lol @ maryland destroying bc

11/10/2007 11:22:15 PM

lol @ talking good about TOB during a BC game

11/10/2007 11:29:03 PM

haha. BC fans pwnt.

And wtf Cal? 24-17 USC with a little over 2 to go.

11/10/2007 11:33:41 PM

oh, dear God

don't blow this, Twerps

11/10/2007 11:36:47 PM

wtf Maryland? don't blow this shit!

haha, awesome. 7 yard onside kick.

[Edited on November 10, 2007 at 11:39 PM. Reason : ]

11/10/2007 11:38:09 PM

ah damn. plz to not touch it if it doesn't go 10 yds.


lol. pwnt. At least maryland had the common sense not to touch it when it's short like VT.

[Edited on November 10, 2007 at 11:39 PM. Reason : ]

11/10/2007 11:38:31 PM

they get to rush the field.

11/10/2007 11:41:09 PM

Storm the field!! Where's the tear gas? The zip tie handcuffs???

11/10/2007 11:41:38 PM

so does vt

11/10/2007 11:41:39 PM

lucky bastards

unfortunately, video cameras and pepper spray scare me

11/10/2007 11:41:52 PM

video cameras?

11/10/2007 11:42:02 PM

^video evidence of rushers -> legal action taken.

11/10/2007 11:42:37 PM

I kind of feel bad for Matt Ryan right now though. There is like no security protecting him from the typical crazy asshole Maryland fan.

11/10/2007 11:42:49 PM

the ones the cops have to capture drunken antics and use the footage against you


(BTW, i wish i cold get my hands on the video from today. i was in rare form)

[Edited on November 10, 2007 at 11:43 PM. Reason : ,]

11/10/2007 11:43:07 PM

gai.


heh ESPN buying the fresno state feed instead of sending cameras out to hawaii i see.

brennan is about to set some kind of record with 2 more TD's

[Edited on November 10, 2007 at 11:47 PM. Reason : ]

11/10/2007 11:44:28 PM

hell, clemson goes after pretty much every game. So who chokes next weekend? Both Clempson(5-2) and the Beagles(4-2) have 2 losses. The game next weekend guarantees the winner a spot in the championship game. And UVA and VT play for the Coastal Division the following week.

11/10/2007 11:47:40 PM

personally, I hope the Beagles win and then lose their last ACC game and State wins their last two. It would put us all at 5-3, and yes I know we wouldn't make the champ. game, but it would be pretty awesome, after the start of this year to end up tied (record wise) for the division lead.

11/11/2007 12:04:09 AM

^bc/clemson could always have a major brawl and both be suspended from the game.

11/11/2007 12:25:28 AM

let the debating and lobbying begin, there are like 9 one loss teams now fighting for the last spot (Kansas owns one until they lose)

11/11/2007 12:51:25 AM

Quote :

"Kansas owns one until they lose"

clearly the polls are not out, but i do not think that this will be the case at all.

11/11/2007 2:22:35 AM

^^ hopefully this will be the year the BCS finally implodes. Osu and Ok are always favored by the computers, but not seeing LSU and Oregon would be a shame and if kansas beat mizzu to go 12-0 then who knows.

11/11/2007 4:48:28 AM

http://www.dukesuperbowl.com/

I didn't feel like it was worthy of it's own thread, but lol.

11/11/2007 1:15:04 PM

right now it might not be worthy of it's own thread, but this time next week

11/11/2007 1:19:31 PM

^^ hahah. 10/10 on that site.

Quote :

"Did everybody see the Air Force game? We can beat Notre Dame! We watched it all on NBC. Air Force has small players with a lot of heart and patriotism – just like us. And you know the saying – Mom, Duke and Apple Pie… USA! DUKE!"

[Edited on November 11, 2007 at 1:20 PM. Reason : ^]

11/11/2007 1:19:55 PM

^^^that is friggin HILARIOUS!!! still laughin my ass off

[Edited on November 11, 2007 at 1:22 PM. Reason : ^]

11/11/2007 1:21:45 PM

1. LSU (35) 9-1 1,457
2. Oregon (13) 8-1 1,407
3. Oklahoma (4) 9-1 1,366
4. Kansas (7) 10-0 1,344
5. West Virginia (1) 8-1 1,238
6. Missouri 9-1 1,194
7. Ohio State 10-1 1,145
8. Arizona State 9-1 1,042
9. Georgia 8-2 1,005
10. Virginia Tech 8-2 923
11. Texas 9-2 844
12. Hawaii 9-0 842
13. USC 8-2 814
14. Florida 7-3 686
15. Boise State 9-1 556
16. Clemson 8-2 548
17. Virginia 9-2 547
18. Boston College 8-2 505
19. Tennessee 7-3 306
20. Kentucky 7-3 304
21. Illinois 8-3 271
22. Penn State 8-3 262
23. Michigan 8-3 259
24. Wisconsin 8-3 226
25. Cincinnati 8-2 163


haha. BC could finish the season out of the top 25.

