or impeded. Surely the "Hand of Allah" [...] The Miracle One the day of the hi-jackings the US Government is running drills with its Air Force where it is simulating "Multiple Hijackings of Aircraft" within the United States of America. This drill causes great confusion amongst Air Traffic Controllers as it provides "Cover" for the real Hijackings. Without these drills it is very possible that the Aircraft that were hijacked could have been intercepted far earlier. Certainly one has to consider this some sort of "Miracle" Surely "The hand of Allah" [...] This is only a small sampling of the Miracles of 9/11. Any that do not believe in that higher powers did not have a hand in this are surely blinded.The number of coincidences that occurred in those few days is mind boggling. Passports surviving fires and found blocks away and belonging to terrorists, the Miracle of a bag that did not get onto the flight that included the names and details of every hijacker. Persons receiving warnings out of the ether not to fly on that day. Cell phones suddenly working where they had never worked before along with people recording their calls. People barely trained in flying aircraft performing miraculous corkscrew maneuvers in Jumbo Aircraft! "

LOL

5/9/2006 4:32:18 PM

post your name and address

5/9/2006 4:33:00 PM

i posted mine

post yours, salis

5/9/2006 4:33:30 PM

He keeps running...

Same questions....26 pages later...

Who is avoiding a rational argument?

No, bin Laden didn't have any motive to carry out the 9/11 attacks.

Its not like he issued a fatwah or anything urging muslims to kill americans.

Keep ignoring evidence, little buddy.

Quote :

"Text of Fatwah Urging Jihad Against Americans Published in Al-Quds al-'Arabi on Febuary 23, 1998 Statement signed by Sheikh Usamah Bin-Muhammad Bin-Ladin; Ayman al-Zawahiri, leader of the Jihad Group in Egypt; Abu- Yasir Rifa'i Ahmad Taha, a leader of the Islamic Group; Sheikh Mir Hamzah, secretary of the Jamiat-ul-Ulema-e-Pakistan; and Fazlul Rahman, leader of the Jihad Movement in Bangladesh ... All these crimes and sins committed by the Americans are a clear declaration of war on God, his messenger, and Muslims. And ulema have throughout Islamic history unanimously agreed that the jihad is an individual duty if the enemy destroys the Muslim countries. This was revealed by Imam Bin-Qadamah in "Al- Mughni," Imam al-Kisa'i in "Al- Bada'i," al-Qurtubi in his interpretation, and the shaykh of al-Islam in his books, where he said "As for the militant struggle, it is aimed at defending sanctity and religion, and it is a duty as agreed. Nothing is more sacred than belief except repulsing an enemy who is attacking religion and life." On that basis, and in compliance with God's order, we issue the following fatwa to all Muslims The ruling to kill the Americans and their allies--civilians and military--is an individual duty for every Muslim who can do it in any country in which it is possible to do it, in order to liberate the al-Aqsa Mosque and the holy mosque from their grip, and in order for their armies to move out of all the lands of Islam, defeated and unable to threaten any Muslim. This is in accordance with the words of Almighty God, "and fight the pagans all together as they fight you all together," and "fight them until there is no more tumult or oppression, and there prevail justice and faith in God." This is in addition to the words of Almighty God "And why should ye not fight in the cause of God and of those who, being weak, are ill-treated and oppressed--women and children, whose cry is 'Our Lord, rescue us from this town, whose people are oppressors; and raise for us from thee one who will help!'" We -- with God's help -- call on every Muslim who believes in God and wishes to be rewarded to comply with God's order to kill the Americans and plunder their money wherever and whenever they find it. We also call on Muslim ulema, leaders, youths, and soldiers to launch the raid on Satan's U.S. troops and the devil's supporters allying with them, and to displace those who are behind them so that they may learn a lesson."

http://www.ict.org.il/articles/fatwah.htm

Could you please address these questions? I'm not trying to redirect or distract here. I'm genuinely curious. You made statements regarding all of these questions in this very thread, I would just like you to explain them before moving on. I questioned these claims when they were originally made, but you ignored me. Why won't you answer them?

