^^clinton waited for her jet, but i don't know why that would have prevented an assistant from saying something. does she not travel with anyone?

7/1/2016 10:10:51 AM

^^

You left out the word 'retroactively'.

[Edited on July 1, 2016 at 10:12 AM. Reason : ^^]

7/1/2016 10:12:10 AM

^not really how it works, that's a bad talking point

[Edited on July 1, 2016 at 10:17 AM. Reason : .]

7/1/2016 10:17:06 AM

^^drone bombing targets not retroactive

[Edited on July 1, 2016 at 10:18 AM. Reason : s]

7/1/2016 10:17:53 AM

Quote :

"Didn't they say he did it unexpectedly?"

Are you really going to take that at face value? It's possible, but there are a multitude of possible reasons why they met and why it was leaked to press.

[Edited on July 1, 2016 at 10:19 AM. Reason : .]

7/1/2016 10:17:55 AM

^^ Are you referring to the emails that didn't mention drones or targets?

7/1/2016 10:32:04 AM

Quote :

"All up to the FBI now."

How exactly is that a development?

7/1/2016 10:35:04 AM

You're really burying your head in the sand if you think she didn't send classified information knowingly.

The classified part is only the tip of the iceberg though. There's also the FOIA avoidance, quid pro quo appointments, aides employed at the state department/teneo/Clinton foundation at the same time, foreign donations while she was Secretary. It goes on and on and it's probably why the case is taking so long. It keeps expanding.

Does anyone even like Clinton anymore, other than goalielax? I know y'all are scared of Trump, but there is another option. Demand she step down before the convention. It's a huge mistake to nominate her given the investigation(s) and the fact that she is viewed nearly as unfavorably as Trump, and dropping.

What a fucking mess.

[Edited on July 1, 2016 at 10:39 AM. Reason : .]

7/1/2016 10:37:25 AM

Quote :

"It goes on and on and it's probably why the case is taking so long. It keeps expanding."

In your wet dreams.

[Edited on July 1, 2016 at 10:46 AM. Reason : VV in your wet dreams]

7/1/2016 10:39:56 AM

Idk how anyone doesn't want to see the Clintons go down at this point.

7/1/2016 10:42:33 AM

maybe Lynch was telling bill that if hillary cared about the party she will drop out before the convention because charges are coming but wont be ready by july 25th

7/1/2016 10:45:57 AM

^^^
Just admit dawg, you want to see it too

lol unplanned meeting

http://dailycaller.com/2016/07/01/reporter-fbi-ordered-no-photos-outside-clinton-lynch-meeting-video/

Quote :

"The reporter who broke the story about the secret meeting between Bill Clinton and Attorney General Loretta Lynch told Fox News that FBI officials on the tarmac instructed those on the tarmac “no photos, no pictures, no cell phones."

[Edited on July 1, 2016 at 11:00 AM. Reason : .]

7/1/2016 10:51:10 AM

Quote :

" How exactly is that a development?"

the AG made a public statement that she will go along with FBI's recommendation, this is a development because she isn't required to go along with the FBI's recommendation

7/1/2016 11:02:56 AM

Bernie's got this.

7/1/2016 11:58:05 AM

^yeah, he hasnt endorsed her yet for a reason

7/1/2016 12:48:50 PM

Friday always brings the good shit

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/07/01/clinton-sought-secret-info-on-eu-bailout-plans-as-son-in-laws-doomed-hedge-fund-gambled-on-greece.html

7/1/2016 12:56:21 PM

lol - the funds tanked. pretty much proof nothing happened.

your unhinging has been spectacular to witness.

7/1/2016 1:08:55 PM

excuse after excuse after excuse

7/1/2016 1:18:00 PM

^^
k

7/1/2016 1:19:07 PM

^^^ that isn't proof nothing improper was done.

But the article also doesn't prove anything improper was done. Again.

[Edited on July 1, 2016 at 1:52 PM. Reason : X]

7/1/2016 1:50:27 PM

unc had more evidence of wrongdoing and played in a national championship

7/1/2016 10:23:31 PM

UNC didn't lie about having classified information (up to TS) on a completely unsecure server that more than likely was hacked numerous times by foreign governments

7/2/2016 11:36:39 AM

Is there a list of people in this thread who don't think this is a big deal?

7/2/2016 12:05:31 PM

I think it's dumb how Clinton has handled this, but I don't think there's a more nefarious motivation other than she really values her personal privacy, due the whole Lewinksky thing.

7/2/2016 12:41:05 PM

Wow

7/2/2016 1:03:58 PM

often times dumb things are illegal

7/2/2016 1:17:47 PM

Just saw someone on CNN tweet:

Quote :

"Sources tell CNN's Evan Perez: expectation is that there will be announcement of no charges in Clinton email probe w/in next two weeks or so"

7/2/2016 5:07:52 PM

Totally didn't see that coming!

[Edited on July 2, 2016 at 5:18 PM. Reason : But for real this is the same BS as those "charges are coming tommorow" articles]

7/2/2016 5:17:01 PM

Quote :

"Is there a list of people in this thread who don't think this is a big deal?"

<---------

[Edited on July 2, 2016 at 7:47 PM. Reason : .]

7/2/2016 7:46:49 PM

Breaking news:

Her interview was completely voluntary.

True story.

7/2/2016 7:52:15 PM

no charges gg everyone

7/5/2016 11:24:42 AM

lol, they aren't even charging one of the aides? guccifer must have kept quiet

the funny thing is that they aren't recommending no charges because there is no evidence of statute violations (there is), but because they don't think a prosecutor would bring charges

[Edited on July 5, 2016 at 11:29 AM. Reason : .]

