stanford, rice, utah and arizona =QUALITYstanford, rice, utah and arizona =QUALITYstanford, rice, utah and arizona =QUALITYstanford, rice, utah and arizona =QUALITYstanford, rice, utah and arizona =QUALITYstanford, rice, utah and arizona =QUALITYstanford, rice, utah and arizona =QUALITYstanford, rice, utah and arizona =QUALITYstanford, rice, utah and arizona =QUALITYstanford, rice, utah and arizona =QUALITYstanford, rice, utah and arizona =QUALITYstanford, rice, utah and arizona =QUALITYstanford, rice, utah and arizona =QUALITYstanford, rice, utah and arizona =QUALITYstanford, rice, utah and arizona =QUALITYstanford, rice, utah and arizona =QUALITYstanford, rice, utah and arizona =QUALITYstanford, rice, utah and arizona =QUALITYstanford, rice, utah and arizona =QUALITY

11/7/2006 1:56:45 AM

OMG George Washington went 27-1 last year in basketball and only got a 8 seed.

ITS WHO YOU PLAY ASSHAT.

11/7/2006 1:56:54 AM

because when u play a cupcake schedule other stuff doesnt matter dickweed.

youre denying the experts that have been doing this for YEARSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS longer than you have been alive and that therefore makes you retarded. these guys have played, coached and seen these teams, trust me...THEY KNOW.

11/7/2006 1:57:27 AM

and ucla isnt beaing anyone and losing to team worse than tamu is beating. wasu and was both blew ucla out. missouri is better than both of those teams.

11/7/2006 1:59:21 AM

Quote :

"Strength of schedule does play a mojor role in that, but, THAT record crosses the line. There is just no way around that. 4-5 c'mon man, you can't be serious. With that logic, you could schedule the toughest record ever and nearly lose every game,and still be ahead of others. wow. "

11/7/2006 1:59:44 AM

im sure earl meant lose nearly every game and not nearly lose every game.

11/7/2006 2:01:13 AM

Its really odd and funny how you two are always online together.

Shouldn't you guys be in Chapel Hill butt buddies??

11/7/2006 2:02:49 AM

Seriously, that's a loop hole in the system then. Just schedule usc, ohio state, michigan, louiville etc and nearly lose to them. You'll be ahead of others who have a better record.

^me and you are online alot together. Here you go again with no point statements.

[Edited on November 7, 2006 at 2:05 AM. Reason : .]

11/7/2006 2:03:18 AM

earl, what are you saying? you keep saying nearly lose to them which would insiuate they beat all the good teams by small ammounts.


is this what you mean?

said-nearly lose to all of them


i think you mean- lose to nearly all of them

can i get a confirmation?

11/7/2006 2:05:45 AM

Just lose to them period. Play a tough team, lose. Lose to every one I mentioned above (all the top ranked teams) (have the toughest schedule ever) Still be ranked higher than someone with a better record. That's insane, and also the reason why we need a playoff system.


[Edited on November 7, 2006 at 2:08 AM. Reason : we won this thread]

11/7/2006 2:06:57 AM

Quote :

"we wonVICTORED this thread"

11/7/2006 2:22:10 AM

Quote :

"Seriously, that's a loop hole in the system then. Just schedule usc, ohio state, michigan, louiville etc and nearly lose to them. You'll be ahead of others who have a better record."

any team who could play those schools close would be a pretty good team

unlike a&m

they blow

11/7/2006 2:24:48 AM

minnesota is a top 25 team too then

losses to the top 3 teams +wisconsin

[Edited on November 7, 2006 at 2:30 AM. Reason : that is damn impressive gophers are rollin]

11/7/2006 2:29:27 AM

minnesota lost to UM by two touchdowns and got BLOWN THE FUCK OUT by the buckeyes and the badgers

do even read the posts our do you just attack your keyboard all willy-nilly

[Edited on November 7, 2006 at 2:31 AM. Reason : ]

11/7/2006 2:30:47 AM

ucla lost to cal by two touchdowns and got BLOWN THE FUCK OUT by the cougars

and lost to orgeron and washington by 10

[Edited on November 7, 2006 at 2:32 AM. Reason : same thing]

11/7/2006 2:31:41 AM

yeah i know

that's why i didn't post a bunch of hyperbole about them being a top 25 team

neither did sagarin

what the fuck are you talking about

[Edited on November 7, 2006 at 2:33 AM. Reason : ]

11/7/2006 2:32:43 AM

so washington state is better than ohio state now


^dont go editing your post then asking what im talking about. we know what you first typed

[Edited on November 7, 2006 at 2:35 AM. Reason : ahaha nice edit jackass]

11/7/2006 2:33:15 AM

please explain your logic

because i never said anything close to that

--

i didn't delete anything in my edit

i added the last two lines

please tell me what i typed first

[Edited on November 7, 2006 at 2:37 AM. Reason : ]