11/11/2007 2:03:49 PM

they're going to finish just like every other season of theirs.

11/11/2007 2:09:02 PM

From #2 to #18 in just two weeks. Could they perhaps be unranked after next week?

11/11/2007 2:32:25 PM

^wouldn't think they drop out for losing at Clemson, unless it's a blowout

it's possible though

11/11/2007 6:06:13 PM

I would piss myself if we finish tied with BC... and it could very well happen.

11/11/2007 6:54:14 PM

I meant if kansas doesnt lose they will make the title game so until then leave a spot for them. If kansas finishes undefeated including beating a #3 oklahoma in the title game and they dont make the BCS title game that will be the end of the BCS, there would be nothing they could say to explain it

11/11/2007 7:07:58 PM

Presuming next week goes as assumed, the NC this year is going to be a joke.

11/11/2007 7:52:36 PM

If only there were a way to determine a true champion in a situation like this...

11/11/2007 7:53:59 PM

Quote :

"I meant if kansas doesnt lose they will make the title game so until then leave a spot for them. If kansas finishes undefeated including beating a #3 oklahoma in the title game and they dont make the BCS title game that will be the end of the BCS, there would be nothing they could say to explain it"

sounds like what people were saying about Auburn a few years ago, where did that get us?

11/11/2007 8:00:21 PM

^^^ why? LSU / Oregon would be a great great game

[Edited on November 11, 2007 at 8:15 PM. Reason : d]

11/11/2007 8:01:17 PM

Yes. I agree. But I've always been a four team playoff guy.

11/11/2007 8:06:16 PM

As an OSU fan, I'm biased. But I hate that when you lose matters just as much, if not more, than who you lose to.

11/11/2007 8:17:32 PM

^Oregon and LSU both play way harder schedules than tOSU this year. they even broke it down on Gameday yesterday. LSU and Oregon play the 12th and 13th hardest schedules, while tOSU plays the 63rd toughest schedule, so I don't think when they lost would have factored as much as you think, if LSU, tOSU, and Oregon run the table.

Quote :

"sounds like what people were saying about Auburn a few years ago, where did that get us?"

well the difference was that we had three undefeated teams that year, Oklahoma, USC, and Auburn. everyone gave Oklahoma the benefit of the doubt b/c the media had been sucking them off for the past few years. they thought OU would eventually break through. they had won the 2000 National Championship (2001 Orange Bowl man that was an ugly game) and had made it to the previous years National Championship game (2004 Sugar Bowl). in reality Oklahoma shouldn't have even made it to the 2004 Sugar Bowl, since they didn't even win their conference (stupid computers). it should have been USC, who was #1 in the AP Poll, but #3 in the BCS that year. Auburn was kind of shafted since I'm positive they could have performed much better against USC than OU's 55-19 performance, but I really don't think even Auburn could have beat the Trojans that year. They were that good. Despite being outstanding again the next year, they lost too much on defense to close out Texas the next year in the National Championship game.

So while we should have seen Auburn vs. USC in 2005, we more than likely would have had the same result, USC as National Champions. I mean Auburn nearly let Virginia Tech a team that lost to USC come back on them. Virginia Tech performed admirably against USC earlier in the season in VT's own backyard, but you could tell that USC was a cut above in that game.

[Edited on November 11, 2007 at 8:32 PM. Reason : ]

11/11/2007 8:27:24 PM

The fuckeyes are an overrated sack of shit and better hope they don't play a bowl game against anyone worth a damn.

11/11/2007 8:37:03 PM

I think tOSU is one of the Top 10 teams in college football this year, but I'm glad that Illinois beat them, b/c I didn't think they were better than some of the teams immediately below them. I mean Boeckman, one of the most efficient QBs this year, had 3 interceptions in that game. He was definitely off during that game.

11/11/2007 8:40:50 PM

I dont think Boeckman is that good anyway. I know he was rated highly in passer efficiency, but he underthrows damn near every deep ball.

11/11/2007 9:08:41 PM

Boeckman is efficent; he is just a QB who does enough to keep them winning.

I think Boeckman is a senior this year? So he is just a short-term replacement

11/11/2007 9:12:23 PM