cheese dammit.

2/27/2006 4:38:34 PM

jews are in it for the cheese

its 100% fact

2/27/2006 4:41:37 PM

its 100% PROVEN fact

[Edited on February 27, 2006 at 4:43 PM. Reason : `]

2/27/2006 4:43:02 PM

Last time I was suspened, the supposed problem was that I was "messing up" others' threads by posting on "conspiracy-related" subject matter. I was certainly not trying to harm or destroy the threads. I was trying to have a serious discussion on the issues, and the material I brought to the discussion, though "conspiracy-related", was relevant to the discussion.

But it's perfectly fine for you guys to spam my threads with cheese nonsense, which is intentionally designed to damage the thread?

2/27/2006 4:51:45 PM

is your post 100% proven fact?

2/27/2006 4:52:50 PM

i'm limiting my cheese talk to the one cheese thread per week.

however, i'll continue to call you out on being an irrational douche in your threads.

2/27/2006 4:53:09 PM

Quote :

"I was trying to have a serious discussion on the issues, and the material I brought to the discussion, though "conspiracy-related", was relevant to the discussion."

YES, NO DISCUSSION OF EDUCATION IS COMPLETE WITHOUT A LITTLE JEWISH CONSPIRACY

2/27/2006 5:04:07 PM

I'm giving abonorio, jonhguth, and woodfoot the benefit of the doubt. the spam posts on this page were only about an hour after i warned you not to do it, so maybe you didn't see it.

at any rate, this thread now contains the same warning. spam the soapbox with cheese stuff, etc, and i will suspend you like it's fucking cool.

2/27/2006 5:25:39 PM

so lemme get this straight

why does he get one jew thread a week
but we don't get a cheese thread a week

lets ignore the fact that this cheese shit is bananas
THE JEW SHIT IS JUST AS FUCKING LOONEY

WHO FUCKING CARES ABOUT THE EDOMITES

2/27/2006 5:30:47 PM

theres some more information in the other thread you made about the same thing
http://www.brentroad.com/message_topic.aspx?topic=366836
lots more in here
http://www.brentroad.com/message_topic.aspx?topic=273702
and in between the proof that hell is inside the earth because of fire worms i think there was some in here
http://www.brentroad.com/message_topic.aspx?topic=74208

just pointing out some more information, not anything i should get suspended for

2/27/2006 5:38:32 PM

A WELL RESPECTED FINLAND NEWSPAPER

2/27/2006 5:56:14 PM

2/27/2006 6:12:12 PM

You can't be serious.

2/27/2006 6:14:24 PM

THE INTERNET

SERIOUS BUSINESS

2/27/2006 6:15:46 PM

say what you want about theDuke...

Quote :

"theDuke866: ...and i will suspend you like it's fucking cool."

but the cheese-eating mo@#$%er has some great lines

[Edited on February 27, 2006 at 6:26 PM. Reason : i lolled, seriously]

2/27/2006 6:25:54 PM

He's a goddamned hypocrite, is what he is.

2/27/2006 7:21:40 PM

so what did he do this time?

personally i say keep him. its entertaining.

nobody makes you respond to the threads

2/27/2006 7:25:08 PM

i still say move the fucker's shit to the lounge

2/27/2006 7:26:19 PM

HE WAS GIVEN AN ULTIMATUM. EITHER BE SUSPENDED OR LIMIT HIS BULLSHIT TO ONE THREAD. ONE. THIS WAS AS A RESULT OF EVERYONE FUCKING SAYING EITHER HE GOES OR WE PUT CHEESE THREADS EVERYWHERE.

NOW ALL OF A SUDDEN HE GETS ONE THREAD PER WEEK. WHICH WAS NOT THE FUCKING DEAL. THEN ON TOP OF IT, WHEN ANOTHER EQUALLY STUPIDASS THREAD IS MADE AS A WEEKLY THING, THAT PERSON GETS SUSPENDED.

NOW TELL ME WHERE CHANGING THE DEAL AND BEING A HYPOCRITE ON TOP OF IT IS A GOOD THING.

2/27/2006 7:27:17 PM

The thing is that if nobody responded and let it fall to the bottom all the time nobody would care. Eventually Salisburyboy will get the hint. If not, well, who really cares? Nobody believes a thing he says.