Why didn't they build a pipeline in 1998? Why did they blow up their own african embassies and then launch a missile attack on Afghanistan? They were set to build a natural gas pipeline with the Taliban then. Why mess that up for no reason?

You don't believe that Afghanistan was invaded for the sake of a pipeline? Then why are you defending that theory so stubbornly?

You just said that Afghanistan was invaded so that a pipeline could be built. Now you're saying that the zionists wanted to prevent the building of a pipeline - just like how Iraq was invaded to secure the oil supply even though the zionists don't care about the oil supply. How do you reconcile all of the conflicting information that you spout off on here?

By the way, how did the zionists cause the Revolutionary War?

Do you even know anything about american history? To say that the Civil War was caused simply by "illuminati agitators" is to ignore almost every detail of the decades that preceded the conflict.

Can we get some proof that John Wilkes Booth was an agent of the NWO rather than an upset Confederate sympathizer?

I would also like to see some proof that Pearl Harbor was caused by the evil edomite zionists.

You have provided absolutely no evidence at all that the Rothschilds are the zionists at the top running world events. They were a prominent family that supported the creation of a jewish state, that is all. Please provide some evidence other than "Here are some rich jews!"

So why should anyone believe your rantings anyway You have admitted that you hate jews. As such, you are far from an impartial source when you blame jews for every problem in the world.

So when was the Israeli false flag terrorist attack in Washington state?

Why is it spamming if I repeat unanswered questions, but it's ok for you to repost the same article in the same thread five times?

5/9/2006 4:33:52 PM

get up, get get get down, 911's a joke in yo' town

5/10/2006 1:24:57 PM

Check out this rubbish:

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=50172

Quote :

"No, Virginia, a missile did not hit the Pentagon May 12, 2006 © 2006 WorldNetDaily.com And no, Virginia, a controlled demolition did not bring down the World Trade Center, not even WTC VII."

Not even WTC Building 7?!! LOL. Ok, he's signalling from the start that this article is complete bullshit. And I'll go ahead and let you know. He doesn't explain how the buildings collapsed in the rest of the article. This is it, just a blanket denial.

And if a missile didn't hit the Pentagon, then why did Donald Rumsfeld say so? And again, I'm not saying that I know for sure what hit the Pentagon, but the evidence doesn't support it being a Boeing 757 like the government says.

Quote :

"I know that well-meaning people believe all of this, and I am reluctant to challenge their beliefs. But, alas, such beliefs have repercussion."

More and more people are waking up to the truth. And neo-con shill operations like WND are having to produce shoddy hit pieces like this to try to counter it.

Quote :

"Nor did George W. Bush. This was not an "inside job." Bush did not "know." There is absolutely nothing in his character or in the public record to suggest that he would allow some 3,000 Americans to be killed and the American economy to be wrecked for any reason, let alone as a pretext to a war that needed no greater provocation than, say, a sunken ship or a bombed embassy. After all, an incident as marginal as an attack on an American destroyer in the Gulf of Tonkin legitimized the much more costly war in Vietnam."

A BIG domestic ("terrorist") attack was needed. PNAC even admitted as much when they said a "new Pearl Harbor" event was needed. And a domestic attack was further needed to serve as the pretext for a police state crackdown in the U.S. But the author totally ignored that potential motive.

Quote :

"If a local law professor had not interrupted my lawn mowing the other day to argue this, I would have thought such arguments an unjust caricature of the left. But no, the left actually seems to have convinced itself that this is so."

Yep, those "nutjob conspiracy theorists" are just everywhere now it seems.

Quote :

"To understand what did happen on Sept. 11, please do check out the flawlessly executed new movie, "United 93." This real time presentation shows how even smart people and sophisticated systems can misinterpret an event that is unprecedented. For those who want specific visual answers to the various 9-11 conspiracies, take a look at the March 2005 edition of Popular Mechanics."

United 93 "flawlessly executed"? The Popular Mechanics article has the answers?

