Quote :

"meh, ended up voting for ron paul not b/c i am terribly supportive of him as a candidate, "

So you're not terribly supportive of our constitution, liberty, and freedom?

What are you into? Slavery and fascism?

Serious question because Ron Paul's whole platform is the constitution, liberty, and freedom so if you're not supportive of that, then what are you supportive of?

[Edited on May 8, 2012 at 10:47 AM. Reason : .]

5/8/2012 10:46:25 AM

i'm also into declaring baby seal clubbing as the national sport, but it's hard to find a candidate who will publicly support that these days

[Edited on May 8, 2012 at 11:18 AM. Reason : get real guy]

5/8/2012 11:17:44 AM

It's okay to like slavery and facism if that's your opinion. I was just asking.

5/8/2012 11:24:47 AM

I voted for Obama in '08 specifically in favor of slavery. He won't fool me again in 2012.

[Edited on May 8, 2012 at 11:27 AM. Reason : What year is it?]

5/8/2012 11:26:32 AM

I believe it's the year of NYM shutting up.

5/8/2012 11:43:22 AM

that's an awfully antagonistic and repressive statement. WWRPD?

5/8/2012 11:45:44 AM

I fully understand its implications and the awkward position one might have answering it because it's a loaded question. But seriously, Ron paul goes on stage and preaches liberty, liberty, liberty, constitution constitution constitution every. day. of his life for the last 30 years... but yet you claim to not be "terribly supportive" of Ron Paul.

It doesn't make sense.

[Edited on May 8, 2012 at 11:54 AM. Reason : .]

5/8/2012 11:53:07 AM

Quote :

" Republican Executive Committee Member Calls for Resignation of RNC Chairman Reince Priebus Washington, DC, May 07, 2012 --(PR.com)-- Jeffrey Bales, a Member-at-Large of the Pima County GOP Executive Committee (Tucson, Arizona), says: “Due to violation of the RNC's Rule #11, I call for Chairman Reince Priebus to resign immediately. It is un-American and beneath the standards established by the Republican Party to violate this rule. It is unethical to support a single Republican Presidential candidate (Mitt Romney) while other Republican candidates remain in the race. http://www.pr.com/press-release/410950 "

[Edited on May 8, 2012 at 1:43 PM. Reason : pic]

5/8/2012 1:30:53 PM

I voted for Ron Paul today.


Crazy I know

5/8/2012 2:31:30 PM

Although there is no support to be seen on this site for Romney, YET, I predict Romney is going to win all the primaries. I'm specifically pointing to election fraud here.


ron paul, on the other hand, will win all the delegates from the very same states that he loses in the distant future.


If the establishment lets him win a state tonight, ron paul WILL be the presidential nominee

5/8/2012 3:09:16 PM

Quote :

"I voted for Ron Paul today."

5/8/2012 4:39:51 PM

I used to think GeniuSxBoY was just a moonbat, but after this page I'm pretty sure he's just a troll.

5/8/2012 4:56:13 PM

Thank you for your vote mdozer73

5/8/2012 5:20:48 PM

wait, you're actually ron paul?

5/8/2012 5:27:49 PM

lol wut?

5/8/2012 5:37:29 PM

HAHAHAHA ROMNEY WINS INDIANA ALREADY

http://www.google.com/elections/ed/us/results



FUCKING RIGGED BULLSHIT lmao.

5/8/2012 7:27:09 PM

I wonder what percentage of republican voters will simply vote for anyone other than Obama, or just any republican candidate because of the (R) next to their name. I also know several people who normally vote democrat, that are planning to vote for Paul.

Don't most polls show Paul doing better vs Obama than Romney vs Obama?

5/8/2012 7:51:41 PM

north carolina 0.7% reporting

Romney
68.6%
43,530


Santorum
9.7%
6,137


Paul
8.9%
5,673



hahahaha, lost north carolina already with .7% reporting

5/8/2012 8:00:30 PM

Well, Paul is barely beating two people who aren't even running.

5/8/2012 8:22:55 PM

Sure, if you believe the numbers. You going to believe my bullshit? Or are you going to believe theirs?




