No

9/19/2013 8:42:01 PM

Yeah, I read the link. It says that there is no specific cut off point, but those super low numbers you're quoting are only for essential body fat and not total body fat. I only said that once women start to drop below 17 total body fat that they start to experience problems.

And yeah, no to the rock hard abs on a woman. Two of the girls I work out with are body builders and I think that they look kinda gross, even when they're not competing.

[Edited on September 19, 2013 at 8:43 PM. Reason : .]

9/19/2013 8:42:14 PM

That's wrong, you're wrong

9/19/2013 8:44:19 PM

Whatever you say.

9/19/2013 8:45:53 PM

I would not complain about those rock hard lady abs.

9/19/2013 8:46:43 PM

A woman can only get so much muscle without steroids. They can't get to the disgusting level without help.

9/19/2013 8:47:07 PM

Their boobs disappear.

9/19/2013 8:47:48 PM

Still better than giant blue veins

9/19/2013 8:52:17 PM

If you like a strong manly chest of steel.

9/19/2013 8:55:10 PM

Its better than udders

9/19/2013 8:57:08 PM

God made implants.

9/19/2013 8:58:18 PM

Wait, so bottombaby thinks

Body fat % = BMI

And yo BlackJesus, age doesn't go into BMI.

And no, I don't like rock hard abs on chicks. To see the abs I like, see the chicks I have posted in the fitness models thread and the best thing you have seen thread. When they have a vertical line down the middle and a vertical lines on each side is ideal. When abs are just starting to show is also good. But rock hard abs, no I don't particularly like those, but do admire them.

But yeah, if the choice is a chick with belly flaps or abs of steel, the choice is obvious.

P.S.

Quote :

"Yeah, lowest ESSENTIAL body fat. That's not the total body fat percentage, dude."

What are you talking about? What's the distinction between the two? The article did not intend to use the word essential to distinguish it somehow from total body fat. Essential = necessary, in that article, not as in some subset of the total fat.


[Edited on September 19, 2013 at 9:44 PM. Reason : Please leave the discussion to those who know]

[Edited on September 19, 2013 at 9:46 PM. Reason : ]

9/19/2013 9:38:34 PM

9/19/2013 9:51:16 PM

going back to how this thread started, what in the hell is wrong with you people who like, say, the 175 lb picture? I mean, I know people have different tastes, but why would anyone prefer someone who is 50 pounds overweight?

I personally think the 124 lb picture is the only one I'd actually pursue her at. She could be a friend with benefits at 132. I would sleep with her at 140 if I had been going without for a while and could do it without expending any effort.

Quote :

"Why does everyone encourage fat chicks to get fat again?[/i] [quote]because everyone is fat"

Yep, our country has gotten so fat that we've lost sight of what constitutes overweight. People don't even view themselves as fat anymore unless they are absolute whales, because most people are overweight (and only a very few are actually in any semblance of good shape.)


[Edited on September 19, 2013 at 10:39 PM. Reason : I'm headed to the gym right now...and then I'm getting up for some cardio work at 6 am.]

9/19/2013 10:33:16 PM

the 140 pic has charisma

9/19/2013 10:34:33 PM

Quote :

"Body fat % = BMI "

Uh, no. I don't. I clearly stated that I chose the wrong graphic. Herp de derp.

And actually, "essential body fat" IS a subset of total body fat. Total body fat = essential body fat + storage body fat. The numbers quoted in that article specifically refer to essential body fat. When those essential numbers drop below that, you start to see systemic repercussions such as the absence of menstruation. My point being that those low numbers aren't realistic total body fat percentages because it is just a portion of your total body fat.

I, at least, know more than someone whose ass has been sitting in a chair for the past month starving himself. I've been working with a dietician and a personal trainer for over a year now actually learning about health and nutrition instead of just reading the internet.

9/19/2013 10:38:04 PM

chair = rock inside a cave

9/19/2013 10:39:55 PM

Quote :

"I clearly stated that I chose the wrong graphic."

Really? You suck at lying too.

My knowledge comes from a combination of official courses, books, and the Internet, not just from the Internet. I started reading up on nutrition when the Internet didn't fucking exist, back in 1987.

And hey, no need to get personal, you 44% body fat beast.

