Quote :

" My tears were shed during the primaries. I don't want either candidate. All I want at this point is for the hacks to be concerned about corruption. Somethings are more important than whose "team" wins. I honestly don't know what blatant evidence it would take for a Clinton supporter to actually care, but I guess that cognitive dissonance is a trademark of #ImWithHer types. "

Quote :

"Shut the fuck up."

hah. somebody got their feeling wheelings hurt. if you are good we can get ice cream later ok







[Edited on October 22, 2016 at 11:58 AM. Reason : ^]

10/22/2016 11:54:57 AM

Lol at beatsunc taking the victory lap driving JCE's troll

10/22/2016 3:00:17 PM

Quote :

"I don't know how many times I can say it. I think she will be more of the same in Washington. She isn't different than 95% of all politicians. But she won't potentially do anything catastrophic and will apppoint at worst center-left justices. "

I would be fine with "more of the same" as a worst case scenario.

But this has been an unprecedented election where the corruption has been exposed and it seems to simply not matter because the media, the FBI, the DOJ are all working in collusion, and I think that is scary on either side, especially if democrats win the house/senate/supreme court.

I think the worst thing I've heard so far this election is that even FOX news was afraid of airing the video of Scott Foval admitting to funding and organizing the violence at Trump rallies, out of fear of retaliation once Clinton wins.

10/22/2016 5:15:48 PM

^Where did you hear that? A news outlet? Or the angry voices in your own head.

http://www.cnn.com/2016/10/22/politics/trump-says-hell-sue-sexual-misconduct-accusers/index.html

Quote :

""Every woman lied when they came forward to hurt my campaign," Trump said during remarks in Gettysburg, Pennsylvania. "Total fabrication. The events never happened. Never. All of these liars will be sued after the election is over." He added that a "simple phone call" to major news outlets "gets them wall-to-wall coverage with virtually no fact-checking ever.""

Donald Trump is complaining that someone can call a news network, lie, get a bunch of coverage, and be subject to no fact-checking. Possibly he forgot that his entire campaign is based on that process.

10/22/2016 6:01:36 PM

http://boingboing.net/2016/10/22/alt-right-conspiracy-image-gen.html

10/22/2016 7:41:09 PM

So, Trump lies about Clinton wanting to abolish the second amendment (though she is clearly not gun friendly) and then goes out and basically says he wants to curtail some first amendment rights.

Good times.

10/24/2016 7:15:30 AM

Clinton will try to abolish the second amendment through executive orders and establishing a liberal majority in the supreme court. Don't fool yourself into thinking otherwise.

10/24/2016 4:02:58 PM

oh noes!!! fox news is scared!!!! pussies.

that means they're just as influenced by the liberals as CNN.

10/24/2016 4:08:12 PM

WE GOT A PSYCHIC ITT

10/24/2016 4:24:32 PM

Quote :

"Clinton will try to abolish the second amendment through executive orders"

You really think she will "abolish" the 2nd amendment? Why do you think that?

10/24/2016 4:34:54 PM

That's what the real polls say. The polls not manufactured by the Clinton campaign.

10/24/2016 4:36:04 PM

Quote :

"lol @ people thinking Obama will be president - eleusis: 3/22/2008"

[Edited on October 24, 2016 at 4:40 PM. Reason : i'm sure he thought obama was gonna take his guns too ]

10/24/2016 4:39:33 PM

Quote :

"Clinton will try to abolish the second amendment through executive orders and establishing a liberal majority in the supreme court. Don't fool yourself into thinking otherwise."

Language like this annoys me almost as much as JCE and Big4. We can sit here and argue all day long about how everyone was saying the same thing about Obama but before that...

If you're going to make statements like this, are you willing to back them up with anything? You want to put up a bet of $100 for anyone that wants to take the other side that this won't happen (that you'd never pay)? This is not a realm of absolutes and it's fucking annoying to act like it is and then try and equate not believing so to be dumb. Yeah yeah, it's the internet, but the majority of other posters on here manage to not be a pricks while voicing their opinions.

10/24/2016 4:41:41 PM

I'm as pro gun as anyone here but she isn't going to be able to do jack shit in regards to gun control via executive orders

10/24/2016 8:23:17 PM

I don't see anything drastic happening to guns unless the second amendment gets amended, which is unlikely to ever happen in my lifetime.

