Holy fuck, you posted that same article a third time? It's like a new squeeky toy for you.

Get back to us when people get beyond "questioning" czars, k?

And I know what the man's name is, you pedantic douche.

10/8/2009 9:44:41 PM

Quote :

"^ If you don't like this thread, don't post here, BoZo. And you're wrong--as usual."

(That's the best you've got? ...)

10/8/2009 10:17:19 PM

I love hooksaw's HILARIOUS interpretation of usernames as insults.

hey guys, its almost recess time!!

10/8/2009 10:23:37 PM

Hey guys, did you see this yet?

White House snubs Sen. Feingold

Quote :

"The White House decided not to accept my invitation to send a witness to this hearing to explain its position on the constitutional issues we will address today,' Feingold said at a hearing of his Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on the Constitution. 'That's unfortunate. It's also a bit ironic, since one of the concerns that has been raised about these officials is that they will thwart congressional oversight of the executive branch."

http://thehill.com/homenews/senate/61953-white-house-snubs-sen-feingold

10/8/2009 10:26:37 PM

^ Thanks for posting that again. I guess you missed the Byrd story:

Sen. Byrd questions Obama's use of policy 'czars'

http://www.nytimes.com/gwire/2009/02/25/25greenwire-byrd-questions-obamas-use-of-policy-czars-9865.html

And it's not "pedantic" to point out the difference between "Fienman" (sic) and Feingold.

10/9/2009 2:18:50 AM

just because he's not well versed in jew surnames, doesn't diminish his overall point.

10/9/2009 2:52:56 AM

^ Thanks for your input, joe_salisbury. And why is my point invalid?

10/9/2009 2:55:30 AM

your point isnt invalid. its right on the top of your head, plain for all to see.

10/9/2009 2:56:25 AM

^ Dude, GTFO--seriously.

BTW, didn't you have to leave a job once for reading a book at work about the coming Zionist occupation or some shit?

10/9/2009 3:15:00 AM

i love getting a rise out of you. you're so easy.

the book was an academic book: "The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foriegn Policy" by Mearsheimer (U Chicago) and Walt (Harvard).

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Israel_Lobby_and_U.S._Foreign_Policy

and no, of course i didnt lose my job because of it. i was making a joke. you're just too dense to get it. my position was cut for R&D budgetary reasons. I wound up getting a hugely better job with more pay, better benefits, that i've been at for going on 2 years now. it's great, thank you.

anyhow, i dislike Judaism only slightly less than i dislike Christianity and Mohammedism. Hindoos and Buddhists are too amusing to dislike. neo-Pagans and other New-Agey fruity flakes are moderately annoying, and I reserve a special loathing for Mormons. Scientologists are a pestilence and ought to be outright banished.





[Edited on October 9, 2009 at 3:44 AM. Reason : ]

10/9/2009 3:39:04 AM

^ Thanks--I didn't remember the details. But your reading selection is just one example--your anti-Semitism is well-documented here:

Quote :

"Israel is blameless. they're victims, dont you know? remember the Nazis? that shit gave the Israelis a free pass for 100 years."

joe_salisbury

message_topic.aspx?topic=553495&page=10

Quote :

"hezbollah is a legitimate army, using guerrilla tactics. Israelis call them terrorists. Hezbollah's problem is they dont know how to spin the media, like the terrorist Israelis can. now see, when the US uses terror tactics we rationalize them like so: 'we had to nuke them slant bastards, cuz a full invasion woulda cost a lot and hurt too much. so if we vaporize hundreds of thousands of innocent old men, women and children, that will scare the Japs into surrendering.' see? nice and tidy. just plug your ears while you repeat it 500 times. guaranteed to help you feel superior."

Quote :

"al-qaeda is not a military organization, and they dont engage other militaries. they target civilians hezbollah is a uniformed military organization that engages opposing military units. when they are outgunned and/or underfunded, they move to guerrilla tactics. assymetric warfare does not equal terrorism."

joe_salisbury

message_topic.aspx?topic=421131&page=3

10/9/2009 3:45:15 AM

DID YOU PULL THAT OUT OF YOUR POCKET JOE SCHMOE POST LOG DIARY

what a fookin wanker. i cant beleive you post stalk me so intensely and so thoroughly.

ohter than my occasional heavy use of sarcasm there, i dont see anything there that's either incorrect or needs retracting.

in any case, i have posted 10 extremely critical posts on Christianity for every 1 critical post on Judaism.



i swear, dude, you've got a hardon for me, dont'cha?

10/9/2009 3:50:03 AM

^ You started it with this:

Quote :

"just because he's not well versed in jew surnames, doesn't diminish his overall point."

But I posted the truth:

Quote :

"And it's not 'pedantic' to point out the difference between 'Fienman' (sic) and Feingold."

hooksaw

And this is an indisputable fact--it's just that it pisses off you left-wing moonbats to no end:

Quote :

"In any event, my point stands: It's not just Glenn Beck and Company questioning Obama's 'czars.'"

hooksaw

10/9/2009 4:07:49 AM

um... every cabinet-level position gets scrutinized. what's your point?

oh, wait a minute... i know!

you're still mad about that whole Harriet Miers fiasco!

LOL. you're so adorable.

10/9/2009 4:30:34 AM

And my point still stands:

Quote :

"Until someone can tell me what these guys are doing to usurp anyone's authority, I'll just write it off as more redbaiting ...."

P.S. - A couple of Democrats, out of how many?

[Edited on October 9, 2009 at 6:52 AM. Reason : *~<]Bo]

10/9/2009 6:37:31 AM