11/7/2006 2:34:02 AM

you calimed ucla was better by saying minn lost to um by 14 and got blown out by ohio state

but ucla lost to cal by 14 and got blown out by washington state.

they both lost to the other good team by 2 scores so the only difference is who they got blown the fuckout by

you think ucla is better so that would mean

getting blown the fuck out by washignton state>getting blown the fuckout by ohio state

11/7/2006 2:38:09 AM

i never previously claimed that ucla was the better team, but they probably are

as a whole, ucla's body of work is slightly more impressive

minnesota almost lost to NORTH DAKOTA STATE

--

also

Quote :

"you think ucla is better so that would mean getting blown the fuck out by washignton state>getting blown the fuckout by ohio state"

that's some backwards fucking logic if i've ever seen it

[Edited on November 7, 2006 at 2:42 AM. Reason : ]

11/7/2006 2:40:40 AM

^^im gettin really confused

i dont understand your logic at all, i dont even know how to read your sentences.

please rephrase that or something...

better yet please never post again.

[Edited on November 7, 2006 at 2:41 AM. Reason : f]

11/7/2006 2:41:26 AM

its not my logic. its ernies logic.

ernie thinks ucla(4-5) is better than tamu(8-2) because ucla lost to cal oregon and got blown out by washington state. neither team has beaten anyone

so i took that logic and picked minnesota. they lost to michigan and wisconsin and got blown out by ohio state.

the only difference in the things i told you about ucla and minn is who they got blown out by.

ernie says the things listed for ucla are better than the things listed for minn so that would mean ernie think washington state is better than ohio state.



ernies logic is full of wholes. its confusing to even him. he just knew nd was a top 10 team but the computer he is defending calls them 17.

11/7/2006 2:45:36 AM

neither team has any business ahead of an 8-2 big12 team.

11/7/2006 2:47:23 AM

MINNESOTA

08/31 at Kent St W 44-0 - expected
09/09 at #22 California L 42-17 - blown the fuck out by a decent team
09/16 Temple W 62-0 - temple
09/23 at Purdue L 27-21 - bad
09/30 #6 Michigan L 28-14 - not terrible
10/07 Penn State L 28-27 - acceptable
10/14 at #25 Wisconsin L 48-12 - ugly, but UW is a pretty good team
10/21 ND State W 10-9 - nigger, please
10/28 at #1 Ohio St L 44-0 - blown the fuck out by the best team in the country
11/04 Indiana W 63-26 - expected

UCLA

09/02 Utah W 31-10 - good win
09/09 Rice W 26-16 - should've won by more
09/23 at Washington L 29-19 - bad loss
09/30 Stanford W 31-0 - stanford
10/07 Arizona W 27-7 - good win
10/14 at #18 Oregon L 30-20 - not terrible
10/21 at #10 N Dame L 20-17 - ROBBED
10/28 Wash St L 37-15 - blown the fuck out by a bad team
11/04 at #10 California L 38-24 - bad loss to a really good team

A&M

09/02 The Citadel W 35-3 - CREAMPUFF
09/09 La Lafayette W 51-7 - CREAMPUFF
09/16 Army W 28-24 - CREAMPUFF
09/23 La Tech W 45-14 - CREAMPUFF
09/30 Texas Tech L 31-27 - good loss
10/07 at Kansas W 21-18 - THREE POINTS, CREAMPUFF
10/14 #19 Missouri W 25-19 - mizzou isn't great
10/21 at Oklahoma St W 34-33 - weak
10/28 at Baylor W 31-21 - CREAMPUFF
11/04 #18 Oklahoma L 17-16 - good loss



neither team is that great

ucla is the best of the bunch, followed by minnesota, a&m is way behind

suck my balls

11/7/2006 2:51:08 AM

3-6 IS BETTER THAN 8-2 NOW.



THIS JUST KEEPS GETTING BETTER.

[Edited on November 7, 2006 at 2:54 AM. Reason : 3-6 NOT 2-8]

11/7/2006 2:53:59 AM

who the fuck is 2-8?

you can't add either?

--

who the fuck is 3-6?

you can't add either?

[Edited on November 7, 2006 at 2:55 AM. Reason : ]

11/7/2006 2:55:00 AM

hahahaha

hcngay

YOU LOSE

now shut up

11/7/2006 2:57:24 AM

WELL SHIT 4-6 IS BETTER THAN 8-2 NOW


and by your logic minn would be the best cuz they lost to the best.

minn is a top 25 team cuz they lost to the top 3 teams in the country.




how the fuck is arizona better than missouri? you are just making shit up now

utah rice and stanfoord are good wins.

robbery is factored into computers?

how did ucla get robbed anyway? i saw quinn and samardja make a play?