10/24/2016 8:27:57 PM

The 281 People, Places and Things Donald Trump Has Insulted on Twitter: A Complete List

http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2016/01/28/upshot/donald-trump-twitter-insults.html?_r=0

10/24/2016 8:38:12 PM

Quote :

"If you're going to make statements like this, are you willing to back them up with anything? You want to put up a bet of $100 for anyone that wants to take the other side that this won't happen (that you'd never pay)? This is not a realm of absolutes and it's fucking annoying to act like it is and then try and equate not believing so to be dumb. Yeah yeah, it's the internet, but the majority of other posters on here manage to not be a pricks while voicing their opinions."

again, if you think Hillary isn't going to target guns hard, then you're fucking delusional. There are already 4 supreme court justices that disagreed with the Heller case; you think that's not going to get bumped up to 5 or 6 in the next 4-8 years? We're talking about a woman that championed the Brady bill; does that not register with you at all?

10/24/2016 10:59:40 PM

I wouldn't worry about it much. Is it any more difficult for crazy people to get guns in 2016 than it was 8 years ago? What about ordinary, law abiding citizens? We're about due for another mass shooting any day now, but nothing will be done about it, so just relax

10/24/2016 11:10:08 PM

^^ I wish she would "target guns hard". Unfortunately that doesn't look like it's going to happen.

10/24/2016 11:54:30 PM

Jebus the crazy is strong with this eleusis wingnut.

Dude is saying Hillary will abolish the 2nd Amendment, which is crazy as fuck.

There's no fucking way he wasn't one of the idiots who claimed Obama was going to take people's guns nearly a decade ago.

Quote :

"If you think Hillary isn't going to target guns hard, then you're fucking delusional"

What the fuck does that woman care about guns? Obama got emotional as fuck about gun violence time and time again. He OBVIOUSLY cares about guns. And what did he do? Tell me.

10/25/2016 12:09:33 AM

Quote :

"We're talking about a woman that championed the Brady bill"

and your point is?

10/25/2016 2:05:24 AM

Hillary will only take your guns if she can sell them to Saudi Arabia

10/25/2016 7:13:21 AM

Reagan championed the Brady Bill...

10/25/2016 7:17:51 AM

Quote :

"i'm sure he thought obama was gonna take his guns too"

nah, but I guarantee you he's still thinking sharia law will be implemented in the lame duck session

10/25/2016 8:54:30 AM

eleusis...you quoted my point about how you probably will refuse to actually put up money or anything else of "value" to back up your shitty claims, and then proceeded to completely ignore that point and just posted yet more bullshit.

Please provide the time frame for which we can expect this to happen, what you're willing to risk on it, and the BS excuse you're going to use later for why it didn't happen the way you think and why that won't prove you're a fucking moron

10/25/2016 9:11:08 AM

I don't know specifics about Obamacare. Don't know how it's affecting premiums or who is using it and don't know a good way to replace it.

So Donnie and I are about equal in that respect after hearing his comments on it today.

10/25/2016 12:06:13 PM

Obamacare was designed to fail. Obama was a terrible negotiator and began from a compromised position and republicans destroyed the bill with compromises on that. You just can't get things done conservative and liberal at the same time. Thats why these two parties have failed us.

10/25/2016 7:36:42 PM

trump is a piece of crap but got to commend him on doing a good job on getting more people to not trust the govt or the media

10/26/2016 6:51:08 AM

Sure, if you want an entire worldview to be based on his lies.

He is by far the worst person imaginable to be the guy who did that for people like you because he is a pathological liar. Take for instance the very real problems with Obamacare. All he has to do is hammer home the problem but nope... Donnie has to go and lie and tell him it's killing his employees (who all have employed-sponsored plans).

Any good points he may have about the media are basically ignored by reasonable people because he can't help but calling them juvenile names and his supporters can't help but scream awful things.

The quicker Trump and these people go away and we have real intelligent arguments against the media biases and governmental overreach the better.

10/26/2016 7:50:26 AM

Quote :

"trump is a piece of crap but got to commend him on doing a good job on getting more people to not trust the govt or the media "

ha. too bad he failed at that too. he's about to launch his own media company (Trump TV or some bullshit like it) and he wanted his constituents to put blind faith in him, regardless of the fact that he is absolutely unqualified and unfit to be a US president.

you're essentially saying he did a great job of convincing people to believe unfounded truths and rally against the party he was running against.

preaching to not trust the government and media isn't the same as questioning the government and media and trying to hold them more accountable.

10/26/2016 10:59:49 AM

Quote :

"Obama was a terrible negotiator"

lol

10/26/2016 1:38:50 PM

Quote :

"^Where did you hear that? A news outlet? Or the angry voices in your own head. "

From O'Keef saying he was scheduled to be on the news but cut off.