BWHAHAHAHAHA!!!!

5/12/2006 3:05:17 PM

wait

which poster is that

i'm serious

aliases are not cool man

suspend

5/12/2006 3:08:41 PM

i don't have an alias

suspend woodfoot for being a troll

5/12/2006 3:10:55 PM

you've already admitted that two people post on your name

1. the guy who signed up for it, who posts in sports talk
2. the vocal conspiracy nut who happens to be a racist


right?

do you not now admit that there are two people using salisburyboy?

5/12/2006 3:12:04 PM

Quote :

" MOON WORSHIPPERS!!! DARKSIDED! "

5/12/2006 3:13:08 PM

that's completely different from an alias

and alias is when you have one person using multiple accounts

5/12/2006 3:13:14 PM

do you admit though that is what the case with the user name salisburyboy is though

5/12/2006 3:14:11 PM

is it against the rules to let another person use your account to post? no

5/12/2006 3:15:26 PM

do you admit that is what is going on

5/12/2006 3:17:11 PM

So salisburyboy, why are you going out of your way to find articles to respond to when you have 30+ pages of unanswered questions right here?

Keep running.

5/12/2006 3:46:23 PM

hey salisburyboy, what is your name and address

5/12/2006 7:02:52 PM

Wow. This garbage is even worse than the WND article above...

http://www.americanthinker.com/articles.php?article_id=5488

Quote :

"Take Off the 9/11 Tinfoil Hats May 11th, 2006"

Ooooooh, calling us "tin foil hatters"! How persuasive and original! Let me go get my tinfoil hat right now, by the way.

Quote :

"the belief that the US government either had foreknowledge of 9/11 or directly participated in the events of that day is widespread and growing ever more popular"

Damn right. That tends to happen when the evidence leads to that conclusion. And now hacks in the MSM are panicking, and scrambling to defend the official fairy tale with miserable articles like this.

Quote :

"The problem with debunking theories like those advanced in Loose Change as well as the numerous books and articles arguing for a conspiracy involving the US government, the CIA, secret societies, multi-national corporations, or the Bush family is one of time. It takes an enormous amount of time and effort to lay out the facts to refute these theories on a point by point basis."

Well, actually, the real problem is that the evidence is not on your side. And saying "we don't have the time" is a pathetically lame excuse. There is more than enough time to address the issues raised by skeptics of the "official" conspiracy theory. The MSM's got all the time in the world. And the resources. But all the MSM wants to do is call the skeptics "tin foil hatters" and other names. And when they actually do address the issues in anything approaching a substantive fashion, they usually only address a few of the (weaker) issues raised by the skeptics, and do so giving virtually no real evidence to support the "official" story (eg, the Popular Mechanics hit piece).

Quote :

"But this is just a drop in the bucket, inadequate to the tidal wave of conspiracy spittle flowing from the corners of nutjob mouths."

Oooooh..."nutjob mouths." How professional. And persuasive I might add. I think I better believe the official story because MSM shills and hacks are calling me names. I'm scared.

Quote :

"A Zogby poll from August, 2004 revealed that nearly 50% of New Yorkers believe that the government had advance knowledge of 9/11 and “consciously failed to act.” Clearly, there is much work to do if the truth is to survive another generation concerning the real conspiracy involving Osama bin Laden, al Qaeda, and the evil men who deliberately set out to execute a detailed plan to murder nearly 3,000 innocent Americans. Future generations will not understand who attacked us on 9/11 and why unless we do a better job of replacing fantasy with fact."

LOL. That almost sounds like a white flag to me.

Just give it up. The "official" story about 19 boxcutter-wielding Arabs masterminded by an evil genius from a cave, who attacked us for no other reason than "theys hate our freedom" is the REAL fantasy. And people who believe that crap are the real "conspiracy theorists." Before long, there will be virtually no one left who buys the "official" story.

