spookyjon All American 21682 Posts user info edit post |
Not to mention the fact that I, personally, don't trust him with anything he can't pronounce. 10/21/2005 6:12:19 PM |
SandSanta All American 22435 Posts user info edit post |
He's Commander in Chief no? 'Trusted' with leading the armed forces?
The war in Iraq is going great?
Oh Wait. 10/21/2005 6:14:13 PM |
Josh8315 Suspended 26780 Posts user info edit post |
spookyjon -- my source is fox news (tv) 10/21/2005 6:15:35 PM |
spookyjon All American 21682 Posts user info edit post |
Okay, some other place I read said she was taking a two week break after the first 25 people. but she's definitely done 25, not 2. 10/21/2005 7:16:26 PM |
Penzoate Veteran 267 Posts user info edit post |
I think Harriet Miers should not nominated for supreme court justice! I have a feeling that she is going look at her opinions more so than examine both sides of the issue. 10/23/2005 1:31:26 PM |
jwb9984 All American 14039 Posts user info edit post |
THAT'S the best you could come up with for why you think she shouldn't have been nominated
you're an idiot 10/23/2005 5:25:11 PM |
agentlion All American 13936 Posts user info edit post |
sike 10/27/2005 10:36:43 AM |
jbtilley All American 12797 Posts user info edit post |
Harriet Miers withdrew her nomination. IMO she was never intended to be a serious contender. Just someone to soften up everyone for the next nominee. 10/27/2005 11:10:15 AM |
spookyjon All American 21682 Posts user info edit post |
WELL PLAYED, MR. BUSH. 10/27/2005 12:08:56 PM |
Excoriator Suspended 10214 Posts user info edit post |
there is no way that the miers fiasco has put bush in a stronger position for a second nomination.
and there wasn't any way to have thought that would happen before he nominated her.
she was a serious, albeit stupid, nomination 10/27/2005 12:11:28 PM |