In this video segment, CNN reporter Jaime McIntyre says his statement was taken out of context. He was replying to a concern that the plane crashed into the round in front of the Pentagon. He was merely pointing out that the plane crashed directly into the building.

McIntyre goes on to say that he personally took photos of pieces of the plane that were scattered around. I think he personally believes it was the jet that hit the Pentagon.

http://www.cnn.com/video/player/player.html?url=/video/us/2006/05/16/mcintyre.911.pentagon.video.affl

5/17/2006 10:44:21 AM

http://www.abcnews.go.com/Politics/story?id=1968996&page=1

Quote :

"New Tape Stirs Up 9/11 Conspiracy Theories May 16, 2006 — The minute the Pentagon released images of the Sept. 11 attack on its building, the message boards at ABCNEWS.com lit up with conspiracy theories. Some blame it on an inside job by members of the Bush administration to benefit their business interests. Some say it was planned by neoconservatives to advance their worldview. Others don't know what happened but doubt the official story put forward by the government. The world of conspiracy theories surrounding the Sept. 11 attacks is vast, and more than four years after the worst terrorist incident on U.S. soil, countless scenarios are put forth on the Internet, in academic forums and on talk radio each day. Some are of the "MIHOP" variety, which claim people in power made it happen on purpose, while others are of the "LIHOP" kind — they let it happen on purpose. With Tuesday's release of video footage of American Airlines Flight 77 crashing into the Pentagon building, an attack that killed 184 people on Sept. 11, questions rage again."

So, the message boards "lit up" with posts from those who don't believe the government....er...I mean those "wacko conspiracy theories". I guess the "conspiracy theorists" are hardly in the extreme minority, and represent a significant portion of the public.

But who cares about that...whatever the government says is gospel truth. And the MSM is the mouthpiece for the government, always faithfully reporting what the government overlords say without question. So don't question the MSM or government, even if what they say is not supported by evidence, logic, or reason and even though they have a track record for lying and covering up the truth. If you do question them, you're a "paranoid lunatic conspiracy theorist."


AND HOW DARE THOSE CONSPIRACY NUTS SAY THERE WAS A CONSPIRACY TO COMMIT THE 9/11 ATTACKS! THERE WAS NO CONSPIRACY AT ALL! DAMN YOU CONSPIRACY THEORISTS!!1!




[Edited on May 17, 2006 at 11:04 AM. Reason : ``````````]

5/17/2006 10:58:22 AM

oh damn, you have people on the abcnews.com message board on your side. YOU'RE CERTAINLY GAINING MOMENTUM!

5/17/2006 11:02:41 AM

THEY'RE ALL LUNATIC CONSPIRACY NUTS. THERE WAS NO CONSPIRACY TO COMMIT THE 9/11 ATTACKS.

AND THE GOVERNMENT LOVES US. THEY WOULD NEVER LIE OR HARM THEIR OWN CITIZENS. THEIR PROTECTING US FROM AL QUAIDER BY LEAVING THE BORDER WIDE OPEN. USAMER BIN LADEN AND THE FREEDOM-HATING AYARABS DID IT! AND THEY DIDN'T CONSPIRE TO DO IT. REMEMBER, THERE WAS NO CONSPIRACY.

5/17/2006 11:07:33 AM

being vocal and being the majority are often two far separate things

5/17/2006 11:08:11 AM

I'd be silent too if I was faced with having to support the government's fairy tale about 19 freedom-hating Arabs and an evil genius in a cave pulling off 9/11, and having to explain all the problems and impossibilities with the official story--including the stand down of the U.S. Air Defense, the collapse of WTC 7, the phony bin Laden tapes, etc.

5/17/2006 11:11:40 AM

i knew there was a reason i left this thread

your logic makes me want to bash my head into a wall

this fuckin' guy

5/17/2006 11:22:21 AM

^^ you are the biggest simpleton, idiot in three states.

please die.

in a fire.

5/17/2006 11:27:35 AM

So is all caps Salisbury akin to the old Salisbury we all knew and loved?

