there’s videos of both, dipshit

9/15/2026 2:56:35 PM

9/15/2026 3:19:15 PM

typical chud behavior, doubling down

anyways

Robert Kraft’s gonna get the whole tour cancelled because he couldn’t tolerate a musician being pro-Palestinian/anti-genocide

[Edited on September 15, 2026 at 3:58 PM. Reason : .]

9/15/2026 3:38:41 PM

I totally love it when someone decides they'd rather be willfully blind than admit they were ever wrong.

9/15/2026 3:56:50 PM

Yeah that's totally me. If you find anyone on here that's changed there mind more than me I'm all ears!

TBF my views on this are closer to TGL than Q.

9/15/2026 4:02:44 PM

I did not research your history, I'm just referring to what is currently happening in this thread.

9/15/2026 4:07:29 PM

i'd be impressed if anybody in this thread could even accurately summarize my views

[Edited on September 15, 2026 at 4:35 PM. Reason : so many bytes unexamined]

9/15/2026 4:35:30 PM

Quote :

"The central finding: qntmfred is best characterized as a basic Zionist, a conditional supporter of Israel, a pessimistic supporter of Palestinian statehood, and an atheist/humanist who considers religious rejection of Jewish sovereignty the conflict’s primary cause. He assigns Hamas and broader Islamist rejectionism most present responsibility, but also criticizes settlements, acknowledges Palestinian suffering and Jewish extremism, and says Netanyahu should face legal accountability. (January 2025, August 2025, November 2024) His position changed noticeably: the 2010–2012 posts were comparatively balanced and policy-focused; after October 7, his emphasis moved strongly toward Israel’s legitimacy, hostages, Hamas, antisemitism, and the religious dimensions of the conflict."

Quote :

"CaelNCSU: Only 10 posts, so conclusions are limited. He explicitly places himself closer to thegoodlife3 than qntmfred, opposes Trump’s Gaza takeover/relocation proposal, and appears broadly critical of Israeli conduct and US deference to Netanyahu. The thread does not establish his preferred political settlement or views on Hamas and Zionism. "

Quote :

" thegoodlife3: 66 posts. He is strongly pro-Palestinian, describes Israel’s campaign as genocide or indiscriminate mass killing, emphasizes civilian suffering, starvation and unequal rights, and strongly rejects conflating Palestinian advocacy with Hamas or antisemitism. He assigns substantial agency to Netanyahu’s government but says little about Hamas, Israeli security, or his preferred final settlement."

[Edited on September 15, 2026 at 5:13 PM. Reason : ai]

9/15/2026 5:04:07 PM

not bad for a clanker

[Edited on September 15, 2026 at 5:19 PM. Reason : i'd rather be understood by friends and loved ones but i'll take what i can get. they are only human]

[Edited on September 15, 2026 at 5:26 PM. Reason : i'd be really impressed if thegoodlife3 could even accurately summarize his views]

9/15/2026 5:18:37 PM

^ I took your positions as "whatabout Hamas, with measured Israel criticism". In general, I skew more towards anti-Israel sentiment which is why I said that.

Did a dive on my post history the last two years.

Quote :

"CaelNCSU is best described during this period as a politically independent, anti-establishment economic populist with a technically minded and strongly contrarian style. He is not a consistent partisan Republican: he says he voted for Obama twice, did not vote for president in 2016 (elsewhere calling it a third-party vote), and has voted for Democrats more often than Republicans. He nevertheless voted for Trump in 2024. His stated reasons centered less on Trump himself than on JD Vance, Elon Musk, RFK Jr., hostility to establishment Democrats, opposition to COVID mandates, immigration and public-order concerns, and the hope of an anti-war, anti-bureaucratic realignment. That experiment ended in open regret. By December 2025 he was already describing Trump as co-opted by the same system he was supposed to disrupt. In March-May 2026 he said Kamala Harris might not have been worse, called the administration's Iran policy and ICE implementation failures, wrote that he was trying to imagine going back and changing his vote, and supported removing Trump and much of the administration from office. His core political story across these posts is therefore not a steady move to the right; it is a populist defection from the Democrats followed by disillusionment with Trump. His most consistent commitments are: - protecting working- and middle-class people from deindustrialization, inflation, financialization, and technological displacement; - hostility to foreign wars and US subsidies for Israel; - suspicion of media, public-health, corporate, regulatory, and bureaucratic institutions; - immigration enforcement and a strong public-order response to visible crime, addiction, and street disorder; - opposition to employment-based COVID vaccine mandates; - belief that both parties use cultural conflict to divert attention from class and economic power; - enthusiasm for technical competence and innovation, tempered by unusually strong concern about AI-driven unemployment and inequality. He is also a deliberately abrasive writer. Sarcasm, vulgarity, hyperbole, slurs, and adversarial framing are common. Some posts are plainly jokes or provocations. His longer posts are much more nuanced than his one-liners, but the style sometimes makes a qualified argument look more extreme than it is—and at other times genuinely substitutes provocation for evidence."