Quote :

"The only comparably conspiracy-laden event to in recent history was the Kennedy assassination"

Wait, so this bozo is telling me there wasn't a conspiracy to commit 9/11? Even if you buy the official story, you mean to tell me those 19 freedom-hating Aaayrabs and Usamer bin Laden didn't conspire to commit 9/11?

Quote :

"And the truly alarming fact is that 70% of Americans under 30 years old believe that JFK gives a true representation of the facts surrounding the assassination. Conspiracy mongers like Stone can have a huge influence on people’s attitudes toward history. "

Well heck. While this shill is hard at it defending fairy tales, he might as well defend the "official" story on the JFK assassination as well. That lone nut Oswald did it folks. And if you don't believe it, well by God, you're a "lunatic conspiracy theorist."

Damn, I expect pathetic name-calling and smear tactics from trolls on message boards. But if that's the best MSM journalists can do to try to counter the arguments of skeptics of the official 9/11 story, the official 9/11 fable is in serious trouble.



[Edited on May 13, 2006 at 4:33 PM. Reason : ``````````]

5/13/2006 4:11:35 PM

i love how people are always like "if you and guth and etc etc didn't bttt this thread it would just die"

fuck this shit

DO YOU ADMIT THAT THERE ARE TWO USERS WHO POST UNDER SALISBURYBOY
ONE WHO POSTS IN SPORTS TALK AND ONE WHO POSTS IN SOAP BOX
DO YOU ADMIT THAT

5/13/2006 5:36:43 PM

PS
I'M NOT SURE WWW.AMERICANTHINKERS.COM COUNTS AS "MSM"

THIS FUCKIN' GUY

5/13/2006 5:37:38 PM

i notice salis getting more and more profane....


desperation???

5/13/2006 5:56:05 PM

more and more loony

[Edited on May 13, 2006 at 6:02 PM. Reason : *]

5/13/2006 6:02:15 PM

Quote :

" MOON WORSHIPPERS!!! DARKSIDED! "

5/13/2006 6:20:13 PM

So salisburyboy, why are you going out of your way to find articles to respond to when you have 30+ pages of unanswered questions right here?

Keep running.

5/13/2006 9:38:44 PM

ttt

5/14/2006 12:05:16 PM

5/14/2006 10:43:23 PM

http://www.madison.com/tct/opinion/column/index.php?ntid=83698&ntpid=1

Quote :

"Media hide truth: 9/11 was inside job Published: May 12, 2006 By Kevin Barrett The Capital Times Last Saturday, former Bush administration official Morgan Reynolds drew an enthusiastic capacity crowd to the Wisconsin Historical Society auditorium. It is probably the first time in Historical Society history that a political talk has drawn a full house on a Saturday afternoon at the beginning of final exams. Reynolds, the former director of the Criminal Justice Center at the National Center for Policy Analysis, and the ex-top economist for George W. Bush's Labor Department, charged the Bush administration with gross malfeasance, and proposed the prosecution of top administration officials. Normally, if a prestigious UW alumnus and ex-Bush administration official were to come to the Wisconsin Historical Society to spill the beans about a Bush administration scandal, it would make the news. The local TV stations would cover it, and it would merit front page headlines in The Capital Times and Wisconsin State Journal. Reynolds' indictment of the administration he worked for was a stunning, life-changing event for many of those who witnessed it. As the event's organizer, I have received dozens of e-mails about it from people who were deeply affected. Despite the prestigious speaker and venue, and the gravity of the charges aired, for most Americans indeed most Madisonians the event never happened. Why? Because it was censored, subjected to a total media blackout. Not a word in the State Journal. Not a word in The Capital Times. Not a word on the local TV news. Not a word on local radio news. And, of course, not a word in the national media. Why the blackout? Because Reynolds violated the ultimate U.S. media taboo. He charges the Bush administration with orchestrating the 9/11 attacks as a pretext for launching a preplanned "long war" in the Middle East, rolling back our civil liberties, and massively increasing military spending. When a former Bush administration insider makes such charges, how can the media ignore them? Is Reynolds a lone crank? Hardly. A long list of prominent Americans have spoken out for 9/11 truth: Rev. William Sloane Coffin, Sen. Barbara Boxer, former head of the Star Wars program Col. Robert Bowman, ex-Reagan administration economics guru Paul Craig Roberts, progressive Jewish author-activist Rabbi Michael Lerner, former CIA official Ray McGovern, author-essayist Gore Vidal, and many other respected names from across the political spectrum have gone on the record for 9/11 truth. Are the media ignoring all these people, and dozens more like them, because there is no evidence to support their charges? Hardly. Overwhelming evidence, from the obvious air defense stand-down, to the nonprotection of the president in Florida, to the blatant controlled demolition of World Trade Center building 7, proves that 9/11 was an inside job. As noted philosopher-theologian and 9/11 revisionist historian David Griffin writes: "It is already possible to know, beyond a reasonable doubt, one very important thing: the destruction of the World Trade Center was an inside job, orchestrated by terrorists within our own government." A growing list of scientists has lined up behind BYU physicist Steven Jones and MIT engineer Jeff King in support of Griffin's position, as evidenced by the growth of Scholars for 9/11 Truth (st911.org) and Scientific Professionals Investigating 9/11 (physics911.net). As a Watergate-era graduate of the University of Wisconsin School of Journalism, I was taught that exposing government lies and corruption is the supreme duty of the Fourth Estate. I simply cannot fathom the current situation. I do not understand the 9/11 truth blackout. I wish someone would explain it to me. It is time to break the 9/11 truth blackout. Please put pressure on your local media through letters to the editor, call-ins to talk radio, and phone calls to local and national journalists."