[Edited on November 7, 2006 at 3:00 AM. Reason : where was robbery?]

11/7/2006 2:58:37 AM

I NEVER SAID ARIZONA WAS BETTER THAN MISSOURI

AS

A

WHOLE

UCLA'S

BODY

OF

WORK

IS

MORE

IMPRESSIVE

THAN

TEXAS

A

AND

M'S

.

TEXAS

A

AND

M

HAS

PLAYED

A

SCHEDULE

FULL

OF

CREAM

PUFFS

GOD

DAMN

11/7/2006 3:00:49 AM

Quote :

"robbery is factored into computers?"

STRENGTH OF SCHEDULE

MARGIN OF VICTORY

11/7/2006 3:01:28 AM

sos really?

so if i play duke and the refs cheat me then it will look like i played a better team than duke?

11/7/2006 3:03:12 AM

kill yourself

the world would benefit

11/7/2006 3:04:45 AM

NO

seriously man

are you that fucking stupid

notre dame is a good fucking team (STRENGTH OF SCHEDULE)

when you lose by three points (MARGIN OF VICTORY) to a good fucking team (STRENGTH OF SCHEDULE) it doesn't devalue your ranking as much

please read the sagarin page so we can have an intelligent debate

11/7/2006 3:04:51 AM

fuck this shit, the panthers could beat any of these teams

11/7/2006 3:07:04 AM

i'm not reading the page of a system that puts a 4-5 team with wins over nobody ahead of an 8-2 team with a win over a solid 7-3 bowl team. I refuse to.

11/7/2006 3:07:38 AM

then get out of sports talk and out of this thread ASAP

11/7/2006 3:08:24 AM

fair enough

just let me know when you come up with the most respected and trusted method of ranking computation in all of sports

because that's what the sagarin index is

i'll be waiting

11/7/2006 3:08:59 AM

if its so respected and trusted why do they have the human polls and bcs polls. why not just go solely by "the most respected and trusted poll in sports"?


why does anyone have beef with it?

11/7/2006 3:11:54 AM

Quote :

"if its so respected and trusted why do they have the human polls and bcs polls"

you are the only person to have beef with sagarin

people with brains realize his system is practical

and that quote is the ultimate proof that you are the world's biggest fucking moron

the sagarin index is part of the bcs formula

just fucking stop

11/7/2006 3:14:05 AM

Quote :

"why does anyone have beef with it"

probably because

Quote :

"i'm not reading the page of a system that puts a 4-5 team with wins over nobody ahead of an 8-2 team with a win over a solid 7-3 bowl team."

11/7/2006 3:14:21 AM

NO ONE HAS BEEF WITH SAGARIN

EXCEPT THE MENTALLY HANDICAPPED

I'M LOOKING AT YOU HCNGUYEN AND DRUNKNLOADED

IT'S PART OF THE BCS FORMULA

THE BCS FORMULA

I REPEAT

IT'S PART OF THE BCS FORMULA

11/7/2006 3:15:36 AM

but since nobody has beef with it and it is perfect it should BE the bcs formula. why should anything else go in if its already right?

thats like adding flour to toll house cookie dough

not just part of the formula.

[Edited on November 7, 2006 at 3:17 AM. Reason : the bcs:the pinnacle of sports perfection. amirite?]

11/7/2006 3:15:59 AM

i never said it was perfect

learn to fucking read

i said it was practical

11/7/2006 3:16:48 AM

its practical. usually right, sometimes wrong


and its wrong in saying ucla is better than tamu and the sec is waaaay better than the acc.


/thread

[Edited on November 7, 2006 at 3:19 AM. Reason : just didnt work out this year]

11/7/2006 3:18:46 AM

lol, if i was gay i'd totally be turned on by ernie

11/7/2006 3:19:27 AM

look

you are obviously too fucking stupid to have any type of intelligent debate

so i'm going to resort to childish insults

you only have 8 facebook friends

get off tww and get a goddamn life

[Edited on November 7, 2006 at 3:21 AM. Reason : ]

11/7/2006 3:19:52 AM

good lord, at least argue over some better teams

here's a good one

OSU/Michigan should meet for the title


GO!

11/7/2006 3:21:12 AM

Quote :

"you only have 8 facebook friends"

Quote :

"lol, if i was gay i'd totally be turned on by ernie "

11/7/2006 3:21:23 AM

8 facebook friends = 8 friends

evem if that was my facebook. i dont have facebook. i have 418 myspace friends but that doesnt mean i have 418 friends.

your views on life are in line with your knowledge of college football

[Edited on November 7, 2006 at 3:23 AM. Reason : more internet friend= better life and more losses=better football team]

11/7/2006 3:22:06 AM

lol if my brain was jello i could totally relate to a fuckup like drunknloaded

11/7/2006 3:22:10 AM