9/15/2026 5:43:50 PM

^^^do me billy

[Edited on September 15, 2026 at 5:44 PM. Reason : Prob haven't posted here enough or substantly enough]

9/15/2026 5:44:04 PM

Quote :

"StTexan is best characterized as **decidedly pro-Israel, strongly anti-Hamas and anti-Iranian-regime, anti-Netanyahu, and highly permissive of Israeli and American military force**. He believes Israel is imperfect and sometimes excessive, but sees its enemies and the possibility of “death to Israel” as worse. His most concise statement is: “although israel is not great, the alternative is death to israel. Need happy medium.” ([April 18, 2024](https://thewolfweb.com/message_topic.aspx?topic=576855&page=37#16670108)) “Happy medium” should not be mistaken for neutrality. His sympathy and attention are distributed very unevenly. He frequently cheers operations against Hamas, Hezbollah, and Iran, treats collateral or infrastructural damage cavalierly, and spends much more time criticizing anti-Israel arguments than discussing Palestinian rights or civilian suffering. In the wider one-year archive he says plainly, “I think most people unfairly criticize israel.” ([April 10, 2026](https://thewolfweb.com/message_topic.aspx?topic=626452&page=10#16724373)) At the same time, he is not a Netanyahu loyalist or an unconditional defender of every Israeli choice. He wanted Netanyahu replaced as early as 2019, blamed him for the October 7 intelligence failure, sometimes urges restraint toward Iran, and recognizes that Trump enables conduct other presidents might not. The most accurate short label is therefore **hawkish, critical pro-Israel**, not “Israel-can-do-no-wrong.”"

Quote :

"StTexan’s last year of posting is primarily the record of an exceptionally active community participant, not a political essayist. He posted on 354 of the period’s 366 calendar days—about 21 posts per active day. Most activity is forum games, casual conversation, sports, entertainment, food, fitness, and interaction with other regulars. Politics is important but only 13.4% of the archive. Politically, he is best described as a **Democratic-leaning anti-Trump moderate with economically redistributive instincts, strong pro-Israel views, and unusually hawkish American-national-power preferences**. He thinks Trump is authoritarian, corrupt, petty, and damaging; says January 6 should have disqualified him; and repeatedly treats Harris as the obvious preferable 2024 choice. Yet he applauds some Trump foreign-policy operations, supports regime change in hostile states, favors an American-dominated international order, and at moments says those actions make him regret not voting for Trump. He is an enthusiastic everyday AI user rather than a technical evangelist. He treats ChatGPT as a more convenient Wikipedia, uses it for a remarkable range of practical and silly questions, and considers AI an overall net positive. He is much less worried about its social harms than the board’s critics and expresses a broad “ends justify the means” attitude toward national competition and technological development. His writing is short, reactive, playful, often vulgar, and frequently ironic. The median post is only 11 words, and more than a quarter contain five or fewer. Any assessment that ignores the jokes and conversational context would make him look simultaneously more extreme and more incoherent than the sustained record supports."

9/15/2026 6:13:48 PM

Thats pretty close honestly

9/15/2026 6:23:12 PM

Quote :

"i'd be really impressed if thegoodlife3 could even accurately summarize his views"

genocide is bad. apartheid is bad. countries shouldn’t do either.

9/15/2026 6:25:33 PM