2/27/2006 7:44:43 PM

GET THE HINT?

2/27/2006 7:46:59 PM

Fine, then nobody should care if there's a hundred cheese threads, let alone one. I mean if nobody responds, they'll get the message.

RIGHT?

2/27/2006 7:47:30 PM

Quote :

"Eventually Salisburyboy will get the hint."

incorrect. he would just keep bumping it bttt every week

2/27/2006 7:51:09 PM

Even if he BTTT his own threads nobody forces you to click on it.

Maybe there should be 1 cheese thread for Salisburyboy's 1 thread. Seems fair, although it's not my place to say since I'm not a mod...

2/27/2006 8:34:26 PM

HE IS NOT GOING TO STOP
HE IS NOT GOING TO "GET THE HINT"
HE IS A RACIST FUCKING NUTJOB

AND THIS IS WHERE HE THINKS HE IS FIGHTING HIS BATTLE

HE MAKES POSTS ABOUT HOW CHILDISH THE CH__SE SHIT IS
BUT YOU KNOW HE'S ON HIS PRISONPLANET MESSAGE BOARD BRAGGING ABOUT THE ZIONISTS WHO MOCK HIM

2/27/2006 8:41:13 PM

Quote :

"HE WAS GIVEN AN ULTIMATUM. EITHER BE SUSPENDED OR LIMIT HIS BULLSHIT TO ONE THREAD. ONE. THIS WAS AS A RESULT OF EVERYONE FUCKING SAYING EITHER HE GOES OR WE PUT CHEESE THREADS EVERYWHERE. NOW ALL OF A SUDDEN HE GETS ONE THREAD PER WEEK. WHICH WAS NOT THE FUCKING DEAL. THEN ON TOP OF IT, WHEN ANOTHER EQUALLY STUPIDASS THREAD IS MADE AS A WEEKLY THING, THAT PERSON GETS SUSPENDED. NOW TELL ME WHERE CHANGING THE DEAL AND BEING A HYPOCRITE ON TOP OF IT IS A GOOD THING."

No, he was suspended originally by Maverick. I never made any "deal" or agreed to any terms with anyone except for salisburyboy, and that was out of sheer generosity. My aim as moderator is to make the place as enjoyable as possible for the most people possible, but I'm not a slave to that. In addition, I don't owe anybody here anything, and nobody will get anywhere by trying to browbeat me.

I'm pretty hands off as a mod (must be that libertarian lean of mine), but if you force my hand, I will suspend you with the quickness.

2/27/2006 10:21:27 PM

Good fucking thing.

Nothing you say means anything anymore.

2/27/2006 10:23:14 PM

Quote :

"AND THIS IS WHERE HE THINKS HE IS FIGHTING HIS BATTLE"

Oh the irony.

2/27/2006 11:14:33 PM

2/27/2006 11:24:03 PM

Quote :

"he would just keep bumping it bttt every week"

Actually random users have been bumping them lately.

JT3bucky:

http://www.thewolfweb.com/message_topic.aspx?topic=372529
bumped from 12/8/2005 to 2/28/2006

http://www.thewolfweb.com/message_topic.aspx?topic=361042
bumped from 12/8/2005 to 2/28/2006




RoidRaginTKE:

http://www.thewolfweb.com/message_topic.aspx?topic=273702
from 1/23/2006 to 2/27/2006

me
from time to time

He will always have about 8 threads on &page=1

2/28/2006 7:36:21 AM

Quote :

"Woodfoot: HE IS A RACIST FUCKING NUTJOB"

In case you didn't notice, calling me "anti-Semitic" or "racist" isn't going to scare me into silence. I like it when people use those smear labels against me. I've even got them in the biography section of my user profile. Being "anti-Semitic" just means you dare to be critical of Jews, and being "racist" can mean nothing more than thinking race is important.

And reporting me to the ADL isn't going to do the trick either. Holding so-called "anti-Semitic" views is not a crime, and I'm not the least bit scared of the ADL doing anything to me. They've got bigger fish to fry.

2/28/2006 8:25:58 AM

2/28/2006 8:30:39 AM

Quote :

"Being "anti-Semitic" just means you dare to be critical of Jews, and being "racist" can mean nothing more than thinking race is important."

