^ Please STFU.

[Edited on February 12, 2007 at 1:53 AM. Reason : PS: I didn't bring up your Dad, you did.]

2/12/2007 1:52:16 AM

You're boring now.

And that went waaaay over your head, I guess.

[Edited on February 12, 2007 at 1:54 AM. Reason : .]

2/12/2007 1:53:40 AM

^ GRRRRRRRRRRR! You're angry on the Internet--a lot.

2/12/2007 1:56:50 AM

Why are you copying me now?

2/12/2007 2:01:51 AM

someone lied to me.

people do not get wise with age.

2/12/2007 9:13:35 AM

^

2/12/2007 11:21:14 AM

CBS has hired Rick Kaplan--who is associated with the Bill Clinton operation and is a close personal friend--to serve as executive producer of its Evening News with Katie Couric. CBS News: Fuck objectivity.

3/8/2007 8:41:47 PM

Quote :

"After Kaplan moved to Cable News Network, U.S. News & World Report found that Kaplan had ordered CNN reporters to “limit the use of the word ‘scandal’ in reporting on Clinton’s campaign fundraising.”"

3/8/2007 8:44:12 PM

Quote :

"CBS has hired Rick Kaplan--who is associated with the Bill Clinton operation and is a close personal friend--to serve as executive producer of its Evening News with Katie Couric. CBS News: Fuck objectivity."

What about Tony Snow of Fox News being hired as the White House Press Secretary. He won't answer a single valid question and evidently that what conservatives are praising him for; being bad for the democratic process.

3/8/2007 8:55:22 PM

Having posted that, it seems like this guy has a lot of credentials and is a good hire. Seems like the neocons (hooksaw) are just being petty again.

3/8/2007 9:07:54 PM

^ You fucking fool--I am NOT a fucking neocon. You don't know shit about me, so please stop acting like you do.

PS: If you even knew the meaning of the word "neocon," which you use pejoratively, you would know that I could not possibly be one. This would be a good time to educate yourself.

3/8/2007 11:42:35 PM

I seem to recall CNN being a liberal news outlet, per this thread. Is it true

http://www.crooksandliars.com/2007/04/04/what-the-hell-is-wrong-with-cnn/

4/5/2007 12:21:11 PM

Who cares. It's about eggs, man.

4/5/2007 3:45:25 PM

hooksaw = salisburyboy

4/5/2007 4:14:04 PM

^ Suck my eggs.

4/5/2007 4:29:50 PM

you think you know me?

4/5/2007 4:49:12 PM

Are his ratings down or something

http://www.crooksandliars.com/2007/04/05/bill-oreillys-head-practically-explodes-as-he-screams-at-geraldo/


This is disgusting. Fucking O'Reilly. This is what I would imagine a real life argument with TreeTwista being like.

Strawman strawman, ad hominem, illogical point, red herring...ding ding ding, what the fuck do we have Bill?


YOU HATE AMERICA

YOU WANT ANARCHY

YOU WANT BROWN MEN ANTS RUNNING ACROSS THE BORDERS FREELY

BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH

[Edited on April 5, 2007 at 10:24 PM. Reason : a]

4/5/2007 10:24:11 PM

suspend

4/5/2007 10:41:06 PM

^^ Strawman = Arguments I Don't Like

State409shinesmybaldheadc

4/6/2007 12:28:49 AM

^ come on dude. thats weak as hell.

you're 40 years old, now. all you can do is rag on someone for hairloss?

why dont you have pictures of yourself up? how do we even know your not just some 60 year old geezer stalking the 19 year old "chocolate butter pussy" ?

i wonder if you're really even an NCSU student at all.

oh, and:

Quote :

"Dentaldamn: someone lied to me. people do not get wise with age. "

quote of the day

[Edited on April 6, 2007 at 3:51 AM. Reason : ]

4/6/2007 3:48:48 AM

^ STFU, troll. First, these assholes give me shit all the time about being [OLD]. I don't hear your whiny ass complaining about that ageism noise, do I?

Second, as I've posted, I'm a TA at State. I feel the need to maintain some sense of anonymity for obvious reasons--but several people on here know that I am exactly what I say I am.

And third, that "chocolate butter pussy" shit is just stupid, man. You got so owned on that exchange it ain't even funny--except it actually is--despite what your circle-jerk clique posts here.

Fourth, as to your statement that you "wonder," who gives a shit what you wonder about, kid? Wonder whether you're going to stick your finger in your asshole again, okay?

BTW, don't think I didn't notice that you changed your age in your user info after I called you out on it. Unlike yours, my user info has always been correct, and unlike you I have no aliases, and unlike you I don't go to FF and piss and moan about shit. So, why don't you and your other buddies here go ahead and lube up and e-rub it out, got it?

4/6/2007 5:12:31 AM

Quote :

"I'm a TA at State. I feel the need to maintain some sense of anonymity for obvious reasons"

oh, okay.

because youre a 40 year old man with a "hot, smart and sexy" 24-year old fiancee who has 3 bachelors degrees.... but you spend your time trying to get up in 19-year old girls' "chocolate butter" pussy. (all your words, not mine.)

seriously, i dig it. thats cool. i'd want to remain anonymous too.

tell you what, i'll quit busting on your game, if you just take a photo of the top of your head so we can see your hairline. deal?