7/5/2016 11:27:33 AM

According to Comey, there were 100+ emails with classified info and 2000+ retroactively classified. And he believes her server was hacked, although they couldn't find hard evidence.

7/5/2016 11:32:49 AM

Its like any other case federal prosecutors investigate. If there's a slim to none chance of actually winning a conviction, they don't bother wasting taxpayer money on it.

7/5/2016 11:34:30 AM

pretty clear that the AG definitely knew their recommendation when she made her pledge to follow their recommendation, timing of her save-face statement was too close

Quote :

"Its like any other case federal prosecutors investigate. If there's a slim to none chance of actually winning a conviction, they don't bother wasting taxpayer money on it."

that is supposed to be a decision for the prosecutors in the justice department, not the FBI

[Edited on July 5, 2016 at 11:35 AM. Reason : .]

7/5/2016 11:34:33 AM

The GOP must be loving this. A real cha- oh wait they nominated Donald Fucking Trump

7/5/2016 12:28:38 PM

I'm shocked y'all. SHOCKED!

[Edited on July 5, 2016 at 12:47 PM. Reason : can't wait to hear beatsunc's next theory]

7/5/2016 12:47:25 PM

Let's not forget that this whole thing is because NSA IT was too lazy to setup the State Department with the same mobile email system they provided to Obama. Left to their own devices, it became a bit of a shit show.

Quote :

""We began examining options for (Secretary Clinton) with respect to secure 'BlackBerry-like' communications," wrote Donald R. Reid, the department's assistant director for security infrastructure. "The current state of the art is not too user friendly, has no infrastructure at State, and is very expensive." Reid wrote that each time they asked the NSA what solution they had worked up to provide a mobile device to Obama, "we were politely told to shut up and color.""

http://www.cbsnews.com/news/emails-show-nsa-rejected-hillary-clinton-request-for-secure-smartphone/

[Edited on July 5, 2016 at 12:51 PM. Reason : .]

7/5/2016 12:49:35 PM

fbi:

Quote :

"+ 110 emails in 52 email chains that contained classified information at the time that they were sent + 8 chains of emails that contained information which was considered “Top Secret” + 36 email chains that held information considered “secret” + 8 other email chains that held “confidential” information The investigation also uncovered about 2,000 emails which were related to Clinton’s work as Secretary of State but they had been deleted earlier and not turned over to the State Department by Clinton."

other people have been prosecuted for less in the past. so its just more evidence the system is rigged and more good reasons to not vote for her are my 2 takeaways from this email deal

7/5/2016 1:14:24 PM

^Nope, Comey specifically said that was not case.

Quote :

"In looking back at our investigations into mishandling or removal of classified information, we cannot find a case that would support bringing criminal charges on these facts. All the cases prosecuted involved some combination of: clearly intentional and willful mishandling of classified information; or vast quantities of materials exposed in such a way as to support an inference of intentional misconduct; or indications of disloyalty to the United States; or efforts to obstruct justice. We do not see those things here."

7/5/2016 1:22:55 PM

Honestly, if I'm a Clinton supporter I'm not arguing on her behalf here. She clearly used horrendous judgment multiple times. Doubling down on her stupidity is exactly what a buffoon like Trump does when he fucks up. Own it, take your licks and move on.

No vindication had for either side with this mess.

7/5/2016 1:24:51 PM

Quote :

"Nope, Comey specifically said that was not case."

my point was is that its rigged! hah of course he said that

7/5/2016 1:41:52 PM

So my only question is, when viewed side by side with Petraeus, how come he got punished and she didn't?

That's all I'm going to say anymore about the Clinton email fiasco.

7/5/2016 2:14:16 PM

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/fact-checker/wp/2016/02/24/why-the-clinton-email-scandal-and-petraeus-leak-are-not-really-alike/

7/5/2016 2:32:08 PM

Sandy Berger would be a better comparison than Patraeus (probation and fine, loss of security clearance)


or maybe Hillary Clinton and the whitewater document she lost (nothing)

[Edited on July 5, 2016 at 5:10 PM. Reason : or HRC herself]

7/5/2016 5:08:46 PM

Quote :

"so its just more evidence the system is rigged - 7/5/2016 1:14:24 PM"

Quote :

"other people have been prosecuted for less in the past - 7/5/2016 1:14:24 PM"

says the guy who stays glued to Trump's Twitter feed all day

Quote :

"@realDonaldTrump The system is rigged. General Petraeus got in trouble for far less. Very very unfair! As usual, bad judgment. 11:37 AM - 5 Jul 2016"

Quote :

"@realDonaldTrump FBI director said Crooked Hillary compromised our national security. No charges. Wow! #RiggedSystem 11:39 AM - 5 Jul 2016"

Wonder where you got that language from?!

Quote :

"are my [Donald Trump Supplied] 2 takeaways from this email deal"

7/5/2016 6:17:59 PM

i actually didn't see his tweets until after i posted.

they are pretty obvious reactions to the news many people felt

7/5/2016 7:15:58 PM

Yeah that isn't really a crazy take on the situation. It clearly shows there are those who have their own set of rules, not that any of this is surprising.

7/5/2016 7:30:04 PM

^^ BS you watch that feed like a hawk and always send them to me, then you parrot his two takeaways as your own. Don't know who you think you're fooling here

[Edited on July 5, 2016 at 7:47 PM. Reason : ^ agreed, but that wasn't Trump's point or language ]

7/5/2016 7:46:47 PM

^lol that you think that only trump could have come up the word "rigged". like that is Shakespeare or something

7/5/2016 8:19:16 PM