I wouldn't call your obsession "daring to be critical of jews". You spend your days posting nonsense about jews being the sons of satan. Thats not criticism, thats blatant slander.

Of course, if you found out about jews saying the same things about christians, you would create a thread about how jews want to exterminate us.

Then we would all laugh at you.

Even more.

2/28/2006 2:07:13 PM

Quote :

"You spend your days posting nonsense about jews being the sons of satan. Thats not criticism, thats blatant slander."

It's not "slander." It's Biblical.


“I know the blasphemy of them which say they are Jews, and are not, but are the synagogue of Satan.” (Revelation 2:9)

These so-called "Jews" are not racial Israelites. They are descendants of the Edomites, Turkish Khazars, and others.


Yahshua speaking to the Jewish Pharisees:

"Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do." (John 8:44)


Remember that the so-called "Jews" are really descendants of the Edomites:

"And I hated Esau, and laid his mountains and his heritage waste for the dragons of the wilderness. Whereas Edom saith, We are impoverished, but we will return and build the desolate places; thus saith the LORD of hosts, They shall build, but I will throw down; and they shall call them, The border of wickedness, and, The people against whom the LORD hath indignation for ever." (Malachi 1:3-4)


Did I write Revelation 2:9, John 8:44, or Malachi 1:3-4? I guess you can call God and the Bible "anti-Semitic" too.


[Edited on February 28, 2006 at 2:32 PM. Reason : `]

2/28/2006 2:27:28 PM

so explain why any of this matters

2/28/2006 2:40:23 PM

i don't know why i'm doing this

but
why would Jesus' criticisms of the Pharisees and Saducees be a judgement of the entire jewish race?

2/28/2006 2:48:33 PM

Quote :

"why would Jesus' criticisms of the Pharisees and Saducees be a judgement of the entire jewish race? "

Well, Jesus' strong criticism of the Pharisees is certainly a condemnation of their evil, Satanic religion. The modern religion known as "Judaism" traces its roots directly back to the Pharisees.


And Jesus also condemned the race of the Pharisees:

"Ye serpents, ye GENERATION of vipers, how can ye escape the damnation of hell?" (Matthew 23:33)

*Note: "generation" in the above verse is translated from the Greek word "gennema" (Strong's #1081), which means "offspring."

Confirm here:

Strong's Concordance:
http://www.tgm.org/bible.htm

Strong's Lexicon:
http://www.eliyah.com/lexicon.html

2/28/2006 3:04:29 PM

^^^ Keep being a nutjob. Quoting the Bible as proof of anything is a key nutjob characteristic.

2/28/2006 3:04:43 PM

More from Matthew Chapter 23 where Jesus is speaking to the Pharisees:

"Wherefore ye be witnesses unto yourselves, that ye are the children of them which killed the prophets....That upon you may come all the righteous blood shed upon the earth, from the blood of righteous Abel unto the blood of Zacharias son of Barachias, whom ye slew between the temple and the altar." Verily I say unto you, All these things shall come upon this generation." (Matthew 23:31,35-36)


There are several points from this passage. Jesus is stating that the Pharisees are the children (ie, of the same race) of those that killed the prophets. Also, based on the passage, the Pharisees may even be a descendants of Cain (who slew Abel). In fact, there is evidence to show that the Edomites and descendants of Cain may have intermixed.

It is clear that Jesus is identifying and placing importance upon the race or lineage of the Pharisees. Based on this passage, and many others, it is clear that he is condemning this race.


[Edited on February 28, 2006 at 3:23 PM. Reason : `]

2/28/2006 3:23:01 PM

WHY DOES ANY OF THIS MATTER?

2/28/2006 3:23:55 PM

Quote :

"WHY DOES ANY OF THIS MATTER?"

That has been thoroughly explained in the course of the thread. I think the first post of the thread pretty much covers it. Go back and read that first post.

Basically, the Bible was only written for racial Israelites, and Jesus only came for the Israelites. So, it is of vital importance as to who the real racial Israelites are.

2/28/2006 3:28:16 PM

I'd like to find a direct bloodline from salisburyboy to an edomite.

That would be awesome.