(ps: my "alias" is JoeSchmoe... pretty clever, huh? )

4/6/2007 6:35:47 AM

Quote :

"^^ Strawman = Arguments I Don't Like"

I don't call one man shouting like an 8 yrd old that just had his ice cream sandwich stolen "Arguments I Don't Like"


I'd need to see a transcript of that clip, just to know what the fuck O'Reilly was saying, because for once, someone trumped his ass and he wasn't able to overtalk them.

4/6/2007 8:28:58 AM

^^ Typically stupid. Ask around--I've got all my hair, fucker. BTW, isn't it about time for your dumbass to get suspended again? Will you send me a brain scan so I can see that screw that's loose?

^ Not true, and I disagree with O'Reilly about many things. I don't even really like him--he's too much of a blowhard these days. But he was right on the subject at issue: If the illegal alien in question had been deported after he was convicted of any one of his first three crimes, he sure as hell couldn't have killed two people--period.

4/7/2007 12:40:31 AM

Quote :

"Ask around--I've got all my hair, fucker."

is it true? does anyone know this guy? is he really a student or just another old stalker?

4/7/2007 12:55:19 AM

Quote :

"MSNBC.com identified 144 journalists who made political contributions from 2004 through the start of the 2008 campaign, according to the public records of the Federal Election Commission. Most of the newsroom checkbooks leaned to the left: 125 journalists gave to Democrats and liberal causes. Only 17 gave to Republicans. Two gave to both parties."

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/19113485/

6/21/2007 10:55:32 PM

Yeah, read it earlier today. I now know the O'Reilly Factor is biased toward Republicans. I didn't know that before.



(Cross-pollination from another thread to make the same point: )

This is a front-page picture from the Sun of Britain the day of the 1992 elections there. Kinnock was the Labour candidate. The Sun was then and still is owned by Rupert Murdoch, an Australian that also owns Fox News amongst numerous other media groups.

Quote :

"Background: The Conservative Party under John Major was fighting to stay in power against a determined bid by the Labour Party. The Conservatives had held on to government control since Margaret Thatcher became Britain’s first woman Prime Minister on May 4, 1979. She had resigned two years earlier in November 1990. At the time most national newspapers, with the possible exception of The Independent , supported one of the three main political parties. The Sun and its owner, Rupert Murdoch, supported the Conservatives, mainly because they believed that the members of that party would support his growing media empire in Britain. (Later on The Sun came out in support of Tony Blair). Kelvin MacKenzie had little time for politicians of whatever party. He has been quoted as saying that: "As a newspaper is an unlicensed product . . . [it] can/will/must reflect the prejudices or delights of an editor or owner. This gives an editor a unique power . . . to damn or praise the most powerful in the land. And if you intend to give the mighty a mauling then the front page is the best place to do it." In this case, his target was Neil Kinnock who did lose the election."

All news is biased. Us as consumers would just be better if they all told us before their stories a disclaimer saying "we tend to be liberal" or "we tend to be conservative". That way we can make up our minds on the story. The bias is not in itself wrong, it's operating under the guise they are neutral and independent that is wrong. People ask me how I could give an ounce of credibility to Wikipedia. I tell them I take it with a grain of salt and then read. That's how you should treat your news.

[Edited on June 21, 2007 at 11:22 PM. Reason : .]

6/21/2007 11:01:34 PM

The New York Times admits left-wing bias:

http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9D01E7D8173DF936A15754C0A9629C8B63&sec=&spon=&pagewanted=1

6/21/2007 11:24:11 PM

All American media is biased.

However, if the NY Times admits they're biased, as a conservative you're no longer allowed to be mad at them for their articles. If a con man tells you he's a con man, are you getting conned?

So following this logic, hooksaw can no longer start threads that link to NY Times articles cause they will no longer have a purpose.

Now all that's left is for Fox News and Rupert Murdoch to admit they're conservative and pro-New World Order elitism.

[Edited on June 21, 2007 at 11:38 PM. Reason : .]

6/21/2007 11:32:13 PM

meanwhile, Faux News maintains its evenhanded Fair and Balanced programming.

6/21/2007 11:35:44 PM

^^^i'm going to out on a limb and say that you didn't read past the first couple paragraphs.

6/22/2007 12:00:23 AM

But, no one likes to write about the status quo (aka conservatism). So, I don't know why people continue to be up and arms about the liberal media.

6/22/2007 8:18:08 AM

^ Because they're like Puritans.

"Puritanism is the haunting belief that someone, somewhere, might be happy."

-H.L. Mencken, 1920s

6/22/2007 9:32:23 AM

hooksaw what neocon blog did you read that in? hey yall lets point out that fox news is conservatively biased and bring up some british newspaper from 15 years ago while ignoring that MSNBC (not a neocon station) identified that 7x more journalists made contributions to Democrats and liberal causes than Republicans

6/22/2007 9:39:05 AM

^ Exactly. And what about the journalism schools? Bastions of conservative thought, I'm sure.

6/22/2007 2:57:10 PM

Quote :

" conservative thought"

oxymoron

6/22/2007 2:59:12 PM

^ Liberal idiocy revealed.

6/22/2007 3:06:55 PM