The only issue I take with the article is that Bush and his Administration, though complicit in 9/11, did not mastermind the attacks. Our elected politicians are controlled by powerful interests behind the scenes. And I think you all know who I'm talking about.

5/15/2006 8:48:34 AM

yes.

obviously a cabal of ex-sesame street muppets along with kermit and gang are pulling all the strings.

5/15/2006 9:03:40 AM

Have you noticed the current general position on 9/11 across the political spectrum?

Many left-wing publications (like The Capital Times [above]) are openly acknowledging that 9/11 was an inside job. And Village Voice questioned why WTC Building 7 and the twin towers collapsed. Then, you have many "mainstream" papers like The San Francisco Chronicle and The Miami Herald acknowledging that there are serious problems with the "official" story.

I think it's highly plausible that a majority of the those on the left now believe that 9/11 was an inside job. And a substantial portion of "independents" and those on the right believe this also.

Overall, the MSM is still supporting the official story, but it seems the main source of recent blatant support for the official 9/11 story is coming from right-wing Bush-worshipping sources like World Net Daily, which try to smear all those who don't believe the official story as "left-wing Michael Moore-loving conspiracy mongers." This may indicate that a shift of sorts is taking place, where in the near future the only people supporting the official account 100% will be right-wing republican sources like WND.

Also of note, as anyone who is familiar with the 9/11 truth movement knows, is that most of the leaders in the 9/11 Truth Movement are not liberals, but are in fact far-right wing conservatives (who oppose Bush, the republicans, and the phony conservatives of course). So, the point is that the 9/11 Truth Movement is far more than just left-wing liberals. It is being lead by far-right conservatives, which would indicate that the movement includes many "conservatives" as well.

All of this shows that the belief that 9/11 was an inside job is hardly an extreme minority viewpoint any more. It is taking over in left-wing circles, includes many on the right and in the middle, and now even the MSM is having to admit there are serious problems with the official story. In the future, look for the MSM to soften their support for the official story, opening up debate about possible complicity by the government. But, of course, if that occurs they will only allow Bush, Cheney, or other puppet politicians to be blamed, and will shift focus away from the Zionist connections (eg, Mossad involvement).