9/19/2013 10:48:57 PM

Excuse me. I stand corrected. I asked "Is that better?" and posted a correct graphic.

And yup. I am an absolute beast.

9/19/2013 10:53:13 PM

0EP knows his shit, he's a smart fellow, its not like he'd ever post his Social Security number on thewolfweb

9/19/2013 10:54:12 PM

Exactly, and what you should have asked was "Is that correct?"

No harm has come of it yet... weren't you or someone else going to claim benefits under my number? Come on man, show me how it is harmful...I dare you!

9/19/2013 10:57:27 PM

All I remember is you posted your SS# on thewolfweb. I'm not an identity thief, but posting your SS# anywhere other than a W-2 or credit check makes you an idiot

9/19/2013 10:59:23 PM

Uh, no. "Is that better?" is a pretty standard sarcastic American English when you're righting a wrong to satisfy someone else.

9/19/2013 10:59:53 PM

Quote :

"Bottombaby thinks 22% is the sweet spot, all I need to read to know she is fat"

Uhh, 22% body fat is not anywhere near fat for a female. Are you sure you're not confusing BMI with BF?

9/19/2013 11:01:14 PM

Uh, I know that too, but this shit's serious business, gotta use the correct words

Btw, I stand corrected on essential vs total body fat.


[Edited on September 19, 2013 at 11:19 PM. Reason : ]

9/19/2013 11:02:23 PM

9/19/2013 11:04:07 PM

Don't even let d357r0y3r get started on this subject. He will [user]d357r0y[/user] ya'll

9/19/2013 11:20:01 PM

Chubby chaser

9/20/2013 6:05:53 AM

22% is fat, you guys are all chubby chasers (see: anything Kate Upton on this site)

9/20/2013 8:18:18 AM

you really are a terrible troll

9/20/2013 10:40:50 AM

then why do you keep posting a graphic that just confirms that 15 is right

9/20/2013 10:43:53 AM

Yeah, 15% is hot, but the 45% girl will do anything.

9/20/2013 10:48:03 AM

it's pretty immoral for you to criticize human beings who have 22% body fat. very unethical. you're a condescending hypocritical butthole.

9/20/2013 10:50:56 AM

how is it hypocrtical, i've always been against the fatties

9/20/2013 10:55:59 AM

i just think it's funny that you're always getingt on your high and mighty "morality" horse, but then you're total dick about a girl being 10 pounds overweight (i mean, i understand if you're criticizing the morbidly obese, but come on man, live and let live, quit being such a sociopath)

9/20/2013 11:00:51 AM

bunch a damn chubby chasers on TWW

9/20/2013 11:11:10 AM

i'm not attacking anyone, just pointing out that fat is fat

9/20/2013 11:13:11 AM

Also, for you craigslist girls. Fat is not "curvy".

9/20/2013 11:16:16 AM

BBW

9/20/2013 11:16:43 AM

Quote :

"i'm not attacking anyone"

uh, you're certainly attacking "chubby chasers" and Kate Upton

9/20/2013 11:22:58 AM

I WOULD ATTACK KATE UPTON.....WITH MY COCK!!

9/20/2013 11:25:58 AM

calling kate upton fat isn't attacking her, its just saying that she is fat

unless you are saying being fat is bad? Are you? YOU HYPOCRITE!!

9/20/2013 11:26:34 AM

I'D CHASE KATE UPTON WITH MY CHUBBY

[Edited on September 20, 2013 at 11:27 AM. Reason : the?]

9/20/2013 11:27:16 AM

yeah, fat is bad. but 22% ain't "fat".

9/20/2013 11:27:37 AM

sure it is, look at the graphic

[Edited on September 20, 2013 at 11:28 AM. Reason : and Kate Upton is somewhere in the +30% range anyways]

9/20/2013 11:27:57 AM

shallow

9/20/2013 11:30:44 AM

how dare you attack me, you hypocrite!

9/20/2013 11:31:06 AM

troll, troll, troll your boat

9/20/2013 11:33:16 AM

everyone is shallow to a degree

people call me skinny, i don't whine about it

9/20/2013 11:34:14 AM

What the fuck people, slow the ufck down

[Edited on September 20, 2013 at 11:36 AM. Reason : ]

9/20/2013 11:34:24 AM