2/28/2006 3:30:55 PM

so the bible isnt for anyone who isnt a racial israelite? thats just stupid

2/28/2006 3:36:27 PM

NO
IT ISN'T CLEAR

ITS CLEAR THAT YOU HAVE SOME KIND OF SICK PARADOXICAL VIEW OF THE BIBLE

2/28/2006 3:43:39 PM

So how exactly is judaism an "evil, Satanic religion"?

"According to the New Testament, Pharisees wanted to punish Jesus for healing a man's withered hand on the Sabbath, but there is no Rabbinic rule according to which Jesus had violated the Sabbath. According to the New Testament the Pharisees objected to Jesus's mission to outcast groups such as beggars and tax-collectors, but Rabbinic texts actually emphasize the availability of forgiveness to all. Indeed, much of Jesus' teaching, for example the Sermon on the Mount, is consistent with that of the Pharisees.

Some scholars believe that those passages of the New Testament that present a caricature of the Pharisees were not written during Jesus' lifetime but rather sometime after the destruction of Herod's Temple in 70 CE, at a time when it had become clear that most Jews did not consider Jesus to be the messiah. At this time Christians sought most new converts from among the gentiles. They thus presented a story of Jesus that was more sympathetic to Romans than to Jews. Moreover, it was only after 70 CE that Phariseeism emerged as the dominant form of Judaism. For Christian leaders at this time to present Christianity as the legitimate heir to the Old Testament Covenant, they had to devalue Rabbinic Judaism."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pharisees

2/28/2006 3:44:58 PM

you never explained why it was that these white "lost israelites" (the nordics, germanics, celtics, anglo-saxons, etc) were polytheists, which they most certainly were

2/28/2006 3:47:38 PM

Quote :

"so the bible isnt for anyone who isnt a racial israelite? thats just stupid"

Why?

Think about the Old Testament and the Israelites before the time of Jesus. Would anyone argue that the Old Testament was for anyone other than the Israelites. Of course not. The laws of God and the Scriptures were only written for God's Chosen People, the Israelites. God did not give his law to any other race of people.

Now, move ahead to the time of Jesus. This may shock some, but Jesus actually said that he was only sent to the Israelites. And he commanded his disciples to only spread the gospel to the Israelites:

Matthew 15:22-24: "And, behold, a woman of Canaan came out of the same coasts, and cried unto him, saying, Have mercy on me, O Lord, thou son of David; my daughter is grievously vexed with a devil. But he answered her not a word. And his disciples came and besought him, saying, Send her away; for she crieth after us. But he answered and said, I am not sent but unto the lost sheep of the house of Israel."

Matthew 10:5-6: "These twelve Jesus sent forth, and commanded them, saying, Go not into the way of the Gentiles, and into any city of the Samaritans enter ye not: But go rather to the lost sheep of the house of Israel."


Does this not make perfect sense? Only the Israelites (and no other races) were under the law and needed a "savior."

2/28/2006 3:47:43 PM

It makes perfect sense.









































To a nutjob.

2/28/2006 3:50:27 PM

Quote :

"God did not give his law to any other race of people. "

Matthew 28:19
Go ye therefore, and teach all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost.

Mark 16:15
Go ye into all the world, and preach the gospel to every creature.

Acts 8:25
And they, when they had testified and preached the word of the Lord, returned to Jerusalem, and preached the gospel in many villages of the Samaritans.

Acts 15:3
They [Paul and Barnabas] passed through Phenice and Samaria, declaring the conversion of the Gentiles.

Acts 22:21
And he [Jesus] said unto me [Paul], Depart: for I will send thee far hence unto the Gentiles.

Acts 28:28
Be it known therefore unto you, that the salvation of God is sent unto the Gentiles, and that they will hear it.

2/28/2006 3:52:11 PM

All authority hath been given unto me in heaven and on earth. Go ye therefore, and make disciples of all the nations, baptizing them into the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit: teaching them to observe all things whatsoever I commanded you: and lo, I am with you always, even unto the end of the world” (Mt. 28:18-20 ASV).

i mean, ive always assumed that "all the nations" meant, well, all the nations.

wait, let me guess, he only meant "all the real, non-EDOMITE j00 Nations, meaning the lost tribes which dont exist and were polytheists if they did exist"

2/28/2006 3:53:28 PM