[Edited on May 15, 2006 at 10:05 AM. Reason : ``````````]

5/15/2006 9:43:48 AM

Well, it's hard to deny evidence that's right before your eyes. I'm not much into politics, but if I were to bet my money on who was right, I'd bet in our soapbox queen (i.e., salisburyboy)

5/15/2006 10:06:50 AM

also...edomites

Quote :

"yes. obviously a cabal of ex-sesame street muppets along with kermit and gang are pulling all the strings."

along with the guys from Fragal Rock...those dudes are sketchy

[Edited on May 15, 2006 at 10:33 AM. Reason : asdf]

5/15/2006 10:29:21 AM

Quote :

"also...edomites"

Oh, so they're really semites? Please, tell me more, because I want to know why I'm supposedly an "evil anti-Semite."

So, basically you guys are pro-Semite, and don't believe that Edomites exist. Right?

5/15/2006 10:41:16 AM

Quote :

"Oh, so they're really semites?"

did i say that??...show me where i said that??

stop trolling me...jeez man

5/15/2006 10:43:46 AM

this is for anybody: who are the Semites?

5/15/2006 11:29:57 AM

is this a trick question??

Quote :

"I want to know why I'm supposedly an "evil anti-Semite.""

and what do you mean "supposedly"??....did you or did you not admit to being one?...is it or is it not part of your profile??

[Edited on May 15, 2006 at 11:52 AM. Reason : asdf]

5/15/2006 11:39:28 AM

Quote :

"Normally, if a prestigious UW alumnus and ex-Bush administration official were to come to the Wisconsin Historical Society to spill the beans about a Bush administration scandal, it would make the news."

unfounded accusations =/= spilling the beans.

PASTE PASTE PASTE

IGNORE IGNORE IGNORE

Same questions....26 pages later...

Who is avoiding a rational argument?

No, bin Laden didn't have any motive to carry out the 9/11 attacks.

Its not like he issued a fatwah or anything urging muslims to kill americans.

Keep ignoring evidence, little buddy.

Quote :

"Text of Fatwah Urging Jihad Against Americans Published in Al-Quds al-'Arabi on Febuary 23, 1998 Statement signed by Sheikh Usamah Bin-Muhammad Bin-Ladin; Ayman al-Zawahiri, leader of the Jihad Group in Egypt; Abu- Yasir Rifa'i Ahmad Taha, a leader of the Islamic Group; Sheikh Mir Hamzah, secretary of the Jamiat-ul-Ulema-e-Pakistan; and Fazlul Rahman, leader of the Jihad Movement in Bangladesh ... All these crimes and sins committed by the Americans are a clear declaration of war on God, his messenger, and Muslims. And ulema have throughout Islamic history unanimously agreed that the jihad is an individual duty if the enemy destroys the Muslim countries. This was revealed by Imam Bin-Qadamah in "Al- Mughni," Imam al-Kisa'i in "Al- Bada'i," al-Qurtubi in his interpretation, and the shaykh of al-Islam in his books, where he said "As for the militant struggle, it is aimed at defending sanctity and religion, and it is a duty as agreed. Nothing is more sacred than belief except repulsing an enemy who is attacking religion and life." On that basis, and in compliance with God's order, we issue the following fatwa to all Muslims The ruling to kill the Americans and their allies--civilians and military--is an individual duty for every Muslim who can do it in any country in which it is possible to do it, in order to liberate the al-Aqsa Mosque and the holy mosque from their grip, and in order for their armies to move out of all the lands of Islam, defeated and unable to threaten any Muslim. This is in accordance with the words of Almighty God, "and fight the pagans all together as they fight you all together," and "fight them until there is no more tumult or oppression, and there prevail justice and faith in God." This is in addition to the words of Almighty God "And why should ye not fight in the cause of God and of those who, being weak, are ill-treated and oppressed--women and children, whose cry is 'Our Lord, rescue us from this town, whose people are oppressors; and raise for us from thee one who will help!'" We -- with God's help -- call on every Muslim who believes in God and wishes to be rewarded to comply with God's order to kill the Americans and plunder their money wherever and whenever they find it. We also call on Muslim ulema, leaders, youths, and soldiers to launch the raid on Satan's U.S. troops and the devil's supporters allying with them, and to displace those who are behind them so that they may learn a lesson."

http://www.ict.org.il/articles/fatwah.htm

Could you please address these questions? I'm not trying to redirect or distract here. I'm genuinely curious. You made statements regarding all of these questions in this very thread, I would just like you to explain them before moving on. I questioned these claims when they were originally made, but you ignored me. Why won't you answer them?

