my favorite: cock-sucking gum-guzzling gutter slut

9/10/2008 4:01:39 PM

"Adriana Lima: Victoria's Secret Model
Height 5'10" - Weight 112 pounds

Jessica Biel: Actress (started on "7th Heaven")
Height 5'8" - Weight 108 pounds

Kate Beckinsale: Actress (movie "Underworld")
Height 5'8" - Weight 115 pounds

Gabrielle Union: Actress (movie "Bring it On")
Height 5'8" - Weight 110 pounds

Jessica Alba: Actress (movie "Into The Blue")
Height 5'7" - Weight 127 pounds


Megan Fox: Actress (movie "Transformers")
Height 5'6" - Weight 114 pounds

Roselyn Sanchez: Actress (TV show "Without a Trace")
Height 5'7" - Weight 130 pounds

Eva Longoria: Actress (TV show "Desperate Housewives")
Height 5'2" - Weight 105 pounds

Salma Hayek: Actress (movie "Desperado")
Height 5'2" - Weight 115 pounds

Kelly Hu: Actress (movie "Scorpion King")
Height 5'5" - Weight 122 pounds

"

interesting...

9/10/2008 6:07:11 PM

im 5 9 150, no girl should be shorter than me and weight nearly the same in my book

9/10/2008 7:28:32 PM

Quote :

"I'm an athletic build with some fat I could still lose and i'm 5'8 150"

I'm still laughing that the original poster thinks that he can be 5' 8", 150lbs with fat and still be able to call himself an athletic build.

9/10/2008 8:23:31 PM

Quote :

"athletic build with some fat"

oxymoron much?

9/10/2008 8:24:18 PM

NO FATTIES

9/10/2008 10:21:44 PM

Quote :

"NO FATTIES"

9/10/2008 11:01:11 PM

There's no way in hell those weights are right.

9/11/2008 2:11:56 PM

they pissing you off a little?

9/11/2008 2:14:08 PM

I'm just saying, I would run my penis into Jessica Biel and Kate Beckinsale like an autistic kid putting the peg in the hole.

They are super hot and I'd bet serious money on Biel weighing 135-145, and Beckinsale weighing 135-140 easily.

9/11/2008 2:19:31 PM

Y'all are some skinny little faggots.

9/11/2008 2:26:31 PM

^ OMG CHUBBY CHASER

9/11/2008 2:28:09 PM

Quote :

"I am also willing to bet you can look at a woman that is hawt and think she is 20 lbs lighter than what she truly weighs."

9/11/2008 2:31:41 PM

Yeah, at 5'7" I find it hard seeing them that light. Maybe 5-10 lbs heavier...the 5'10" Victoria Secret model I could see being that light because those bitches are crazy skinny.

[Edited on September 11, 2008 at 2:34 PM. Reason : [no fatties]]

9/11/2008 2:34:27 PM

Quote :

"I'm 5'6 and about 145"

i'd hit it

9/11/2008 2:34:38 PM

Quote :

"Beckinsale"

i'm sorry, but i cannot help but feel the need to post a picture of the most beautiful woman in the world...she is pure class

9/11/2008 2:36:49 PM

Girls that are 5'6" and 145 can holla at me anytime they want.
Hell thats just about perfect right there anyhow.

9/11/2008 2:37:32 PM

has trapezius or that doughy idiot thats impossible to argue with posted in here yet


because they will. you should be prepared for that

9/11/2008 2:43:56 PM

^^^winnar

9/11/2008 2:45:25 PM

hmmm...who wouldve thunk that alba was 20 pounds heavier than biel

9/11/2008 2:46:43 PM

Most of yall are to fugly or socially awkward to ever get a girl with much better stats than that without them being crazy or having a busted face anyway.... so who cares


/thread

9/11/2008 2:49:21 PM

Quote :

"I'm still laughing that the original poster thinks that he can be 5' 8", 150lbs with fat and still be able to call himself an athletic build."

headdesk.

I weight 150 and i have a body composition that floats between 11.5% and 12.5% body fat. Given I have a quality level of muscle tone, especially in my legs and calves given all the swim/bike/run i do.

Quote :

"oxymoron much?"

not quite, analytical thought is usually a requirement to conceptualize something, so i can understand where you may have failed. Regardless, a 9 - 10% body fat composition would be ideal for me, while remaining at 150. Meaning I could still stand to lose 3lbs.

9/11/2008 2:57:34 PM

swimming doesn't do much for your calves

9/11/2008 3:28:26 PM

but running does. biking and swimming account for the upward part of my legs, which is specifically why i said legs and calves.

do you ever have anything fruitful to contribute or do you prefer operating by making poorly formed conclusions?

9/11/2008 3:41:42 PM

these are some serious posts coming from a serious cat

HeRSeriousCat

9/11/2008 3:44:32 PM

Biking builds your legs .... running leans them out....

9/11/2008 3:51:28 PM

swimming, if you're using your legs that much for freestyle you're doing it wrong...

9/11/2008 3:56:27 PM

Jesus Christ, you guys.

9/11/2008 3:57:31 PM

^^^True. The biking has helped add a lot of muscle up there, and so has the running. the running has continued to keep them tight, but not small. i run, maybe, 12 - 15 miles a week, which is not enough to make your legs twig thin.

^^
you clearly don't know anything about swimming. this would be the point where i readdress my previous statement towards you.

^TRUTH. but its okay, trolling really doesn't bother me. especially when its this blatant.