Rick Santorum Calls Mitt Romney The Worst Republican To Run Against Obama
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=lfCFnCvJqi4#t=130s

Republican Santorum endorses Romney for president
http://news.yahoo.com/republican-santorum-endorses-romney-president-131426314.html

[Edited on May 8, 2012 at 8:52 PM. Reason : .]

5/8/2012 8:52:29 PM

Good thing the popular vote doesn't matter in this democracy.

[Edited on May 8, 2012 at 8:57 PM. Reason : .]

5/8/2012 8:57:22 PM

RON PAUL

5/8/2012 10:55:11 PM

^^^ Is this fool serious?

5/9/2012 12:05:51 AM

i voted for ron paul today.

5/9/2012 12:58:13 AM

You voted for Ron Paul AND for Amendment 1? *high-five*

[Edited on May 9, 2012 at 1:04 AM. Reason : ]

5/9/2012 1:03:16 AM

^^ + ^ = Jesus fucking Christ. Politics FAIL. You are fucking retarded.

[Edited on May 9, 2012 at 1:48 AM. Reason : ]

5/9/2012 1:48:06 AM

Let it be known my high-five is full of sarcasm

5/9/2012 1:50:45 AM

I wasn't so much addressing you, personally, as much as what you posted. Sorry for any confusion.

5/9/2012 2:02:47 AM

This is what poll numbers look like in an unrigged election:

Quote :

"Barack Obama was not the only Democrat on the ballot on Tuesday in West Virginia's Democratic Presidential Primary. Keith Judd - also known as Inmate No. 11593-051 at the Federal Correctional Institution in Texarkana, Texas - was running against him. Judd, who is serving out a 17.5 year sentence for extortion, currently has received 40 percent of the vote, with 83 percent of precincts reporting, according to The Associated Press. Obama currently has received 60 percent of the vote."

Quote :

"Judd would not be the first Democratic challenger to Obama to qualify for delegate representation at the 2012 Democratic National Convention. In Oklahoma's Democratic primary in March, Randall Terry, a Democratic candidate who founded the anti-abortion group Operation Rescue and has more than 50 arrests under his belt, received 18 percent of the vote in the primary, giving him one delegate"

http://news.yahoo.com/federal-inmate-keith-judd-receiving-sizable-percent-vote-031637339--abc-news-politics.html



Mind you, RON PAUL only got Paul 16%, 11%, and 11% which is bogus for someone who has won 80% or more of the delegates from the first ten states.

[Edited on May 9, 2012 at 3:10 AM. Reason : .]

5/9/2012 3:02:19 AM

Funny, you can't be registered to vote in west Virginia if you're in prison on a felony charge so you shoudlnt legally be allowed on the ballot.

Now THAT is election fraud.

5/9/2012 3:11:00 AM

Quote :

"Mind you, RON PAUL only got Paul 16%, 11%, and 11% which is bogus"

No, it's not. That's roughly the same support he has in every single poll that ISNT a dailypaul.com poll.

Quote :

"for someone who has won 80% or more of the delegates from the first ten states."

First off, this reasoning doesn't hold as different states award delegates different ways, and Paul has explicitly made it his strategy to play delegate systems rather than go for a popular vote victory of any kind.

Secondly, no, he has not won 80% or more of delegates from the first ten states, Florida and Arizona alone rule that out. The only websites reporting ridiculous delegate counts like that are those run by Paul fans for Paul fans.

[Edited on May 9, 2012 at 10:31 AM. Reason : .]

5/9/2012 10:29:22 AM

Quote :

"No, it's not. That's roughly the same support he has in every single poll that ISNT a dailypaul.com poll. "

So you're saying the numbers match every other rigged poll. Mind Blowing!

Quote :

"First off, this reasoning doesn't hold as different states award delegates different ways, and Paul has explicitly made it his strategy to play delegate systems rather than go for a popular vote victory of any kind. Secondly, no, he has not won 80% or more of delegates from the first ten states, Florida and Arizona alone rule that out. The only websites reporting ridiculous delegate counts like that are those run by Paul fans for Paul fans. "

You're just troll posting, you need to stop. I'd like to have a serious discussion with someone who is knowledgeable, please. You're getting out of line with this.