5/17/2006 11:31:27 AM

PSST...THE TERM "CONSPIRACY THEORIST" IS CODE FOR A PERSON WHO DARES TO QUESTION THE GOSPEL TRUTH ESPOUSED BY THE GOVERNMENT AND MSM, ESPECIALLY ONE WHO THINKS THE GOVERNMENT/ESTABLISHMENT/MSM MAY HAVE LESS THAN PERFECTLY BENIGN INTENTIONS. INSTEAD OF ARGUING THE ISSUES SUBSTANTIVELY, WE TRY TO SMEAR ANYONE WHO HOLDS THOSE VIEWS AS "CRAZY." PASS THIS ALONG.

THE GOVERNMENT AND PEOPLE ON THE MSM HAVE "LEGITIMACY." THEY WEAR SUITS AND ACT IMPORTANT AND PROFESSIONAL. THAT MEANS YOU SHOULD TRUST THEM. IF YOU DON'T BELIEVE BIG BROTHER GOVERNMENT AND THE MSM LOVE YOU AND YOU DON'T TRUST THEM INFINITELY, EVEN WITH YOUR LIFE, THEN YOU'RE A LUNATIC NUTBALL CONSPIRACY THEORIST WHO NEEDS TO BE PUT ON MEDS OR THROWN IN A MENTAL INSTITUTION.

5/17/2006 11:34:04 AM

Quote :

"INSTEAD OF ARGUING THE ISSUES SUBSTANTIVELY"

you are also the BIGGEST hypocrite in 49 states and the district of columbia, guam and puerto rico.

only 1 douche in california ties you.

5/17/2006 11:36:53 AM

DARING TO QUESTION THE MSM AND GOVERNMENT. HOW DARE THEY! THINK ABOUT THAT.

THOSE PEOPLE ARE TRULY ABSOLUTELY INSANE!!

5/17/2006 11:39:10 AM

why don't you actually talk to us and answer questions and respond to things we say instead of either A) posting more prisonplanet bullshit or
B) typing in all caps with points not even relevant to what we're talking about.


plz to die in fire.

5/17/2006 11:45:27 AM

I HATE DEM CONSPIRACY THEORISTS! THEY SHOULD DIE!

HOW DARE THEY QUESTION DUBYA AND OUR GLORIOUS GOVERNMENT LEADERS, WHO ARE DELIVERING FREEDOM TO IRAQ AND ALL OVER THE WORLD, AND DEFENDING FREEDOM HERE AT HOME BY LEAVING THE BORDER WIDE OPEN AND SPYING ON US AND SEARCHING US WITHOUT WARRANTS AND TRASHING THE BILL OF RIGHTS.

THOSE CONSPIRACY THEORISTS ARE THE ENEMIES OF FREEDOM. THEY PROBABLY WITH AL QAIDER! WE NEED TO SHUT DOWN THE INTERNET TO SILENCE THESE TERRA'ISTS!!

5/17/2006 11:46:54 AM

see.



theduke... please suspend. This is why he should be fucking gone forever.

5/17/2006 11:48:58 AM

So I can't use sarcasm like everyone else?

I should be suspended? Hardly. I'm not trolling and spamming other peoples' threads. I've done absolutely nothing wrong, other than if holding politically incorrect viewpoints is wrong.

5/17/2006 11:51:29 AM

you don't answer any goddam questions. Basically, you should have to pay for this service. All you do is post links to other sites (whcih I call spam). You never answer any question that you're confronted with. Instead of answering, you mutter off bullshit such as what we have above and for the last 40 pages.

5/17/2006 12:17:03 PM

Quote :

"you don't answer any goddam questions"

not true

Quote :

"You never answer any question that you're confronted with"

blatant lie


Anyone can see that I answer questions. I've responded to literally dozens and dozens of questions over the course of 40 pages in this thread. But keep trying to smear me with blatant falsehoods. It shows the desperateness of your situation.

And even IF it was true that I haven't responded to questions, how is that a reason to suspend anyone? It's not. You're just desperate to do anything to try to silence me.

5/17/2006 12:20:39 PM

i'll get booted from here if all I did was post links. That's spamming.


And you don't answer questions. You're selective about the ones you pretend to "answer" when all you do is spout out more bullshit hoping that if you shit on enough stuff, no one will remember what the question was.