A fight breaks out at a Trump rally = news.

Video exposing corrupt DNC organizing, paying, and training protestors to incite violence... *crickets*

10/26/2016 2:31:15 PM

Quote :

"Please provide the time frame for which we can expect this to happen"

Clinton appoints new SCOTUS justices, justices start ruling against the Keller decision, liberal cities/states act on this and start severely restricting when and where firearms can be owned or carried. SCOTUS and executive actions combine to allow firearms and ammo manufacturers to be sued, causing rampant increases in cost of firearm ownership. Higher costs and restrictions reduce the number of future firearms enthusiasts, which in turn drives down support for groups like the NRA and JPFO. Eventually, the 2nd amendment will be so neutered that people actually think it doesn't grant firearm ownership to individuals; there would be no reason to appeal it at that point.

The total timeframe for this to happen is 20-30 years, so thinking either of us will still be bantering on a college message board that's currently in a death rattle is ludicrous.

10/26/2016 4:16:38 PM

So basically in your scenario you can never really be proven wrong, even when it doesn't actually happen

10/26/2016 4:43:17 PM

Quote :

"crickets*"

Did you see where one of the activists in the video coordinated with Breitbart.com so they could get "Rubiobot" protests on camera during the primary? Seems fishy, like maybe Bannon is a DNC plant, just something I'm hearing people say.

10/26/2016 5:16:50 PM

clintons not even going to appoint liberal justices. that is just a myth. she already said she intends on moving forward with garland.

10/26/2016 6:44:03 PM

She's going to move forward with Garland because it further cements President Obama's legacy as having nominated Scalia's replacement.

10/26/2016 6:52:40 PM

are you seriously arguing that Garland is going to be pro-gun? what. the. fuck.

10/27/2016 12:03:24 AM

^ such. indignation. based. on. a. strawman.

[Edited on October 27, 2016 at 12:12 AM. Reason : And further making no sense]

10/27/2016 12:08:05 AM

Dana bash is supposed to be a journalist but is too busy trying to be a celebrity on the daily show to seem the least bit impartial.

10/27/2016 2:50:02 AM

Didn't see it and you didn't provide context but I can't imagine she could have been any more sycophantic to Clinton as Mark Halperin's utterly embarrassing suck up to Trump was yesterday for Bloomberg..

10/27/2016 7:56:13 AM

maybe nobody covers the Okeefe shit because it has been proven time and time again that he selectively edits everything, uses video to lie, and otherwise is completely untrustworthy as a source for anyone besides dipshits like you who fall for their bullshit

10/27/2016 10:36:08 AM

I don't think most would say to accept the okeefe videos at face value, but some of the video is damning regardless of the edits. It is wierd that there has been virtually no coverage on the wikileaks podesta emails or the okeefe stuff. You are talking about criminal behavior. Whether that is tied directly to Hilary is irrelevant. There are some seriously shady tactics going on with the DNC--and please don't respond with the "but the GOP is too.." defense. It is as pathetic as the "but bill clinton..." defense that came after the pussy grabbing scandal.

[Edited on October 27, 2016 at 10:54 AM. Reason : d]

10/27/2016 10:54:12 AM

Quote :

"podesta emails...You are talking about criminal behavior."

Do tell.

There have been plenty of stories about them, but there's just not much meat in them that I've seen. Maybe they're saving the good stuff for last.

10/27/2016 11:05:41 AM

I mean it is criminal to incite a riot. Maybe that's what he is inferring from that video?

Though by that standard Trump is dangerously close to having done that multiple times at his rallies.

[Edited on October 27, 2016 at 11:07 AM. Reason : X]

10/27/2016 11:07:17 AM

Yea, Trump is the violent one...

The planned, paid, calculated planting of violent instigators by the DNC
Chicago rally canceled because of such staged violence/protest
A kid tried to fight for a cops gun to "shoot Trump"
A kid rushed Trump on stage and was rewarded with air time on news
There are videos of "protestors" attacking Trump supporters in CA
Recent firebombing of GOP ha in NC
Sledge hammered TRUMP star in Hollywood

But Trump is the violent one... Because MUH NARRATIVE!!!

10/27/2016 1:36:01 PM

are you serious?

10/27/2016 1:36:20 PM

Facts... In my echo chamber???

10/27/2016 1:37:51 PM

you can't be serious

10/27/2016 1:38:33 PM

Did someone claim Trump was violent? Who is he arguing with?

10/27/2016 1:54:42 PM