[Edited on May 9, 2012 at 11:51 AM. Reason : .]

5/9/2012 11:43:23 AM

Will you kill yourself or move to a remote compound when RP doesn't even win the republican nomination?

[Edited on May 9, 2012 at 12:21 PM. Reason : autocorrect]

5/9/2012 12:21:27 PM

Don't worry about me, baby doll.

5/9/2012 12:23:50 PM

All of the mainstream polls are wrong! The only ones that are right are the ones that affirm what I already believe. How can you not see this?

5/9/2012 12:26:01 PM

I posted the video so you could watch the conventions live. imstoned.

jazon, my sworn enemy, will even vouch for me on this point.

5/9/2012 12:29:40 PM

Fun election fraud compilation.

http://youtu.be/QGVxmXBy9jQ

5/9/2012 12:32:35 PM

Quote :

"So you're saying the numbers match every other rigged poll. Mind Blowing!"

You are saying that every poll ever is rigged.

Quote :

"You're just troll posting, you need to stop. I'd like to have a serious discussion with someone who is knowledgeable, please. You're getting out of line with this. "

Lol, there was no trolling whatsoever. You're dodging like a motherfucker because you can't back up insane claims like "Paul won 80% or more of delegates from the first ten states." Are just making shit up at this point?

5/9/2012 3:18:20 PM

Quote :

"You are saying that every poll ever is rigged. "

What does the very first sentence say 10 posts up? I think you have reading comprehension issues.

Also if the establishment controls the entire election, it's pretty safe to assume they're all rigged (unless it's not worth their time like in the west virginia Obama/felony ballot). They wouldn't rig one and leave the others to faith. Power is a drug to the establishment. If they are not in control of every aspect of every little thing, they go through withdrawls.

[Edited on May 9, 2012 at 8:31 PM. Reason : .]

5/9/2012 8:28:59 PM

This video is unlisted. Only those with the link can see it.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=UDam6YhdLtQ

5/10/2012 5:15:19 AM

^ A more cynical person might have posted that under the heading "Ron Paul desperate for campaign funds, dismayed at not being able to use Kickstarter"

5/10/2012 6:04:13 AM

Romney should be disqualified already

Quote :

"As everyone is well aware there is now a campaign gaining momentum to unseat Chairman Priebus for his violation of Rule 11 ([PDF](http://www.gop.com/images/legal/2008_RULES_Adopted.pdf) page 20) by [endorsing and supporting a candidate while a primary is still on.](http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HYfHzqd6myk) under section (a). (a) The Republican National Committee shall not, without the prior written and filed approval of all members of the Republican National Committee from the state involved, contribute money or in-kind aid to any candidate for any public or party office except the nominee of the Republican Party or a candidate who is unopposed in the Republican primary after the filing deadline for that office. But what everyone seems to be overlooking and is the most important part of the law is under part (b). (b) ... No person nominated in violation of this rule shall be recognized by the Republican National Committee as the nominee of the Republican Party from that state. Meaning any state where Romney and the RNC have worked together, without the written and filed prior approval of ALL GOP State Committee members of that state, IS INVALID. He cannot be recognized by the RNC as the nominee of those states. Meaning, we win those states. This should be the new focus along with unseating Priebus of the Rule 11 Campaign, to invalidate his nomination in any states where this occurred. =============================================== After reading over this again several times I am certain that the final sentence includes the entire Rule, not just clause (b) meaning it's the punishment for the violation of the entire rule. to Summarize. The RNC can't contribute money or in-kind aid to any candidate for any public or party office Unless it has. prior written and filed approval of all members of the Republican National Committee from the state involved Exceptions include: the nominee of the Republican Party (NOT ROMNEY) a candidate who is unopposed in the Republican primary (NOT ROMNEY) Also, The RNC will not recognize any state GOP bylaws that allow, persons who have participated or are participating in the selection of any nominee of a party other than the Republican Party RESOLVED: No person nominated in violation of this rule shall be recognized by the Republican National Committee as the nominee of the Republican Party from that state. =================================================================== If you can verify my analysis is sound please go vote up this information at Reddit where trolls are already down voting it. http://www.reddit.com/r/ronpaul/comments/tfvx3/reince_priebu... UPDATE: Proof on Romney's page of this violation. https://www.mittromney.com/donate and a screenshot in case they get jumpy. http://i45.tinypic.com/1040z03.jpg"

5/10/2012 2:15:39 PM

Party rules aren't legally binding. They could change their minds and decide to pick a candidate by a game of musical chairs if they want.