5/17/2006 12:23:27 PM

what about the dozen or so legitimate questions that have been posed to u by Mr. Joshua? u have blatantly ignored those questions even though they are valid questions in reference to ur statements.

5/17/2006 12:23:49 PM

Quote :

"i'll get booted from here if all I did was post links. That's spamming."

And that's NOT what I'm doing. I don't only post links. I interact with users, engage in discussion, etc.

For you to say that I don't debate, don't respond to questions, or "only post links" is a COMPLETE JOKE.

5/17/2006 12:27:45 PM

Quote :

"I interact with users, engage in discussion, etc."

you are so full of shit, it's amazing.

5/17/2006 12:29:42 PM

well, i'm sure the majority in here would agree with me.


And your sarcasm isn't even that funny. You consider something sarcasm when you put it in all caps and spell out words like al qaeder.

not funny.

[Edited on May 17, 2006 at 12:30 PM. Reason : .]

5/17/2006 12:30:10 PM

What am I doing right now? Is this not a discussion?

5/17/2006 12:30:16 PM

yeah, the only thing you discuss is when we start to breathe down your neck again for blatantly spamming.

When we actually refute your bullshit sources, you go into spam mode.

5/17/2006 12:31:05 PM

Quote :

"what about the dozen or so legitimate questions that have been posed to u by Mr. Joshua? u have blatantly ignored those questions even though they are valid questions in reference to ur statements"

Mr. Joshua keeps repeating questions I have already responded to and on issues I've already addressed. Everyone can see that he is trolling.

5/17/2006 12:33:04 PM

i must be missing that. you're the one that's constantly trolling.

5/17/2006 12:34:04 PM

NO HE IS NOT TROLLING YOU IGNORANT FUCK

THOSE ARE LEGIT QUESTIONS THAT THE VAST MAJORITY YOU HAVE IGNORED AND THOSE YOU HAVEN'T YOU SKIRTED THE ISSUE WITH MORE BULLSHIT

[Edited on May 17, 2006 at 12:34 PM. Reason : *]

5/17/2006 12:34:07 PM

you're just a big of a troll as he is 30th

b/w supporting Mr. Joshuatroll and saying you want me dead, what exactly have you contributed to the discussion?

5/17/2006 12:35:20 PM

it no longer does any good to contribute anything

you either ignore it or continue on with your bullshit

so what point is there other than to call you out for the douchenozzle you are?

he has REPEATEDLY asked you legitimate questions which you either ignore or skirt.

this is "100% PROVEN FACT" as you so like to spout

[Edited on May 17, 2006 at 12:37 PM. Reason : and i really do hope you die. in a fire.]

5/17/2006 12:36:56 PM

about twice as much as you do salisbury. You have no idea what discussion is anymore. ALl you know how to do is shit all over stuff to the point that it's unrecognizeable.

5/17/2006 12:37:36 PM

Sometimes Mr. Joshua asks legitimate questions, but other times he repeats questions I've already responded to and on issues I've already addressed. And even after I point that out, and have responded to some of the very questions at least 3-4 times, he continues to post the questions in that one giant spam post of his. It's obvious what he's doing.

5/17/2006 12:39:20 PM

where did u respond to his question about bin Laden's issued Fatwa? i would like to read ur answer to that question since u have already answered it. (i must've missed it in all the intelligence floating around in here).

5/17/2006 12:42:09 PM

Quote :

"Sometimes Mr. Joshua asks legitimate questions, but other times he repeats questions I've already responded to and on issues I've already addressed. And even after I point that out, and have responded to some of the very questions at least 3-4 times, he continues to post the questions in that one giant spam post of his. It's obvious what he's doing."

blatantly false. any response you have given to any of his questions has been full of more crazy bullshit. you have NEVER provided anything more than a theory. no evidence whatsoever of anything you claim. and these responses are for maybe 2-3 of his questions.

COMPLETELY FULL OF SHIT.

5/17/2006 12:44:19 PM

Quote :

"i would like to read ur answer to that question since u have already answered it"

I didn't say I had responded to that. I haven't. Partly because there is no reason for me to take Mr. Joshua seriously. Even if I respond to the question, he'll just repeat the same question over and over and say that I didn't respond to it. It's a joke.