[Edited on September 11, 2008 at 3:59 PM. Reason : ^s]

9/11/2008 3:58:36 PM

i was running 4x-5x miles per week and my legs aren't thin... they're are 2 diff sets of muscle fibers weight builds short fat calfs endurance builds long skinny ones ... mine are long and fat.

9/11/2008 4:12:11 PM

My gf is 5'5" and 125 to 130lb. She's not a rail nor does she have rolls.

5'6 and about 145 is a slightly above average

9/11/2008 4:14:04 PM

why the hell aren't there more pictures of the women mentioned in this thread? is tdub broken?

9/11/2008 4:18:27 PM

Quote :

"why the hell aren't there more pictures of the women mentioned in this thread? is tdub broken?"

^^

9/11/2008 4:21:22 PM

The issue i have with this thread is that all women are weak...

there are women @ my gym that are 5'2 125 that are not huge but are tone and strong with nice abs and STRONG legs ( i <3 thighs that don't touch at the top )

9/11/2008 4:43:40 PM

Quote :

"swimming, if you're using your legs that much for freestyle you're doing it wrong..."

Quote :

"^^ you clearly don't know anything about swimming. this would be the point where i readdress my previous statement towards you."

I guarantee that unless you swam varsity, Arab13 knows more about swimming than you. Also he is correct. Unless you are doing a full speed sprint (say 200 yards or less) your legs don't do much. If your legs are getting a workout from swimming 1000+ yards, either your legs are incredibly weak or you have a terrible stroke.

9/11/2008 4:46:30 PM

sumfoo, i mistook what you were saying, i think.

^pay attention to what it is that i actually said before you become condescending. Arab stated that you don't use your legs that much, when in fact you use your legs multiple times per arm cycle. This is why i stated that he must not know anything about swimming. I specifically stated biking and swimming for the upward part of my legs because the biking works both the quads and hamstrings (i'll clarify that i use clipless shoes since every technicality is getting questioned). Its moronic or naive for one to suggest that swimming has no effect on leg muscles.

If he knows more than he should express it and demonstrate it appropriately as opposed to making idiotic inane retorts. i apologize but i cannot make up for the lack of commonsense that has been demonstrated in this thread.

9/11/2008 4:59:10 PM

9/11/2008 5:32:21 PM

5'4" and 150ish is average for a female. But that is US, which is skewed.

I'm 5'6" and 145 as a guy. I'm not saying those dimensions on a girl can't work, but probably 9 times out of 10 its not pretty.

Quote :

"i run, maybe, 12 - 15 miles a week, which is not enough to make your legs twig thin."

That's a ridiculous statement. There are plenty of long distance runners out there who have a decent amount of mass. Adequate nutrition and genes play a large role as well.

[Edited on September 11, 2008 at 6:18 PM. Reason : a]

9/11/2008 6:14:48 PM

12 to 15 miles a week is not distance running.

Distance runners pull 50-80 miles a week at least. And I've never, ever met a long distance runner who didn't have extremely lean legs. Not to say there arent ANY, but it's got to be a serious corner case.

BTTT, 5'2-5'3 and 110-125 is ideal for me

9/11/2008 8:09:40 PM

Long distance running and muscle mass don't go together, I don't care what type of genes you have. Now, long distance runners have excellent body definition, so you see their leg muscles very well, but that's because they have such low bf%.

9/11/2008 8:13:24 PM

wait back up

who is the chick in the giant silk bloomers

9/12/2008 1:19:07 AM

^ALkatraz's gf

9/12/2008 1:20:29 AM

sweet. my eyes just fluttered in a very seductive manner

9/12/2008 1:28:20 AM

Quote :

"I weight 150 and i have a body composition that floats between 11.5% and 12.5% body fat. Given I have a quality level of muscle tone, especially in my legs and calves given all the swim/bike/run i do. "

there is no "quality level of muscle tone" on a guy that's 5'-8" and 12% body fat. That merely makes you a small framed person. So what if you can swim, run, and ride a bike? Big deal; anyone that isn't paralyzed and/or morbidly obese is typically capable of doing all three of those. if you were 175-180 pounds at that same percentage body fat, then you could be considered an athletic build.

9/12/2008 3:31:40 PM

That's 5'4 or 5'5, and 137, IIRC.

9/12/2008 3:47:59 PM

Quote :

"you clearly don't know anything about swimming."

I'm sure i have much more experience than you on the subject, I have been swimming competitively since I was 6, and still do.

and like I said, if you use your legs that much for freestyle you're doing it wrong, (enough to make them look muscular at all that is) 80%+ of your power should come from the pull alone. that or you just suck at it.


i mostly just greatly enjoy watching you box yourself into corners like this

Quote :

"when in fact you use your legs multiple times per arm cycle. "

a freestyle kick is 6-8 inches of movement, if you do it right, from the level, it's all fast twitch and energy effort wise should be a very small portion of the overall output.
sprinting is a bit different and the percentage is bigger on the kick but still much less than the pull.

Quote :

"Its moronic or naive for one to suggest that swimming has no effect on leg muscles. "

very marginal effect

[Edited on September 12, 2008 at 3:57 PM. Reason : .]

9/12/2008 3:53:21 PM

Quote :

"That's 5'4 or 5'5, and 137, IIRC."

actually I am 5'4 and 150 morbidly obese by TWW standards

I'm in the middle

9/12/2008 4:16:12 PM

it's ok

i like tww-fat chicks.

9/12/2008 4:17:27 PM

there is no way your 145

your tiny

9/12/2008 4:20:28 PM

she's dense

9/12/2008 4:28:12 PM