Paul supporters are wasting their time and all this effort trying to pretend to be Republicans, when they could be building support in the general public for a run as an Independent. I think there's a real danger of Paul supporters getting angry and cynical about this republican mess and just dropping out of politics entirely.

Just think if they had spent all these hours they wasted at caucuses out on the street or pooling money for TV commercials.

[Edited on May 10, 2012 at 2:26 PM. Reason : .]

5/10/2012 2:22:29 PM

What are your thoughts about that, smc?

5/10/2012 2:24:58 PM

Romney's campaign spokesperson and the RNC both openly reported this in the beginning of April in, among other places, the USA Today and the Wall Street Journal.

Glad that DailyPaul users blew this wide open 5 weeks later..

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702304750404577320110707663768.html

[Edited on May 10, 2012 at 2:28 PM. Reason : Link]

5/10/2012 2:26:06 PM

We, too, have known about this for 5 weeks, NYM, thank you for assuming this issue has been beaten to death and resolved 5 weeks later.

5/10/2012 2:32:29 PM

Just a bit confused why they are so non-chalant about it and why no one complained in 2008 when McCain did the exact same thing. And why Newts campaign says this is done every year.

Must because they know they can get away with anything since they are the establishment... or because they really aren't doing anything wrong.

5/10/2012 2:35:34 PM

Quote :

"What does the very first sentence say 10 posts up? I think you have reading comprehension issues."

The one that says "the election" is rigged? That doesn't make sense, I'm talking about polling outfits. There are dozens of them, independent from each other, and they all agree Paul doesn't appeal to more than 1-520% of the GOP, absolute tops

Quote :

"Also if the establishment controls the entire election, it's pretty safe to assume they're all rigged (unless it's not worth their time like in the west virginia Obama/felony ballot). They wouldn't rig one and leave the others to faith. Power is a drug to the establishment. If they are not in control of every aspect of every little thing, they go through withdrawls."

No, it's not. It is not safe to assume that "the establishment" owns every polling outfit in the country. That's about as safe to assume as thinking that tin foil is going to reflect the mind control rays.



[Edited on May 10, 2012 at 2:39 PM. Reason : .]

5/10/2012 2:37:27 PM

^^Those are great questions, perhaps you should look inside yourself for the answers. You've been proestablishment, anti-paul, pro-media, anti-geniusxboy this whole thread. You defend the RNC because they make the rules and you don't think the people who make the rules would ever blatantly break the rules.


[Edited on May 10, 2012 at 2:39 PM. Reason : .]

5/10/2012 2:38:22 PM

Seriously, Geniusxboy, look at this: http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2012/president/us/republican_presidential_nomination-1452.html#polls

You are saying that CNN, Pew, Foxnews, the NYT, Opinion Research, CBS, ABC, the Washington Post, McClatchy, Marist, Reason-Rupe, Rasmussen, Bloomberg, Reuters, Ipsos, Wall St. Journal, NBC, Quinnipiac, Politico, GWU, Battleground, and more are all in on one big conspiracy that spans all ideologies and inter-company competition.

You could easily argue that each one is biased, or that a few work together, but to argue that all 20+ of them are working together with the exact same goal, in tandem no less to ensure their polls rise and fall the same way, is just insane. You are either insane, stupid, or autistic, possibly all three. There's no debating this, it literally takes a crazy person to believe this. You have no evidence to support it either, except pictures of campaign rallies and vague complaints about "the establishment" that describe nothing in detail whatsoever. If you aren't a crazy end-timer waving a cardboard sign on the freeway, you're indistinguishable from one.

Seriously, show me a poll that puts Paul above, say 20% support. One that isn't an online poll (Easily swamped with botnets) or a dailypaul.com user survey.

[Edited on May 10, 2012 at 2:47 PM. Reason : .]

5/10/2012 2:46:18 PM