As for the supposed fatwah issued by bin Laden, even if that is true, how does that prove he was responsible for the 9/11 attacks? It doesn't.

And who's to say this supposed fatwah isn't actually another fake or piece of propaganda by the government and military--such as the fake bin Laden tapes. They've already admitted that they are using propaganda. They admitted to playing up the role of Zarqawi for propaganda purposes.

5/17/2006 12:49:00 PM

MORE CLAIMS WITH NO EVIDENCE

MODUS OPERANDI

I MEAN AT LEAST HE'S PREDICTABLE

5/17/2006 12:50:09 PM

Ok, go ahead and blast me, but this footage creates more questions for me than anything else.

If they are 100% sure that a plane hit the pentagon, then why didnt they release a better video? Your typical Wal-Mart has 50 or so security cameras. To be sure the Pentagon has more than that by tenfold. There were cameras at the hotel, the citgo, and the building itself. So why, if theyre so sure of this, did they release such an unlclear video? They had a really good feature on this on Coast to Coast AM last night. The head of Judicial Watch (the group requesting the tapes) spoke on this, and mentioned discussions w/ former Air Force Identification experts who claim w/o a doubt that this wasnt an airliner hole in the pentagon, its too small and there's no sign of the wingspan.

The uncertainty of the Pentagon case opens up the book on the other crashes and makes you wonder if there are similar strange occurances. If this makes me a conspiracy nut, then awesome, i love conspiracies.

This is pretty sketch, and more and more people are realizing this. Its not beyond the govt. and other major institutions (ie big business) to conspire like this. just look at Operation Northstar in the early 60s.

And it's baffling to me that so many "Libertarians" are so quick to take the govt's side on this.

PS: I dont buy into the Jew conspiracy bullshit.

And I also dont buy the whole "worldwide dark organization" thing Alex Jones pitches.

[Edited on May 17, 2006 at 12:55 PM. Reason : .]

5/17/2006 12:50:49 PM

Oh, do you want the evidence on the fake bin Laden tapes and the fact that the government is using propaganda to play up the role of Zarqawi?

I've got that evidence if you want me to post it.

Wait, if I post it though, you and the other trolls will scream that I'm "spamming" and "only providing links."

What to do?

5/17/2006 12:51:58 PM

none of that was concrete evidence of anything.

5/17/2006 12:52:58 PM

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/04/09/AR2006040900890_pf.html

Quote :

"Military Plays Up Role of Zarqawi Jordanian Painted As Foreign Threat To Iraq's Stability By Thomas E. Ricks Washington Post Staff Writer Monday, April 10, 2006; A01 The U.S. military is conducting a propaganda campaign to magnify the role of the leader of al-Qaeda in Iraq, according to internal military documents and officers familiar with the program. The effort has raised his profile in a way that some military intelligence officials believe may have overstated his importance and helped the Bush administration tie the war to the organization responsible for the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks."

OMG!! SPAMMING!!

5/17/2006 12:55:23 PM

Quote :

"Partly because there is no reason for me to take Mr. Joshua seriously."

ahahahahahahahahaha.... ahahahahahahahahahah


ahahahahahahah


and why exactly shoud [hahahahahahahaahahahahahah] we take you [hahahahahahaha] seriously?



he doesn't like joshua cause it's a j00 name.

5/17/2006 12:57:49 PM

http://www.thewolfweb.com/message_topic.aspx?topic=409409

5/17/2006 1:33:48 PM

Quote :

"Mr. Joshua keeps repeating questions I have already responded to and on issues I've already addressed. Everyone can see that he is trolling."

you have NEVER answered Mr. Joshua's question. and if you wont answer them because you have no reason to take his seriuosly then how about this... I am asking them. so there ya go...are you going to avoid me for the next 20 pages??

5/17/2006 3:01:39 PM

Quote :

"you have NEVER answered Mr. Joshua's question"

What, the fatwah question? I just responded to that today...

Quote :

"As for the supposed fatwah issued by bin Laden, even if that is true, how does that prove he was responsible for the 9/11 attacks? It doesn't. And who's to say this supposed fatwah isn't actually another fake or piece of propaganda by the government and military--such as the fake bin Laden tapes. They've already admitted that they are using propaganda. They admitted to playing up the role of Zarqawi for propaganda purposes."