Why didn't they build a pipeline in 1998? Why did they blow up their own african embassies and then launch a missile attack on Afghanistan? They were set to build a natural gas pipeline with the Taliban then. Why mess that up for no reason?

You don't believe that Afghanistan was invaded for the sake of a pipeline? Then why are you defending that theory so stubbornly?

You just said that Afghanistan was invaded so that a pipeline could be built. Now you're saying that the zionists wanted to prevent the building of a pipeline - just like how Iraq was invaded to secure the oil supply even though the zionists don't care about the oil supply. How do you reconcile all of the conflicting information that you spout off on here?

By the way, how did the zionists cause the Revolutionary War?

Do you even know anything about american history? To say that the Civil War was caused simply by "illuminati agitators" is to ignore almost every detail of the decades that preceded the conflict.

Can we get some proof that John Wilkes Booth was an agent of the NWO rather than an upset Confederate sympathizer?

I would also like to see some proof that Pearl Harbor was caused by the evil edomite zionists.

You have provided absolutely no evidence at all that the Rothschilds are the zionists at the top running world events. They were a prominent family that supported the creation of a jewish state, that is all. Please provide some evidence other than "Here are some rich jews!"

So why should anyone believe your rantings anyway You have admitted that you hate jews. As such, you are far from an impartial source when you blame jews for every problem in the world.

So when was the Israeli false flag terrorist attack in Washington state?

Why is it spamming if I repeat unanswered questions, but it's ok for you to repost the same article in the same thread five times?

5/15/2006 1:17:02 PM

Quote :

"did you or did you not admit to being one?...is it or is it not part of your profile??"

I'm just adopting a smear term as a badge of honor.

But my question is what exactly does it mean to be "anti-Semitic." IE, who are the Semites?

5/15/2006 2:47:54 PM

Few people know that the word antisemitism was created by an antisemite, Wilhelm Marr. Marr's intention was to replace the German word Judenhass (Jew-hatred) with a term that would make Jew-haters sound less vulgar and even somewhat scientific.

http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/Talk:anti-Semitism

5/15/2006 2:53:11 PM

So the Jooz are Semites?

And Edomites don't exist, right? Only Semites.

5/15/2006 2:58:30 PM

When did I say that?

Oh right. Misrepresentation.

5/15/2006 3:04:54 PM

salisbury, you would be baffled by Minoriteam.

See, the good guys are a gang of wily Edomites; a black, an Indian, a Hispanic, a Chinese man, and a Jew (or, as you would say, a "Jew").

But see, they fight The White Shadow, who has the illuminati symbol for a head!

5/15/2006 6:00:33 PM

Quote :

"So the Jooz are Semites? And Edomites don't exist, right? Only Semites."

waaaaaaiiiit a sec....i feel like we have seen this tactic before...

salis will wait for someone to say that edomites dont exist....or that the jews are semites....and then he will post some insane (OMG ADHOMIAFDSFADf) article saying otherwise....

and then....if no one responds accordingly...he will post the article anyway...

5/15/2006 6:52:42 PM

Quote :

"But my question is what exactly does it mean to be "anti-Semitic.""

Quote :

"Few people know that the word antisemitism was created by an antisemite, Wilhelm Marr. Marr's intention was to replace the German word Judenhass (Jew-hatred) with a term that would make Jew-haters sound less vulgar and even somewhat scientific."

I already answered your question little buddy.

