page 4

9/12/2012 3:20:15 PM

9/12/2012 3:21:05 PM

i think it could very well have been a demolition job. it wouldn't have to have weeks and weeks of planning, as they weren't terribly worried about damaging surrounding buildings (BECAUSE PLANES ALREADY FLEW INTO THEM).

i mean if they wanted to destroy some sensitive materials rather than have them possibly fall into the wrong hands, it's possible that could happen.

9/12/2012 7:22:52 PM

Did anyone hear explosives going off immediately prior to the collapse?

9/12/2012 7:34:25 PM

No, because they didn't.

9/12/2012 7:36:23 PM

Quote :

"Did anyone hear explosives going off immediately prior to the collapse?"

It's in the video that d357r0y3r posted.

9/12/2012 8:31:38 PM

so who did the controlled demolition... the government or the turrrrrorists?

9/13/2012 9:37:15 AM

Have y'all ever hear concrete break ? If there was an explosion it would be hard to separate the noise from the sound of a 4'x4' concrete column breaking... I'm not saying there was one... I'm just saying over the other noises you would never know.

I just find it wierd that a building designed to be hit by a bigger plane fell when a smaller one hit it.

9/13/2012 9:48:22 AM

it's like when those earthquake-proof buildings collapsed during an earthquake!

9/13/2012 9:56:12 AM

IF THE BLACK BOX IS MADE OF INDESTRUCTIBLE MATERIAL, THEN WHY ISN'T THE WHOLE DAMN PLANE MADE WITH THAT MATERIAL?

9/13/2012 10:03:26 AM

Harmonics are nearly impossible to thwart. But this should have been less severe then the study they did on the building without any exacerbating conditions. And plenty of "earthquake proof buildings" survive many earthquakes. So that's really a one in a thousand fuck up. This is two for two...

9/13/2012 10:05:42 AM

It's entirely possible that demolition technicians were brought in to do a quick setup to bring down building 7 because it was unstable and deemed a risk to the rescue workers. Although I'm not sure why this would have been hidden from the public. Which is why the NIST explanation is more credible.

9/13/2012 1:33:13 PM

"I remember getting a call from the, er, fire department commander, telling me that they were not sure they were gonna be able to contain the fire, and I said, 'We've had such terrible loss of life, maybe the smartest thing to do is pull it.' And they made that decision to pull and we watched the building collapse."

Larry Silverstein


http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=7UiF_wzmK8s


If this doesn't convince you, there is nothing in the universe that will convince you.

9/13/2012 1:38:40 PM

Um, it sounds like they decided to pull their firemen out and cease their effort because it was hopeless and/or risky to continue. The subsequent collapse validated their decision.

[Edited on September 13, 2012 at 1:48 PM. Reason : .]

9/13/2012 1:46:05 PM

A Building is an "it"
Firemen are a "them"

Fuck you're an idiot.

9/13/2012 3:11:26 PM

A firefighting effort is an "it."

Fuck you're obtuse.

9/13/2012 3:17:46 PM

Wow. Just wow. You get an F on your test for giving the incorrect answer.

9/13/2012 3:23:11 PM

nevermind that the phrase "pull it" is basically NEVER used in the context of demolition. That's what it meant this time!

9/13/2012 3:47:57 PM

Quote :

"Wow. Just wow. You get an F on your test for giving the incorrect answer."

[Edited on September 13, 2012 at 3:51 PM. Reason : .]

9/13/2012 3:48:00 PM

Quote :

"nevermind that the phrase "pull it" is basically NEVER used in the context of demolition."

What fucking fantasy world do you live in?!? It's used ALL THE GODDAMN TIME, albeit incorrectly, in the context of demolition.

9/13/2012 4:02:14 PM

wut

Quote :

"Brent Blanchard, a demolitions expert with Protec, and contributor to ImplosionWorld.com, weighs in with his expert opinion: We have never once heard the term 'pull it' being used to refer to the explosive demolition of a building, and neither has any blast team we've spoken with. The term is used in conventional demolition circles, to describe the specific activity of attaching long cables to a pre-weakened building and maneuvering heavy equipment (excavators, bulldozers etc) to 'pull' the frame of the structure over onto its side for further dismantlement."

https://sites.google.com/site/wtc7lies/is%22pullusedbydemolitionsprostomean%22demol

[Edited on September 13, 2012 at 5:03 PM. Reason : .]

9/13/2012 4:58:28 PM

Congratulations, you fell for propaganda.


Next.

9/13/2012 5:42:45 PM

I have a priori determined that WTC7 was, in fact, brought down by Howard Stern, as Fartman, letting loose a hurricane of stench from his ass. Prove me wrong. All dis-confirming evidence I will reject outright and claim is nothing more than propaganda to deceive you all and throw everyone off of the, you know...scent. Fartman WILL use his asspowers for nefarious reasons again. WTC7 was just the beginning.



COME AT ME, BRO


[Edited on September 13, 2012 at 6:14 PM. Reason : .]

9/13/2012 5:57:35 PM

^^ pretty much every post you make this statement applies to:

argumentum ad ignorantiam
argumentum ad nauseam
onus probandi

take your pick really..

[Edited on September 13, 2012 at 5:59 PM. Reason : -^]

9/13/2012 5:59:02 PM

and pretty much every post you make I have to jam a knife in my eye to get my mind off the pain you caused my brain.

9/13/2012 6:03:09 PM

this thread had promise

9/13/2012 6:59:16 PM

geniusxboy is far worse than salisburyboy ever was

9/13/2012 7:06:39 PM

Quote :

"Congratulations, you fell for propaganda."

Really? And your basis for this is? Surely if this is a common demolitions term, you could find some reference to it in the literature, or you could find plenty of people who say it's a common term and is used in same the context as found in the Silverstein quote.. So what's YOUR basis for claiming that it's a common demolitions term? Some random guy? Why is HE more authoritative than the hundreds of other demolitions experts saying otherwise?

9/13/2012 9:13:19 PM

Damn, yawl still talking about this shit.

9/13/2012 9:37:11 PM

yeah this won't be topical for another year

9/13/2012 9:38:02 PM

"5...4...3...2...1....Pull!" *BOOM*

Go pull that pizza out of the oven.

9/13/2012 11:33:07 PM

I'd rather be RIGHT than whatever the fuck you guy are: Ignorant assclowns that suck at making jokes about pizza.


People have been using "pulled" as a slang term to describe a demolished building since as long as I can remember. That's more than 20 years that the term has been around.

9/14/2012 5:39:03 AM

and your experience with demolition is... I know you can demolish a pizza store, but that's totally different. So, now, the entire demolition industry must be in on the conspiracy, right? Cause they're saying that "pull" has nothing to do with explosives, but PizzaBoy knows and says otherwise, because PizzaBoy has years of demolitions experience, which is why he runs a fucking pizza store

9/14/2012 7:30:04 PM

I'll bet that the rest of the conspirators were pretty peeved at Larry Silverstein for blabbing about it on camera.

9/14/2012 7:33:27 PM

9/17/2012 5:21:05 PM