5/17/2006 3:05:49 PM

along with the long list of others...


and so what...you respond to the fatwah question by calling it fake and sayign the US government put it out....good job....i think you should try to be a little more predictable next time

[Edited on May 17, 2006 at 3:08 PM. Reason : 666]

5/17/2006 3:07:28 PM

Quote :

"it no longer does any good to contribute anything you either ignore it or continue on with your bullshit so what point is there other than to call you out for the douchenozzle you are? he has REPEATEDLY asked you legitimate questions which you either ignore or skirt. this is "100% PROVEN FACT" as you so like to spout [Edited on May 17, 2006 at 12:37 PM. Reason : and i really do hope you die. in a fire.]"

Quote :

"it no longer does any good to contribute anything you either ignore it or continue on with your bullshit so what point is there other than to call you out for the douchenozzle you are? he has REPEATEDLY asked you legitimate questions which you either ignore or skirt. this is "100% PROVEN FACT" as you so like to spout [Edited on May 17, 2006 at 12:37 PM. Reason : and i really do hope you die. in a fire.]"

Quote :

"it no longer does any good to contribute anything you either ignore it or continue on with your bullshit so what point is there other than to call you out for the douchenozzle you are? he has REPEATEDLY asked you legitimate questions which you either ignore or skirt. this is "100% PROVEN FACT" as you so like to spout [Edited on May 17, 2006 at 12:37 PM. Reason : and i really do hope you die. in a fire.]"

Quote :

"it no longer does any good to contribute anything you either ignore it or continue on with your bullshit so what point is there other than to call you out for the douchenozzle you are? he has REPEATEDLY asked you legitimate questions which you either ignore or skirt. this is "100% PROVEN FACT" as you so like to spout [Edited on May 17, 2006 at 12:37 PM. Reason : and i really do hope you die. in a fire.]"

Quote :

"it no longer does any good to contribute anything you either ignore it or continue on with your bullshit so what point is there other than to call you out for the douchenozzle you are? he has REPEATEDLY asked you legitimate questions which you either ignore or skirt. this is "100% PROVEN FACT" as you so like to spout [Edited on May 17, 2006 at 12:37 PM. Reason : and i really do hope you die. in a fire.]"

Quote :

"it no longer does any good to contribute anything you either ignore it or continue on with your bullshit so what point is there other than to call you out for the douchenozzle you are? he has REPEATEDLY asked you legitimate questions which you either ignore or skirt. this is "100% PROVEN FACT" as you so like to spout [Edited on May 17, 2006 at 12:37 PM. Reason : and i really do hope you die. in a fire.]"

Quote :

"it no longer does any good to contribute anything you either ignore it or continue on with your bullshit so what point is there other than to call you out for the douchenozzle you are? he has REPEATEDLY asked you legitimate questions which you either ignore or skirt. this is "100% PROVEN FACT" as you so like to spout [Edited on May 17, 2006 at 12:37 PM. Reason : and i really do hope you die. in a fire.]"

Quote :

"it no longer does any good to contribute anything you either ignore it or continue on with your bullshit so what point is there other than to call you out for the douchenozzle you are? he has REPEATEDLY asked you legitimate questions which you either ignore or skirt. this is "100% PROVEN FACT" as you so like to spout [Edited on May 17, 2006 at 12:37 PM. Reason : and i really do hope you die. in a fire.]"

5/17/2006 3:12:16 PM

5/17/2006 3:19:21 PM

attack of the trolls!

5/17/2006 3:30:52 PM

Quote :

"it no longer does any good to contribute anything you either ignore it or continue on with your bullshit so what point is there other than to call you out for the douchenozzle you are? he has REPEATEDLY asked you legitimate questions which you either ignore or skirt. this is "100% PROVEN FACT" as you so like to spout [Edited on May 17, 2006 at 12:37 PM. Reason : and i really do hope you die. in a fire.]"

5/17/2006 3:31:56 PM

i think its hit that point

lock this shit up someone

5/17/2006 3:38:59 PM