5/15/2006 7:19:41 PM

Article on Zionist orchestration of 9/11, and how remote-controlled aircraft were most likely used:

http://www.postchronicle.com/commentary/opinion/article_21218634.shtml

Quote :

"Precursors Of Remote-Controlled Flights Of 9/11? by Stephen M. St. John May 15, 2006 [...] Despite what Universal Studios will have you believe, the alleged phone calls from the flights of 9/11 were all fake too. They were all the "product" of voice morphing technology. Cockpit voice recorders do not pick up sound in the passenger cabin, unless of course you are watching a Zionist propaganda movie. [...] ...9/11...achieved the Zionist Neo-Conservative goal of putting American muscle on Mesopotamian patrol. Americans need to suspend their games and other entertainments and engage themselves in a national day of reckoning about what really happened on 9/11. When Americans can see actors and actresses portraying the alleged hijackers and other passengers on United Airlines Flight 93 -- but cannot view any surveillance videotape from any of the "Category X" high security international airports from which the flights of 9/11 departed -- one can only conclude that there is something radically wrong. There is a Praxis of Evil in our midst. A fungus among us. The Scholars for 9/11 Truth (http://www.ST911.org) and the Scientific Panel Investigating 9/11 (http://www.physics911.net), among others, have proved beyond any reasonable doubt that the 9/11 Commission Report is part of a cover-up of what really happened on 9/11. Indeed, all the lies that we have been told about weapons of mass destruction in Iraq -– and they were very big lies -– are but little ones when compared with the BIG LIE about 9/11. The 9/11 Commissioners ignored indications of remote control piloting of the jets of 9/11 brought forward by retired Army Colonel Donn de Grand Pre (among others), who had convened within days of 9/11 a meeting of military, commercial and civilian aviators and experts. Their conclusions, which De Grand Pre reported to the highest levels of the Pentagon, were that the jets of 9/11 could not possibly have been flown the way they were flown by Arab flight students, and that the best explanation for these flights was that they were flown by remote control during the peak activities of multiple NORAD drills. The common thread linking the EC-135N disaster with the Egypt Air Flight 990 disaster and the attacks of 9/11 is the technology of remote control of aerial vehicles. Chief among those comprising the small universe of people conversant with this technology is Rabbi Dov Zakheim, who left his post at System Planning Corporation after President George W. Bush appointed him Undersecretary of Defense and Comptroller of the Pentagon in the months leading up to 9/11. In September of 2000, exactly a year before 9/11 and two months before the presidential election that brought George W. Bush into the White House, Zakheim had signed a controversial paper, published by the Project for the New American Century, which suggested that "a new Pearl Harbor" type of event would greatly facilitate implementation of the recommendations in this paper. Hence, it can be fairly said that the motive, the means, and the opportunity to pull off an event like 9/11 converged between the ears of Rabbi Dov Zakheim. There is an urgent need to reopen the investigations of the EC-135N disaster, the Egypt Air Flight 990 disaster, and the attacks of 9/11. These investigations must take into account the Talmudic law of the Moser, which, like the Mafioso code of omerta, prohibits a Jew from informing upon another Jew to a non-Jew, a practice that is not only diametrically opposed to the adversarial process of our legal and judicial systems, but also to the proper functioning of our intelligence and law enforcement communities. [...] ...no matter what the alleged hijackers said or did in the months and years leading up to 9/11, there is no proof that they were at any of the airports, let alone on the flights of 9/11. Again, where are the routine video surveillance tapes showing them there?"

5/16/2006 9:45:32 AM

Quote :

" MOON WORSHIPPERS!!! DARKSIDED! "

5/16/2006 9:48:50 AM

is salis racist against arabs too??

"we all know arabs cant be good pilots"....man...its a good thing he has a policy of adopting smear words as his user description

5/16/2006 10:07:36 AM

5/16/2006 10:27:39 AM

don't forget the SEM-ITES

they're much more important than Edomites

if you oppose Semites, you're guilty of the crime of anti-Semitism

5/16/2006 11:31:24 AM

You don't just oppose jews, salisburyboy, you hate them.

[Edited on May 16, 2006 at 12:06 PM. Reason : 666]

5/16/2006 12:06:43 PM